Hangzhou Qiandaohu Xunlong Sci-tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6715.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 6715.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 6715.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6715.HK | HK$64.50 | -2.35% | 6.9B | 17.44 | HK$3.70 | N/A |
| 2714.HK | HK$35.84 | -5.24% | 259.2B | -172.86 | -HK$0.21 | +1.35% |
| 9858.HK | HK$3.95 | -3.42% | 18.5B | 22.81 | HK$0.18 | N/A |
| 1117.HK | HK$1.52 | -3.18% | 12.1B | -178.98 | -HK$0.01 | N/A |
| 2419.HK | HK$55.35 | -1.86% | 8.7B | -18.40 | -HK$3.06 | N/A |
| 1432.HK | HK$0.35 | -2.82% | 2.9B | -9.94 | -HK$0.03 | N/A |
| 2425.HK | HK$1.75 | +1.45% | 1.7B | -1.63 | -HK$1.06 | N/A |
| 1431.HK | HK$0.30 | -1.67% | 1.4B | 1.86 | HK$0.16 | N/A |
| 1084.HK | HK$0.66 | +0.76% | 568.3M | 30.05 | HK$0.02 | +1.83% |
| 1936.HK | HK$0.87 | +0.00% | 406.1M | 17.61 | HK$0.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Muyuan (HKSE: 2714.HK)
6715.HK vs 2714.HK Comparison September 2026
Hangzhou Qiandaohu Xunlong Sci-tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6715.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6715.HK stands at 6.9B. In comparison, 2714.HK has a market cap of 259.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 6715.HK is priced at HK$64.50 on the HKSE, while 2714.HK trades at HK$35.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6715.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas 2714.HK's P/E ratio is -172.86. In terms of profitability, 6715.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 2714.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 6715.HK is less volatile compared to 2714.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6715.HK.Check 2714.HK's competition here
China Youran Dairy Group Limited (HKSE: 9858.HK)
6715.HK vs 9858.HK Comparison September 2026
Hangzhou Qiandaohu Xunlong Sci-tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6715.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6715.HK stands at 6.9B. In comparison, 9858.HK has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 6715.HK is priced at HK$64.50 on the HKSE, while 9858.HK trades at HK$3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6715.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas 9858.HK's P/E ratio is 22.81. In terms of profitability, 6715.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 9858.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6715.HK is less volatile compared to 9858.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6715.HK.Check 9858.HK's competition here
China Modern Dairy Holdings Ltd. (HKSE: 1117.HK)
6715.HK vs 1117.HK Comparison September 2026
Hangzhou Qiandaohu Xunlong Sci-tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6715.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6715.HK stands at 6.9B. In comparison, 1117.HK has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 6715.HK is priced at HK$64.50 on the HKSE, while 1117.HK trades at HK$1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6715.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas 1117.HK's P/E ratio is -178.98. In terms of profitability, 6715.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1117.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 6715.HK is less volatile compared to 1117.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6715.HK.Check 1117.HK's competition here
Dekon Food & Agriculture Group (HKSE: 2419.HK)
6715.HK vs 2419.HK Comparison September 2026
Hangzhou Qiandaohu Xunlong Sci-tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6715.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6715.HK stands at 6.9B. In comparison, 2419.HK has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 6715.HK is priced at HK$64.50 on the HKSE, while 2419.HK trades at HK$55.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6715.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas 2419.HK's P/E ratio is -18.40. In terms of profitability, 6715.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 2419.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 6715.HK is less volatile compared to 2419.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6715.HK.Check 2419.HK's competition here
China Shengmu Organic Milk Limited (HKSE: 1432.HK)
6715.HK vs 1432.HK Comparison September 2026
Hangzhou Qiandaohu Xunlong Sci-tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6715.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6715.HK stands at 6.9B. In comparison, 1432.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 6715.HK is priced at HK$64.50 on the HKSE, while 1432.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6715.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas 1432.HK's P/E ratio is -9.94. In terms of profitability, 6715.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1432.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6715.HK is more volatile compared to 1432.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6715.HK.Check 1432.HK's competition here
AustAsia Group Ltd. (HKSE: 2425.HK)
6715.HK vs 2425.HK Comparison September 2026
Hangzhou Qiandaohu Xunlong Sci-tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6715.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6715.HK stands at 6.9B. In comparison, 2425.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 6715.HK is priced at HK$64.50 on the HKSE, while 2425.HK trades at HK$1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6715.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas 2425.HK's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, 6715.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 2425.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 6715.HK is more volatile compared to 2425.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6715.HK.Check 2425.HK's competition here
YuanShengTai Dairy Farm Limited (HKSE: 1431.HK)
6715.HK vs 1431.HK Comparison September 2026
Hangzhou Qiandaohu Xunlong Sci-tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6715.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6715.HK stands at 6.9B. In comparison, 1431.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6715.HK is priced at HK$64.50 on the HKSE, while 1431.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6715.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas 1431.HK's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, 6715.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1431.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 6715.HK is less volatile compared to 1431.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6715.HK.Check 1431.HK's competition here
Green Fresh Biotechnology Company Limited (HKSE: 1084.HK)
6715.HK vs 1084.HK Comparison September 2026
Hangzhou Qiandaohu Xunlong Sci-tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6715.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6715.HK stands at 6.9B. In comparison, 1084.HK has a market cap of 568.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 6715.HK is priced at HK$64.50 on the HKSE, while 1084.HK trades at HK$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6715.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas 1084.HK's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, 6715.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1084.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 6715.HK is less volatile compared to 1084.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6715.HK.Check 1084.HK's competition here
Ritamix Global Limited (HKSE: 1936.HK)
6715.HK vs 1936.HK Comparison September 2026
Hangzhou Qiandaohu Xunlong Sci-tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6715.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6715.HK stands at 6.9B. In comparison, 1936.HK has a market cap of 406.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 6715.HK is priced at HK$64.50 on the HKSE, while 1936.HK trades at HK$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6715.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas 1936.HK's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, 6715.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1936.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 6715.HK is more volatile compared to 1936.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6715.HK.Check 1936.HK's competition here
Fujing Holdings Co., Limited (HKSE: 2497.HK)
6715.HK vs 2497.HK Comparison September 2026
Hangzhou Qiandaohu Xunlong Sci-tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6715.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6715.HK stands at 6.9B. In comparison, 2497.HK has a market cap of 235M. Regarding current trading prices, 6715.HK is priced at HK$64.50 on the HKSE, while 2497.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6715.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas 2497.HK's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, 6715.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 2497.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 6715.HK is less volatile compared to 2497.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6715.HK.Check 2497.HK's competition here
Congyu Intelligent Agricultural Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0875.HK)
6715.HK vs 0875.HK Comparison September 2026
Hangzhou Qiandaohu Xunlong Sci-tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6715.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6715.HK stands at 6.9B. In comparison, 0875.HK has a market cap of 174.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 6715.HK is priced at HK$64.50 on the HKSE, while 0875.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6715.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas 0875.HK's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, 6715.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0875.HK's ROE of -6.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 6715.HK is less volatile compared to 0875.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6715.HK.Check 0875.HK's competition here
China Putian Food Holding Limited (HKSE: 1699.HK)
6715.HK vs 1699.HK Comparison September 2026
Hangzhou Qiandaohu Xunlong Sci-tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6715.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6715.HK stands at 6.9B. In comparison, 1699.HK has a market cap of 90M. Regarding current trading prices, 6715.HK is priced at HK$64.50 on the HKSE, while 1699.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6715.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas 1699.HK's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, 6715.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1699.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 6715.HK is less volatile compared to 1699.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6715.HK.Check 1699.HK's competition here
Chaoda Modern Agriculture (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0682.HK)
6715.HK vs 0682.HK Comparison September 2026
Hangzhou Qiandaohu Xunlong Sci-tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6715.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6715.HK stands at 6.9B. In comparison, 0682.HK has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 6715.HK is priced at HK$64.50 on the HKSE, while 0682.HK trades at HK$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6715.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas 0682.HK's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, 6715.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0682.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 6715.HK is more volatile compared to 0682.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6715.HK.Check 0682.HK's competition here
Asian Citrus Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0073.HK)
6715.HK vs 0073.HK Comparison September 2026
Hangzhou Qiandaohu Xunlong Sci-tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6715.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6715.HK stands at 6.9B. In comparison, 0073.HK has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 6715.HK is priced at HK$64.50 on the HKSE, while 0073.HK trades at HK$1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6715.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas 0073.HK's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, 6715.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0073.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 6715.HK is less volatile compared to 0073.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6715.HK.Check 0073.HK's competition here
China Green (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0904.HK)
6715.HK vs 0904.HK Comparison September 2026
Hangzhou Qiandaohu Xunlong Sci-tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6715.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6715.HK stands at 6.9B. In comparison, 0904.HK has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 6715.HK is priced at HK$64.50 on the HKSE, while 0904.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6715.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas 0904.HK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 6715.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0904.HK's ROE of -12.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 6715.HK is more volatile compared to 0904.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6715.HK.Check 0904.HK's competition here
C.P. Pokphand Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 0043.HK)
6715.HK vs 0043.HK Comparison September 2026
Hangzhou Qiandaohu Xunlong Sci-tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6715.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6715.HK stands at 6.9B. In comparison, 0043.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 6715.HK is priced at HK$64.50 on the HKSE, while 0043.HK trades at HK$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6715.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas 0043.HK's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, 6715.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0043.HK's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, 6715.HK is more volatile compared to 0043.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6715.HK.Check 0043.HK's competition here
Lanzhou Zhuangyuan Pasture Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1533.HK)
6715.HK vs 1533.HK Comparison September 2026
Hangzhou Qiandaohu Xunlong Sci-tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6715.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6715.HK stands at 6.9B. In comparison, 1533.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 6715.HK is priced at HK$64.50 on the HKSE, while 1533.HK trades at HK$10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6715.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas 1533.HK's P/E ratio is 49.27. In terms of profitability, 6715.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1533.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 6715.HK is more volatile compared to 1533.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6715.HK.Check 1533.HK's competition here
Natural Dairy (NZ) Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0462.HK)
6715.HK vs 0462.HK Comparison September 2026
Hangzhou Qiandaohu Xunlong Sci-tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6715.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6715.HK stands at 6.9B. In comparison, 0462.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 6715.HK is priced at HK$64.50 on the HKSE, while 0462.HK trades at HK$2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6715.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas 0462.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 6715.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0462.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6715.HK is more volatile compared to 0462.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6715.HK.Check 0462.HK's competition here