American Tower Corporation
American Tower Corporation (AMT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMT | $207.45 | -1.74% | 97.1B | 38.70 | $5.36 | +3.22% |
| EQIX | $781.79 | -0.08% | 76.5B | 77.02 | $10.15 | +2.35% |
| CCI | $101.39 | -1.53% | 44.2B | -11.27 | -$9.00 | +5.71% |
| IRM | $91.43 | -0.39% | 27B | 653.21 | $0.14 | +3.28% |
| SBAC | $218.84 | -1.23% | 23.5B | 26.82 | $8.16 | +1.97% |
| WY | $26.17 | -1.25% | 18.9B | 68.91 | $0.38 | +3.13% |
| GLPI | $47.75 | -0.25% | 13.5B | 18.37 | $2.60 | +6.40% |
| LAMR | $125.29 | -0.25% | 12.7B | 29.14 | $4.30 | +4.90% |
| EPR | $54.10 | +0.41% | 4.1B | 26.66 | $2.03 | +6.41% |
| RYN | $26.47 | -1.23% | 4.1B | 10.67 | $2.48 | +11.00% |
Stock Comparison
AMT vs EQIX Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, EQIX has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while EQIX trades at $781.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas EQIX's P/E ratio is 77.02. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EQIX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to EQIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check EQIX's competition here
AMT vs CCI Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, CCI has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while CCI trades at $101.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas CCI's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CCI's ROE of -7.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to CCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check CCI's competition here
AMT vs IRM Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, IRM has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while IRM trades at $91.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas IRM's P/E ratio is 653.21. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IRM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to IRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check IRM's competition here
AMT vs SBAC Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, SBAC has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while SBAC trades at $218.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas SBAC's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SBAC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to SBAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check SBAC's competition here
AMT vs WY Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, WY has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while WY trades at $26.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas WY's P/E ratio is 68.91. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to WY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check WY's competition here
AMT vs GLPI Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, GLPI has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while GLPI trades at $47.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas GLPI's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GLPI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to GLPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check GLPI's competition here
AMT vs LAMR Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, LAMR has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while LAMR trades at $125.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas LAMR's P/E ratio is 29.14. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LAMR's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to LAMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check LAMR's competition here
AMT vs EPR Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, EPR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while EPR trades at $54.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas EPR's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EPR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to EPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check EPR's competition here
AMT vs RYN Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, RYN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while RYN trades at $26.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas RYN's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RYN's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to RYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check RYN's competition here
AMT vs PCH Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, PCH has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while PCH trades at $42.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas PCH's P/E ratio is 80.55. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PCH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to PCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check PCH's competition here
AMT vs OUT Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, OUT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while OUT trades at $18.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas OUT's P/E ratio is 28.99. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OUT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to OUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check OUT's competition here
AMT vs EPR-PE Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, EPR-PE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while EPR-PE trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas EPR-PE's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EPR-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to EPR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check EPR-PE's competition here
AMT vs CXW Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, CXW has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while CXW trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas CXW's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CXW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to CXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check CXW's competition here
AMT vs EPR-PC Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, EPR-PC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while EPR-PC trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas EPR-PC's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EPR-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to EPR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check EPR-PC's competition here
AMT vs EPR-PG Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, EPR-PG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while EPR-PG trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas EPR-PG's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EPR-PG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to EPR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check EPR-PG's competition here
AMT vs UNIT Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, UNIT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while UNIT trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas UNIT's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to UNIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to UNIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check UNIT's competition here
AMT vs SMA Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, SMA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while SMA trades at $36.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas SMA's P/E ratio is -133.85. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SMA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to SMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check SMA's competition here
AMT vs LANDP Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, LANDP has a market cap of 689.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while LANDP trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas LANDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LANDP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to LANDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check LANDP's competition here
AMT vs FPI Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, FPI has a market cap of 485.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while FPI trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas FPI's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FPI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to FPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check FPI's competition here
AMT vs AFCG Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, AFCG has a market cap of 95.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while AFCG trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas AFCG's P/E ratio is -9.61. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AFCG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to AFCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check AFCG's competition here
AMT vs PW Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, PW has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while PW trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas PW's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to PW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check PW's competition here
AMT vs CTT Comparison August 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 97.1B. In comparison, CTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $207.45, while CTT trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.70, whereas CTT's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to CTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check CTT's competition here