Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited AEM Peers
See (AEM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEM | $118.75 | -0.15% | 59.6B | 25.10 | $4.70 | +1.36% |
| NEM | $59.65 | +2.39% | 65.5B | 13.40 | $4.39 | +1.70% |
| WPM | $89.73 | -0.08% | 40.6B | 65.71 | $1.36 | +0.53% |
| GOLD | $20.82 | -0.24% | 36.4B | 17.34 | $1.22 | +1.89% |
| FNV | $163.97 | +0.03% | 31.4B | 51.02 | $3.20 | +0.90% |
| AU | $45.85 | +0.61% | 23.1B | 21.00 | $2.18 | +0.27% |
| GFI | $23.85 | +0.76% | 21.2B | 17.19 | $1.38 | +2.29% |
| KGC | $15.64 | +0.06% | 19.1B | 15.86 | $0.98 | +0.77% |
| RGLD | $180.02 | +1.23% | 11.7B | 29.41 | $6.04 | +0.96% |
| AGI | $26.81 | +0.94% | 11.2B | 42.88 | $0.62 | +0.38% |
Stock Comparison
AEM vs NEM Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 65.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while NEM trades at $59.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs WPM Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while WPM trades at $89.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 65.71. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs GOLD Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while GOLD trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs FNV Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while FNV trades at $163.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 51.02. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs AU Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while AU trades at $45.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is more volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs GFI Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while GFI trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs KGC Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while KGC trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs RGLD Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while RGLD trades at $180.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs AGI Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while AGI trades at $26.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 42.88. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs HMY Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while HMY trades at $14.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs CDE Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while CDE trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs AUY Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs SBSW Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while SBSW trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -12.54. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs OR Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while OR trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 150.47. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs BTG Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while BTG trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is -7.69. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BTG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs IAG Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while IAG trades at $7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs EGO Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while EGO trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs NGD Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while NGD trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 27.36. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs HL Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while HL trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 49.79. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs HL-PB Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while HL-PB trades at $50.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 1696.67. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs ORLA Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while ORLA trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 36.70. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs SAND Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while SAND trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 93.70. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs EQX Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while EQX trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs SSRM Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while SSRM trades at $12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 30.98. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs NG Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while NG trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -15.92. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NG's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs CGAU Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while CGAU trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 40.33. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs SA Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while SA trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -133.73. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs ARMN Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while ARMN trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 42.50. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs DRD Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while DRD trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs CNL Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 944.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while CNL trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -23.19. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNL's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs IAUX Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 486.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while IAUX trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs GSS Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs DC Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while DC trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -11.94. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs CMCL Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 389M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while CMCL trades at $20.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs GAU Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 330.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while GAU trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -18.36. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs ODV Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 288.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while ODV trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs NFGC Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 286.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while NFGC trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs CTGO Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 242M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while CTGO trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTGO's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs DC-WT Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 187.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while DC-WT trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs THM Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 187M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while THM trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -44.98. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs IDR Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 180.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while IDR trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs USAU Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 173M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while USAU trades at $12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs GSV Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs GLDG Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 141.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while GLDG trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -7.23. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs VGZ Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while VGZ trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VGZ's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs HYMCL Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while HYMCL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is more volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs HYMC Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 117.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while HYMC trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs TRX Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 94.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while TRX trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -33.40. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs GORO Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while GORO trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs NVAWW Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while NVAWW trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is more volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs PZG Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while PZG trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs AAU Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAU's ROE of -11.79%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs ODVWZ Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while ODVWZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is more volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs AUST Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while AUST trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs HYMCW Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs HYMCZ Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs GPL Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs KL Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs PVG Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 59.6B. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $118.75, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.10, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.