WEILONG Delicious Global Holdings Ltd
WEILONG Delicious Global Holdings Ltd (9985.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (9985.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9985.HK | HK$11.83 | +0.42% | 29.1B | 23.96 | HK$0.50 | +2.34% |
| 0288.HK | HK$8.02 | +1.39% | 102.3B | 8.05 | HK$0.99 | +6.48% |
| 0151.HK | HK$5.59 | -1.41% | 66.3B | 14.05 | HK$0.40 | +4.58% |
| 0322.HK | HK$11.19 | -3.37% | 63.9B | 15.75 | HK$0.72 | +3.49% |
| 2319.HK | HK$16.25 | -0.79% | 62.7B | 538.67 | HK$0.03 | +3.44% |
| 3799.HK | HK$3.73 | +0.81% | 51.1B | 15.54 | HK$0.24 | N/A |
| 6186.HK | HK$4.54 | -2.78% | 41.5B | 10.65 | HK$0.43 | +7.13% |
| 0142.HK | HK$6.34 | +2.42% | 27.6B | 5.85 | HK$1.11 | +3.93% |
| 9676.HK | HK$8.13 | +0.87% | 16B | 38.57 | HK$0.21 | +2.21% |
| 2555.HK | HK$9.41 | +0.53% | 13.9B | 25.51 | HK$0.37 | +6.42% |
Stock Comparison
9985.HK vs 0288.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 0288.HK has a market cap of 102.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 0288.HK trades at HK$8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 0288.HK's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 0288.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 0288.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 0288.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 0151.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 0151.HK has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 0151.HK trades at HK$5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 0151.HK's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 0151.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 0151.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 0151.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 0322.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 0322.HK has a market cap of 63.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 0322.HK trades at HK$11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 0322.HK's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 0322.HK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 0322.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 0322.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 2319.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 2319.HK has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 2319.HK trades at HK$16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 2319.HK's P/E ratio is 538.67. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 2319.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 2319.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 2319.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 3799.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 3799.HK has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 3799.HK trades at HK$3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 3799.HK's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 3799.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 3799.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 3799.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 6186.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 6186.HK has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 6186.HK trades at HK$4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 6186.HK's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 6186.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 6186.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 6186.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 0142.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 0142.HK has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 0142.HK trades at HK$6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 0142.HK's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 0142.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 0142.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 0142.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 9676.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 9676.HK has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 9676.HK trades at HK$8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 9676.HK's P/E ratio is 38.57. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 9676.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 9676.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 9676.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 2555.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 2555.HK has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 2555.HK trades at HK$9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 2555.HK's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 2555.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 2555.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 2555.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 1579.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 1579.HK has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 1579.HK trades at HK$13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 1579.HK's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1579.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 1579.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 1579.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 0345.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 0345.HK has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 0345.HK trades at HK$9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 0345.HK's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 0345.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 0345.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 0345.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 2517.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 2517.HK has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 2517.HK trades at HK$3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 2517.HK's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 2517.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is less volatile compared to 2517.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 2517.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 1610.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 1610.HK has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 1610.HK trades at HK$1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 1610.HK's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1610.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 1610.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 1610.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 1112.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 1112.HK has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 1112.HK trades at HK$11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 1112.HK's P/E ratio is -123.56. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1112.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 1112.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 1112.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 1475.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 1475.HK has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 1475.HK trades at HK$6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 1475.HK's P/E ratio is 35.68. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1475.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 1475.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 1475.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 1230.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 1230.HK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 1230.HK trades at HK$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 1230.HK's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1230.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 1230.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 1230.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 1458.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 1458.HK has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 1458.HK trades at HK$2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 1458.HK's P/E ratio is 68.00. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1458.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 1458.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 1458.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 1717.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 1717.HK has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 1717.HK trades at HK$2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 1717.HK's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1717.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 1717.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 1717.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 1497.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 1497.HK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 1497.HK trades at HK$8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 1497.HK's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1497.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 1497.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 1497.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 6868.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 6868.HK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 6868.HK trades at HK$3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 6868.HK's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 6868.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 6868.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 6868.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 6836.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 6836.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 6836.HK trades at HK$3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 6836.HK's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 6836.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 6836.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 6836.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 9977.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 9977.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 9977.HK trades at HK$1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 9977.HK's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 9977.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 9977.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 9977.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 0411.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 0411.HK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 0411.HK trades at HK$10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 0411.HK's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 0411.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 0411.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 0411.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 1837.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 1837.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 1837.HK trades at HK$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 1837.HK's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1837.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 1837.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 1837.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 3838.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 3838.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 3838.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 3838.HK's P/E ratio is 2.28. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 3838.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 3838.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 3838.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 8476.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 8476.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 8476.HK trades at HK$3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 8476.HK's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 8476.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 8476.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 8476.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 1583.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 1583.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 1583.HK trades at HK$1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 1583.HK's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1583.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 1583.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 1583.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 0829.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 0829.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 0829.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 0829.HK's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 0829.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 0829.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 0829.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 0809.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 0809.HK has a market cap of 994.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 0809.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 0809.HK's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 0809.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is less volatile compared to 0809.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 0809.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 2317.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 2317.HK has a market cap of 913.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 2317.HK trades at HK$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 2317.HK's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 2317.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is less volatile compared to 2317.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 2317.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 3999.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 3999.HK has a market cap of 650.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 3999.HK trades at HK$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 3999.HK's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 3999.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 3999.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 3999.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 2530.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 2530.HK has a market cap of 650M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 2530.HK trades at HK$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 2530.HK's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 2530.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 2530.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 2530.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 8609.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 8609.HK has a market cap of 585M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 8609.HK trades at HK$1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 8609.HK's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 8609.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 8609.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 8609.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 1262.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 1262.HK has a market cap of 425.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 1262.HK trades at HK$1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 1262.HK's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1262.HK's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 1262.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 1262.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 1285.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 1285.HK has a market cap of 410.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 1285.HK trades at HK$0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 1285.HK's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1285.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 1285.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 1285.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 2226.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 2226.HK has a market cap of 382M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 2226.HK trades at HK$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 2226.HK's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 2226.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is less volatile compared to 2226.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 2226.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 1068.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 1068.HK has a market cap of 304.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 1068.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 1068.HK's P/E ratio is -8.35. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1068.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 1068.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 1068.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 0926.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 0926.HK has a market cap of 302M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 0926.HK trades at HK$2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 0926.HK's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 0926.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 0926.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 0926.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 1767.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 1767.HK has a market cap of 275M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 1767.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 1767.HK's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1767.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 1767.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 1767.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 3889.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 3889.HK has a market cap of 210.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 3889.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 3889.HK's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 3889.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 3889.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 3889.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 1676.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 1676.HK has a market cap of 113.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 1676.HK trades at HK$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 1676.HK's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1676.HK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 1676.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 1676.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 0834.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 0834.HK has a market cap of 112.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 0834.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 0834.HK's P/E ratio is -4.96. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 0834.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is less volatile compared to 0834.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 0834.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 1695.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 1695.HK has a market cap of 108M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 1695.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 1695.HK's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1695.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is less volatile compared to 1695.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 1695.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 0932.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 0932.HK has a market cap of 90.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 0932.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 0932.HK's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 0932.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 0932.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 0932.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 8362.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 8362.HK has a market cap of 84M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 8362.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 8362.HK's P/E ratio is -26.09. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 8362.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is less volatile compared to 8362.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 8362.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 0841.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 0841.HK has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 0841.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 0841.HK's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 0841.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is more volatile compared to 0841.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 0841.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 2147.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 2147.HK has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 2147.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 2147.HK's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 2147.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is less volatile compared to 2147.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 2147.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 8241.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 8241.HK has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 8241.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 8241.HK's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 8241.HK's ROE of -4.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is less volatile compared to 8241.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 8241.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 1340.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 1340.HK has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 1340.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 1340.HK's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1340.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is less volatile compared to 1340.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 1340.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 8179.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 8179.HK has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 8179.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 8179.HK's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 8179.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is less volatile compared to 8179.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 8179.HK's competition here
9985.HK vs 6183.HK Comparison August 2025
9985.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9985.HK stands at 29.1B. In comparison, 6183.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 9985.HK is priced at HK$11.83, while 6183.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9985.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas 6183.HK's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, 9985.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 6183.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9985.HK is less volatile compared to 6183.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9985.HK.Check 6183.HK's competition here