1957 & Co. (Hospitality) Limited
1957 & Co. (Hospitality) Limited (8495.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (8495.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8495.HK | HK$0.29 | +0.00% | 111.4M | -17.79 | -HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 9987.HK | HK$370.60 | -2.73% | 130.2B | 18.85 | HK$19.66 | +2.08% |
| 6862.HK | HK$14.01 | -2.03% | 75.9B | 16.29 | HK$0.86 | +5.91% |
| 1364.HK | HK$25.20 | -0.08% | 59.9B | 20.32 | HK$1.24 | +3.69% |
| 0999.HK | HK$6.92 | -1.28% | 8.1B | 9.89 | HK$0.70 | N/A |
| 9658.HK | HK$10.71 | -0.56% | 6.3B | 22.79 | HK$0.47 | N/A |
| 1405.HK | HK$47.18 | -2.24% | 6.2B | 39.32 | HK$1.20 | N/A |
| 9922.HK | HK$1.83 | +0.55% | 2.5B | 36.60 | HK$0.05 | +2.20% |
| 0341.HK | HK$3.99 | +0.00% | 2.3B | 17.35 | HK$0.23 | +8.77% |
| 2217.HK | HK$1.57 | -0.63% | 2.1B | 26.17 | HK$0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
8495.HK vs 9987.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 9987.HK has a market cap of 130.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 9987.HK trades at HK$370.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 9987.HK's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 9987.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 9987.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 9987.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 6862.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 6862.HK has a market cap of 75.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 6862.HK trades at HK$14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 6862.HK's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6862.HK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 6862.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 6862.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 1364.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 1364.HK has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 1364.HK trades at HK$25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 1364.HK's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1364.HK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 1364.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 1364.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 0999.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 0999.HK has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 0999.HK trades at HK$6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 0999.HK's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0999.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 0999.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 0999.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 9658.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 9658.HK has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 9658.HK trades at HK$10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 9658.HK's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 9658.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 9658.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 9658.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 1405.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 1405.HK has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 1405.HK trades at HK$47.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 1405.HK's P/E ratio is 39.32. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1405.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 1405.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 1405.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 9922.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 9922.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 9922.HK trades at HK$1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 9922.HK's P/E ratio is 36.60. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 9922.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 9922.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 9922.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 0341.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 0341.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 0341.HK trades at HK$3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 0341.HK's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0341.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 0341.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 0341.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 2217.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 2217.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 2217.HK trades at HK$1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 2217.HK's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2217.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 2217.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 2217.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 9869.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 9869.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 9869.HK trades at HK$1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 9869.HK's P/E ratio is 35.67. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 9869.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 9869.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 9869.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 2150.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 2150.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 2150.HK trades at HK$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 2150.HK's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2150.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 2150.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 2150.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 1488.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 1488.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 1488.HK trades at HK$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 1488.HK's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1488.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK and 1488.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 1488.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 0538.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 0538.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 0538.HK trades at HK$0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 0538.HK's P/E ratio is 98.00. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0538.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 0538.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 0538.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 6811.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 6811.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 6811.HK trades at HK$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 6811.HK's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6811.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 6811.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 6811.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 0156.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 0156.HK has a market cap of 918.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 0156.HK trades at HK$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 0156.HK's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0156.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 0156.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 0156.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 8371.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 8371.HK has a market cap of 725.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 8371.HK trades at HK$1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 8371.HK's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8371.HK's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8371.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 8371.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 0052.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 0052.HK has a market cap of 513M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 0052.HK trades at HK$3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 0052.HK's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0052.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 0052.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 0052.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 0520.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 0520.HK has a market cap of 430.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 0520.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 0520.HK's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0520.HK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 0520.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 0520.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 2108.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 2108.HK has a market cap of 376M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 2108.HK trades at HK$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 2108.HK's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2108.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 2108.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 2108.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 0226.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 0226.HK has a market cap of 340.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 0226.HK trades at HK$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 0226.HK's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0226.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 0226.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 0226.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 0573.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 0573.HK has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 0573.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 0573.HK's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0573.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 0573.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 0573.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 1978.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 1978.HK has a market cap of 264M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 1978.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 1978.HK's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1978.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 1978.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 1978.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 1314.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 1314.HK has a market cap of 199.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 1314.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 1314.HK's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1314.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 1314.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 1314.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 0126.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 0126.HK has a market cap of 191.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 0126.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 0126.HK's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0126.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 0126.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 0126.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 1869.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 1869.HK has a market cap of 160.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 1869.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 1869.HK's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1869.HK's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 1869.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 1869.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 1181.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 1181.HK has a market cap of 159.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 1181.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 1181.HK's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1181.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 1181.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 1181.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 1843.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 1843.HK has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 1843.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 1843.HK's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1843.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 1843.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 1843.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 8120.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 8120.HK has a market cap of 98.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 8120.HK trades at HK$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 8120.HK's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8120.HK's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8120.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 8120.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 8213.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 8213.HK has a market cap of 89.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 8213.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 8213.HK's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8213.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK and 8213.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 8213.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 8527.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 8527.HK has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 8527.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 8527.HK's P/E ratio is -8.55. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8527.HK's ROE of +4.94%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8527.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 8527.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 0703.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 0703.HK has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 0703.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 0703.HK's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0703.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 0703.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 0703.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 8428.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 8428.HK has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 8428.HK trades at HK$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 8428.HK's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8428.HK's ROE of -4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8428.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 8428.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 8447.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 8447.HK has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 8447.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 8447.HK's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8447.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8447.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 8447.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 1703.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 1703.HK has a market cap of 71.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 1703.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 1703.HK's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1703.HK's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 1703.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 1703.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 3666.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 3666.HK has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 3666.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 3666.HK's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3666.HK's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 3666.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 3666.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 1443.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 1443.HK has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 1443.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 1443.HK's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1443.HK's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 1443.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 1443.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 8300.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 8300.HK has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 8300.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 8300.HK's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8300.HK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8300.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 8300.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 8232.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 8232.HK has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 8232.HK trades at HK$0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 8232.HK's P/E ratio is -5.81. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8232.HK's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8232.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 8232.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 0657.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 0657.HK has a market cap of 50.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 0657.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 0657.HK's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0657.HK's ROE of +4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK and 0657.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0657.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 8412.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 8412.HK has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 8412.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 8412.HK's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8412.HK's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK and 8412.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 8412.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 8519.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 8519.HK has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 8519.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 8519.HK's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8519.HK's ROE of -16.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8519.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 8519.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 8432.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 8432.HK has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 8432.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 8432.HK's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8432.HK's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8432.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 8432.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 8510.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 8510.HK has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 8510.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 8510.HK's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8510.HK's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK and 8510.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 8510.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 8367.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 8367.HK has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 8367.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 8367.HK's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8367.HK's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8367.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 8367.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 8096.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 8096.HK has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 8096.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 8096.HK's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8096.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8096.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 8096.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 8056.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 8056.HK has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 8056.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 8056.HK's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8056.HK's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8056.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 8056.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 1007.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 1007.HK has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 1007.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 1007.HK's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1007.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 1007.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 1007.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 8475.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 8475.HK has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 8475.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 8475.HK's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8475.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8475.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 8475.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 8493.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 8493.HK has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 8493.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 8493.HK's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8493.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8493.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 8493.HK's competition here
8495.HK vs 0047.HK Comparison April 2026
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 111.4M. In comparison, 0047.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at HK$0.29, while 0047.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -17.79, whereas 0047.HK's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0047.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 0047.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.Check 0047.HK's competition here