ABB Ltd
ABB Ltd ABLZF Peers
See (ABLZF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABLZF | $65.95 | +0.15% | 120.6B | 28.98 | $2.28 | +1.54% |
| ABBNY | $65.06 | -0.66% | 118.9B | 28.56 | $2.28 | +1.52% |
| MIELY | $43.69 | +3.73% | 45.2B | 20.47 | $2.13 | +1.07% |
| MIELF | $21.76 | +8.75% | 45.1B | 20.72 | $1.05 | +1.55% |
| DLEGF | $3.00 | +0.00% | 40.3B | 60.00 | $0.05 | +0.46% |
| LGRVF | $145.85 | +0.00% | 38.2B | 27.68 | $5.27 | +1.57% |
| LGRDY | $28.88 | -0.82% | 37.8B | 27.49 | $1.05 | +1.67% |
| PRYMF | $75.79 | -1.38% | 21.7B | 27.16 | $2.79 | +1.20% |
| PRYMY | $37.18 | -0.46% | 21.5B | 26.54 | $1.40 | +1.23% |
| OSAGY | $51.10 | +0.00% | 15.3B | -26.34 | -$1.94 | +3.69% |
Stock Comparison
ABLZF vs ABBNY Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, ABBNY has a market cap of 118.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while ABBNY trades at $65.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas ABBNY's P/E ratio is 28.56. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ABBNY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to ABBNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs MIELY Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, MIELY has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while MIELY trades at $43.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas MIELY's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MIELY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to MIELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs MIELF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, MIELF has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while MIELF trades at $21.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas MIELF's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MIELF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to MIELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs DLEGF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, DLEGF has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while DLEGF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas DLEGF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DLEGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to DLEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs LGRVF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, LGRVF has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while LGRVF trades at $145.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas LGRVF's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LGRVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to LGRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs LGRDY Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, LGRDY has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while LGRDY trades at $28.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas LGRDY's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LGRDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to LGRDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs PRYMF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, PRYMF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while PRYMF trades at $75.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas PRYMF's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PRYMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to PRYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs PRYMY Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, PRYMY has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while PRYMY trades at $37.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas PRYMY's P/E ratio is 26.54. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PRYMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to PRYMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs OSAGY Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, OSAGY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while OSAGY trades at $51.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas OSAGY's P/E ratio is -26.34. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OSAGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to OSAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs PHPPY Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, PHPPY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while PHPPY trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas PHPPY's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PHPPY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to PHPPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs FELTF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, FELTF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while FELTF trades at $45.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas FELTF's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FELTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to FELTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs FELTY Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, FELTY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while FELTY trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas FELTY's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FELTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to FELTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs NEXNY Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, NEXNY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while NEXNY trades at $68.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas NEXNY's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to NEXNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs OSAGF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, OSAGF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while OSAGF trades at $53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas OSAGF's P/E ratio is -157.35. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OSAGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to OSAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs NXPRF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, NXPRF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while NXPRF trades at $119.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas NXPRF's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NXPRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to NXPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs YASKF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, YASKF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while YASKF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas YASKF's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to YASKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to YASKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs NRKBF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, NRKBF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while NRKBF trades at $81.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas NRKBF's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NRKBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to NRKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs FUWAF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, FUWAF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while FUWAF trades at $49.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas FUWAF's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FUWAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to FUWAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs FUWAY Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, FUWAY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while FUWAY trades at $23.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas FUWAY's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FUWAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to FUWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs SFFYF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, SFFYF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while SFFYF trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas SFFYF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SFFYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to SFFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs LMHDF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, LMHDF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while LMHDF trades at $2,548.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas LMHDF's P/E ratio is 40.16. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LMHDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to LMHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs YASKY Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, YASKY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while YASKY trades at $39.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas YASKY's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to YASKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to YASKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs LDGYY Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, LDGYY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while LDGYY trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas LDGYY's P/E ratio is -22.62. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LDGYY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to LDGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs LGYRF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, LGYRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while LGYRF trades at $61.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas LGYRF's P/E ratio is -20.76. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LGYRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to LGYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs GYUAF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, GYUAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while GYUAF trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas GYUAF's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GYUAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to GYUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs HMDPF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, HMDPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while HMDPF trades at $96.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas HMDPF's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HMDPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to HMDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs VLXGF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, VLXGF has a market cap of 939.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while VLXGF trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas VLXGF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VLXGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to VLXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs VARGF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, VARGF has a market cap of 861.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while VARGF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas VARGF's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VARGF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to VARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs HOIEF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, HOIEF has a market cap of 633M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while HOIEF trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas HOIEF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HOIEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to HOIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs EFLVF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, EFLVF has a market cap of 591.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while EFLVF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas EFLVF's P/E ratio is -179.50. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EFLVF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to EFLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs CBLNF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, CBLNF has a market cap of 586.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while CBLNF trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas CBLNF's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CBLNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to CBLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs CBLNY Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, CBLNY has a market cap of 561.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while CBLNY trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas CBLNY's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CBLNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to CBLNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs WSPCF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, WSPCF has a market cap of 536.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while WSPCF trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas WSPCF's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WSPCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to WSPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs RNRTY Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, RNRTY has a market cap of 513.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while RNRTY trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas RNRTY's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RNRTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to RNRTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs ZMTBY Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, ZMTBY has a market cap of 417.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while ZMTBY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas ZMTBY's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZMTBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to ZMTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs XPPLF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, XPPLF has a market cap of 334.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while XPPLF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas XPPLF's P/E ratio is -21.82. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to XPPLF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to XPPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs ALFNF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, ALFNF has a market cap of 330.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while ALFNF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas ALFNF's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ALFNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to ALFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs COSXF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, COSXF has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while COSXF trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas COSXF's P/E ratio is 43.81. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to COSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to COSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs CPWHF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, CPWHF has a market cap of 261.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while CPWHF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas CPWHF's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CPWHF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to CPWHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs ABHBY Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, ABHBY has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while ABHBY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas ABHBY's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ABHBY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to ABHBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs CRPHY Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, CRPHY has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while CRPHY trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas CRPHY's P/E ratio is -6.66. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CRPHY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to CRPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs NVNXF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, NVNXF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while NVNXF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas NVNXF's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NVNXF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to NVNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs PCELF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, PCELF has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while PCELF trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas PCELF's P/E ratio is -39.44. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PCELF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to PCELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs GELNF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, GELNF has a market cap of 134.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while GELNF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas GELNF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GELNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to GELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs FCELB Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, FCELB has a market cap of 120.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while FCELB trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas FCELB's P/E ratio is -974.03. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FCELB's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to FCELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs TNPOF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, TNPOF has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while TNPOF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas TNPOF's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TNPOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to TNPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs AFGYF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, AFGYF has a market cap of 109.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while AFGYF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas AFGYF's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AFGYF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to AFGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs DIALF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, DIALF has a market cap of 104M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while DIALF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas DIALF's P/E ratio is -7.65. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DIALF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to DIALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs ILIKF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, ILIKF has a market cap of 104M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while ILIKF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas ILIKF's P/E ratio is -19.17. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ILIKF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to ILIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs VARTY Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, VARTY has a market cap of 89.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while VARTY trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas VARTY's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VARTY's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to VARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs ONMBF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, ONMBF has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while ONMBF trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas ONMBF's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ONMBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to ONMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs TNTLF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, TNTLF has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while TNTLF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas TNTLF's P/E ratio is -59.63. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TNTLF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to TNTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs ARTGF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, ARTGF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while ARTGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas ARTGF's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ARTGF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to ARTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs NHHHF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, NHHHF has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while NHHHF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas NHHHF's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NHHHF's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to NHHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs EXROF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, EXROF has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while EXROF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas EXROF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EXROF's ROE of -3.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to EXROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs MNSEF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, MNSEF has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while MNSEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas MNSEF's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MNSEF's ROE of -3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to MNSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs IHGP Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, IHGP has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while IHGP trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas IHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IHGP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to IHGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs QBAK Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, QBAK has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while QBAK trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas QBAK's P/E ratio is -14.22. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to QBAK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to QBAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs ORBT Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, ORBT has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while ORBT trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas ORBT's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ORBT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to ORBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs LPSIF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, LPSIF has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while LPSIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas LPSIF's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LPSIF's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to LPSIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs SSCFF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, SSCFF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while SSCFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas SSCFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SSCFF's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to SSCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs ASTO Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, ASTO has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while ASTO trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas ASTO's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ASTO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to ASTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs DFEL Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, DFEL has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while DFEL trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas DFEL's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DFEL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to DFEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs HYEG Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, HYEG has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while HYEG trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas HYEG's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HYEG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to HYEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs LNNNF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, LNNNF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while LNNNF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas LNNNF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LNNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to LNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs GPGC Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, GPGC has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while GPGC trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas GPGC's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GPGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to GPGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs CECBF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, CECBF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while CECBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas CECBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CECBF's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to CECBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs LPENF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, LPENF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while LPENF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas LPENF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LPENF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to LPENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs OZSC Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, OZSC has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while OZSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas OZSC's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OZSC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to OZSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs EGTYF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, EGTYF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while EGTYF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas EGTYF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EGTYF's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to EGTYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs IDGC Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, IDGC has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while IDGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas IDGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IDGC's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to IDGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs GBLTF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, GBLTF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while GBLTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas GBLTF's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GBLTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to GBLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs CAPC Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, CAPC has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while CAPC trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas CAPC's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CAPC's ROE of -2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to CAPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs ENEVF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, ENEVF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while ENEVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas ENEVF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ENEVF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to ENEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs ZAIRF Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, ZAIRF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while ZAIRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas ZAIRF's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZAIRF's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to ZAIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs TOGI Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, TOGI has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while TOGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas TOGI's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TOGI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to TOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs USLG Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, USLG has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while USLG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas USLG's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to USLG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to USLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs LNNNY Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, LNNNY has a market cap of 980.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while LNNNY trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas LNNNY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LNNNY's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to LNNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs KRFG Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, KRFG has a market cap of 665.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while KRFG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas KRFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KRFG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to KRFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs SGLN Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, SGLN has a market cap of 569K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while SGLN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas SGLN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SGLN's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to SGLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs BSTK Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, BSTK has a market cap of 551.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while BSTK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas BSTK's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BSTK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to BSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs PSTO Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, PSTO has a market cap of 470.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while PSTO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas PSTO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PSTO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to PSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs HLXW Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, HLXW has a market cap of 265.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while HLXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas HLXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HLXW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to HLXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs IMHCW Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, IMHCW has a market cap of 204K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while IMHCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas IMHCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IMHCW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to IMHCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs TRUL Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, TRUL has a market cap of 21.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while TRUL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas TRUL's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TRUL's ROE of +7.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to TRUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs AIPG Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, AIPG has a market cap of 20.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while AIPG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas AIPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AIPG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to AIPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs EIPC Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, EIPC has a market cap of 20.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while EIPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas EIPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EIPC's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to EIPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs DLYT Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, DLYT has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while DLYT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas DLYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DLYT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to DLYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs CHGI Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, CHGI has a market cap of 13K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while CHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas CHGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CHGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to CHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs FDEI Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, FDEI has a market cap of 11.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while FDEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas FDEI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FDEI's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to FDEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs DCFCQ Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, DCFCQ has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while DCFCQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas DCFCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DCFCQ's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to DCFCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs LSCG Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, LSCG has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while LSCG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas LSCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LSCG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to LSCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs GNAL Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, GNAL has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while GNAL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas GNAL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GNAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to GNAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs GCHT Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, GCHT has a market cap of 5.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while GCHT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas GCHT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GCHT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to GCHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs USGA Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, USGA has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while USGA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas USGA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to USGA's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to USGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs GCLL Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, GCLL has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while GCLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas GCLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GCLL's ROE of +3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is less volatile compared to GCLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs XNNHQ Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, XNNHQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while XNNHQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas XNNHQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to XNNHQ's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to XNNHQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs TMGY Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, TMGY has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while TMGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas TMGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TMGY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to TMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.
ABLZF vs AXPWQ Comparison
ABLZF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLZF stands at 120.6B. In comparison, AXPWQ has a market cap of 960. Regarding current trading prices, ABLZF is priced at $65.95, while AXPWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLZF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.98, whereas AXPWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABLZF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AXPWQ's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLZF is more volatile compared to AXPWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLZF.