Goldway Education Group Limited
Goldway Education Group Limited 8160.HK Peers
See (8160.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8160.HK | HK$0.30 | +5.36% | 42.9M | -0.34 | -HK$0.87 | N/A |
9901.HK | HK$36.80 | +0.55% | 60.2B | 20.44 | HK$1.80 | +0.16% |
0667.HK | HK$6.53 | +0.62% | 14.4B | 25.12 | HK$0.26 | +3.08% |
1797.HK | HK$12.98 | +1.25% | 13.6B | -649.00 | -HK$0.02 | N/A |
1773.HK | HK$4.15 | +0.97% | 8.5B | 11.86 | HK$0.35 | +2.17% |
0839.HK | HK$2.68 | N/A | 7.5B | 24.36 | HK$0.11 | +3.80% |
1969.HK | HK$4.10 | -0.24% | 4.9B | 5.77 | HK$0.71 | +2.67% |
2469.HK | HK$2.25 | -0.88% | 4.9B | 18.75 | HK$0.12 | N/A |
3978.HK | HK$4.95 | -1.59% | 3.7B | 17.68 | HK$0.28 | +2.48% |
0032.HK | HK$8.20 | N/A | 3.1B | 7.07 | HK$1.16 | +5.12% |
Stock Comparison
8160.HK vs 9901.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 9901.HK has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 9901.HK trades at HK$36.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 9901.HK's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 9901.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 9901.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 0667.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 0667.HK has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 0667.HK trades at HK$6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 0667.HK's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 0667.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 0667.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1797.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1797.HK has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1797.HK trades at HK$12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1797.HK's P/E ratio is -649.00. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1797.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 1797.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1773.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1773.HK has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1773.HK trades at HK$4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1773.HK's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1773.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 1773.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 0839.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 0839.HK has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 0839.HK trades at HK$2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 0839.HK's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 0839.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 0839.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1969.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1969.HK has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1969.HK trades at HK$4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1969.HK's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1969.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 1969.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 2469.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 2469.HK has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 2469.HK trades at HK$2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 2469.HK's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 2469.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 2469.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 3978.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 3978.HK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 3978.HK trades at HK$4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 3978.HK's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 3978.HK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 3978.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 0032.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 0032.HK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 0032.HK trades at HK$8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 0032.HK's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 0032.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 0032.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1890.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1890.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1890.HK trades at HK$1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1890.HK's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1890.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 1890.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 9616.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 9616.HK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 9616.HK trades at HK$3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 9616.HK's P/E ratio is 4.28. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 9616.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 9616.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1769.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1769.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1769.HK trades at HK$3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1769.HK's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1769.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is less volatile compared to 1769.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 2001.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 2001.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 2001.HK trades at HK$0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 2001.HK's P/E ratio is 2.07. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 2001.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 2001.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 0382.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 0382.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 0382.HK trades at HK$1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 0382.HK's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 0382.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 0382.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 6169.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 6169.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 6169.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 6169.HK's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 6169.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 6169.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1765.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1765.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1765.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1765.HK's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1765.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 1765.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 2175.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 2175.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 2175.HK trades at HK$2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 2175.HK's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 2175.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 2175.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1935.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1935.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1935.HK trades at HK$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1935.HK's P/E ratio is 4.05. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1935.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 1935.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1593.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1593.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1593.HK trades at HK$1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1593.HK's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1593.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 1593.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1525.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1525.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1525.HK trades at HK$2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1525.HK's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1525.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 1525.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 2779.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 2779.HK has a market cap of 965.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 2779.HK trades at HK$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 2779.HK's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 2779.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 2779.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1317.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1317.HK has a market cap of 951.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1317.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1317.HK's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1317.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 1317.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1082.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1082.HK has a market cap of 924.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1082.HK trades at HK$1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1082.HK's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1082.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 1082.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1756.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1756.HK has a market cap of 708M. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1756.HK trades at HK$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1756.HK's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1756.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 1756.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1565.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1565.HK has a market cap of 703M. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1565.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1565.HK's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1565.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 1565.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1851.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1851.HK has a market cap of 665M. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1851.HK trades at HK$1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1851.HK's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1851.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is less volatile compared to 1851.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1569.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1569.HK has a market cap of 628.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1569.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1569.HK's P/E ratio is -14.90. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1569.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 1569.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 6913.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 6913.HK has a market cap of 393.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 6913.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 6913.HK's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 6913.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 6913.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 6068.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 6068.HK has a market cap of 232.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 6068.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 6068.HK's P/E ratio is 2.14. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 6068.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 6068.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 2371.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 2371.HK has a market cap of 222.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 2371.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 2371.HK's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 2371.HK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is less volatile compared to 2371.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1449.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1449.HK has a market cap of 166.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1449.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1449.HK's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1449.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 1449.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1758.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1758.HK has a market cap of 146.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1758.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1758.HK's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1758.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 1758.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1752.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1752.HK has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1752.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1752.HK's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1752.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 1752.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1598.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1598.HK has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1598.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1598.HK's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1598.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 1598.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1871.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1871.HK has a market cap of 118.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1871.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1871.HK's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1871.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 1871.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 1775.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 1775.HK has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 1775.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 1775.HK's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1775.HK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 1775.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 8363.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 8363.HK has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 8363.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 8363.HK's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 8363.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 8363.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 8417.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 8417.HK has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 8417.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 8417.HK's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 8417.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is more volatile compared to 8417.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.
8160.HK vs 8055.HK Comparison
8160.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8160.HK stands at 42.9M. In comparison, 8055.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 8160.HK is priced at HK$0.30, while 8055.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8160.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas 8055.HK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 8160.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 8055.HK's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 8160.HK is less volatile compared to 8055.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8160.HK.