Amal Ltd

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ASIANPAINT.NS has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while ASIANPAINT.NS trades at ₹2,169.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas ASIANPAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 55.56. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ASIANPAINT.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to ASIANPAINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check ASIANPAINT.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ASIANPAINT.BO has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while ASIANPAINT.BO trades at ₹2,169.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas ASIANPAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 55.30. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ASIANPAINT.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to ASIANPAINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check ASIANPAINT.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PIDILITIND.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while PIDILITIND.NS trades at ₹1,273.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas PIDILITIND.NS's P/E ratio is 58.11. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PIDILITIND.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to PIDILITIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check PIDILITIND.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PIDILITIND.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while PIDILITIND.BO trades at ₹1,272.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas PIDILITIND.BO's P/E ratio is 58.10. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PIDILITIND.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to PIDILITIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check PIDILITIND.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SOLARINDS.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while SOLARINDS.BO trades at ₹13,104.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas SOLARINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 79.80. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SOLARINDS.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to SOLARINDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check SOLARINDS.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SOLARINDS.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while SOLARINDS.NS trades at ₹13,109.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas SOLARINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 79.74. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SOLARINDS.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to SOLARINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check SOLARINDS.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SRF.BO has a market cap of 757.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while SRF.BO trades at ₹2,415.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas SRF.BO's P/E ratio is 42.62. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SRF.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to SRF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check SRF.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SRF.NS has a market cap of 757.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while SRF.NS trades at ₹2,416.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas SRF.NS's P/E ratio is 42.61. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SRF.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to SRF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check SRF.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LINDEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 597.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while LINDEINDIA.BO trades at ₹7,299.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas LINDEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 100.87. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LINDEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to LINDEINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check LINDEINDIA.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LINDEINDIA.NS has a market cap of 597.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while LINDEINDIA.NS trades at ₹7,296.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas LINDEINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 101.30. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LINDEINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to LINDEINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check LINDEINDIA.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BERGEPAINT.NS has a market cap of 487.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while BERGEPAINT.NS trades at ₹422.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas BERGEPAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 46.32. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BERGEPAINT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to BERGEPAINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check BERGEPAINT.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BERGEPAINT.BO has a market cap of 487.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while BERGEPAINT.BO trades at ₹421.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas BERGEPAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 45.07. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BERGEPAINT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to BERGEPAINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check BERGEPAINT.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, FLUOROCHEM.BO has a market cap of 354.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while FLUOROCHEM.BO trades at ₹3,211.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas FLUOROCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 54.10. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FLUOROCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to FLUOROCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check FLUOROCHEM.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HSCL.BO has a market cap of 225.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while HSCL.BO trades at ₹448.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas HSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.56. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HSCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to HSCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check HSCL.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HSCL.NS has a market cap of 225.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while HSCL.NS trades at ₹448.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas HSCL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.51. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HSCL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to HSCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check HSCL.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ACUTAAS.NS has a market cap of 190.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while ACUTAAS.NS trades at ₹2,110.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas ACUTAAS.NS's P/E ratio is 66.54. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ACUTAAS.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to ACUTAAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check ACUTAAS.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ACUTAAS.BO has a market cap of 190.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while ACUTAAS.BO trades at ₹2,110.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas ACUTAAS.BO's P/E ratio is 66.39. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ACUTAAS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is less volatile compared to ACUTAAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check ACUTAAS.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ATUL.NS has a market cap of 189.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while ATUL.NS trades at ₹6,296.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas ATUL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ATUL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to ATUL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check ATUL.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ATUL.BO has a market cap of 189.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while ATUL.BO trades at ₹6,295.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas ATUL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ATUL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to ATUL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check ATUL.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, DCMSHRIRAM.BO has a market cap of 180B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while DCMSHRIRAM.BO trades at ₹1,131.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas DCMSHRIRAM.BO's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DCMSHRIRAM.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to DCMSHRIRAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check DCMSHRIRAM.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, DCMSHRIRAM.NS has a market cap of 179.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while DCMSHRIRAM.NS trades at ₹1,131.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas DCMSHRIRAM.NS's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DCMSHRIRAM.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to DCMSHRIRAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check DCMSHRIRAM.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AARTIIND.BO has a market cap of 149.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while AARTIIND.BO trades at ₹408.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas AARTIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 39.52. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AARTIIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to AARTIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check AARTIIND.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AARTIIND.NS has a market cap of 149.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while AARTIIND.NS trades at ₹408.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas AARTIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 39.48. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AARTIIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to AARTIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check AARTIIND.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AETHER.NS has a market cap of 148.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while AETHER.NS trades at ₹1,103.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas AETHER.NS's P/E ratio is 68.89. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AETHER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to AETHER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check AETHER.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AETHER.BO has a market cap of 147.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while AETHER.BO trades at ₹1,105.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas AETHER.BO's P/E ratio is 68.81. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AETHER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to AETHER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check AETHER.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ANURAS.BO has a market cap of 145.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while ANURAS.BO trades at ₹1,264.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas ANURAS.BO's P/E ratio is 82.81. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ANURAS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to ANURAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check ANURAS.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ANURAS.NS has a market cap of 145.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while ANURAS.NS trades at ₹1,265.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas ANURAS.NS's P/E ratio is 82.94. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ANURAS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to ANURAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check ANURAS.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KANSAINER.BO has a market cap of 142.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while KANSAINER.BO trades at ₹178.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas KANSAINER.BO's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KANSAINER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to KANSAINER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check KANSAINER.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KANSAINER.NS has a market cap of 141.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while KANSAINER.NS trades at ₹178.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas KANSAINER.NS's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KANSAINER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to KANSAINER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check KANSAINER.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BASF.NS has a market cap of 141.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while BASF.NS trades at ₹3,311.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas BASF.NS's P/E ratio is 37.43. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BASF.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to BASF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check BASF.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BASF.BO has a market cap of 141.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while BASF.BO trades at ₹3,314.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas BASF.BO's P/E ratio is 37.67. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BASF.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to BASF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check BASF.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, VINATIORGA.NS has a market cap of 139.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while VINATIORGA.NS trades at ₹1,309.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas VINATIORGA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VINATIORGA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to VINATIORGA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check VINATIORGA.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SPLPETRO.BO has a market cap of 139.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while SPLPETRO.BO trades at ₹733.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas SPLPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 51.95. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SPLPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to SPLPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check SPLPETRO.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, VINATIORGA.BO has a market cap of 138.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while VINATIORGA.BO trades at ₹1,309.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas VINATIORGA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.31. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VINATIORGA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to VINATIORGA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check VINATIORGA.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AKZOINDIA.NS has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while AKZOINDIA.NS trades at ₹2,991.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas AKZOINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AKZOINDIA.NS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is less volatile compared to AKZOINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check AKZOINDIA.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AKZOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 130.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while AKZOINDIA.BO trades at ₹2,984.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas AKZOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AKZOINDIA.BO's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is less volatile compared to AKZOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check AKZOINDIA.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, FINEORG.BO has a market cap of 127.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while FINEORG.BO trades at ₹4,354.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas FINEORG.BO's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FINEORG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to FINEORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check FINEORG.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, FINEORG.NS has a market cap of 127.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while FINEORG.NS trades at ₹4,363.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas FINEORG.NS's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FINEORG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to FINEORG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check FINEORG.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PRIVISCL.NS has a market cap of 114.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while PRIVISCL.NS trades at ₹2,941.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas PRIVISCL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.17. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PRIVISCL.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to PRIVISCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check PRIVISCL.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PRIVISCL.BO has a market cap of 114.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while PRIVISCL.BO trades at ₹2,941.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas PRIVISCL.BO's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PRIVISCL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to PRIVISCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check PRIVISCL.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PCBL.BO has a market cap of 101.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while PCBL.BO trades at ₹258.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas PCBL.BO's P/E ratio is 38.28. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PCBL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to PCBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check PCBL.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PCBL.NS has a market cap of 101.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while PCBL.NS trades at ₹258.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas PCBL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.17. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PCBL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to PCBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check PCBL.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AMIORG.NS has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while AMIORG.NS trades at ₹1,176.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas AMIORG.NS's P/E ratio is 119.06. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AMIORG.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to AMIORG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check AMIORG.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AMIORG.BO has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while AMIORG.BO trades at ₹1,176.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas AMIORG.BO's P/E ratio is 118.95. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AMIORG.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to AMIORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check AMIORG.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SHAILY.BO has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while SHAILY.BO trades at ₹2,088.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas SHAILY.BO's P/E ratio is 60.91. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SHAILY.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to SHAILY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check SHAILY.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, JUBLINGREA.BO has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while JUBLINGREA.BO trades at ₹579.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas JUBLINGREA.BO's P/E ratio is 34.15. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JUBLINGREA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to JUBLINGREA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check JUBLINGREA.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GRWRHITECH.BO has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while GRWRHITECH.BO trades at ₹3,701.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas GRWRHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GRWRHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to GRWRHITECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check GRWRHITECH.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GRWRHITECH.NS has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while GRWRHITECH.NS trades at ₹3,703.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas GRWRHITECH.NS's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GRWRHITECH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to GRWRHITECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check GRWRHITECH.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CLEAN.BO has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while CLEAN.BO trades at ₹710.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas CLEAN.BO's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CLEAN.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to CLEAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check CLEAN.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CLEAN.NS has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while CLEAN.NS trades at ₹710.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas CLEAN.NS's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CLEAN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to CLEAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check CLEAN.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ALKYLAMINE.NS has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while ALKYLAMINE.NS trades at ₹1,319.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas ALKYLAMINE.NS's P/E ratio is 37.35. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALKYLAMINE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to ALKYLAMINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check ALKYLAMINE.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ALKYLAMINE.BO has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while ALKYLAMINE.BO trades at ₹1,318.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas ALKYLAMINE.BO's P/E ratio is 37.29. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALKYLAMINE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to ALKYLAMINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check ALKYLAMINE.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SUDARSCHEM.BO has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while SUDARSCHEM.BO trades at ₹762.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas SUDARSCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 115.44. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SUDARSCHEM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to SUDARSCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check SUDARSCHEM.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SUDARSCHEM.NS has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while SUDARSCHEM.NS trades at ₹762.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas SUDARSCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is -98.28. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SUDARSCHEM.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to SUDARSCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check SUDARSCHEM.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GALAXYSURF.BO has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while GALAXYSURF.BO trades at ₹1,653.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas GALAXYSURF.BO's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GALAXYSURF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to GALAXYSURF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check GALAXYSURF.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GALAXYSURF.NS has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while GALAXYSURF.NS trades at ₹1,655.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas GALAXYSURF.NS's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GALAXYSURF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to GALAXYSURF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check GALAXYSURF.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KINGFA.NS has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while KINGFA.NS trades at ₹4,192.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas KINGFA.NS's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KINGFA.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to KINGFA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check KINGFA.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KINGFA.BO has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while KINGFA.BO trades at ₹4,218.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas KINGFA.BO's P/E ratio is 32.69. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KINGFA.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to KINGFA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check KINGFA.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GULFOILLUB.BO has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while GULFOILLUB.BO trades at ₹888.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas GULFOILLUB.BO's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GULFOILLUB.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to GULFOILLUB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check GULFOILLUB.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GULFOILLUB.NS has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while GULFOILLUB.NS trades at ₹889.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas GULFOILLUB.NS's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GULFOILLUB.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to GULFOILLUB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check GULFOILLUB.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TANFACIND.BO has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while TANFACIND.BO trades at ₹2,033.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas TANFACIND.BO's P/E ratio is 52.75. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TANFACIND.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to TANFACIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check TANFACIND.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, INDIGOPNTS.BO has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while INDIGOPNTS.BO trades at ₹767.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas INDIGOPNTS.BO's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INDIGOPNTS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is less volatile compared to INDIGOPNTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check INDIGOPNTS.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, INDIGOPNTS.NS has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while INDIGOPNTS.NS trades at ₹767.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas INDIGOPNTS.NS's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INDIGOPNTS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to INDIGOPNTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check INDIGOPNTS.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RESPONIND.BO has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while RESPONIND.BO trades at ₹131.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas RESPONIND.BO's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RESPONIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is less volatile compared to RESPONIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check RESPONIND.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RESPONIND.NS has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while RESPONIND.NS trades at ₹129.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas RESPONIND.NS's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RESPONIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is less volatile compared to RESPONIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check RESPONIND.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, VISHNU.BO has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while VISHNU.BO trades at ₹503.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas VISHNU.BO's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VISHNU.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to VISHNU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check VISHNU.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, POCL.NS has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while POCL.NS trades at ₹1,084.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas POCL.NS's P/E ratio is 29.40. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to POCL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to POCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check POCL.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, POCL.BO has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while POCL.BO trades at ₹1,086.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas POCL.BO's P/E ratio is 29.40. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to POCL.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to POCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check POCL.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, VISHNU.NS has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while VISHNU.NS trades at ₹507.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas VISHNU.NS's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VISHNU.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to VISHNU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check VISHNU.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BALAMINES.NS has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while BALAMINES.NS trades at ₹1,065.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas BALAMINES.NS's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BALAMINES.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to BALAMINES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check BALAMINES.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BALAMINES.BO has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while BALAMINES.BO trades at ₹1,063.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas BALAMINES.BO's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BALAMINES.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to BALAMINES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check BALAMINES.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LXCHEM.BO has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while LXCHEM.BO trades at ₹117.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas LXCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 40.87. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LXCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to LXCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check LXCHEM.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LXCHEM.NS has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while LXCHEM.NS trades at ₹118.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas LXCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 40.90. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LXCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to LXCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check LXCHEM.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, JINDALPOLY.BO has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while JINDALPOLY.BO trades at ₹772.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas JINDALPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -24.84. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JINDALPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to JINDALPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check JINDALPOLY.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, JINDALPOLY.NS has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while JINDALPOLY.NS trades at ₹772.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas JINDALPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -15.16. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JINDALPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to JINDALPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check JINDALPOLY.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NEOGEN.BO has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while NEOGEN.BO trades at ₹1,200.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas NEOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 159.26. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NEOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to NEOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check NEOGEN.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NEOGEN.NS has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while NEOGEN.NS trades at ₹1,194.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas NEOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 158.74. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NEOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to NEOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check NEOGEN.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ADVENZYMES.BO has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while ADVENZYMES.BO trades at ₹272.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas ADVENZYMES.BO's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ADVENZYMES.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to ADVENZYMES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check ADVENZYMES.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ADVENZYMES.NS has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while ADVENZYMES.NS trades at ₹272.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas ADVENZYMES.NS's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ADVENZYMES.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to ADVENZYMES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check ADVENZYMES.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GRAUWEIL.NS has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while GRAUWEIL.NS trades at ₹117.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas GRAUWEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GRAUWEIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to GRAUWEIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check GRAUWEIL.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NOCIL.NS has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while NOCIL.NS trades at ₹165.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas NOCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 45.86. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NOCIL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to NOCIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check NOCIL.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NOCIL.BO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while NOCIL.BO trades at ₹165.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas NOCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 43.36. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NOCIL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to NOCIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check NOCIL.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, FISCHER.BO has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while FISCHER.BO trades at ₹40.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas FISCHER.BO's P/E ratio is 69.71. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FISCHER.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to FISCHER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check FISCHER.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GRAUWEIL.BO has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while GRAUWEIL.BO trades at ₹61.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas GRAUWEIL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GRAUWEIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is less volatile compared to GRAUWEIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check GRAUWEIL.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TATVA.NS has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while TATVA.NS trades at ₹1,109.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas TATVA.NS's P/E ratio is 78.84. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TATVA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to TATVA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check TATVA.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TATVA.BO has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while TATVA.BO trades at ₹1,114.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas TATVA.BO's P/E ratio is 78.67. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TATVA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to TATVA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check TATVA.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, JUBLINDS.NS has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while JUBLINDS.NS trades at ₹1,633.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas JUBLINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 72.49. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JUBLINDS.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to JUBLINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check JUBLINDS.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, JUBLINDS.BO has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while JUBLINDS.BO trades at ₹1,623.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas JUBLINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 72.31. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JUBLINDS.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to JUBLINDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check JUBLINDS.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, JUBLCPL.NS has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while JUBLCPL.NS trades at ₹1,720.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas JUBLCPL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JUBLCPL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is less volatile compared to JUBLCPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check JUBLCPL.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, JUBLCPL.BO has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while JUBLCPL.BO trades at ₹1,705.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas JUBLCPL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JUBLCPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is less volatile compared to JUBLCPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check JUBLCPL.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TIDEWATER.NS has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while TIDEWATER.NS trades at ₹1,479.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas TIDEWATER.NS's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TIDEWATER.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to TIDEWATER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check TIDEWATER.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TIDEWATER.BO has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while TIDEWATER.BO trades at ₹1,478.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas TIDEWATER.BO's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TIDEWATER.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to TIDEWATER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check TIDEWATER.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, POLYPLEX.NS has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while POLYPLEX.NS trades at ₹794.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas POLYPLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 82.04. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to POLYPLEX.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to POLYPLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check POLYPLEX.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, POLYPLEX.BO has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while POLYPLEX.BO trades at ₹792.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas POLYPLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 82.11. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to POLYPLEX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to POLYPLEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check POLYPLEX.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.NS has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while PRINCEPIPE.NS trades at ₹224.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas PRINCEPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 57.10. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check PRINCEPIPE.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, XPROINDIA.BO has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while XPROINDIA.BO trades at ₹1,036.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas XPROINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 184.79. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XPROINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to XPROINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check XPROINDIA.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, XPROINDIA.NS has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while XPROINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,035.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas XPROINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 183.19. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XPROINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to XPROINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check XPROINDIA.NS's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SIRCA.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while SIRCA.BO trades at ₹421.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas SIRCA.BO's P/E ratio is 38.60. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SIRCA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to SIRCA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check SIRCA.BO's competition here

AMAL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMAL.BO stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SIRCA.NS has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAL.BO is priced at ₹474.30, while SIRCA.NS trades at ₹422.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.07, whereas SIRCA.NS's P/E ratio is 38.29. In terms of profitability, AMAL.BO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SIRCA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAL.BO is more volatile compared to SIRCA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAL.BO.Check SIRCA.NS's competition here