American Tower Corporation
American Tower Corporation (AMT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMT | $229.87 | -0.59% | 107.6B | 37.26 | $6.17 | +2.89% |
| EQIX | $801.43 | +1.51% | 78.4B | 83.92 | $9.55 | +2.24% |
| CCI | $111.48 | -2.13% | 48.5B | -12.37 | -$9.01 | +5.14% |
| IRM | $99.34 | +0.58% | 29.3B | 242.24 | $0.41 | +3.02% |
| SBAC | $233.92 | -0.51% | 25.1B | 30.94 | $7.56 | +1.79% |
| WY | $26.47 | +3.08% | 19.2B | 54.03 | $0.49 | +3.12% |
| LAMR | $125.42 | +0.35% | 13B | 30.52 | $4.11 | +4.90% |
| GLPI | $46.68 | -0.99% | 12.8B | 17.96 | $2.60 | +6.56% |
| EPR | $57.23 | -1.19% | 4.4B | 35.14 | $1.63 | +6.04% |
| RYN | $24.12 | +1.09% | 3.8B | 10.13 | $2.38 | +12.09% |
Stock Comparison
AMT vs EQIX Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, EQIX has a market cap of 78.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while EQIX trades at $801.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas EQIX's P/E ratio is 83.92. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EQIX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to EQIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check EQIX's competition here
AMT vs CCI Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, CCI has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while CCI trades at $111.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas CCI's P/E ratio is -12.37. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CCI's ROE of -6.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to CCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check CCI's competition here
AMT vs IRM Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, IRM has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while IRM trades at $99.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas IRM's P/E ratio is 242.24. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to IRM's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to IRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check IRM's competition here
AMT vs SBAC Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, SBAC has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while SBAC trades at $233.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas SBAC's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SBAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to SBAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check SBAC's competition here
AMT vs WY Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, WY has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while WY trades at $26.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas WY's P/E ratio is 54.03. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to WY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check WY's competition here
AMT vs LAMR Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, LAMR has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while LAMR trades at $125.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas LAMR's P/E ratio is 30.52. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LAMR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to LAMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check LAMR's competition here
AMT vs GLPI Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, GLPI has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while GLPI trades at $46.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas GLPI's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GLPI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to GLPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check GLPI's competition here
AMT vs EPR Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, EPR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while EPR trades at $57.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas EPR's P/E ratio is 35.14. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to EPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check EPR's competition here
AMT vs RYN Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, RYN has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while RYN trades at $24.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas RYN's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to RYN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to RYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check RYN's competition here
AMT vs PCH Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, PCH has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while PCH trades at $41.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas PCH's P/E ratio is 68.75. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PCH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to PCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check PCH's competition here
AMT vs OUT Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, OUT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while OUT trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas OUT's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OUT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to OUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check OUT's competition here
AMT vs EPR-PE Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, EPR-PE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while EPR-PE trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas EPR-PE's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EPR-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to EPR-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check EPR-PE's competition here
AMT vs CXW Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, CXW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while CXW trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas CXW's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CXW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to CXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check CXW's competition here
AMT vs EPR-PC Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, EPR-PC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while EPR-PC trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas EPR-PC's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EPR-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to EPR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check EPR-PC's competition here
AMT vs EPR-PG Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, EPR-PG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while EPR-PG trades at $21.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas EPR-PG's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EPR-PG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to EPR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check EPR-PG's competition here
AMT vs UNIT Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, UNIT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while UNIT trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas UNIT's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to UNIT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to UNIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check UNIT's competition here
AMT vs SMA Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, SMA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while SMA trades at $36.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas SMA's P/E ratio is -103.41. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SMA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to SMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check SMA's competition here
AMT vs LANDP Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, LANDP has a market cap of 728.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while LANDP trades at $20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas LANDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LANDP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to LANDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check LANDP's competition here
AMT vs FPI Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, FPI has a market cap of 486.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while FPI trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas FPI's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FPI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to FPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check FPI's competition here
AMT vs AFCG Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, AFCG has a market cap of 103M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while AFCG trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas AFCG's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AFCG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to AFCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check AFCG's competition here
AMT vs PW Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, PW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while PW trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas PW's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PW's ROE of -3.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to PW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check PW's competition here
AMT vs CTT Comparison July 2025
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 107.6B. In comparison, CTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $229.87, while CTT trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 37.26, whereas CTT's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to CTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.Check CTT's competition here