NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 9866.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 9866.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9866.HK | HK$35.42 | -2.42% | 83B | -10.36 | -HK$3.44 | N/A |
| 81211.HK | HK$76.30 | -1.42% | 816.6B | 25.31 | HK$3.04 | +0.40% |
| 1211.HK | HK$89.00 | -0.78% | 814B | 26.46 | HK$3.39 | +0.46% |
| 0175.HK | HK$18.00 | -1.10% | 194.8B | 19.39 | HK$0.93 | +2.77% |
| 80175.HK | HK$15.48 | -1.15% | 168.1B | 11.81 | HK$1.31 | +2.77% |
| 9973.HK | HK$25.42 | -0.47% | 147.5B | 15.49 | HK$1.64 | +3.88% |
| 2333.HK | HK$8.43 | -3.88% | 121.9B | 7.25 | HK$1.19 | +4.66% |
| 2015.HK | HK$48.52 | -1.10% | 100.2B | -94.23 | -HK$0.52 | N/A |
| 9927.HK | HK$42.62 | -0.23% | 91.9B | 87.20 | HK$0.49 | +2.12% |
| 9868.HK | HK$45.90 | +0.35% | 87.4B | -17.07 | -HK$2.68 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BYD Company Limited Class H (HKSE: 81211.HK)
9866.HK vs 81211.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 81211.HK has a market cap of 816.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 81211.HK trades at HK$76.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 81211.HK's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 81211.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is less volatile compared to 81211.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 81211.HK's competition here
BYD Company Limited (HKSE: 1211.HK)
9866.HK vs 1211.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 1211.HK has a market cap of 814B. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 1211.HK trades at HK$89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 1211.HK's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 1211.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is less volatile compared to 1211.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 1211.HK's competition here
Geely Automobile Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0175.HK)
9866.HK vs 0175.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 0175.HK has a market cap of 194.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 0175.HK trades at HK$18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 0175.HK's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 0175.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is more volatile compared to 0175.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 0175.HK's competition here
Geely Automobile Holdings Limited (HKSE: 80175.HK)
9866.HK vs 80175.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 80175.HK has a market cap of 168.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 80175.HK trades at HK$15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 80175.HK's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 80175.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is more volatile compared to 80175.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 80175.HK's competition here
Chery Automobile Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9973.HK)
9866.HK vs 9973.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 9973.HK has a market cap of 147.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 9973.HK trades at HK$25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 9973.HK's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 9973.HK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is more volatile compared to 9973.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 9973.HK's competition here
Great Wall Motor Company Limited (HKSE: 2333.HK)
9866.HK vs 2333.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 2333.HK has a market cap of 121.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 2333.HK trades at HK$8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 2333.HK's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 2333.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is less volatile compared to 2333.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 2333.HK's competition here
Li Auto Inc. (HKSE: 2015.HK)
9866.HK vs 2015.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 2015.HK has a market cap of 100.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 2015.HK trades at HK$48.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 2015.HK's P/E ratio is -94.23. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 2015.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is more volatile compared to 2015.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 2015.HK's competition here
Seres Group Co.,Ltd (HKSE: 9927.HK)
9866.HK vs 9927.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 9927.HK has a market cap of 91.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 9927.HK trades at HK$42.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 9927.HK's P/E ratio is 87.20. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 9927.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is less volatile compared to 9927.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 9927.HK's competition here
XPeng Inc. (HKSE: 9868.HK)
9866.HK vs 9868.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 9868.HK has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 9868.HK trades at HK$45.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 9868.HK's P/E ratio is -17.07. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 9868.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is more volatile compared to 9868.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 9868.HK's competition here
Dongfeng Motor Group Company Limited (HKSE: 0489.HK)
9866.HK vs 0489.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 0489.HK has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 0489.HK trades at HK$9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 0489.HK's P/E ratio is -119.25. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 0489.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is more volatile compared to 0489.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 0489.HK's competition here
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK)
9866.HK vs 9863.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 9863.HK has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 9863.HK trades at HK$40.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 9863.HK's P/E ratio is 207.13. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 9863.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is less volatile compared to 9863.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 9863.HK's competition here
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2238.HK)
9866.HK vs 2238.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 2238.HK has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 2238.HK trades at HK$2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 2238.HK's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 2238.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is more volatile compared to 2238.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 2238.HK's competition here
Yadea Group Holdings Ltd. (HKSE: 1585.HK)
9866.HK vs 1585.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 1585.HK has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 1585.HK trades at HK$9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 1585.HK's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 1585.HK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is less volatile compared to 1585.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 1585.HK's competition here
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1114.HK)
9866.HK vs 1114.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 1114.HK has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 1114.HK trades at HK$2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 1114.HK's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 1114.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is less volatile compared to 1114.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 1114.HK's competition here
BAIC Motor Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1958.HK)
9866.HK vs 1958.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 1958.HK has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 1958.HK trades at HK$0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 1958.HK's P/E ratio is 50.31. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 1958.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is more volatile compared to 1958.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 1958.HK's competition here
Luyuan Group Holding (Cayman) Limited (HKSE: 2451.HK)
9866.HK vs 2451.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 2451.HK has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 2451.HK trades at HK$12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 2451.HK's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 2451.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is less volatile compared to 2451.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 2451.HK's competition here
VOYAH Automotive Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 7489.HK)
9866.HK vs 7489.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 7489.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 7489.HK trades at HK$2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 7489.HK's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 7489.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is less volatile compared to 7489.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 7489.HK's competition here
Qingling Motors Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1122.HK)
9866.HK vs 1122.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 1122.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 1122.HK trades at HK$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 1122.HK's P/E ratio is -24.08. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 1122.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is more volatile compared to 1122.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 1122.HK's competition here
Ev Dynamics (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0476.HK)
9866.HK vs 0476.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 0476.HK has a market cap of 172.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 0476.HK trades at HK$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 0476.HK's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 0476.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is less volatile compared to 0476.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 0476.HK's competition here
Gemilang International Limited (HKSE: 6163.HK)
9866.HK vs 6163.HK Comparison August 2026
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9866.HK stands at 83B. In comparison, 6163.HK has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, 9866.HK is priced at HK$35.42 on the HKSE, while 6163.HK trades at HK$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9866.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -10.36, whereas 6163.HK's P/E ratio is -49.72. In terms of profitability, 9866.HK's ROE is -3.29%, compared to 6163.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9866.HK is more volatile compared to 6163.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9866.HK.Check 6163.HK's competition here