Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited AEM Peers
See (AEM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEM | $106.49 | +1.63% | 53.83B | 28.17 | $3.78 | +1.51% |
| NEM | $49.86 | +2.47% | 55.49B | 11.36 | $4.39 | +2.02% |
| WPM | $78.77 | +2.97% | 35.74B | 57.92 | $1.36 | +0.80% |
| FNV | $158.97 | +2.19% | 30.62B | 49.68 | $3.20 | +0.92% |
| GOLD | $17.75 | +0.68% | 30.52B | 14.55 | $1.22 | +2.25% |
| AU | $40.44 | +1.43% | 20.36B | 18.55 | $2.18 | +2.24% |
| GFI | $20.79 | +3.77% | 18.60B | 15.06 | $1.38 | +2.63% |
| KGC | $13.76 | +2.00% | 16.93B | 14.33 | $0.96 | +0.87% |
| RGLD | $169.29 | +2.21% | 11.14B | 27.98 | $6.05 | +1.01% |
| AGI | $24.56 | +3.13% | 10.33B | 40.93 | $0.60 | +0.41% |
Stock Comparison
AEM vs NEM Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 55.49B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while NEM trades at $49.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs WPM Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 35.74B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while WPM trades at $78.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 57.92. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs FNV Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 30.62B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while FNV trades at $158.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 49.68. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs GOLD Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 30.52B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while GOLD trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs AU Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 20.36B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while AU trades at $40.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs GFI Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 18.60B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while GFI trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs KGC Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 16.93B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while KGC trades at $13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs RGLD Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 11.14B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while RGLD trades at $169.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs AGI Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 10.33B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while AGI trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 40.93. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs HMY Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 9.02B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while HMY trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs AUY Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.63B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs CDE Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while CDE trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs OR Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while OR trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 136.15. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs BTG Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 3.90B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while BTG trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is -6.28. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs EGO Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 3.68B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while EGO trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs IAG Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 3.60B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while IAG trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs SBSW Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while SBSW trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -8.28. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs HL-PB Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while HL-PB trades at $50.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 1683.33. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs HL Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while HL trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 40.25. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs NGD Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while NGD trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs ORLA Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 2.93B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while ORLA trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 33.65. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs EQX Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while EQX trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs SAND Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while SAND trades at $8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 81.45. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs SSRM Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while SSRM trades at $10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs NVAWW Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while NVAWW trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs CGAU Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while CGAU trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 36.22. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs NG Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while NG trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NG's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs DRD Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while DRD trades at $14.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs SA Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while SA trades at $11.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -46.44. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs ARMN Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while ARMN trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 35.56. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs CNL Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 818.75M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while CNL trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -29.24. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNL's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs GSS Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.33M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs GAU Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 324.05M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while GAU trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is 63.01. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs DC Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 312.17M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while DC trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs CMCL Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 298.68M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while CMCL trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs ODV Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 248.63M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while ODV trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs NFGC Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 236.72M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while NFGC trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs IAUX Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 226.69M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while IAUX trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs CTGO Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 188.22M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while CTGO trades at $15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTGO's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs IDR Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 179.17M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while IDR trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs GSV Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 155.95M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs GLDG Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 148.96M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while GLDG trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs THM Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 140.09M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while THM trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -33.69. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs USAU Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 130.86M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while USAU trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -7.53. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs VGZ Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 120.66M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while VGZ trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VGZ's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs DC-WT Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 92.76M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while DC-WT trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs TRX Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 87.28M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while TRX trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -30.94. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs GORO Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 78.68M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while GORO trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs HYMC Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 74.95M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while HYMC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +3.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs PZG Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 32.02M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while PZG trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs ODVWZ Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 21.96M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while ODVWZ trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs AAU Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.10M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAU's ROE of -11.79%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs AUST Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 15.66M. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while AUST trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs HYMCL Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 427216.00. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while HYMCL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +3.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.
AEM vs HYMCW Comparison
AEM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEM stands at 53.83B. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 34977.00. Regarding current trading prices, AEM is priced at $106.49, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +3.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AEM is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEM.