American Tower Corporation
American Tower Corporation AMT Peers
See (AMT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMT | $213.39 | +0.81% | 99.90B | 34.53 | $6.18 | +3.08% |
| EQIX | $875.92 | +1.00% | 85.68B | 91.82 | $9.54 | +2.00% |
| CCI | $102.35 | +1.57% | 44.57B | -11.36 | -$9.01 | +6.13% |
| IRM | $100.60 | +1.11% | 29.68B | 245.37 | $0.41 | +2.85% |
| SBAC | $232.92 | +1.67% | 25.03B | 30.85 | $7.55 | +1.74% |
| WY | $26.72 | +0.94% | 19.38B | 54.53 | $0.49 | +3.03% |
| GLPI | $47.61 | +1.54% | 13.08B | 16.59 | $2.87 | +6.38% |
| LAMR | $119.87 | +2.57% | 12.27B | 29.17 | $4.11 | +4.93% |
| EPR | $54.16 | +0.86% | 4.12B | 33.23 | $1.63 | +6.38% |
| RYN | $24.18 | +0.71% | 3.77B | 10.16 | $2.38 | +4.66% |
Stock Comparison
AMT vs EQIX Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, EQIX has a market cap of 85.68B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while EQIX trades at $875.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas EQIX's P/E ratio is 91.82. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EQIX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to EQIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs CCI Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, CCI has a market cap of 44.57B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while CCI trades at $102.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas CCI's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CCI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to CCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs IRM Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, IRM has a market cap of 29.68B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while IRM trades at $100.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas IRM's P/E ratio is 245.37. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to IRM's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to IRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs SBAC Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, SBAC has a market cap of 25.03B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while SBAC trades at $232.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas SBAC's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SBAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to SBAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs WY Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, WY has a market cap of 19.38B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while WY trades at $26.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas WY's P/E ratio is 54.53. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to WY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs GLPI Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, GLPI has a market cap of 13.08B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while GLPI trades at $47.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas GLPI's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GLPI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to GLPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs LAMR Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, LAMR has a market cap of 12.27B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while LAMR trades at $119.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas LAMR's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LAMR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to LAMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs EPR Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, EPR has a market cap of 4.12B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while EPR trades at $54.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas EPR's P/E ratio is 33.23. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to EPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs RYN Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, RYN has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while RYN trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas RYN's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to RYN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to RYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs PCH Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, PCH has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while PCH trades at $40.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas PCH's P/E ratio is 64.08. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PCH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to PCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs OUT Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, OUT has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while OUT trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas OUT's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OUT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to OUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs CXW Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, CXW has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while CXW trades at $21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas CXW's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CXW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to CXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs EPR-PE Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, EPR-PE has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while EPR-PE trades at $30.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas EPR-PE's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EPR-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to EPR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs EPR-PC Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, EPR-PC has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while EPR-PC trades at $23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas EPR-PC's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EPR-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to EPR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs EPR-PG Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, EPR-PG has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while EPR-PG trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas EPR-PG's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EPR-PG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to EPR-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs UNIT Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, UNIT has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while UNIT trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas UNIT's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to UNIT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to UNIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs LANDP Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, LANDP has a market cap of 730.07M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while LANDP trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas LANDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LANDP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to LANDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs FPI Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, FPI has a market cap of 484.96M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while FPI trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas FPI's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FPI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to FPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs AFCG Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, AFCG has a market cap of 119.08M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while AFCG trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas AFCG's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AFCG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to AFCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs PW Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 99.90B. In comparison, PW has a market cap of 3.97M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $213.39, while PW trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.53, whereas PW's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PW's ROE of -3.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to PW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.