Forafric Global PLC
Forafric Global PLC AFRIW Peers
See (AFRIW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFRIW | $0.32 | -13.49% | 8.6M | -13.92 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| ADM | $53.61 | -0.70% | 25.8B | 18.88 | $2.84 | +3.79% |
| TSN | $54.42 | +0.17% | 19B | 21.18 | $2.57 | +3.66% |
| BG | $85.38 | -0.20% | 11.5B | 10.96 | $7.79 | +3.22% |
| SFD | $23.35 | -0.11% | 9.2B | 10.29 | $2.27 | +2.14% |
| CALM | $102.10 | -0.94% | 5B | 5.04 | $20.24 | +6.57% |
| AGRO | $9.40 | -1.11% | 4.7B | 14.91 | $0.63 | +3.74% |
| IBA | $53.00 | -1.82% | 2.6B | 7.77 | $6.82 | N/A |
| VITL | $36.23 | +1.34% | 1.6B | 32.35 | $1.12 | N/A |
| FDP | $33.01 | -1.05% | 1.6B | 10.82 | $3.05 | +3.31% |
Stock Comparison
AFRIW vs ADM Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, ADM has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while ADM trades at $53.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas ADM's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to ADM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to ADM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs TSN Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, TSN has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while TSN trades at $54.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas TSN's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to TSN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to TSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs BG Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, BG has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while BG trades at $85.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas BG's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to BG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to BG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs SFD Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, SFD has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while SFD trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas SFD's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to SFD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to SFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs CALM Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, CALM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while CALM trades at $102.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas CALM's P/E ratio is 5.04. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to CALM's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to CALM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs AGRO Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, AGRO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while AGRO trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas AGRO's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to AGRO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to AGRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs IBA Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, IBA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while IBA trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas IBA's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to IBA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to IBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs VITL Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, VITL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while VITL trades at $36.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas VITL's P/E ratio is 32.35. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to VITL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to VITL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs FDP Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, FDP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while FDP trades at $33.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas FDP's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to FDP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to FDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs DOLE Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, DOLE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while DOLE trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas DOLE's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to DOLE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to DOLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs LND Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, LND has a market cap of 374.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while LND trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas LND's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to LND's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to LND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs CHSCP Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, CHSCP has a market cap of 339.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while CHSCP trades at $27.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas CHSCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to CHSCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to CHSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs CHSCL Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, CHSCL has a market cap of 333.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while CHSCL trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas CHSCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to CHSCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to CHSCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs CHSCN Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, CHSCN has a market cap of 331.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while CHSCN trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas CHSCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to CHSCN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to CHSCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs CHSCM Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, CHSCM has a market cap of 330.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while CHSCM trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas CHSCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to CHSCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to CHSCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs CHSCO Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, CHSCO has a market cap of 323.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while CHSCO trades at $26.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas CHSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to CHSCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to CHSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs LMNR Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, LMNR has a market cap of 271M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while LMNR trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas LMNR's P/E ratio is -115.38. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to LMNR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to LMNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs ALCO Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, ALCO has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while ALCO trades at $31.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas ALCO's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to ALCO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to ALCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs AFRI Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, AFRI has a market cap of 208.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while AFRI trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas AFRI's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to AFRI's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to AFRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs AGFS Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, AGFS has a market cap of 161.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while AGFS trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas AGFS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to AGFS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to AGFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs VFF Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, VFF has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while VFF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas VFF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to VFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to VFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs LOCL Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, LOCL has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while LOCL trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas LOCL's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to LOCL's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to LOCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs PME Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, PME has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while PME trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas PME's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to PME's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to PME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs DTCK Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, DTCK has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while DTCK trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas DTCK's P/E ratio is -6.68. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to DTCK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to DTCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs SANW Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, SANW has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while SANW trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas SANW's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to SANW's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to SANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs APPHW Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, APPHW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while APPHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas APPHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to APPHW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to APPHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs APPH Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, APPH has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while APPH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas APPH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to APPH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to APPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs SDOT Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, SDOT has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while SDOT trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas SDOT's P/E ratio is 1.12. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to SDOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to SDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs EDBL Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, EDBL has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while EDBL trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas EDBL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to EDBL's ROE of -4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to EDBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs EDBLW Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, EDBLW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while EDBLW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas EDBLW's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to EDBLW's ROE of -4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to EDBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs AQB Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, AQB has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while AQB trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas AQB's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to AQB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to AQB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs AGRI Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, AGRI has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while AGRI trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas AGRI's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to AGRI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to AGRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs KALWW Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, KALWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while KALWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas KALWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to KALWW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to KALWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs KAL Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, KAL has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while KAL trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas KAL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to KAL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to KAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs AAGRW Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, AAGRW has a market cap of 315.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while AAGRW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas AAGRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to AAGRW's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to AAGRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs AGRIW Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, AGRIW has a market cap of 69.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while AGRIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas AGRIW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to AGRIW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to AGRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.
AFRIW vs AAGR Comparison
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 8.6M. In comparison, AAGR has a market cap of 5.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.32, while AAGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -13.92, whereas AAGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to AAGR's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to AAGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.