XPeng Inc.
XPeng Inc. (9868.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (9868.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9868.HK | HK$79.00 | +0.70% | 150.5B | -30.86 | -HK$2.56 | N/A |
| 1211.HK | HK$96.75 | -1.48% | 911.9B | 61.23 | HK$1.58 | +1.49% |
| 0175.HK | HK$17.40 | +0.06% | 190.2B | 10.51 | HK$1.67 | +1.90% |
| 9927.HK | HK$90.50 | +0.61% | 188.8B | 17.37 | HK$5.21 | N/A |
| 2333.HK | HK$12.82 | -0.08% | 160B | 8.90 | HK$1.44 | +3.84% |
| 80175.HK | HK$15.32 | -0.65% | 154.5B | N/A | N/A | +1.90% |
| 9973.HK | HK$25.60 | -2.74% | 147.6B | 8.15 | HK$3.14 | N/A |
| 2015.HK | HK$67.90 | -3.21% | 137.2B | 15.65 | HK$4.34 | N/A |
| 9866.HK | HK$44.80 | -0.22% | 93.9B | -3.42 | -HK$13.11 | N/A |
| 2238.HK | HK$3.43 | -1.72% | 82B | -8.57 | -HK$0.40 | +1.59% |
Stock Comparison
9868.HK vs 1211.HK Comparison March 2026
9868.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9868.HK stands at 150.5B. In comparison, 1211.HK has a market cap of 911.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9868.HK is priced at HK$79.00, while 1211.HK trades at HK$96.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9868.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.86, whereas 1211.HK's P/E ratio is 61.23. In terms of profitability, 9868.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1211.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 9868.HK is more volatile compared to 1211.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9868.HK.Check 1211.HK's competition here
9868.HK vs 0175.HK Comparison March 2026
9868.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9868.HK stands at 150.5B. In comparison, 0175.HK has a market cap of 190.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9868.HK is priced at HK$79.00, while 0175.HK trades at HK$17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9868.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.86, whereas 0175.HK's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, 9868.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0175.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9868.HK is more volatile compared to 0175.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9868.HK.Check 0175.HK's competition here
9868.HK vs 9927.HK Comparison March 2026
9868.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9868.HK stands at 150.5B. In comparison, 9927.HK has a market cap of 188.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9868.HK is priced at HK$79.00, while 9927.HK trades at HK$90.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9868.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.86, whereas 9927.HK's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, 9868.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 9927.HK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 9868.HK is more volatile compared to 9927.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9868.HK.Check 9927.HK's competition here
9868.HK vs 2333.HK Comparison March 2026
9868.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9868.HK stands at 150.5B. In comparison, 2333.HK has a market cap of 160B. Regarding current trading prices, 9868.HK is priced at HK$79.00, while 2333.HK trades at HK$12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9868.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.86, whereas 2333.HK's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, 9868.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 2333.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9868.HK is more volatile compared to 2333.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9868.HK.Check 2333.HK's competition here
9868.HK vs 80175.HK Comparison March 2026
9868.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9868.HK stands at 150.5B. In comparison, 80175.HK has a market cap of 154.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9868.HK is priced at HK$79.00, while 80175.HK trades at HK$15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9868.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.86, whereas 80175.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 9868.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 80175.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9868.HK is more volatile compared to 80175.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9868.HK.Check 80175.HK's competition here
9868.HK vs 9973.HK Comparison March 2026
9868.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9868.HK stands at 150.5B. In comparison, 9973.HK has a market cap of 147.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9868.HK is priced at HK$79.00, while 9973.HK trades at HK$25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9868.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.86, whereas 9973.HK's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, 9868.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 9973.HK's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 9868.HK is less volatile compared to 9973.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9868.HK.Check 9973.HK's competition here
9868.HK vs 2015.HK Comparison March 2026
9868.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9868.HK stands at 150.5B. In comparison, 2015.HK has a market cap of 137.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9868.HK is priced at HK$79.00, while 2015.HK trades at HK$67.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9868.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.86, whereas 2015.HK's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, 9868.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 2015.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9868.HK is more volatile compared to 2015.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9868.HK.Check 2015.HK's competition here
9868.HK vs 9866.HK Comparison March 2026
9868.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9868.HK stands at 150.5B. In comparison, 9866.HK has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9868.HK is priced at HK$79.00, while 9866.HK trades at HK$44.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9868.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.86, whereas 9866.HK's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, 9868.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 9866.HK's ROE of -9.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 9868.HK is less volatile compared to 9866.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9868.HK.Check 9866.HK's competition here
9868.HK vs 2238.HK Comparison March 2026
9868.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9868.HK stands at 150.5B. In comparison, 2238.HK has a market cap of 82B. Regarding current trading prices, 9868.HK is priced at HK$79.00, while 2238.HK trades at HK$3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9868.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.86, whereas 2238.HK's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, 9868.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 2238.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9868.HK is more volatile compared to 2238.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9868.HK.Check 2238.HK's competition here
9868.HK vs 0489.HK Comparison March 2026
9868.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9868.HK stands at 150.5B. In comparison, 0489.HK has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9868.HK is priced at HK$79.00, while 0489.HK trades at HK$9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9868.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.86, whereas 0489.HK's P/E ratio is -119.25. In terms of profitability, 9868.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0489.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9868.HK is more volatile compared to 0489.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9868.HK.Check 0489.HK's competition here
9868.HK vs 9863.HK Comparison March 2026
9868.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9868.HK stands at 150.5B. In comparison, 9863.HK has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9868.HK is priced at HK$79.00, while 9863.HK trades at HK$44.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9868.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.86, whereas 9863.HK's P/E ratio is -88.32. In terms of profitability, 9868.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 9863.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9868.HK is less volatile compared to 9863.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9868.HK.Check 9863.HK's competition here
9868.HK vs 1585.HK Comparison March 2026
9868.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9868.HK stands at 150.5B. In comparison, 1585.HK has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9868.HK is priced at HK$79.00, while 1585.HK trades at HK$11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9868.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.86, whereas 1585.HK's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, 9868.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1585.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 9868.HK is less volatile compared to 1585.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9868.HK.Check 1585.HK's competition here
9868.HK vs 1114.HK Comparison March 2026
9868.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9868.HK stands at 150.5B. In comparison, 1114.HK has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9868.HK is priced at HK$79.00, while 1114.HK trades at HK$3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9868.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.86, whereas 1114.HK's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, 9868.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1114.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9868.HK is less volatile compared to 1114.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9868.HK.Check 1114.HK's competition here
9868.HK vs 1958.HK Comparison March 2026
9868.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9868.HK stands at 150.5B. In comparison, 1958.HK has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9868.HK is priced at HK$79.00, while 1958.HK trades at HK$1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9868.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.86, whereas 1958.HK's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, 9868.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1958.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9868.HK is less volatile compared to 1958.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9868.HK.Check 1958.HK's competition here
9868.HK vs 2451.HK Comparison March 2026
9868.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9868.HK stands at 150.5B. In comparison, 2451.HK has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9868.HK is priced at HK$79.00, while 2451.HK trades at HK$15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9868.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -30.86, whereas 2451.HK's P/E ratio is 34.33. In terms of profitability, 9868.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 2451.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9868.HK is more volatile compared to 2451.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9868.HK.Check 2451.HK's competition here