Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 9863.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 9863.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9863.HK | HK$40.18 | +0.50% | 55.8B | 208.16 | HK$0.19 | N/A |
| 81211.HK | HK$76.05 | -1.11% | 807.6B | 25.03 | HK$3.04 | +0.40% |
| 1211.HK | HK$88.40 | -1.34% | 803.1B | 26.11 | HK$3.39 | +0.47% |
| 0175.HK | HK$17.91 | -0.83% | 193.2B | 19.23 | HK$0.93 | +2.79% |
| 80175.HK | HK$15.39 | -0.71% | 167B | 11.72 | HK$1.31 | +2.79% |
| 9973.HK | HK$25.24 | -0.63% | 146.6B | 15.39 | HK$1.64 | +3.90% |
| 2333.HK | HK$8.38 | -2.84% | 118.4B | 7.04 | HK$1.19 | +4.80% |
| 2015.HK | HK$48.22 | -2.39% | 97.8B | -91.98 | -HK$0.52 | N/A |
| 9927.HK | HK$42.12 | -2.00% | 90.1B | 85.45 | HK$0.49 | +2.17% |
| 9868.HK | HK$45.38 | -0.79% | 86.7B | -16.94 | -HK$2.68 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BYD Company Limited Class H (HKSE: 81211.HK)
9863.HK vs 81211.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 81211.HK has a market cap of 807.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 81211.HK trades at HK$76.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 81211.HK's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 81211.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is more volatile compared to 81211.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 81211.HK's competition here
BYD Company Limited (HKSE: 1211.HK)
9863.HK vs 1211.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 1211.HK has a market cap of 803.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 1211.HK trades at HK$88.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 1211.HK's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1211.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is more volatile compared to 1211.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 1211.HK's competition here
Geely Automobile Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0175.HK)
9863.HK vs 0175.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 0175.HK has a market cap of 193.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 0175.HK trades at HK$17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 0175.HK's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0175.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is more volatile compared to 0175.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 0175.HK's competition here
Geely Automobile Holdings Limited (HKSE: 80175.HK)
9863.HK vs 80175.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 80175.HK has a market cap of 167B. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 80175.HK trades at HK$15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 80175.HK's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 80175.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is more volatile compared to 80175.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 80175.HK's competition here
Chery Automobile Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9973.HK)
9863.HK vs 9973.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 9973.HK has a market cap of 146.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 9973.HK trades at HK$25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 9973.HK's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 9973.HK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is more volatile compared to 9973.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 9973.HK's competition here
Great Wall Motor Company Limited (HKSE: 2333.HK)
9863.HK vs 2333.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 2333.HK has a market cap of 118.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 2333.HK trades at HK$8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 2333.HK's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2333.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is more volatile compared to 2333.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 2333.HK's competition here
Li Auto Inc. (HKSE: 2015.HK)
9863.HK vs 2015.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 2015.HK has a market cap of 97.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 2015.HK trades at HK$48.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 2015.HK's P/E ratio is -91.98. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2015.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is more volatile compared to 2015.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 2015.HK's competition here
Seres Group Co.,Ltd (HKSE: 9927.HK)
9863.HK vs 9927.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 9927.HK has a market cap of 90.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 9927.HK trades at HK$42.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 9927.HK's P/E ratio is 85.45. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 9927.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is more volatile compared to 9927.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 9927.HK's competition here
XPeng Inc. (HKSE: 9868.HK)
9863.HK vs 9868.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 9868.HK has a market cap of 86.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 9868.HK trades at HK$45.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 9868.HK's P/E ratio is -16.94. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 9868.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is more volatile compared to 9868.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 9868.HK's competition here
NIO Inc. (HKSE: 9866.HK)
9863.HK vs 9866.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 9866.HK has a market cap of 82.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 9866.HK trades at HK$35.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 9866.HK's P/E ratio is -10.26. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 9866.HK's ROE of -3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is more volatile compared to 9866.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 9866.HK's competition here
Dongfeng Motor Group Company Limited (HKSE: 0489.HK)
9863.HK vs 0489.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 0489.HK has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 0489.HK trades at HK$9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 0489.HK's P/E ratio is -119.25. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0489.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is more volatile compared to 0489.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 0489.HK's competition here
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2238.HK)
9863.HK vs 2238.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 2238.HK has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 2238.HK trades at HK$2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 2238.HK's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2238.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is more volatile compared to 2238.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 2238.HK's competition here
Yadea Group Holdings Ltd. (HKSE: 1585.HK)
9863.HK vs 1585.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 1585.HK has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 1585.HK trades at HK$9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 1585.HK's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1585.HK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is more volatile compared to 1585.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 1585.HK's competition here
Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1114.HK)
9863.HK vs 1114.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 1114.HK has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 1114.HK trades at HK$2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 1114.HK's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1114.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is less volatile compared to 1114.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 1114.HK's competition here
BAIC Motor Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1958.HK)
9863.HK vs 1958.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 1958.HK has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 1958.HK trades at HK$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 1958.HK's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1958.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is more volatile compared to 1958.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 1958.HK's competition here
Luyuan Group Holding (Cayman) Limited (HKSE: 2451.HK)
9863.HK vs 2451.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 2451.HK has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 2451.HK trades at HK$12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 2451.HK's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2451.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is more volatile compared to 2451.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 2451.HK's competition here
VOYAH Automotive Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 7489.HK)
9863.HK vs 7489.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 7489.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 7489.HK trades at HK$2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 7489.HK's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7489.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is more volatile compared to 7489.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 7489.HK's competition here
Qingling Motors Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1122.HK)
9863.HK vs 1122.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 1122.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 1122.HK trades at HK$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 1122.HK's P/E ratio is -24.08. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1122.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is more volatile compared to 1122.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 1122.HK's competition here
Ev Dynamics (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0476.HK)
9863.HK vs 0476.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 0476.HK has a market cap of 188.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 0476.HK trades at HK$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 0476.HK's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0476.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is less volatile compared to 0476.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 0476.HK's competition here
Gemilang International Limited (HKSE: 6163.HK)
9863.HK vs 6163.HK Comparison August 2026
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9863.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9863.HK stands at 55.8B. In comparison, 6163.HK has a market cap of 174.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 9863.HK is priced at HK$40.18 on the HKSE, while 6163.HK trades at HK$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9863.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 208.16, whereas 6163.HK's P/E ratio is -50.93. In terms of profitability, 9863.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6163.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9863.HK is more volatile compared to 6163.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9863.HK.Check 6163.HK's competition here