Forafric Global PLC
Forafric Global PLC (AFRIW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AFRIW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFRIW | $0.87 | +13.90% | 23.5M | -37.97 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| ADM | $67.69 | -0.28% | 32.5B | 30.35 | $2.23 | +3.00% |
| BG | $121.32 | -0.52% | 23.5B | 28.68 | $4.23 | +2.29% |
| TSN | $62.96 | -1.41% | 22.4B | 112.45 | $0.56 | +3.15% |
| SFD | $25.19 | +0.60% | 9.9B | 11.35 | $2.22 | +4.00% |
| AGRO | $8.92 | -3.04% | 4.5B | 37.21 | $0.24 | +3.80% |
| CALM | $84.13 | +0.38% | 4B | 3.55 | $23.67 | +9.46% |
| IBA | $53.00 | -1.82% | 2.6B | 7.77 | $6.82 | +1.84% |
| FDP | $41.70 | +0.60% | 2B | 25.45 | $1.64 | +2.91% |
| DOLE | $15.80 | -1.22% | 1.5B | 12.56 | $1.26 | +2.09% |
Stock Comparison
AFRIW vs ADM Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, ADM has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while ADM trades at $67.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas ADM's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to ADM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to ADM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check ADM's competition here
AFRIW vs BG Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, BG has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while BG trades at $121.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas BG's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to BG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to BG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check BG's competition here
AFRIW vs TSN Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, TSN has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while TSN trades at $62.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas TSN's P/E ratio is 112.45. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to TSN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to TSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check TSN's competition here
AFRIW vs SFD Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, SFD has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while SFD trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas SFD's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to SFD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to SFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check SFD's competition here
AFRIW vs AGRO Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, AGRO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while AGRO trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas AGRO's P/E ratio is 37.21. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to AGRO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to AGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check AGRO's competition here
AFRIW vs CALM Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, CALM has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while CALM trades at $84.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas CALM's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to CALM's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to CALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check CALM's competition here
AFRIW vs IBA Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, IBA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while IBA trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas IBA's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to IBA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to IBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check IBA's competition here
AFRIW vs FDP Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, FDP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while FDP trades at $41.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas FDP's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to FDP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to FDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check FDP's competition here
AFRIW vs DOLE Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, DOLE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while DOLE trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas DOLE's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to DOLE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to DOLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check DOLE's competition here
AFRIW vs VITL Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, VITL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while VITL trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas VITL's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to VITL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to VITL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check VITL's competition here
AFRIW vs VFF Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, VFF has a market cap of 398.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while VFF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas VFF's P/E ratio is 69.00. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to VFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to VFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check VFF's competition here
AFRIW vs LND Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, LND has a market cap of 398.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while LND trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas LND's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to LND's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to LND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check LND's competition here
AFRIW vs CHSCP Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, CHSCP has a market cap of 344.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while CHSCP trades at $28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas CHSCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to CHSCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to CHSCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check CHSCP's competition here
AFRIW vs CHSCO Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, CHSCO has a market cap of 321.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while CHSCO trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas CHSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to CHSCO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to CHSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check CHSCO's competition here
AFRIW vs ALCO Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, ALCO has a market cap of 316.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while ALCO trades at $41.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas ALCO's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to ALCO's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to ALCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check ALCO's competition here
AFRIW vs CHSCL Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, CHSCL has a market cap of 314.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while CHSCL trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas CHSCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to CHSCL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to CHSCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check CHSCL's competition here
AFRIW vs CHSCN Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, CHSCN has a market cap of 312.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while CHSCN trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas CHSCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to CHSCN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to CHSCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check CHSCN's competition here
AFRIW vs CHSCM Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, CHSCM has a market cap of 308.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while CHSCM trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas CHSCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to CHSCM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to CHSCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check CHSCM's competition here
AFRIW vs AFRI Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, AFRI has a market cap of 264.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while AFRI trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas AFRI's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to AFRI's ROE of -2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to AFRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check AFRI's competition here
AFRIW vs LMNR Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, LMNR has a market cap of 252.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while LMNR trades at $13.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas LMNR's P/E ratio is -15.01. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to LMNR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to LMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check LMNR's competition here
AFRIW vs AGFS Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, AGFS has a market cap of 161.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while AGFS trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas AGFS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to AGFS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to AGFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check AGFS's competition here
AFRIW vs LOCL Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, LOCL has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while LOCL trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas LOCL's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to LOCL's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to LOCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check LOCL's competition here
AFRIW vs PME Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, PME has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while PME trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas PME's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to PME's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to PME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check PME's competition here
AFRIW vs APPH Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, APPH has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while APPH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas APPH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to APPH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to APPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check APPH's competition here
AFRIW vs APPHW Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, APPHW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while APPHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas APPHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to APPHW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to APPHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check APPHW's competition here
AFRIW vs EDBLW Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, EDBLW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while EDBLW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas EDBLW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to EDBLW's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to EDBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check EDBLW's competition here
AFRIW vs AQB Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, AQB has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while AQB trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas AQB's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to AQB's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to AQB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check AQB's competition here
AFRIW vs SDOT Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, SDOT has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while SDOT trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas SDOT's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to SDOT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to SDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check SDOT's competition here
AFRIW vs KAL Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, KAL has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while KAL trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas KAL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to KAL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to KAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check KAL's competition here
AFRIW vs KALWW Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, KALWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while KALWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas KALWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to KALWW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to KALWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check KALWW's competition here
AFRIW vs AGRI Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, AGRI has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while AGRI trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas AGRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to AGRI's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to AGRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check AGRI's competition here
AFRIW vs AVX Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, AVX has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while AVX trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas AVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to AVX's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to AVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check AVX's competition here
AFRIW vs EDBL Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, EDBL has a market cap of 936K. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while EDBL trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas EDBL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to EDBL's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to EDBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check EDBL's competition here
AFRIW vs AAGR Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, AAGR has a market cap of 572.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while AAGR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas AAGR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to AAGR's ROE of +3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW and AAGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AAGR's competition here
AFRIW vs DTCK Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, DTCK has a market cap of 116.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while DTCK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas DTCK's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to DTCK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to DTCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check DTCK's competition here
AFRIW vs AGRIW Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, AGRIW has a market cap of 66.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while AGRIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas AGRIW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to AGRIW's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to AGRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check AGRIW's competition here
AFRIW vs AAGRW Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, AAGRW has a market cap of 57.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while AAGRW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas AAGRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to AAGRW's ROE of +3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to AAGRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check AAGRW's competition here
AFRIW vs SANW Comparison February 2026
AFRIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 23.5M. In comparison, SANW has a market cap of 43.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.87, while SANW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -37.97, whereas SANW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is -2.30%, compared to SANW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is less volatile compared to SANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check SANW's competition here