toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 652A.T's competitors and their performance on the JPX and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 652A.T and its JPX peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 652A.T | ¥3,745.00 | +2.88% | 55.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 4689.T | ¥500.40 | -0.12% | 3.4T | 16.64 | ¥30.08 | +1.46% |
| 4684.T | ¥6,059.00 | -1.14% | 2.6T | 31.92 | ¥189.81 | +1.55% |
| 4733.T | ¥10,080.00 | +1.58% | 757.8B | 37.90 | ¥265.94 | +1.22% |
| 3994.T | ¥7,000.00 | +2.12% | 388.3B | 70.56 | ¥99.21 | N/A |
| 4686.T | ¥4,850.00 | -1.92% | 311.5B | 20.64 | ¥234.99 | +0.62% |
| 4478.T | ¥4,645.00 | +0.98% | 275.4B | 255.22 | ¥18.20 | N/A |
| 4443.T | ¥2,137.00 | -2.11% | 268B | 33.63 | ¥63.54 | +0.12% |
| 581A.T | ¥3,155.00 | +0.16% | 254.8B | 27.72 | ¥113.80 | N/A |
| 2432.T | ¥2,558.00 | +0.18% | 236.8B | 6.33 | ¥403.95 | +2.58% |
Stock Comparison
LY Corporation (JPX: 4689.T)
652A.T vs 4689.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4689.T has a market cap of 3.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4689.T trades at ¥500.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4689.T's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4689.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4689.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4689.T's competition here
OBIC Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 4684.T)
652A.T vs 4684.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4684.T has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4684.T trades at ¥6,059.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4684.T's P/E ratio is 31.92. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4684.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4684.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4684.T's competition here
OBIC Business Consultants Co., Ltd. (JPX: 4733.T)
652A.T vs 4733.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4733.T has a market cap of 757.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4733.T trades at ¥10,080.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4733.T's P/E ratio is 37.90. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4733.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4733.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4733.T's competition here
Money Forward, Inc. (JPX: 3994.T)
652A.T vs 3994.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3994.T has a market cap of 388.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3994.T trades at ¥7,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3994.T's P/E ratio is 70.56. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3994.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3994.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3994.T's competition here
JustSystems Corporation (JPX: 4686.T)
652A.T vs 4686.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4686.T has a market cap of 311.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4686.T trades at ¥4,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4686.T's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4686.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4686.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4686.T's competition here
freee K.K. (JPX: 4478.T)
652A.T vs 4478.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4478.T has a market cap of 275.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4478.T trades at ¥4,645.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4478.T's P/E ratio is 255.22. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4478.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4478.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4478.T's competition here
Sansan, Inc. (JPX: 4443.T)
652A.T vs 4443.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4443.T has a market cap of 268B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4443.T trades at ¥2,137.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4443.T's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4443.T's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4443.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4443.T's competition here
GO Inc. (JPX: 581A.T)
652A.T vs 581A.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 581A.T has a market cap of 254.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 581A.T trades at ¥3,155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 581A.T's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 581A.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is less volatile compared to 581A.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 581A.T's competition here
DeNA Co., Ltd. (JPX: 2432.T)
652A.T vs 2432.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 2432.T has a market cap of 236.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 2432.T trades at ¥2,558.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2432.T's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 2432.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 2432.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 2432.T's competition here
NSD Co., Ltd. (JPX: 9759.T)
652A.T vs 9759.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 9759.T has a market cap of 230.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 9759.T trades at ¥3,057.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 9759.T's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 9759.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 9759.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 9759.T's competition here
Infomart Corporation (JPX: 2492.T)
652A.T vs 2492.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 2492.T has a market cap of 201.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 2492.T trades at ¥756.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2492.T's P/E ratio is 78.02. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 2492.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is less volatile compared to 2492.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 2492.T's competition here
Appier Group, Inc. (JPX: 4180.T)
652A.T vs 4180.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4180.T has a market cap of 144.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4180.T trades at ¥1,414.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4180.T's P/E ratio is 42.94. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4180.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4180.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4180.T's competition here
Timee, Inc. (JPX: 215A.T)
652A.T vs 215A.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 215A.T has a market cap of 142.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 215A.T trades at ¥1,431.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 215A.T's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 215A.T's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 215A.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 215A.T's competition here
Cybozu, Inc. (JPX: 4776.T)
652A.T vs 4776.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4776.T has a market cap of 132B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4776.T trades at ¥2,910.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4776.T's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4776.T's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4776.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4776.T's competition here
WingArc1st Inc. (JPX: 4432.T)
652A.T vs 4432.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4432.T has a market cap of 123.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4432.T trades at ¥3,555.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4432.T's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4432.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4432.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4432.T's competition here
Gungho Online Entertainment, Inc. (JPX: 3765.T)
652A.T vs 3765.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3765.T has a market cap of 122.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3765.T trades at ¥2,340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3765.T's P/E ratio is 51.18. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3765.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3765.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3765.T's competition here
Zuken Inc. (JPX: 6947.T)
652A.T vs 6947.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 6947.T has a market cap of 113.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 6947.T trades at ¥5,390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 6947.T's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 6947.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 6947.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 6947.T's competition here
PKSHA Technology Inc. (JPX: 3993.T)
652A.T vs 3993.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3993.T has a market cap of 106.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3993.T trades at ¥3,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3993.T's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3993.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3993.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3993.T's competition here
Plus Alpha Consulting Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 4071.T)
652A.T vs 4071.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4071.T has a market cap of 94B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4071.T trades at ¥2,216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4071.T's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4071.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4071.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4071.T's competition here
ARGO GRAPHICS Inc. (JPX: 7595.T)
652A.T vs 7595.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 7595.T has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 7595.T trades at ¥1,240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 7595.T's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 7595.T's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 7595.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 7595.T's competition here
Broadleaf Co., Ltd. (JPX: 3673.T)
652A.T vs 3673.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3673.T has a market cap of 84.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3673.T trades at ¥465.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3673.T's P/E ratio is 45.95. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3673.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3673.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3673.T's competition here
Smaregi, Inc. (JPX: 4431.T)
652A.T vs 4431.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4431.T has a market cap of 72.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4431.T trades at ¥3,785.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4431.T's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4431.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4431.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4431.T's competition here
ExaWizards Inc. (JPX: 4259.T)
652A.T vs 4259.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4259.T has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4259.T trades at ¥752.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4259.T's P/E ratio is 41.48. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4259.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is less volatile compared to 4259.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4259.T's competition here
Computer Engineering & Consulting, Ltd. (JPX: 9692.T)
652A.T vs 9692.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 9692.T has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 9692.T trades at ¥2,156.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 9692.T's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 9692.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 9692.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 9692.T's competition here
TASUKI Holdings Inc. (JPX: 166A.T)
652A.T vs 166A.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 166A.T has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 166A.T trades at ¥1,043.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 166A.T's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 166A.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 166A.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 166A.T's competition here
Fukui Computer Holdings,Inc. (JPX: 9790.T)
652A.T vs 9790.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 9790.T has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 9790.T trades at ¥3,065.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 9790.T's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 9790.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 9790.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 9790.T's competition here
Miroku Jyoho Service Co., Ltd. (JPX: 9928.T)
652A.T vs 9928.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 9928.T has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 9928.T trades at ¥2,179.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 9928.T's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 9928.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 9928.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 9928.T's competition here
FFRI Security, Inc. (JPX: 3692.T)
652A.T vs 3692.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3692.T has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3692.T trades at ¥7,600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3692.T's P/E ratio is 58.62. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3692.T's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is less volatile compared to 3692.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3692.T's competition here
Note Inc. (JPX: 5243.T)
652A.T vs 5243.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 5243.T has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 5243.T trades at ¥2,944.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5243.T's P/E ratio is 44.22. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 5243.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 5243.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 5243.T's competition here
Fixstars Corporation (JPX: 3687.T)
652A.T vs 3687.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3687.T has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3687.T trades at ¥1,749.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3687.T's P/E ratio is 32.85. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3687.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3687.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3687.T's competition here
Base Co., Ltd. (JPX: 4481.T)
652A.T vs 4481.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4481.T has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4481.T trades at ¥3,075.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4481.T's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4481.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4481.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4481.T's competition here
Pro-Ship Incorporated (JPX: 3763.T)
652A.T vs 3763.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3763.T has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3763.T trades at ¥2,031.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3763.T's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3763.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3763.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3763.T's competition here
CELSYS, Inc. (JPX: 3663.T)
652A.T vs 3663.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3663.T has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3663.T trades at ¥1,694.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3663.T's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3663.T's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3663.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3663.T's competition here
Kurashiru, Inc. (JPX: 299A.T)
652A.T vs 299A.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 299A.T has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 299A.T trades at ¥1,066.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 299A.T's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 299A.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 299A.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 299A.T's competition here
istyle Inc. (JPX: 3660.T)
652A.T vs 3660.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3660.T has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3660.T trades at ¥438.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3660.T's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3660.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3660.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3660.T's competition here
Alpha Systems Inc. (JPX: 4719.T)
652A.T vs 4719.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4719.T has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4719.T trades at ¥3,120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4719.T's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4719.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4719.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4719.T's competition here
Datasection Inc. (JPX: 3905.T)
652A.T vs 3905.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3905.T has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3905.T trades at ¥1,795.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3905.T's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3905.T's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is less volatile compared to 3905.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3905.T's competition here
AnyMind Group Inc. (JPX: 5027.T)
652A.T vs 5027.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 5027.T has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 5027.T trades at ¥726.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5027.T's P/E ratio is 34.84. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 5027.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 5027.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 5027.T's competition here
Avant Corporation (JPX: 3836.T)
652A.T vs 3836.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3836.T has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3836.T trades at ¥1,182.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3836.T's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3836.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is less volatile compared to 3836.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3836.T's competition here
VRAIN Solution Inc. (JPX: 135A.T)
652A.T vs 135A.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 135A.T has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 135A.T trades at ¥3,645.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 135A.T's P/E ratio is 43.41. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 135A.T's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 135A.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 135A.T's competition here
BASE, Inc. (JPX: 4477.T)
652A.T vs 4477.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4477.T has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4477.T trades at ¥319.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4477.T's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4477.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is less volatile compared to 4477.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4477.T's competition here
Safie Inc. (JPX: 4375.T)
652A.T vs 4375.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4375.T has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4375.T trades at ¥636.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4375.T's P/E ratio is 75.45. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4375.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4375.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4375.T's competition here
eWeLL Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 5038.T)
652A.T vs 5038.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 5038.T has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 5038.T trades at ¥2,298.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5038.T's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 5038.T's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 5038.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 5038.T's competition here
Vinx Corp. (JPX: 3784.T)
652A.T vs 3784.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3784.T has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3784.T trades at ¥2,017.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3784.T's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3784.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3784.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3784.T's competition here
Cybernet Systems Co., Ltd. (JPX: 4312.T)
652A.T vs 4312.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4312.T has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4312.T trades at ¥1,095.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4312.T's P/E ratio is 36.37. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4312.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4312.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4312.T's competition here
JASTEC Co., Ltd. (JPX: 9717.T)
652A.T vs 9717.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 9717.T has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 9717.T trades at ¥1,934.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 9717.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 9717.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 9717.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 9717.T's competition here
PCA Corporation (JPX: 9629.T)
652A.T vs 9629.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 9629.T has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 9629.T trades at ¥1,583.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 9629.T's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 9629.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 9629.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 9629.T's competition here
System Research Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3771.T)
652A.T vs 3771.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3771.T has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3771.T trades at ¥1,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3771.T's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3771.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3771.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3771.T's competition here
Dynamic Map Platform Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 336A.T)
652A.T vs 336A.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 336A.T has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 336A.T trades at ¥1,288.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 336A.T's P/E ratio is -21.31. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 336A.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is less volatile compared to 336A.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 336A.T's competition here
PLAID,Inc. (JPX: 4165.T)
652A.T vs 4165.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4165.T has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4165.T trades at ¥733.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4165.T's P/E ratio is 56.05. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4165.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4165.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4165.T's competition here
KSK Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 9687.T)
652A.T vs 9687.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 9687.T has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 9687.T trades at ¥1,585.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 9687.T's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 9687.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 9687.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 9687.T's competition here
ISB Corporation (JPX: 9702.T)
652A.T vs 9702.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 9702.T has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 9702.T trades at ¥2,499.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 9702.T's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 9702.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 9702.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 9702.T's competition here
oRo Co., Ltd. (JPX: 3983.T)
652A.T vs 3983.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3983.T has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3983.T trades at ¥1,840.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3983.T's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3983.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3983.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3983.T's competition here
ELEMENTS, Inc. (JPX: 5246.T)
652A.T vs 5246.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 5246.T has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 5246.T trades at ¥1,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5246.T's P/E ratio is 84.83. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 5246.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 5246.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 5246.T's competition here
Arent Inc. (JPX: 5254.T)
652A.T vs 5254.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 5254.T has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 5254.T trades at ¥3,690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5254.T's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 5254.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 5254.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 5254.T's competition here
Digital Grid Corp. (JPX: 350A.T)
652A.T vs 350A.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 350A.T has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 350A.T trades at ¥580.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 350A.T's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 350A.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 350A.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 350A.T's competition here
Toyokumo, Inc. (JPX: 4058.T)
652A.T vs 4058.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4058.T has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4058.T trades at ¥2,162.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4058.T's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4058.T's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4058.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4058.T's competition here
CCReB Advisors Inc. (JPX: 276A.T)
652A.T vs 276A.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 276A.T has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 276A.T trades at ¥4,470.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 276A.T's P/E ratio is 29.44. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 276A.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is less volatile compared to 276A.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 276A.T's competition here
NEOJAPAN Inc. (JPX: 3921.T)
652A.T vs 3921.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3921.T has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3921.T trades at ¥1,601.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3921.T's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3921.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3921.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3921.T's competition here
ABEJA, Inc. (JPX: 5574.T)
652A.T vs 5574.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 5574.T has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 5574.T trades at ¥2,154.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5574.T's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 5574.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 5574.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 5574.T's competition here
eole Inc. (JPX: 2334.T)
652A.T vs 2334.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 2334.T has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 2334.T trades at ¥482.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2334.T's P/E ratio is -31.15. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 2334.T's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 2334.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 2334.T's competition here
Toho System Science Co., Ltd. (JPX: 4333.T)
652A.T vs 4333.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4333.T has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4333.T trades at ¥1,144.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4333.T's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4333.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4333.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4333.T's competition here
Infcurion, Inc. (JPX: 438A.T)
652A.T vs 438A.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 438A.T has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 438A.T trades at ¥913.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 438A.T's P/E ratio is 42.62. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 438A.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 438A.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 438A.T's competition here
OpenWork Inc. (JPX: 5139.T)
652A.T vs 5139.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 5139.T has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 5139.T trades at ¥900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5139.T's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 5139.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 5139.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 5139.T's competition here
UNITED, Inc. (JPX: 2497.T)
652A.T vs 2497.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 2497.T has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 2497.T trades at ¥491.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2497.T's P/E ratio is -19.38. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 2497.T's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 2497.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 2497.T's competition here
E-Guardian Inc. (JPX: 6050.T)
652A.T vs 6050.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 6050.T has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 6050.T trades at ¥1,555.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 6050.T's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 6050.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 6050.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 6050.T's competition here
AGS Corporation (JPX: 3648.T)
652A.T vs 3648.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3648.T has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3648.T trades at ¥1,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3648.T's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3648.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3648.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3648.T's competition here
LECRE Inc. (JPX: 648A.T)
652A.T vs 648A.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 648A.T has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 648A.T trades at ¥1,718.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 648A.T's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 648A.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is less volatile compared to 648A.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 648A.T's competition here
eBASE Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3835.T)
652A.T vs 3835.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3835.T has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3835.T trades at ¥368.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3835.T's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3835.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3835.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3835.T's competition here
Human Technologies, Inc. (JPX: 5621.T)
652A.T vs 5621.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 5621.T has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 5621.T trades at ¥1,680.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5621.T's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 5621.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 5621.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 5621.T's competition here
Enigmo Inc. (JPX: 3665.T)
652A.T vs 3665.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3665.T has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3665.T trades at ¥405.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3665.T's P/E ratio is 69.23. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3665.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3665.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3665.T's competition here
Tobila Systems Inc. (JPX: 4441.T)
652A.T vs 4441.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4441.T has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4441.T trades at ¥1,518.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4441.T's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4441.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4441.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4441.T's competition here
Asteria Corporation (JPX: 3853.T)
652A.T vs 3853.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3853.T has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3853.T trades at ¥916.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3853.T's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3853.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3853.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3853.T's competition here
Cyber Com Co., Ltd. (JPX: 3852.T)
652A.T vs 3852.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3852.T has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3852.T trades at ¥1,904.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3852.T's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3852.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3852.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3852.T's competition here
Kinjiro Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 4013.T)
652A.T vs 4013.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4013.T has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4013.T trades at ¥775.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4013.T's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4013.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4013.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4013.T's competition here
Caulis, Inc. (JPX: 153A.T)
652A.T vs 153A.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 153A.T has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 153A.T trades at ¥2,383.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 153A.T's P/E ratio is 50.27. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 153A.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 153A.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 153A.T's competition here
Environment Friendly Holdings Corp. (JPX: 3777.T)
652A.T vs 3777.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3777.T has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3777.T trades at ¥42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3777.T's P/E ratio is 182.61. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3777.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3777.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3777.T's competition here
LiNKX, Inc. (JPX: 584A.T)
652A.T vs 584A.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 584A.T has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 584A.T trades at ¥2,133.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 584A.T's P/E ratio is 50.93. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 584A.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 584A.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 584A.T's competition here
UNIRITA Inc. (JPX: 3800.T)
652A.T vs 3800.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3800.T has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3800.T trades at ¥1,960.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3800.T's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3800.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3800.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3800.T's competition here
MicroAd, Inc. (JPX: 9553.T)
652A.T vs 9553.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 9553.T has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 9553.T trades at ¥535.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 9553.T's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 9553.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 9553.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 9553.T's competition here
Solvvy Inc. (JPX: 7320.T)
652A.T vs 7320.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 7320.T has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 7320.T trades at ¥1,326.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 7320.T's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 7320.T's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 7320.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 7320.T's competition here
tripla Co., Ltd. (JPX: 5136.T)
652A.T vs 5136.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 5136.T has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 5136.T trades at ¥2,471.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5136.T's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 5136.T's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 5136.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 5136.T's competition here
Information Planning Co. Ltd. (JPX: 3712.T)
652A.T vs 3712.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3712.T has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3712.T trades at ¥967.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3712.T's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3712.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3712.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3712.T's competition here
Aisan Technology Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 4667.T)
652A.T vs 4667.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4667.T has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4667.T trades at ¥907.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4667.T's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4667.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4667.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4667.T's competition here
kubell Co., Ltd. (JPX: 4448.T)
652A.T vs 4448.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4448.T has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4448.T trades at ¥331.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4448.T's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4448.T's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4448.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4448.T's competition here
Sourcenext Corporation (JPX: 4344.T)
652A.T vs 4344.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4344.T has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4344.T trades at ¥101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4344.T's P/E ratio is -5.88. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4344.T's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4344.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4344.T's competition here
Ibis Inc. (JPX: 9343.T)
652A.T vs 9343.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 9343.T has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 9343.T trades at ¥753.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 9343.T's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 9343.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 9343.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 9343.T's competition here
HEROZ, Inc. (JPX: 4382.T)
652A.T vs 4382.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4382.T has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4382.T trades at ¥906.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4382.T's P/E ratio is 32.95. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4382.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is less volatile compared to 4382.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4382.T's competition here
Ubicom Holdings, Inc. (JPX: 3937.T)
652A.T vs 3937.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3937.T has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3937.T trades at ¥1,065.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3937.T's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3937.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3937.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3937.T's competition here
Headwaters Co., Ltd. (JPX: 4011.T)
652A.T vs 4011.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4011.T has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4011.T trades at ¥2,001.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4011.T's P/E ratio is -159.44. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4011.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4011.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4011.T's competition here
SpiderPlus & Co. (JPX: 4192.T)
652A.T vs 4192.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4192.T has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4192.T trades at ¥343.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4192.T's P/E ratio is 193.99. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4192.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is less volatile compared to 4192.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4192.T's competition here
OPEN Group, Inc. (JPX: 6572.T)
652A.T vs 6572.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 6572.T has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 6572.T trades at ¥214.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 6572.T's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 6572.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 6572.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 6572.T's competition here
ENECHANGE Ltd. (JPX: 4169.T)
652A.T vs 4169.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4169.T has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4169.T trades at ¥261.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4169.T's P/E ratio is 32.06. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4169.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4169.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4169.T's competition here
Makuake, Inc. (JPX: 4479.T)
652A.T vs 4479.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4479.T has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4479.T trades at ¥874.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4479.T's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4479.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4479.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4479.T's competition here
Transaction Media Networks Inc. (JPX: 5258.T)
652A.T vs 5258.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 5258.T has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 5258.T trades at ¥364.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5258.T's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 5258.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 5258.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 5258.T's competition here
Property Data Bank, Inc. (JPX: 4389.T)
652A.T vs 4389.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4389.T has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4389.T trades at ¥1,026.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4389.T's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4389.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4389.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4389.T's competition here
DreamArts Corporation (JPX: 4811.T)
652A.T vs 4811.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 4811.T has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 4811.T trades at ¥910.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4811.T's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 4811.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 4811.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 4811.T's competition here
Atled Corp. (JPX: 3969.T)
652A.T vs 3969.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 3969.T has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 3969.T trades at ¥1,383.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3969.T's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 3969.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 3969.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 3969.T's competition here
ASIRO Inc. (JPX: 7378.T)
652A.T vs 7378.T Comparison November 2026
toggle holdings, Inc. (JPX: 652A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 652A.T stands at 55.3B. In comparison, 7378.T has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 652A.T is priced at ¥3,745.00 on the JPX, while 7378.T trades at ¥1,458.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
652A.T currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 7378.T's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, 652A.T's ROE is N/A, compared to 7378.T's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 652A.T is more volatile compared to 7378.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 652A.T.Check 7378.T's competition here