Agricultural Bank of China Limited
Agricultural Bank of China Limited ACGBF Peers
See (ACGBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACGBF | $0.64 | N/A | 248.9B | 6.40 | $0.10 | +18.18% |
| IDCBF | $0.80 | N/A | 349.8B | 6.15 | $0.13 | +7.87% |
| IDCBY | $15.45 | -1.49% | 342.6B | 5.74 | $2.69 | +7.43% |
| BACRP | $193.00 | N/A | 333.4B | N/A | N/A | +3.63% |
| ACGBY | $17.55 | -0.57% | 280B | 6.75 | $2.60 | +12.82% |
| WFCNP | $1.50 | N/A | 245.5B | 0.37 | $4.03 | +2.20% |
| CICHY | $19.27 | -1.38% | 244.4B | 5.38 | $3.58 | +10.16% |
| CICHF | $0.97 | -4.86% | 233.3B | 5.11 | $0.19 | +11.55% |
| BACHF | $0.62 | +3.33% | 219.6B | 6.20 | $0.10 | +10.77% |
| BACHY | $14.47 | -2.33% | 208.6B | 5.57 | $2.60 | +10.00% |
Stock Comparison
ACGBF vs IDCBF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 349.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while IDCBF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to IDCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs IDCBY Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 342.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while IDCBY trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs BACRP Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 333.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while BACRP trades at $193.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to BACRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs ACGBY Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 280B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while ACGBY trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs WFCNP Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 245.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while WFCNP trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to WFCNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs CICHY Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 244.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while CICHY trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs CICHF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 233.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while CICHF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs BACHF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 219.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while BACHF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to BACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs BACHY Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 208.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while BACHY trades at $14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs HBCYF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 203.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while HBCYF trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs CMWAY Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 195.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while CMWAY trades at $116.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 30.84. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs CBAUF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 188.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while CBAUF trades at $112.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to CBAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs MBFJF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 156.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while MBFJF trades at $13.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs BCDRF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 124.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while BCDRF trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs SMFNF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 95.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while SMFNF trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs BBVXF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 85.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while BBVXF trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs NABZY Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while NABZY trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs NAUBF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while NAUBF trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to NAUBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs BCMXY Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while BCMXY trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs BKFCF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 72.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while BKFCF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to BKFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs WEBNF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while WEBNF trades at $21.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs INGVF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while INGVF trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to INGVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs BCLYF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while BCLYF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs ANZGY Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while ANZGY trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs RBSPF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while RBSPF trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs ANEWF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to ANEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs NTIOF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while NTIOF trades at $99.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs NBKCF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while NBKCF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs SCBFY Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while SCBFY trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs SCBFF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while SCBFF trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs TDBKF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs SVNLY Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while SVNLY trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs SVNLF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while SVNLF trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs RBCPF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs FANDF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while FANDF trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to FANDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs BNSPF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to BNSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs AAVMY Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while AAVMY trades at $26.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs ABMRF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while ABMRF trades at $26.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to ABMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs BNDSF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while BNDSF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to BNDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs BNDSY Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while BNDSY trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs EFGXY Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while EFGXY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to EFGXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs EFGIF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while EFGIF trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to EFGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs ALORY Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while ALORY trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to ALORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs CSGKF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to CSGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs FANDY Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while FANDY trades at $41.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to FANDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs PRRCF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while PRRCF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to PRRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs VUPPF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 613M. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to VUPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs BCSO Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 74.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while BCSO trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs ANZBY Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to ANZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.
ACGBF vs TNTTF Comparison
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 248.9B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.64, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.40, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is more volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.