Luk Hing Entertainment Group Holdings Limited
Luk Hing Entertainment Group Holdings Limited (8052.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (8052.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8052.HK | HK$0.04 | -6.82% | 22.5M | -2.05 | -HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 0027.HK | HK$32.70 | -1.45% | 146.9B | 13.75 | HK$2.44 | +3.58% |
| 1928.HK | HK$15.95 | -2.74% | 133B | 18.89 | HK$0.87 | +3.04% |
| 2282.HK | HK$11.12 | -1.42% | 43.6B | 8.64 | HK$1.33 | +7.98% |
| 1128.HK | HK$5.58 | -0.71% | 29.6B | 18.26 | HK$0.31 | +6.54% |
| 3918.HK | HK$3.90 | -1.02% | 17.6B | 7.24 | HK$0.55 | +1.97% |
| 0880.HK | HK$2.05 | -1.44% | 14.8B | -34.67 | -HK$0.06 | N/A |
| 0200.HK | HK$4.09 | -1.21% | 9.6B | 8.75 | HK$0.48 | N/A |
| 8279.HK | HK$0.49 | -2.00% | 5.8B | -50.00 | -HK$0.01 | N/A |
| 6889.HK | HK$3.27 | -0.91% | 2.3B | 9.31 | HK$0.35 | +7.97% |
Stock Comparison
8052.HK vs 0027.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 0027.HK has a market cap of 146.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 0027.HK trades at HK$32.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 0027.HK's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0027.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is more volatile compared to 0027.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 0027.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 1928.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 1928.HK has a market cap of 133B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 1928.HK trades at HK$15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 1928.HK's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 1928.HK's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is more volatile compared to 1928.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 1928.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 2282.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 2282.HK has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 2282.HK trades at HK$11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 2282.HK's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 2282.HK's ROE of +1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is more volatile compared to 2282.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 2282.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 1128.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 1128.HK has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 1128.HK trades at HK$5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 1128.HK's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 1128.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is more volatile compared to 1128.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 1128.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 3918.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 3918.HK has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 3918.HK trades at HK$3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 3918.HK's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 3918.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is more volatile compared to 3918.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 3918.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 0880.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 0880.HK has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 0880.HK trades at HK$2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 0880.HK's P/E ratio is -34.67. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0880.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is more volatile compared to 0880.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 0880.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 0200.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 0200.HK has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 0200.HK trades at HK$4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 0200.HK's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0200.HK's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is more volatile compared to 0200.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 0200.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 8279.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 8279.HK has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 8279.HK trades at HK$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 8279.HK's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 8279.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is more volatile compared to 8279.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 8279.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 6889.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 6889.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 6889.HK trades at HK$3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 6889.HK's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 6889.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is more volatile compared to 6889.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 6889.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 2536.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 2536.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 2536.HK trades at HK$1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 2536.HK's P/E ratio is 175.00. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 2536.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is more volatile compared to 2536.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 2536.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 1076.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 1076.HK has a market cap of 681.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 1076.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 1076.HK's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 1076.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 1076.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 1076.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 1180.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 1180.HK has a market cap of 568.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 1180.HK trades at HK$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 1180.HK's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 1180.HK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK and 1180.HK have similar daily volatility (9.52).Check 1180.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 0082.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 0082.HK has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 0082.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 0082.HK's P/E ratio is -8.20. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0082.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is more volatile compared to 0082.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 0082.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 0296.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 0296.HK has a market cap of 273.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 0296.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 0296.HK's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0296.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is more volatile compared to 0296.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 0296.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 0102.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 0102.HK has a market cap of 211.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 0102.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 0102.HK's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0102.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is more volatile compared to 0102.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 0102.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 1245.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 1245.HK has a market cap of 210.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 1245.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 1245.HK's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 1245.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is more volatile compared to 1245.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 1245.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 0582.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 0582.HK has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 0582.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 0582.HK's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0582.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 0582.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 0582.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 1655.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 1655.HK has a market cap of 136.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 1655.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 1655.HK's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 1655.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is more volatile compared to 1655.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 1655.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 1680.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 1680.HK has a market cap of 131.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 1680.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 1680.HK's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 1680.HK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is more volatile compared to 1680.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 1680.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 0959.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 0959.HK has a market cap of 92.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 0959.HK trades at HK$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 0959.HK's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0959.HK's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 0959.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 0959.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 0070.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 0070.HK has a market cap of 83.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 0070.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 0070.HK's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0070.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 0070.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 0070.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 8308.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 8308.HK has a market cap of 71.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 8308.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 8308.HK's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 8308.HK's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is more volatile compared to 8308.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 8308.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 8400.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 8400.HK has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 8400.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 8400.HK's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 8400.HK's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 8400.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 8400.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 1371.HK Comparison April 2026
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 22.5M. In comparison, 1371.HK has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.04, while 1371.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas 1371.HK's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 1371.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is more volatile compared to 1371.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 1371.HK's competition here