Vedan International (Holdings) Limited (2317.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2317.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2317.HK | HK$0.70 | -1.41% | 1.1B | 8.01 | HK$0.09 | +12.48% |
| 0288.HK | HK$8.35 | +0.48% | 105.6B | 8.00 | HK$1.03 | +11.06% |
| 2319.HK | HK$18.32 | -0.43% | 70.9B | -282.31 | -HK$0.07 | +3.26% |
| 0322.HK | HK$11.48 | -2.30% | 64.1B | 10.90 | HK$1.04 | +8.10% |
| 3799.HK | HK$3.73 | +0.81% | 51.1B | 15.54 | HK$0.24 | N/A |
| 0151.HK | HK$3.48 | -0.29% | 41.5B | 4.39 | HK$0.80 | +4.52% |
| 6186.HK | HK$3.21 | -0.93% | 28.5B | 12.74 | HK$0.25 | +7.71% |
| 0142.HK | HK$5.34 | +0.95% | 22.8B | 3.78 | HK$1.41 | +5.05% |
| 9985.HK | HK$7.61 | -1.42% | 18.7B | 11.36 | HK$0.68 | +5.12% |
| 1579.HK | HK$15.26 | -1.68% | 14.9B | 15.80 | HK$0.97 | +5.91% |
Stock Comparison
2317.HK vs 0288.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0288.HK has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 0288.HK trades at HK$8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 0288.HK's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0288.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 0288.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 0288.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 2319.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 2319.HK has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 2319.HK trades at HK$18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 2319.HK's P/E ratio is -282.31. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2319.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 2319.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 2319.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 0322.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0322.HK has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 0322.HK trades at HK$11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 0322.HK's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0322.HK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 0322.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 0322.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 3799.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 3799.HK has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 3799.HK trades at HK$3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 3799.HK's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3799.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 3799.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 3799.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 0151.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0151.HK has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 0151.HK trades at HK$3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 0151.HK's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0151.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 0151.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 0151.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 6186.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 6186.HK has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 6186.HK trades at HK$3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 6186.HK's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6186.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 6186.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 6186.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 0142.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0142.HK has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 0142.HK trades at HK$5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 0142.HK's P/E ratio is 3.78. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0142.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 0142.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 0142.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 9985.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 9985.HK has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 9985.HK trades at HK$7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9985.HK's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9985.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 9985.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 9985.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 1579.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1579.HK has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 1579.HK trades at HK$15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 1579.HK's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1579.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 1579.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 1579.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 6658.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 6658.HK has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 6658.HK trades at HK$144.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 6658.HK's P/E ratio is 57.57. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6658.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 6658.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 6658.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 1112.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1112.HK has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 1112.HK trades at HK$15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 1112.HK's P/E ratio is 45.77. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1112.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 1112.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 1112.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 2555.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 2555.HK has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 2555.HK trades at HK$4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 2555.HK's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2555.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 2555.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 2555.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 9676.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 9676.HK has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 9676.HK trades at HK$4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9676.HK's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9676.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 9676.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 9676.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 1475.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1475.HK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 1475.HK trades at HK$6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 1475.HK's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1475.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 1475.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 1475.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 0345.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0345.HK has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 0345.HK trades at HK$6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 0345.HK's P/E ratio is 29.32. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0345.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 0345.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 0345.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 1230.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1230.HK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 1230.HK trades at HK$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 1230.HK's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1230.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 1230.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 1230.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 1610.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1610.HK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 1610.HK trades at HK$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 1610.HK's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1610.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 1610.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 1610.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 2517.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 2517.HK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 2517.HK trades at HK$1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 2517.HK's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2517.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 2517.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 2517.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 6683.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 6683.HK has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 6683.HK trades at HK$4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 6683.HK's P/E ratio is -82.20. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6683.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 6683.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 6683.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 1837.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1837.HK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 1837.HK trades at HK$1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 1837.HK's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1837.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 1837.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 1837.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 6836.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 6836.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 6836.HK trades at HK$3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 6836.HK's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6836.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 6836.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 6836.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 9977.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 9977.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 9977.HK trades at HK$1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9977.HK's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9977.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 9977.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 9977.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 6868.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 6868.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 6868.HK trades at HK$2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 6868.HK's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6868.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 6868.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 6868.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 2648.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 2648.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 2648.HK trades at HK$73.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 2648.HK's P/E ratio is 36.62. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2648.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 2648.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 2648.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 0411.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0411.HK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 0411.HK trades at HK$11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 0411.HK's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0411.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 0411.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 0411.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 1458.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1458.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 1458.HK trades at HK$1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 1458.HK's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1458.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 1458.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 1458.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 1717.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1717.HK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 1717.HK trades at HK$1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 1717.HK's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1717.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 1717.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 1717.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 8476.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 8476.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 8476.HK trades at HK$4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8476.HK's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8476.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 8476.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 8476.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 6980.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 6980.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 6980.HK trades at HK$22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 6980.HK's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6980.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 6980.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 6980.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 2797.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 2797.HK has a market cap of 799.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 2797.HK trades at HK$32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 2797.HK's P/E ratio is 62.53. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2797.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 2797.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 2797.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 2530.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 2530.HK has a market cap of 770M. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 2530.HK trades at HK$0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 2530.HK's P/E ratio is 77.00. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2530.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 2530.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 2530.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 1262.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1262.HK has a market cap of 748.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 1262.HK trades at HK$3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 1262.HK's P/E ratio is -13.52. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1262.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 1262.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 1262.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 8609.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 8609.HK has a market cap of 585M. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 8609.HK trades at HK$1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8609.HK's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8609.HK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 8609.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 8609.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 3999.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 3999.HK has a market cap of 569.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 3999.HK trades at HK$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 3999.HK's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3999.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 3999.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 3999.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 1285.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1285.HK has a market cap of 435.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 1285.HK trades at HK$1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 1285.HK's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1285.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 1285.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 1285.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 1767.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1767.HK has a market cap of 320M. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 1767.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 1767.HK's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1767.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 1767.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 1767.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 0926.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0926.HK has a market cap of 294.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 0926.HK trades at HK$2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 0926.HK's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0926.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 0926.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 0926.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 2226.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 2226.HK has a market cap of 277.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 2226.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 2226.HK's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2226.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 2226.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 2226.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 1068.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1068.HK has a market cap of 144M. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 1068.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 1068.HK's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1068.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 1068.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 1068.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 0834.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0834.HK has a market cap of 129.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 0834.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 0834.HK's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0834.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 0834.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 0834.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 1695.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1695.HK has a market cap of 86.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 1695.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 1695.HK's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1695.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 1695.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 1695.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 0932.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0932.HK has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 0932.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 0932.HK's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0932.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 0932.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 0932.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 0841.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0841.HK has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 0841.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 0841.HK's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0841.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 0841.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 0841.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 1676.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1676.HK has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 1676.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 1676.HK's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1676.HK's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 1676.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 1676.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 8179.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 8179.HK has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 8179.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8179.HK's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8179.HK's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is more volatile compared to 8179.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 8179.HK's competition here
2317.HK vs 6183.HK Comparison July 2026
2317.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2317.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 6183.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2317.HK is priced at HK$0.70, while 6183.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 6183.HK's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, 2317.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6183.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2317.HK is less volatile compared to 6183.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2317.HK.Check 6183.HK's competition here