China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 1317.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 1317.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1317.HK | HK$0.18 | +4.12% | 499.1M | 1.56 | HK$0.11 | N/A |
| 9901.HK | HK$44.34 | -0.23% | 70.6B | 15.70 | HK$2.82 | +2.12% |
| 0667.HK | HK$4.05 | +2.79% | 9B | 10.76 | HK$0.38 | +7.41% |
| 0839.HK | HK$1.84 | +0.55% | 5.2B | 2.00 | HK$0.92 | N/A |
| 1851.HK | HK$5.90 | +13.35% | 3B | 18.52 | HK$0.32 | N/A |
| 0032.HK | HK$7.57 | +1.47% | 2.8B | 6.49 | HK$1.17 | +5.55% |
| 3978.HK | HK$3.28 | +4.46% | 2.5B | 7.00 | HK$0.47 | +7.18% |
| 1773.HK | HK$1.17 | +2.63% | 2.4B | 1.33 | HK$0.88 | +9.02% |
| 1890.HK | HK$0.88 | -1.69% | 1.8B | 1.17 | HK$0.75 | +14.86% |
| 9986.HK | HK$1.88 | -15.32% | 1.6B | -47.00 | -HK$0.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (HKSE: 9901.HK)
1317.HK vs 9901.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 9901.HK has a market cap of 70.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 9901.HK trades at HK$44.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 9901.HK's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 9901.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 9901.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 9901.HK's competition here
China East Education Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0667.HK)
1317.HK vs 0667.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 0667.HK has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 0667.HK trades at HK$4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 0667.HK's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0667.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is less volatile compared to 0667.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 0667.HK's competition here
China Education Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0839.HK)
1317.HK vs 0839.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 0839.HK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 0839.HK trades at HK$1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 0839.HK's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0839.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 0839.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 0839.HK's competition here
China Gingko Education Group Company Limited (HKSE: 1851.HK)
1317.HK vs 1851.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 1851.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 1851.HK trades at HK$5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 1851.HK's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 1851.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is less volatile compared to 1851.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 1851.HK's competition here
The Cross-Harbour (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0032.HK)
1317.HK vs 0032.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 0032.HK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 0032.HK trades at HK$7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 0032.HK's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0032.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 0032.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 0032.HK's competition here
China Beststudy Education Group (HKSE: 3978.HK)
1317.HK vs 3978.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 3978.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 3978.HK trades at HK$3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 3978.HK's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 3978.HK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 3978.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 3978.HK's competition here
Tianli International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1773.HK)
1317.HK vs 1773.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 1773.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 1773.HK trades at HK$1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 1773.HK's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 1773.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is less volatile compared to 1773.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 1773.HK's competition here
China Kepei Education Group Limited (HKSE: 1890.HK)
1317.HK vs 1890.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 1890.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 1890.HK trades at HK$0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 1890.HK's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 1890.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is less volatile compared to 1890.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 1890.HK's competition here
Dashan Education Holdings Limited (HKSE: 9986.HK)
1317.HK vs 9986.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 9986.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 9986.HK trades at HK$1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 9986.HK's P/E ratio is -47.00. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 9986.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is less volatile compared to 9986.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 9986.HK's competition here
China YuHua Education Corporation Limited (HKSE: 6169.HK)
1317.HK vs 6169.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 6169.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 6169.HK trades at HK$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 6169.HK's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 6169.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is less volatile compared to 6169.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 6169.HK's competition here
Neutech Group Limited (HKSE: 9616.HK)
1317.HK vs 9616.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 9616.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 9616.HK trades at HK$2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 9616.HK's P/E ratio is 2.37. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 9616.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 9616.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 9616.HK's competition here
XJ International Holdings Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 1765.HK)
1317.HK vs 1765.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 1765.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 1765.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 1765.HK's P/E ratio is 0.99. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 1765.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 1765.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 1765.HK's competition here
JH Educational Technology Inc. (HKSE: 1935.HK)
1317.HK vs 1935.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 1935.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 1935.HK trades at HK$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 1935.HK's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 1935.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 1935.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 1935.HK's competition here
China Chunlai Education Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1969.HK)
1317.HK vs 1969.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 1969.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 1969.HK trades at HK$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 1969.HK's P/E ratio is 1.36. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 1969.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 1969.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 1969.HK's competition here
China General Education Group Limited (HKSE: 2175.HK)
1317.HK vs 2175.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 2175.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 2175.HK trades at HK$2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 2175.HK's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 2175.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 2175.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 2175.HK's competition here
China New Higher Education Group Limited (HKSE: 2001.HK)
1317.HK vs 2001.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 2001.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 2001.HK trades at HK$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 2001.HK's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 2001.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is less volatile compared to 2001.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 2001.HK's competition here
Cathay Media and Education Group Inc. (HKSE: 1981.HK)
1317.HK vs 1981.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 1981.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 1981.HK trades at HK$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 1981.HK's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 1981.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is less volatile compared to 1981.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 1981.HK's competition here
Chen Lin Education Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1593.HK)
1317.HK vs 1593.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 1593.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 1593.HK trades at HK$1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 1593.HK's P/E ratio is 36.26. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 1593.HK's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 1593.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 1593.HK's competition here
Shanghai Gench Education Group Limited (HKSE: 1525.HK)
1317.HK vs 1525.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 1525.HK has a market cap of 960.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 1525.HK trades at HK$2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 1525.HK's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 1525.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 1525.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 1525.HK's competition here
Leader Education Limited (HKSE: 1449.HK)
1317.HK vs 1449.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 1449.HK has a market cap of 643.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 1449.HK trades at HK$0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 1449.HK's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 1449.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is less volatile compared to 1449.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 1449.HK's competition here
Bradaverse Education (Int'l) Investments Group Limited (HKSE: 1082.HK)
1317.HK vs 1082.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 1082.HK has a market cap of 623.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 1082.HK trades at HK$1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 1082.HK's P/E ratio is -27.42. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 1082.HK's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 1082.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 1082.HK's competition here
Edvantage Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0382.HK)
1317.HK vs 0382.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 0382.HK has a market cap of 569.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 0382.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 0382.HK's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0382.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 0382.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 0382.HK's competition here
Virscend Education Company Limited (HKSE: 1565.HK)
1317.HK vs 1565.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 1565.HK has a market cap of 541.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 1565.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 1565.HK's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 1565.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 1565.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 1565.HK's competition here
Legendary Group Limited (HKSE: 8195.HK)
1317.HK vs 8195.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 8195.HK has a market cap of 504.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 8195.HK trades at HK$1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 8195.HK's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 8195.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 8195.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 8195.HK's competition here
China Science and Education Industry Group Limited (HKSE: 1756.HK)
1317.HK vs 1756.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 1756.HK has a market cap of 468M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 1756.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 1756.HK's P/E ratio is 1.41. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 1756.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 1756.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 1756.HK's competition here
Minsheng Education Group Company Limited (HKSE: 1569.HK)
1317.HK vs 1569.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 1569.HK has a market cap of 459.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 1569.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 1569.HK's P/E ratio is 213.73. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 1569.HK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is less volatile compared to 1569.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 1569.HK's competition here
Top Education Group Ltd (HKSE: 1752.HK)
1317.HK vs 1752.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 1752.HK has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 1752.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 1752.HK's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 1752.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 1752.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 1752.HK's competition here
China Oriented International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1871.HK)
1317.HK vs 1871.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 1871.HK has a market cap of 180M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 1871.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 1871.HK's P/E ratio is -14.64. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 1871.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 1871.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 1871.HK's competition here
BExcellent Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1775.HK)
1317.HK vs 1775.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 1775.HK has a market cap of 178.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 1775.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 1775.HK's P/E ratio is -6.98. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 1775.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 1775.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 1775.HK's competition here
South China Vocational Education Group Company Limited (HKSE: 6913.HK)
1317.HK vs 6913.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 6913.HK has a market cap of 150.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 6913.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 6913.HK's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 6913.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is less volatile compared to 6913.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 6913.HK's competition here
Wisdom Education International Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 6068.HK)
1317.HK vs 6068.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 6068.HK has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 6068.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 6068.HK's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 6068.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is less volatile compared to 6068.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 6068.HK's competition here
Chuanglian Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2371.HK)
1317.HK vs 2371.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 2371.HK has a market cap of 131.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 2371.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 2371.HK's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 2371.HK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is less volatile compared to 2371.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 2371.HK's competition here
China 21st Century Education Group Limited (HKSE: 1598.HK)
1317.HK vs 1598.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 1598.HK has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 1598.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 1598.HK's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 1598.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 1598.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 1598.HK's competition here
Bojun Education Company Limited (HKSE: 1758.HK)
1317.HK vs 1758.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 1758.HK has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 1758.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 1758.HK's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 1758.HK's ROE of -3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 1758.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 1758.HK's competition here
Goldway Education Group Limited (HKSE: 8160.HK)
1317.HK vs 8160.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 8160.HK has a market cap of 84.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 8160.HK trades at HK$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 8160.HK's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 8160.HK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 8160.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 8160.HK's competition here
Shentong Robot Education Group Company Limited (HKSE: 8206.HK)
1317.HK vs 8206.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 8206.HK has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 8206.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 8206.HK's P/E ratio is -7.76. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 8206.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is less volatile compared to 8206.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 8206.HK's competition here
SDM Education Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8363.HK)
1317.HK vs 8363.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 8363.HK has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 8363.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 8363.HK's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 8363.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is more volatile compared to 8363.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 8363.HK's competition here
Dadi Education Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8417.HK)
1317.HK vs 8417.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 8417.HK has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 8417.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 8417.HK's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 8417.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is less volatile compared to 8417.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 8417.HK's competition here
China E-Information Technology Group Limited (HKSE: 8055.HK)
1317.HK vs 8055.HK Comparison August 2026
China Maple Leaf Educational Systems Limited (HKSE: 1317.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1317.HK stands at 499.1M. In comparison, 8055.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1317.HK is priced at HK$0.18 on the HKSE, while 8055.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1317.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas 8055.HK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 1317.HK's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 8055.HK's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 1317.HK is less volatile compared to 8055.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1317.HK.Check 8055.HK's competition here