Almaden Minerals Ltd.

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while NEM trades at $63.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check NEM's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while AEM trades at $123.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check AEM's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while WPM trades at $91.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 67.45. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check WPM's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while GOLD trades at $21.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check GOLD's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while FNV trades at $160.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 50.04. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check FNV's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while AU trades at $49.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check AU's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while GFI trades at $24.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check GFI's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while KGC trades at $15.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check KGC's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while AGI trades at $25.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 40.84. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check AGI's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while RGLD trades at $151.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check RGLD's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while HMY trades at $13.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check HMY's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while SBSW trades at $9.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -15.64. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check SBSW's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while CDE trades at $9.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check CDE's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while AUY trades at $5.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check AUY's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while OR trades at $27.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 162.41. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check OR's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while EQX trades at $6.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check EQX's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while BTG trades at $3.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is -7.24. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to BTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check BTG's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while EGO trades at $20.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check EGO's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while IAG trades at $6.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check IAG's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while HL-PB trades at $51.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 1708.50. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check HL-PB's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while HL trades at $5.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check HL's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while NGD trades at $4.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check NGD's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while ORLA trades at $9.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 36.93. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check ORLA's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while SAND trades at $9.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 93.80. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check SAND's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while SSRM trades at $12.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 29.78. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check SSRM's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while NG trades at $5.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -20.12. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to NG's ROE of -14.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check NG's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while SA trades at $15.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -142.82. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check SA's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while CGAU trades at $7.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 39.92. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check CGAU's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while ARMN trades at $7.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 45.19. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check ARMN's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while DRD trades at $13.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check DRD's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 768.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while CNL trades at $8.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -18.87. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to CNL's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check CNL's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 478.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while IAUX trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check IAUX's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while GSS trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check GSS's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 420.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while DC trades at $3.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -12.13. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check DC's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 405.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while CMCL trades at $20.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check CMCL's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 383.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while NFGC trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -9.82. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check NFGC's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 374.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while GAU trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -20.79. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check GAU's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 314.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while ODV trades at $2.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check ODV's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 257.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while IDR trades at $18.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check IDR's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 245.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while CTGO trades at $19.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to CTGO's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check CTGO's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 228.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while THM trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -54.97. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check THM's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while DC-WT trades at $1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check DC-WT's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 169.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while HYMCL trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check HYMCL's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 162.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while GLDG trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -8.16. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check GLDG's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while GSV trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check GSV's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 154.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while USAU trades at $11.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check USAU's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 134.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while HYMC trades at $3.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check HYMC's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while VGZ trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to VGZ's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check VGZ's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 100.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while TRX trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -35.41. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check TRX's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while NVAWW trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check NVAWW's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 64.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while GORO trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check GORO's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while PZG trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check PZG's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while ODVWZ trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check ODVWZ's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while AUST trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check AUST's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check HYMCW's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while GPL trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check GPL's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while KL trades at $38.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check KL's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while PVG trades at $15.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check PVG's competition here

AAU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAU stands at 20.1M. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AAU is priced at $0.15, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAU currently has a P/E ratio of -2.09, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAU's ROE is -11.79%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AAU is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAU.Check HYMCZ's competition here