Archer-Daniels-Midland Company

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, TSN has a market cap of 19.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while TSN trades at $56.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas TSN's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TSN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to TSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, WLMIY has a market cap of 14.85B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while WLMIY trades at $23.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas WLMIY's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WLMIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to WLMIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, WLMIF has a market cap of 14.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while WLMIF trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas WLMIF's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WLMIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to WLMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, BG has a market cap of 10.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while BG trades at $77.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas BG's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to BG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, MNHVF has a market cap of 9.86B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while MNHVF trades at $19.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas MNHVF's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNHVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to MNHVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, MHGVY has a market cap of 9.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while MHGVY trades at $18.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas MHGVY's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MHGVY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to MHGVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, SFD has a market cap of 8.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while SFD trades at $22.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SFD's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to SFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, SALRF has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while SALRF trades at $54.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SALRF's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SALRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to SALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, KLKBF has a market cap of 6.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while KLKBF trades at $6.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas KLKBF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KLKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to KLKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, PPOKF has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while PPOKF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas PPOKF's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPOKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to PPOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, KLKBY has a market cap of 6.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while KLKBY trades at $5.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas KLKBY's P/E ratio is 35.47. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KLKBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to KLKBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, CHPFF has a market cap of 6.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while CHPFF trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CHPFF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHPFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to CHPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, SALRY has a market cap of 6.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while SALRY trades at $11.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SALRY's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SALRY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to SALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, CPOUF has a market cap of 6.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while CPOUF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CPOUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPOUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to CPOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, AAYYY has a market cap of 5.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while AAYYY trades at $9.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AAYYY's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAYYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to AAYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, CALM has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while CALM trades at $92.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CALM's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CALM's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to CALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, AGRO has a market cap of 4.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while AGRO trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AGRO's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGRO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to AGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, ACOPY has a market cap of 3.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while ACOPY trades at $5.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ACOPY's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACOPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to ACOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, BKFKF has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while BKFKF trades at $47.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas BKFKF's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKFKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to BKFKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, IBA has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while IBA trades at $53.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas IBA's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IBA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to IBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, IDBHF has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while IDBHF trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas IDBHF's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IDBHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to IDBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, GARPF has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while GARPF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas GARPF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GARPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to GARPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, UPBMF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while UPBMF trades at $3.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas UPBMF's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UPBMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to UPBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, KNKZF has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while KNKZF trades at $60.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas KNKZF's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KNKZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to KNKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, ASTVF has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while ASTVF trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ASTVF's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASTVF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to ASTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, FDP has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while FDP trades at $33.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas FDP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FDP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to FDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, VITL has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while VITL trades at $35.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas VITL's P/E ratio is 30.12. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VITL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to VITL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, SLCJY has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while SLCJY trades at $3.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SLCJY's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLCJY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to SLCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, DOLE has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while DOLE trades at $14.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas DOLE's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DOLE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to DOLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, DNDPF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while DNDPF trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas DNDPF's P/E ratio is -35.89. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNDPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to DNDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, PTABF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while PTABF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas PTABF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTABF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to PTABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, CTTQF has a market cap of 985.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while CTTQF trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CTTQF's P/E ratio is 70.67. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTTQF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to CTTQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, GRCLF has a market cap of 978.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while GRCLF trades at $4.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas GRCLF's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRCLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to GRCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, EDESY has a market cap of 931.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while EDESY trades at $24.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas EDESY's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EDESY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to EDESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, MRVSY has a market cap of 762.61M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while MRVSY trades at $5.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas MRVSY's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRVSY's ROE of -6.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to MRVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, GRGSF has a market cap of 673.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while GRGSF trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas GRGSF's P/E ratio is 2.86. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRGSF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to GRGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, PPLFF has a market cap of 613.80M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while PPLFF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas PPLFF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPLFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to PPLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, MHPSY has a market cap of 599.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while MHPSY trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas MHPSY's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MHPSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to MHPSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, SISAF has a market cap of 561.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while SISAF trades at $54.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SISAF's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SISAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to SISAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, AAGRY has a market cap of 546.61M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while AAGRY trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AAGRY's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAGRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to AAGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, ASAGF has a market cap of 530.43M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while ASAGF trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ASAGF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASAGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to ASAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, PPLFY has a market cap of 492.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while PPLFY trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas PPLFY's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPLFY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to PPLFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, BRCPF has a market cap of 441.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while BRCPF trades at $4.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas BRCPF's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRCPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to BRCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, ORENF has a market cap of 432.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while ORENF trades at $4.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ORENF's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORENF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to ORENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, SLMCF has a market cap of 429.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while SLMCF trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SLMCF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLMCF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to SLMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, SLCJF has a market cap of 382.08M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while SLCJF trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SLCJF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLCJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to SLCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, AEPLF has a market cap of 373.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while AEPLF trades at $9.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AEPLF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEPLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to AEPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, LND has a market cap of 359.61M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while LND trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas LND's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LND's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to LND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, CHSCN has a market cap of 336.34M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while CHSCN trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CHSCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHSCN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to CHSCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, CHSCP has a market cap of 335.03M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while CHSCP trades at $27.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CHSCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHSCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to CHSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, CHSCL has a market cap of 334.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while CHSCL trades at $25.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CHSCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHSCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to CHSCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, CHSCM has a market cap of 334.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while CHSCM trades at $24.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CHSCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHSCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to CHSCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, CHSCO has a market cap of 334.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while CHSCO trades at $26.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CHSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHSCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to CHSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, ALFDF has a market cap of 284.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while ALFDF trades at $7.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ALFDF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALFDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to ALFDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, LMNR has a market cap of 279.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while LMNR trades at $15.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas LMNR's P/E ratio is 35.98. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LMNR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to LMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, UVPOF has a market cap of 244.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while UVPOF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas UVPOF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UVPOF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to UVPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, SARDF has a market cap of 224.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while SARDF trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SARDF's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SARDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to SARDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, ALCO has a market cap of 223.78M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while ALCO trades at $29.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ALCO's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALCO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to ALCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, AFRI has a market cap of 214.67M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while AFRI trades at $7.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AFRI's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AFRI's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to AFRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, SARDY has a market cap of 175.04M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while SARDY trades at $9.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SARDY's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SARDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to SARDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, STNT has a market cap of 162.45M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while STNT trades at $6.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas STNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STNT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to STNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, AGFS has a market cap of 161.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while AGFS trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AGFS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGFS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to AGFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, DDEJF has a market cap of 129.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while DDEJF trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas DDEJF's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DDEJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to DDEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, DNDEF has a market cap of 79.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while DNDEF trades at $15.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas DNDEF's P/E ratio is -38.66. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNDEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to DNDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, VFF has a market cap of 77.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while VFF trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas VFF's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VFF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to VFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, HLKKF has a market cap of 48.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while HLKKF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas HLKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLKKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to HLKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, NNUTU has a market cap of 41.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while NNUTU trades at $3,750.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas NNUTU's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NNUTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to NNUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, AASZF has a market cap of 29.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while AASZF trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AASZF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AASZF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to AASZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, LOCL has a market cap of 26.80M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while LOCL trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas LOCL's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LOCL's ROE of +2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to LOCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, GARPY has a market cap of 23.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while GARPY trades at $18.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas GARPY's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GARPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to GARPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, PME has a market cap of 23.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while PME trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas PME's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PME's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to PME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, CTUNF has a market cap of 16.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while CTUNF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CTUNF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTUNF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to CTUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, CLAD has a market cap of 14.99M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while CLAD trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CLAD's P/E ratio is -33.67. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLAD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to CLAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, DTCK has a market cap of 14.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while DTCK trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas DTCK's P/E ratio is 30.01. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTCK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to DTCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, AFRIW has a market cap of 13.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while AFRIW trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AFRIW's P/E ratio is -21.70. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AFRIW's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to AFRIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, OPTHF has a market cap of 13.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while OPTHF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas OPTHF's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OPTHF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to OPTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, PRCF has a market cap of 12.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while PRCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas PRCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to PRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, CMGHY has a market cap of 11.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while CMGHY trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CMGHY's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMGHY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to CMGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, SANW has a market cap of 11.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while SANW trades at $5.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SANW's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SANW's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to SANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, APPHW has a market cap of 10.33M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while APPHW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas APPHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APPHW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to APPHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, APPH has a market cap of 10.33M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while APPH trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas APPH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APPH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to APPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, SDOT has a market cap of 8.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while SDOT trades at $1.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SDOT's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SDOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to SDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, PEASF has a market cap of 7.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while PEASF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas PEASF's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEASF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to PEASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, SPZI has a market cap of 6.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while SPZI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SPZI's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPZI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to SPZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, HERB has a market cap of 5.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while HERB trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas HERB's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HERB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to HERB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, CMGHF has a market cap of 4.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while CMGHF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CMGHF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMGHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to CMGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, AGRI has a market cap of 3.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while AGRI trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AGRI's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGRI's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to AGRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, EDBL has a market cap of 2.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while EDBL trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas EDBL's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EDBL's ROE of -11.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to EDBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, EDBLW has a market cap of 2.72M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while EDBLW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas EDBLW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EDBLW's ROE of -11.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to EDBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, AQB has a market cap of 2.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while AQB trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AQB's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AQB's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to AQB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, KAL has a market cap of 2.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while KAL trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas KAL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KAL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to KAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, KALWW has a market cap of 2.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while KALWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas KALWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KALWW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to KALWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, GSFD has a market cap of 1.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while GSFD trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas GSFD's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GSFD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to GSFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, GCEH has a market cap of 1.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while GCEH trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas GCEH's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GCEH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to GCEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, RSSFF has a market cap of 1.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while RSSFF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas RSSFF's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RSSFF's ROE of -5.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to RSSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 1.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while MINE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to MINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, STEV has a market cap of 1.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while STEV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas STEV's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STEV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to STEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, AAGR has a market cap of 1.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while AAGR trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AAGR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAGR's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to AAGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, PNDHF has a market cap of 847363.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while PNDHF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas PNDHF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNDHF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to PNDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, IGPFF has a market cap of 462979.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while IGPFF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas IGPFF's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IGPFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to IGPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, GLGLF has a market cap of 430015.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while GLGLF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas GLGLF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLGLF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to GLGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, AAGRW has a market cap of 315464.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while AAGRW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AAGRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAGRW's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to AAGRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, HERF has a market cap of 245182.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while HERF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas HERF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HERF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to HERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, MSAH has a market cap of 241135.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while MSAH trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas MSAH's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSAH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to MSAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, TAER has a market cap of 232968.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while TAER trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas TAER's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TAER's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to TAER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, MSRM has a market cap of 221637.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while MSRM trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas MSRM's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSRM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to MSRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, SHMP has a market cap of 123627.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while SHMP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SHMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHMP's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to SHMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, AGRIW has a market cap of 69232.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while AGRIW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AGRIW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGRIW's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to AGRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, CHYI has a market cap of 66074.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while CHYI trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CHYI's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHYI's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to CHYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, OGAA has a market cap of 46364.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while OGAA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas OGAA's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OGAA's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to OGAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, SUWN has a market cap of 19963.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while SUWN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SUWN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUWN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to SUWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, SIAF has a market cap of 18107.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while SIAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SIAF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to SIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, URYL has a market cap of 15104.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while URYL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas URYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to URYL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to URYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, FFRMF has a market cap of 1708.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while FFRMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas FFRMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FFRMF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to FFRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, BIQIF has a market cap of 1003.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while BIQIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas BIQIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIQIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to BIQIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, FLAF has a market cap of 921.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while FLAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas FLAF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to FLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, CFPI has a market cap of 384.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while CFPI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CFPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to CFPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, URBF has a market cap of 250.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while URBF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas URBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to URBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is less volatile compared to URBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, KALRQ has a market cap of 184.00. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while KALRQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas KALRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KALRQ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to KALRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, BYIN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while BYIN trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas BYIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BYIN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to BYIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, CAOX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while CAOX trades at $601.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CAOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to CAOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, TSLLF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while TSLLF trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas TSLLF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TSLLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to TSLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.

ADM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ADM stands at 22.80B. In comparison, OCESP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ADM is priced at $47.49, while OCESP trades at $16.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ADM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas OCESP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OCESP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADM is more volatile compared to OCESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADM.