American Tower Corporation
American Tower Corporation AMT Peers
See (AMT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMT | $224.27 | +1.47% | 105.1B | 36.33 | $6.18 | +2.95% |
| EQIX | $789.21 | -0.79% | 77.8B | 83.37 | $9.54 | +2.25% |
| CCI | $103.36 | +0.61% | 45.2B | -11.51 | -$9.01 | +5.53% |
| IRM | $99.51 | -2.98% | 29.5B | 243.63 | $0.41 | +3.00% |
| SBAC | $239.40 | +1.94% | 25.7B | 31.58 | $7.56 | +1.75% |
| WY | $26.73 | +4.05% | 19B | 53.53 | $0.49 | +3.11% |
| GLPI | $48.13 | +3.11% | 13B | 16.76 | $2.83 | +6.45% |
| LAMR | $123.99 | +2.17% | 12.6B | 29.96 | $4.11 | +4.98% |
| EPR | $59.04 | +1.35% | 4.4B | 35.87 | $1.63 | +5.91% |
| RYN | $23.22 | +4.69% | 3.5B | 9.57 | $2.38 | +12.79% |
Stock Comparison
AMT vs EQIX Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, EQIX has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while EQIX trades at $789.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas EQIX's P/E ratio is 83.37. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EQIX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to EQIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs CCI Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, CCI has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while CCI trades at $103.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas CCI's P/E ratio is -11.51. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CCI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to CCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs IRM Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, IRM has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while IRM trades at $99.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas IRM's P/E ratio is 243.63. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to IRM's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to IRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs SBAC Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, SBAC has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while SBAC trades at $239.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas SBAC's P/E ratio is 31.58. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SBAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to SBAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs WY Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, WY has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while WY trades at $26.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas WY's P/E ratio is 53.53. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to WY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs GLPI Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, GLPI has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while GLPI trades at $48.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas GLPI's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GLPI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to GLPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs LAMR Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, LAMR has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while LAMR trades at $123.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas LAMR's P/E ratio is 29.96. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LAMR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to LAMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs EPR Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, EPR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while EPR trades at $59.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas EPR's P/E ratio is 35.87. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to EPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs RYN Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, RYN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while RYN trades at $23.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas RYN's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to RYN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to RYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs PCH Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, PCH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while PCH trades at $40.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas PCH's P/E ratio is 64.95. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PCH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to PCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs OUT Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, OUT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while OUT trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas OUT's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OUT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to OUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs EPR-PE Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, EPR-PE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while EPR-PE trades at $31.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas EPR-PE's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EPR-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to EPR-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs CXW Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, CXW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while CXW trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas CXW's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CXW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to CXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs EPR-PC Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, EPR-PC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while EPR-PC trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas EPR-PC's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EPR-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to EPR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs EPR-PG Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, EPR-PG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while EPR-PG trades at $21.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas EPR-PG's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EPR-PG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to EPR-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs SMA Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, SMA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while SMA trades at $36.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas SMA's P/E ratio is -105.71. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SMA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to SMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs UNIT Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, UNIT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while UNIT trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas UNIT's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to UNIT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to UNIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs LANDP Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, LANDP has a market cap of 696.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while LANDP trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas LANDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LANDP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to LANDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs FPI Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, FPI has a market cap of 526.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while FPI trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas FPI's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FPI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is more volatile compared to FPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs AFCG Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, AFCG has a market cap of 101.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while AFCG trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas AFCG's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AFCG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to AFCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs PW Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, PW has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while PW trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas PW's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PW's ROE of -3.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to PW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.
AMT vs CTT Comparison
AMT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMT stands at 105.1B. In comparison, CTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMT is priced at $224.27, while CTT trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.33, whereas CTT's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, AMT's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMT is less volatile compared to CTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMT.