Amadeus IT Group, S.A.
Amadeus IT Group, S.A. AMADF Peers
See (AMADF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMADF | $86.30 | +0.49% | 38B | 26.72 | $3.23 | +1.33% |
| TRPCF | $63.00 | -3.06% | 41.2B | 18.53 | $3.40 | +0.48% |
| AMADY | $84.84 | +0.82% | 37B | 25.94 | $3.27 | +1.26% |
| TNGCF | $2.30 | -6.52% | 5.3B | 19.17 | $0.12 | N/A |
| DRTGF | $23.50 | N/A | 5B | 8.22 | $2.86 | +0.61% |
| TUIFF | $8.44 | N/A | 4.3B | 7.09 | $1.19 | N/A |
| LGDDF | $22.26 | +7.23% | 3.1B | 16.61 | $1.34 | +3.41% |
| FGETF | $13.37 | N/A | 3B | 40.52 | $0.33 | +1.21% |
| TNLIY | $6.81 | N/A | 1.5B | 20.03 | $0.34 | N/A |
| CTMLF | $8.75 | -41.71% | 1.3B | 31.25 | $0.28 | +2.13% |
Stock Comparison
AMADF vs TRPCF Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, TRPCF has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while TRPCF trades at $63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas TRPCF's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to TRPCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is more volatile compared to TRPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs AMADY Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, AMADY has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while AMADY trades at $84.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas AMADY's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AMADY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is more volatile compared to AMADY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs TNGCF Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, TNGCF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while TNGCF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas TNGCF's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to TNGCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is more volatile compared to TNGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs DRTGF Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, DRTGF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while DRTGF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas DRTGF's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DRTGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is more volatile compared to DRTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs TUIFF Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, TUIFF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while TUIFF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas TUIFF's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to TUIFF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is more volatile compared to TUIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs LGDDF Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, LGDDF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while LGDDF trades at $22.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas LGDDF's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LGDDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is more volatile compared to LGDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs FGETF Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, FGETF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while FGETF trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas FGETF's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FGETF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is more volatile compared to FGETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs TNLIY Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, TNLIY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while TNLIY trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas TNLIY's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to TNLIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is more volatile compared to TNLIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs CTMLF Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, CTMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while CTMLF trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas CTMLF's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CTMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is more volatile compared to CTMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs WEBJF Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, WEBJF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while WEBJF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas WEBJF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WEBJF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is less volatile compared to WEBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs EDDRF Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, EDDRF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while EDDRF trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas EDDRF's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EDDRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is more volatile compared to EDDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs WEJTY Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, WEJTY has a market cap of 940.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while WEJTY trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas WEJTY's P/E ratio is 142.50. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WEJTY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is less volatile compared to WEJTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs OOBHF Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, OOBHF has a market cap of 430.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while OOBHF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas OOBHF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to OOBHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is more volatile compared to OOBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs EOVBF Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, EOVBF has a market cap of 291.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while EOVBF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas EOVBF's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EOVBF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is less volatile compared to EOVBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs LSMNF Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, LSMNF has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while LSMNF trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas LSMNF's P/E ratio is 34.07. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LSMNF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is more volatile compared to LSMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs HWGG Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, HWGG has a market cap of 203.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while HWGG trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas HWGG's P/E ratio is -137.33. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HWGG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is less volatile compared to HWGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs HSWLF Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, HSWLF has a market cap of 190.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while HSWLF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas HSWLF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HSWLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is more volatile compared to HSWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs TRZBF Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, TRZBF has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while TRZBF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas TRZBF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to TRZBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is more volatile compared to TRZBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs ONVC Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, ONVC has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while ONVC trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas ONVC's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ONVC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is more volatile compared to ONVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs ZMWYF Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, ZMWYF has a market cap of 992.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while ZMWYF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas ZMWYF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ZMWYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is more volatile compared to ZMWYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs NNAX Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, NNAX has a market cap of 495.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while NNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas NNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NNAX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is less volatile compared to NNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs CDNO Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, CDNO has a market cap of 120K. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while CDNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas CDNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CDNO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is less volatile compared to CDNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs ARMV Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, ARMV has a market cap of 61.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while ARMV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas ARMV's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ARMV's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is more volatile compared to ARMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs GWYT Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, GWYT has a market cap of 17.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while GWYT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas GWYT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GWYT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is less volatile compared to GWYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs WESC Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, WESC has a market cap of 13K. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while WESC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas WESC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WESC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is more volatile compared to WESC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.
AMADF vs OHTR Comparison
AMADF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMADF stands at 38B. In comparison, OHTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMADF is priced at $86.30, while OHTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMADF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.72, whereas OHTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMADF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to OHTR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMADF is less volatile compared to OHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMADF.