Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 9977.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 9977.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9977.HK | HK$1.99 | +0.00% | 3.2B | 9.95 | HK$0.20 | N/A |
| 3288.HK | HK$32.08 | +0.12% | 235.5B | 23.16 | HK$1.39 | N/A |
| 0288.HK | HK$8.20 | -0.06% | 105.1B | 7.97 | HK$1.03 | +11.09% |
| 0322.HK | HK$13.43 | -1.54% | 75.7B | 12.87 | HK$1.04 | +6.76% |
| 2319.HK | HK$18.73 | -0.48% | 72.4B | -288.15 | -HK$0.07 | +3.18% |
| 3799.HK | HK$3.73 | +0.81% | 51.1B | 15.54 | HK$0.24 | N/A |
| 0151.HK | HK$3.29 | -0.30% | 38.8B | 4.11 | HK$0.80 | +4.82% |
| 6186.HK | HK$3.19 | -0.93% | 28.1B | 12.54 | HK$0.25 | +7.76% |
| 0142.HK | HK$5.20 | +0.29% | 22.2B | 3.68 | HK$1.41 | +5.43% |
| 9985.HK | HK$8.31 | -0.89% | 20.2B | 12.28 | HK$0.68 | +4.69% |
Stock Comparison
Haitian Flav (HKSE: 3288.HK)
9977.HK vs 3288.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 3288.HK has a market cap of 235.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 3288.HK trades at HK$32.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 3288.HK's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3288.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 3288.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 3288.HK's competition here
WH Group Limited (HKSE: 0288.HK)
9977.HK vs 0288.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0288.HK has a market cap of 105.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 0288.HK trades at HK$8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 0288.HK's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0288.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 0288.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 0288.HK's competition here
Tingyi (Cayman Islands) Holding Corp. (HKSE: 0322.HK)
9977.HK vs 0322.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0322.HK has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 0322.HK trades at HK$13.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 0322.HK's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0322.HK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 0322.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 0322.HK's competition here
China Mengniu Dairy Company Limited (HKSE: 2319.HK)
9977.HK vs 2319.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 2319.HK has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 2319.HK trades at HK$18.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 2319.HK's P/E ratio is -288.15. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2319.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 2319.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 2319.HK's competition here
Dali Foods Group Company Limited (HKSE: 3799.HK)
9977.HK vs 3799.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 3799.HK has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 3799.HK trades at HK$3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 3799.HK's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3799.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 3799.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 3799.HK's competition here
Want Want China Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0151.HK)
9977.HK vs 0151.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0151.HK has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 0151.HK trades at HK$3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 0151.HK's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0151.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 0151.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 0151.HK's competition here
China Feihe Limited (HKSE: 6186.HK)
9977.HK vs 6186.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 6186.HK has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 6186.HK trades at HK$3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 6186.HK's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6186.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 6186.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 6186.HK's competition here
First Pacific Company Limited (HKSE: 0142.HK)
9977.HK vs 0142.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0142.HK has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 0142.HK trades at HK$5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 0142.HK's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0142.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 0142.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 0142.HK's competition here
WEILONG Delicious Global Holdings Ltd (HKSE: 9985.HK)
9977.HK vs 9985.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 9985.HK has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 9985.HK trades at HK$8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 9985.HK's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9985.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 9985.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 9985.HK's competition here
Yihai International Holding Ltd. (HKSE: 1579.HK)
9977.HK vs 1579.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 1579.HK has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 1579.HK trades at HK$15.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 1579.HK's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1579.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 1579.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 1579.HK's competition here
Liuliumei (HKSE: 6658.HK)
9977.HK vs 6658.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 6658.HK has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 6658.HK trades at HK$145.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 6658.HK's P/E ratio is 56.29. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6658.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 6658.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 6658.HK's competition here
Health and Happiness (H&H) International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1112.HK)
9977.HK vs 1112.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 1112.HK has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 1112.HK trades at HK$14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 1112.HK's P/E ratio is 44.72. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1112.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 1112.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 1112.HK's competition here
Sichuan Baicha Baidao Industrial Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2555.HK)
9977.HK vs 2555.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 2555.HK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 2555.HK trades at HK$4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 2555.HK's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2555.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 2555.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 2555.HK's competition here
Nissin Foods Company Limited (HKSE: 1475.HK)
9977.HK vs 1475.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 1475.HK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 1475.HK trades at HK$6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 1475.HK's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1475.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 1475.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 1475.HK's competition here
Vitasoy International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0345.HK)
9977.HK vs 0345.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0345.HK has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 0345.HK trades at HK$6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 0345.HK's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0345.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 0345.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 0345.HK's competition here
Yashili International Holdings Ltd (HKSE: 1230.HK)
9977.HK vs 1230.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 1230.HK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 1230.HK trades at HK$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 1230.HK's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1230.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 1230.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 1230.HK's competition here
Shiyue Daotian Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9676.HK)
9977.HK vs 9676.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 9676.HK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 9676.HK trades at HK$4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 9676.HK's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9676.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 9676.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 9676.HK's competition here
COFCO Joycome Foods Limited (HKSE: 1610.HK)
9977.HK vs 1610.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 1610.HK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 1610.HK trades at HK$1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 1610.HK's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1610.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 1610.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 1610.HK's competition here
Guoquan Food (Shanghai) Co Ltd (HKSE: 2517.HK)
9977.HK vs 2517.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 2517.HK has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 2517.HK trades at HK$1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 2517.HK's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2517.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 2517.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 2517.HK's competition here
Star Plus Legend Holdings Limited (HKSE: 6683.HK)
9977.HK vs 6683.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 6683.HK has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 6683.HK trades at HK$4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 6683.HK's P/E ratio is -84.20. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6683.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 6683.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 6683.HK's competition here
Natural Food International Holding Limited (HKSE: 1837.HK)
9977.HK vs 1837.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 1837.HK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 1837.HK trades at HK$1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 1837.HK's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1837.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 1837.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 1837.HK's competition here
Tianyun International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 6836.HK)
9977.HK vs 6836.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 6836.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 6836.HK trades at HK$3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 6836.HK's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6836.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 6836.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 6836.HK's competition here
Tenfu (Cayman) Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 6868.HK)
9977.HK vs 6868.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 6868.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 6868.HK trades at HK$2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 6868.HK's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6868.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is similarly volatile compared to 6868.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 6868.HK's competition here
Xiamen Yan Palace Bird's Nest Industry Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1497.HK)
9977.HK vs 1497.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 1497.HK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 1497.HK trades at HK$6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 1497.HK's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1497.HK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 1497.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 1497.HK's competition here
Lam Soon (Hong Kong) Limited (HKSE: 0411.HK)
9977.HK vs 0411.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0411.HK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 0411.HK trades at HK$11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 0411.HK's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0411.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is similarly volatile compared to 0411.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 0411.HK's competition here
Anjoy Foods Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2648.HK)
9977.HK vs 2648.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 2648.HK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 2648.HK trades at HK$64.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 2648.HK's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2648.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 2648.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 2648.HK's competition here
Jiangxi Qiyunshan Food Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2797.HK)
9977.HK vs 2797.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 2797.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 2797.HK trades at HK$101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 2797.HK's P/E ratio is 197.50. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2797.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 2797.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 2797.HK's competition here
Zhou Hei Ya International Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 1458.HK)
9977.HK vs 1458.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 1458.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 1458.HK trades at HK$1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 1458.HK's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1458.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 1458.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 1458.HK's competition here
Ausnutria Dairy Corporation Ltd (HKSE: 1717.HK)
9977.HK vs 1717.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 1717.HK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 1717.HK trades at HK$1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 1717.HK's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1717.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 1717.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 1717.HK's competition here
Bama Tea Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6980.HK)
9977.HK vs 6980.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 6980.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 6980.HK trades at HK$29.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 6980.HK's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6980.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 6980.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 6980.HK's competition here
Ocean One Holding Ltd. (HKSE: 8476.HK)
9977.HK vs 8476.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 8476.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 8476.HK trades at HK$4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 8476.HK's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8476.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 8476.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 8476.HK's competition here
Vedan International (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 2317.HK)
9977.HK vs 2317.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 2317.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 2317.HK trades at HK$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 2317.HK's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2317.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is similarly volatile compared to 2317.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 2317.HK's competition here
China Starch Holdings Limited (HKSE: 3838.HK)
9977.HK vs 3838.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 3838.HK has a market cap of 941.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 3838.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 3838.HK's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3838.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 3838.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 3838.HK's competition here
Labixiaoxin Snacks Group Limited (HKSE: 1262.HK)
9977.HK vs 1262.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 1262.HK has a market cap of 813.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 1262.HK trades at HK$3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 1262.HK's P/E ratio is -14.68. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1262.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is similarly volatile compared to 1262.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 1262.HK's competition here
Numans (HKSE: 2530.HK)
9977.HK vs 2530.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 2530.HK has a market cap of 745M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 2530.HK trades at HK$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 2530.HK's P/E ratio is 74.50. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2530.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 2530.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 2530.HK's competition here
Eggriculture Foods Ltd. (HKSE: 8609.HK)
9977.HK vs 8609.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 8609.HK has a market cap of 585M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 8609.HK trades at HK$1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 8609.HK's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8609.HK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is similarly volatile compared to 8609.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 8609.HK's competition here
DaChan Food (Asia) Limited (HKSE: 3999.HK)
9977.HK vs 3999.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 3999.HK has a market cap of 579.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 3999.HK trades at HK$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 3999.HK's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3999.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is similarly volatile compared to 3999.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 3999.HK's competition here
Jiashili Group Limited (HKSE: 1285.HK)
9977.HK vs 1285.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 1285.HK has a market cap of 522.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 1285.HK trades at HK$1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 1285.HK's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1285.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 1285.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 1285.HK's competition here
Shenguan Holdings (Group) Limited (HKSE: 0829.HK)
9977.HK vs 0829.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0829.HK has a market cap of 487.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 0829.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 0829.HK's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0829.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 0829.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 0829.HK's competition here
TS Wonders Holding Limited (HKSE: 1767.HK)
9977.HK vs 1767.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 1767.HK has a market cap of 315M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 1767.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 1767.HK's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1767.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is similarly volatile compared to 1767.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 1767.HK's competition here
Besunyen Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 0926.HK)
9977.HK vs 0926.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0926.HK has a market cap of 305.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 0926.HK trades at HK$2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 0926.HK's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0926.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 0926.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 0926.HK's competition here
Honworld Group Limited (HKSE: 2226.HK)
9977.HK vs 2226.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 2226.HK has a market cap of 274.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 2226.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 2226.HK's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2226.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is similarly volatile compared to 2226.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 2226.HK's competition here
China Yurun Food Group Limited (HKSE: 1068.HK)
9977.HK vs 1068.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 1068.HK has a market cap of 142.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 1068.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 1068.HK's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1068.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 1068.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 1068.HK's competition here
Shengrong Holding Ltd (HKSE: 0834.HK)
9977.HK vs 0834.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0834.HK has a market cap of 111.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 0834.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 0834.HK's P/E ratio is -8.13. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0834.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 0834.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 0834.HK's competition here
Asia Cassava Resources Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0841.HK)
9977.HK vs 0841.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0841.HK has a market cap of 102.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 0841.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 0841.HK's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0841.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 0841.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 0841.HK's competition here
Global Corn Group Limited (HKSE: 3889.HK)
9977.HK vs 3889.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 3889.HK has a market cap of 88.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 3889.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 3889.HK's P/E ratio is 1.08. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3889.HK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 3889.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 3889.HK's competition here
Shunten International (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0932.HK)
9977.HK vs 0932.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0932.HK has a market cap of 87M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 0932.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 0932.HK's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0932.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 0932.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 0932.HK's competition here
S&P International Holding Limited (HKSE: 1695.HK)
9977.HK vs 1695.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 1695.HK has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 1695.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 1695.HK's P/E ratio is 3.86. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1695.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is similarly volatile compared to 1695.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 1695.HK's competition here
Winning Tower Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8362.HK)
9977.HK vs 8362.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 8362.HK has a market cap of 82.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 8362.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 8362.HK's P/E ratio is 1180.00. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8362.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 8362.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 8362.HK's competition here
Pu'er Lancang Ancient Tea Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6911.HK)
9977.HK vs 6911.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 6911.HK has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 6911.HK trades at HK$2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 6911.HK's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6911.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is similarly volatile compared to 6911.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 6911.HK's competition here
Huisheng International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1340.HK)
9977.HK vs 1340.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 1340.HK has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 1340.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 1340.HK's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1340.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 1340.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 1340.HK's competition here
Gaodi Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1676.HK)
9977.HK vs 1676.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 1676.HK has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 1676.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 1676.HK's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1676.HK's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 1676.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 1676.HK's competition here
Palinda Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8179.HK)
9977.HK vs 8179.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 8179.HK has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 8179.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 8179.HK's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8179.HK's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is similarly volatile compared to 8179.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 8179.HK's competition here
China Greenfresh Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6183.HK)
9977.HK vs 6183.HK Comparison August 2026
Shandong Fengxiang Co., Ltd (HKSE: 9977.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9977.HK stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 6183.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 9977.HK is priced at HK$1.99 on the HKSE, while 6183.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9977.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.95, whereas 6183.HK's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, 9977.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6183.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9977.HK is less volatile compared to 6183.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9977.HK.Check 6183.HK's competition here