Ritamix Global Limited (1936.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1936.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1936.HK | HK$0.81 | +1.25% | 373.4M | 20.00 | HK$0.04 | N/A |
| 2714.HK | HK$28.38 | -4.19% | 210.5B | 14.11 | HK$2.09 | +1.66% |
| 9858.HK | HK$2.98 | -2.93% | 12.9B | -16.89 | -HK$0.18 | N/A |
| 1117.HK | HK$0.93 | -6.06% | 7.4B | -5.59 | -HK$0.17 | +1.40% |
| 2419.HK | HK$42.74 | -2.33% | 6.9B | 10.54 | HK$4.27 | N/A |
| 1432.HK | HK$0.33 | -1.49% | 2.8B | -6.70 | -HK$0.05 | N/A |
| 3839.HK | HK$8.24 | -0.84% | 2B | 8.28 | HK$0.99 | N/A |
| 2425.HK | HK$1.60 | -5.88% | 1.7B | -1.59 | -HK$1.06 | N/A |
| 1431.HK | HK$0.22 | -1.76% | 1.1B | 1.64 | HK$0.14 | N/A |
| 1084.HK | HK$0.64 | -3.03% | 572.6M | 66.00 | HK$0.01 | +1.82% |
Stock Comparison
1936.HK vs 2714.HK Comparison June 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 373.4M. In comparison, 2714.HK has a market cap of 210.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 2714.HK trades at HK$28.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.00, whereas 2714.HK's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2714.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 2714.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 2714.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 9858.HK Comparison June 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 373.4M. In comparison, 9858.HK has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 9858.HK trades at HK$2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.00, whereas 9858.HK's P/E ratio is -16.89. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9858.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 9858.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 9858.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 1117.HK Comparison June 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 373.4M. In comparison, 1117.HK has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 1117.HK trades at HK$0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.00, whereas 1117.HK's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1117.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 1117.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 1117.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 2419.HK Comparison June 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 373.4M. In comparison, 2419.HK has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 2419.HK trades at HK$42.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.00, whereas 2419.HK's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2419.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 2419.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 2419.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 1432.HK Comparison June 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 373.4M. In comparison, 1432.HK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 1432.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.00, whereas 1432.HK's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1432.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 1432.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 1432.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 3839.HK Comparison June 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 373.4M. In comparison, 3839.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 3839.HK trades at HK$8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.00, whereas 3839.HK's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3839.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 3839.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 3839.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 2425.HK Comparison June 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 373.4M. In comparison, 2425.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 2425.HK trades at HK$1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.00, whereas 2425.HK's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2425.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is more volatile compared to 2425.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 2425.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 1431.HK Comparison June 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 373.4M. In comparison, 1431.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 1431.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.00, whereas 1431.HK's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1431.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 1431.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 1431.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 1084.HK Comparison June 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 373.4M. In comparison, 1084.HK has a market cap of 572.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 1084.HK trades at HK$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.00, whereas 1084.HK's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1084.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 1084.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 1084.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 2497.HK Comparison June 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 373.4M. In comparison, 2497.HK has a market cap of 305M. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 2497.HK trades at HK$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.00, whereas 2497.HK's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2497.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 2497.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 2497.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 0875.HK Comparison June 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 373.4M. In comparison, 0875.HK has a market cap of 258.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0875.HK trades at HK$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.00, whereas 0875.HK's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0875.HK's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 0875.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 0875.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 1699.HK Comparison June 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 373.4M. In comparison, 1699.HK has a market cap of 90M. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 1699.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.00, whereas 1699.HK's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1699.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 1699.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 1699.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 0197.HK Comparison June 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 373.4M. In comparison, 0197.HK has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0197.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.00, whereas 0197.HK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0197.HK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 0197.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 0197.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 0682.HK Comparison June 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 373.4M. In comparison, 0682.HK has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0682.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.00, whereas 0682.HK's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0682.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is more volatile compared to 0682.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 0682.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 0073.HK Comparison June 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 373.4M. In comparison, 0073.HK has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0073.HK trades at HK$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.00, whereas 0073.HK's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0073.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is more volatile compared to 0073.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 0073.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 0904.HK Comparison June 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 373.4M. In comparison, 0904.HK has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0904.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.00, whereas 0904.HK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0904.HK's ROE of -12.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is more volatile compared to 0904.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 0904.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 0043.HK Comparison June 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 373.4M. In comparison, 0043.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0043.HK trades at HK$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.00, whereas 0043.HK's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0043.HK's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is more volatile compared to 0043.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 0043.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 1533.HK Comparison June 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 373.4M. In comparison, 1533.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 1533.HK trades at HK$10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.00, whereas 1533.HK's P/E ratio is 49.27. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1533.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is more volatile compared to 1533.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 1533.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 0462.HK Comparison June 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 373.4M. In comparison, 0462.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0462.HK trades at HK$2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.00, whereas 0462.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0462.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is more volatile compared to 0462.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 0462.HK's competition here