L'Air Liquide S.A.
L'Air Liquide S.A. AIQUF Peers
See (AIQUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIQUF | $210.53 | -2.27% | 121.4B | 32.54 | $6.47 | +1.60% |
| AIQUY | $41.15 | -1.94% | 118.6B | 31.41 | $1.31 | +1.56% |
| PTCAY | $60.13 | N/A | 52B | -546.64 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| GVDBF | $4,979.44 | +1.94% | 45.9B | 36.37 | $136.92 | +1.59% |
| GVDNY | $99.25 | -1.63% | 45.8B | 34.82 | $2.85 | +1.56% |
| PTPIF | $0.53 | N/A | 45.6B | -52.67 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SKFOF | $268.40 | -1.23% | 43.1B | 28.58 | $9.39 | +0.77% |
| SXYAY | $26.70 | -0.82% | 42.8B | 28.40 | $0.94 | +1.43% |
| AKZOY | $22.39 | -0.93% | 34.4B | 21.74 | $1.03 | +3.73% |
| NVZMF | $69.36 | +1.02% | 32.3B | 61.93 | $1.12 | +1.47% |
Stock Comparison
AIQUF vs AIQUY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, AIQUY has a market cap of 118.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while AIQUY trades at $41.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas AIQUY's P/E ratio is 31.41. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIQUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to AIQUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs PTCAY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, PTCAY has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while PTCAY trades at $60.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas PTCAY's P/E ratio is -546.64. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTCAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to PTCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs GVDBF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, GVDBF has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while GVDBF trades at $4,979.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas GVDBF's P/E ratio is 36.37. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GVDBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to GVDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs GVDNY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, GVDNY has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while GVDNY trades at $99.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas GVDNY's P/E ratio is 34.82. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GVDNY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to GVDNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs PTPIF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, PTPIF has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while PTPIF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas PTPIF's P/E ratio is -52.67. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to PTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SKFOF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, SKFOF has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while SKFOF trades at $268.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas SKFOF's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKFOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to SKFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SXYAY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, SXYAY has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while SXYAY trades at $26.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas SXYAY's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SXYAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to SXYAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs AKZOY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, AKZOY has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while AKZOY trades at $22.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas AKZOY's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKZOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to AKZOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs NVZMF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, NVZMF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while NVZMF trades at $69.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas NVZMF's P/E ratio is 61.93. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVZMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to NVZMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs NVZMY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, NVZMY has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while NVZMY trades at $69.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas NVZMY's P/E ratio is 62.35. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVZMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to NVZMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs NPCPF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, NPCPF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while NPCPF trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas NPCPF's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPCPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to NPCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SYIEY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, SYIEY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while SYIEY trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas SYIEY's P/E ratio is 30.31. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYIEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to SYIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SYIEF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, SYIEF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while SYIEF trades at $116.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas SYIEF's P/E ratio is 29.89. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYIEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to SYIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs EMSHF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, EMSHF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while EMSHF trades at $651.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas EMSHF's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMSHF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to EMSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs COVTY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, COVTY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while COVTY trades at $33.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas COVTY's P/E ratio is -28.60. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COVTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to COVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs NDEKF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, NDEKF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while NDEKF trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas NDEKF's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NDEKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to NDEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs NDEKY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, NDEKY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while NDEKY trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas NDEKY's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NDEKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to NDEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs CVVTF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, CVVTF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while CVVTF trades at $62.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas CVVTF's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVVTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to CVVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs AKZOF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, AKZOF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while AKZOF trades at $66.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas AKZOF's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKZOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to AKZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs EVKIF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, EVKIF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while EVKIF trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas EVKIF's P/E ratio is 31.28. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVKIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to EVKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs EVKIY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, EVKIY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while EVKIY trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas EVKIY's P/E ratio is 30.68. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVKIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to EVKIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs CRTSF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, CRTSF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while CRTSF trades at $79.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas CRTSF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRTSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to CRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs CHYHY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, CHYHY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while CHYHY trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas CHYHY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHYHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to CHYHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs BNTGY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, BNTGY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while BNTGY trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas BNTGY's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNTGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to BNTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs BNTGF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, BNTGF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while BNTGF trades at $65.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas BNTGF's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNTGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to BNTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SCVUF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, SCVUF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while SCVUF trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas SCVUF's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCVUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to SCVUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SCVPY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, SCVPY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while SCVPY trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas SCVPY's P/E ratio is 51.08. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCVPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to SCVPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs IMDZF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, IMDZF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while IMDZF trades at $132.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas IMDZF's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IMDZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to IMDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs TKKYY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, TKKYY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while TKKYY trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas TKKYY's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKKYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to TKKYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ASGLF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, ASGLF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while ASGLF trades at $31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas ASGLF's P/E ratio is -14.70. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASGLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to ASGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs FUPBY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, FUPBY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while FUPBY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas FUPBY's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FUPBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to FUPBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs KPTCY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, KPTCY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while KPTCY trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas KPTCY's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KPTCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to KPTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs COIHF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, COIHF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while COIHF trades at $42.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas COIHF's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COIHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to COIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ASGLY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, ASGLY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while ASGLY trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas ASGLY's P/E ratio is -12.61. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASGLY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to ASGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs TKCBY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, TKCBY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while TKCBY trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas TKCBY's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to TKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs OCLDY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, OCLDY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while OCLDY trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas OCLDY's P/E ratio is 100.08. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCLDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to OCLDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs COIHY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, COIHY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while COIHY trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas COIHY's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COIHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to COIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs FUPPF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, FUPPF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while FUPPF trades at $42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas FUPPF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FUPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to FUPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ARKAF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, ARKAF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while ARKAF trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas ARKAF's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to ARKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ARKAY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, ARKAY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while ARKAY trades at $71.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas ARKAY's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARKAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to ARKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs OCLDF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, OCLDF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while OCLDF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas OCLDF's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCLDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to OCLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs MITUF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, MITUF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while MITUF trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas MITUF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MITUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to MITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs KDSKF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, KDSKF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while KDSKF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas KDSKF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KDSKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to KDSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs CLZNY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, CLZNY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while CLZNY trades at $12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas CLZNY's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLZNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to CLZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs MITUY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, MITUY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while MITUY trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas MITUY's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MITUY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to MITUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs AZLGF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, AZLGF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while AZLGF trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas AZLGF's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to AZLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs JMPLF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, JMPLF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while JMPLF trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas JMPLF's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JMPLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to JMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs JMPLY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, JMPLY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while JMPLY trades at $46.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas JMPLY's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JMPLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to JMPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs FUPEF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, FUPEF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while FUPEF trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas FUPEF's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FUPEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to FUPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs CLZNF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, CLZNF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while CLZNF trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas CLZNF's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLZNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to CLZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs WKCMF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, WKCMF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while WKCMF trades at $70.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas WKCMF's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WKCMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to WKCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs NOFCF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, NOFCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while NOFCF trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas NOFCF's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOFCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to NOFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs HXXPY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, HXXPY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while HXXPY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas HXXPY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HXXPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to HXXPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs HXPLF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, HXPLF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while HXPLF trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas HXPLF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HXPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to HXPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ICPVF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, ICPVF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while ICPVF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas ICPVF's P/E ratio is -32.40. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICPVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to ICPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs MBGCF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, MBGCF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while MBGCF trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas MBGCF's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MBGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to MBGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs LNXSY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, LNXSY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while LNXSY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas LNXSY's P/E ratio is -17.22. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNXSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to LNXSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs LNXSF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, LNXSF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while LNXSF trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas LNXSF's P/E ratio is -17.22. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNXSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to LNXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs INCZY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, INCZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while INCZY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas INCZY's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INCZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to INCZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs KSANF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, KSANF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while KSANF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas KSANF's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSANF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to KSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs AWTRF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, AWTRF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while AWTRF trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas AWTRF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AWTRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to AWTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs KPLIF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, KPLIF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while KPLIF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas KPLIF's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KPLIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to KPLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SASOF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, SASOF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while SASOF trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas SASOF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SASOF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to SASOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs DACHF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, DACHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while DACHF trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas DACHF's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DACHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to DACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs IRLCF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, IRLCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while IRLCF trades at $275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas IRLCF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IRLCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to IRLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ZEOOY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, ZEOOY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while ZEOOY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas ZEOOY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZEOOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to ZEOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ZEOOF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, ZEOOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while ZEOOF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas ZEOOF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZEOOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to ZEOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs OCINF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, OCINF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while OCINF trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas OCINF's P/E ratio is -11.23. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCINF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to OCINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs BRRDF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, BRRDF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while BRRDF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas BRRDF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRRDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to BRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs KANKF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, KANKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while KANKF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas KANKF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KANKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to KANKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs TKYMY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, TKYMY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while TKYMY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas TKYMY's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKYMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to TKYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ELKEF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, ELKEF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while ELKEF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas ELKEF's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELKEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to ELKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs TKCBF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, TKCBF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while TKCBF trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas TKCBF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to TKCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ALPKF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, ALPKF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while ALPKF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas ALPKF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALPKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to ALPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs CSNVY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, CSNVY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while CSNVY trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas CSNVY's P/E ratio is 24.48. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSNVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to CSNVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs HUABF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, HUABF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while HUABF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas HUABF's P/E ratio is -18.69. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HUABF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to HUABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs CSNVF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, CSNVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while CSNVF trades at $20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas CSNVF's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSNVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to CSNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs CUYRF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, CUYRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while CUYRF trades at $70.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas CUYRF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUYRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to CUYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs EMNSF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, EMNSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while EMNSF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas EMNSF's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMNSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to EMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs TKYMF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, TKYMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while TKYMF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas TKYMF's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKYMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to TKYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs LNTEF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, LNTEF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while LNTEF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas LNTEF's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNTEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to LNTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ELMTY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, ELMTY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while ELMTY trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas ELMTY's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELMTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to ELMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs ALZCF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, ALZCF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while ALZCF trades at $101.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas ALZCF's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALZCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to ALZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SKKAF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, SKKAF has a market cap of 984.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while SKKAF trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas SKKAF's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to SKKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs HUIHY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, HUIHY has a market cap of 943.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while HUIHY trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas HUIHY's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HUIHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to HUIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs AECLY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, AECLY has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while AECLY trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas AECLY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AECLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to AECLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs VTXPF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, VTXPF has a market cap of 833.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while VTXPF trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas VTXPF's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to VTXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs HASGF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, HASGF has a market cap of 809.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while HASGF trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas HASGF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HASGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to HASGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs DALQF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, DALQF has a market cap of 757.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while DALQF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas DALQF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DALQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to DALQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SYCHF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, SYCHF has a market cap of 720.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while SYCHF trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas SYCHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYCHF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to SYCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs VBVBF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, VBVBF has a market cap of 720M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while VBVBF trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas VBVBF's P/E ratio is -22.16. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VBVBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to VBVBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SYHMY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, SYHMY has a market cap of 616.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while SYHMY trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas SYHMY's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYHMY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to SYHMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs TYOBY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, TYOBY has a market cap of 604M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while TYOBY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas TYOBY's P/E ratio is 171.25. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TYOBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to TYOBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs DLNDY Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, DLNDY has a market cap of 600.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while DLNDY trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas DLNDY's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is less volatile compared to DLNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs FPLSF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, FPLSF has a market cap of 519.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while FPLSF trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas FPLSF's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FPLSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to FPLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs TNMAF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, TNMAF has a market cap of 402.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while TNMAF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas TNMAF's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNMAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to TNMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs FLRAF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, FLRAF has a market cap of 392M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while FLRAF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas FLRAF's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLRAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to FLRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs NCRBF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, NCRBF has a market cap of 331.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while NCRBF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas NCRBF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCRBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to NCRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.
AIQUF vs SYYYF Comparison
AIQUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIQUF stands at 121.4B. In comparison, SYYYF has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIQUF is priced at $210.53, while SYYYF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIQUF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.54, whereas SYYYF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, AIQUF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYYYF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIQUF is more volatile compared to SYYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIQUF.