Cyber Com Co., Ltd. (3852.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3852.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3852.T | ¥1,904.00 | +0.11% | 15.3B | 18.30 | ¥104.04 | +1.58% |
| 4684.T | ¥3,700.00 | -1.60% | 1.6T | 21.73 | ¥171.46 | +2.25% |
| 4716.T | ¥8,230.00 | -3.99% | 1.1T | 17.66 | ¥478.32 | +2.37% |
| 3994.T | ¥4,057.00 | -4.02% | 235.3B | 147.60 | ¥28.74 | N/A |
| 4443.T | ¥1,432.00 | -0.42% | 188.1B | 92.18 | ¥16.11 | +0.17% |
| 9759.T | ¥2,380.00 | -2.30% | 183.2B | 14.15 | ¥170.52 | +3.98% |
| 3697.T | ¥610.10 | -3.42% | 158.8B | 19.32 | ¥32.15 | N/A |
| 215A.T | ¥1,425.00 | -5.25% | 147.3B | 77.94 | ¥18.95 | N/A |
| 3905.T | ¥4,520.00 | -14.23% | 122B | 55.49 | ¥90.64 | N/A |
| 4478.T | ¥1,863.00 | -6.52% | 117.2B | 134.03 | ¥14.75 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
3852.T vs 4684.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4684.T has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4684.T trades at ¥3,700.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4684.T's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4684.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4684.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4684.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4716.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4716.T has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4716.T trades at ¥8,230.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4716.T's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4716.T's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4716.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4716.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3994.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3994.T has a market cap of 235.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3994.T trades at ¥4,057.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3994.T's P/E ratio is 147.60. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3994.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3994.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3994.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4443.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4443.T has a market cap of 188.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4443.T trades at ¥1,432.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4443.T's P/E ratio is 92.18. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4443.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4443.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4443.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9759.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9759.T has a market cap of 183.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9759.T trades at ¥2,380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9759.T's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9759.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9759.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9759.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3697.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3697.T has a market cap of 158.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3697.T trades at ¥610.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3697.T's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3697.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3697.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3697.T's competition here
3852.T vs 215A.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 215A.T has a market cap of 147.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 215A.T trades at ¥1,425.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 215A.T's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 215A.T's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 215A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 215A.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3905.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3905.T has a market cap of 122B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3905.T trades at ¥4,520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3905.T's P/E ratio is 55.49. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3905.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3905.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3905.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4478.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4478.T has a market cap of 117.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4478.T trades at ¥1,863.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4478.T's P/E ratio is 134.03. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4478.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4478.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4478.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4071.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4071.T has a market cap of 107.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4071.T trades at ¥2,486.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4071.T's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4071.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4071.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4071.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4776.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4776.T has a market cap of 106.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4776.T trades at ¥2,222.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4776.T's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4776.T's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4776.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4776.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2492.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2492.T has a market cap of 104.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2492.T trades at ¥372.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2492.T's P/E ratio is 46.24. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2492.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2492.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2492.T's competition here
3852.T vs 6947.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 6947.T has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 6947.T trades at ¥4,560.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 6947.T's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6947.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 6947.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 6947.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3687.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3687.T has a market cap of 91.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3687.T trades at ¥2,701.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3687.T's P/E ratio is 53.32. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3687.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3687.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3687.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4259.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4259.T has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4259.T trades at ¥876.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4259.T's P/E ratio is 49.15. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4259.T's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4259.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4259.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4432.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4432.T has a market cap of 79.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4432.T trades at ¥2,237.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4432.T's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4432.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4432.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4432.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4746.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4746.T has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4746.T trades at ¥4,285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4746.T's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4746.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4746.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4746.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3673.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3673.T has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3673.T trades at ¥740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3673.T's P/E ratio is 56.31. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3673.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3673.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3673.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9692.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9692.T has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9692.T trades at ¥2,053.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9692.T's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9692.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9692.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9692.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9790.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9790.T has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9790.T trades at ¥3,040.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9790.T's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9790.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9790.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9790.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4828.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4828.T has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4828.T trades at ¥955.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4828.T's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4828.T's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4828.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4828.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3663.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3663.T has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3663.T trades at ¥1,711.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3663.T's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3663.T's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3663.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3663.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4481.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4481.T has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4481.T trades at ¥2,839.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4481.T's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4481.T's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4481.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4481.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9928.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9928.T has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9928.T trades at ¥1,698.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9928.T's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9928.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9928.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9928.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2326.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2326.T has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2326.T trades at ¥3,530.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2326.T's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2326.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2326.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2326.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4719.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4719.T has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4719.T trades at ¥3,305.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4719.T's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4719.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4719.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4719.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3763.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3763.T has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3763.T trades at ¥1,706.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3763.T's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3763.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3763.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3763.T's competition here
3852.T vs 299A.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 299A.T has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 299A.T trades at ¥950.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 299A.T's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 299A.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 299A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 299A.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3692.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3692.T has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3692.T trades at ¥4,955.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3692.T's P/E ratio is 37.04. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3692.T's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3692.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3692.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4323.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4323.T has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4323.T trades at ¥1,529.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4323.T's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4323.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4323.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4323.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3836.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3836.T has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3836.T trades at ¥1,069.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3836.T's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3836.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3836.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3836.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4375.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4375.T has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4375.T trades at ¥626.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4375.T's P/E ratio is 81.19. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4375.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4375.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4375.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3784.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3784.T has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3784.T trades at ¥2,017.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3784.T's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3784.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is more volatile compared to 3784.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3784.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4312.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4312.T has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4312.T trades at ¥1,095.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4312.T's P/E ratio is 36.37. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4312.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4312.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4312.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9717.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9717.T has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9717.T trades at ¥1,934.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9717.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9717.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is more volatile compared to 9717.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9717.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4477.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4477.T has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4477.T trades at ¥261.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4477.T's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4477.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4477.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4477.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3983.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3983.T has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3983.T trades at ¥1,953.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3983.T's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3983.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3983.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3983.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3771.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3771.T has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3771.T trades at ¥1,719.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3771.T's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3771.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3771.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3771.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4826.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4826.T has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4826.T trades at ¥496.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4826.T's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4826.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4826.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4826.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5027.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5027.T has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5027.T trades at ¥442.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5027.T's P/E ratio is 31.60. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5027.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5027.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5027.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5038.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5038.T has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5038.T trades at ¥1,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5038.T's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5038.T's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5038.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5038.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9702.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9702.T has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9702.T trades at ¥2,231.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9702.T's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9702.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9702.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9702.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9687.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9687.T has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9687.T trades at ¥4,335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9687.T's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9687.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9687.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9687.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9629.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9629.T has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9629.T trades at ¥1,250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9629.T's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9629.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9629.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9629.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4425.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4425.T has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4425.T trades at ¥1,980.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4425.T's P/E ratio is -130.89. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4425.T's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4425.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4425.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2334.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2334.T has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2334.T trades at ¥620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2334.T's P/E ratio is -44.23. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2334.T's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2334.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2334.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5254.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5254.T has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5254.T trades at ¥3,435.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5254.T's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5254.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5254.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5254.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3853.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3853.T has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3853.T trades at ¥1,165.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3853.T's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3853.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3853.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3853.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3921.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3921.T has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3921.T trades at ¥1,509.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3921.T's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3921.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3921.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3921.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4058.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4058.T has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4058.T trades at ¥1,873.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4058.T's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4058.T's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4058.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4058.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4333.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4333.T has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4333.T trades at ¥1,144.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4333.T's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4333.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4333.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4333.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4165.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4165.T has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4165.T trades at ¥443.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4165.T's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4165.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4165.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4165.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2497.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2497.T has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2497.T trades at ¥488.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2497.T's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2497.T's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2497.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2497.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3648.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3648.T has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3648.T trades at ¥1,057.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3648.T's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3648.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3648.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3648.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9691.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9691.T has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9691.T trades at ¥5,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9691.T's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9691.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9691.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9691.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3835.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3835.T has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3835.T trades at ¥395.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3835.T's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3835.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3835.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3835.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3777.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3777.T has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3777.T trades at ¥51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3777.T's P/E ratio is -5300.00. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3777.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3777.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3777.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9651.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9651.T has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9651.T trades at ¥1,662.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9651.T's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9651.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9651.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9651.T's competition here
3852.T vs 7320.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 7320.T has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 7320.T trades at ¥1,379.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 7320.T's P/E ratio is -57.34. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7320.T's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 7320.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 7320.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3800.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3800.T has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3800.T trades at ¥1,945.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3800.T's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3800.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3800.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3800.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9553.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9553.T has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9553.T trades at ¥507.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9553.T's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9553.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9553.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9553.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4344.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4344.T has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4344.T trades at ¥101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4344.T's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4344.T's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4344.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4344.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9343.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9343.T has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9343.T trades at ¥731.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9343.T's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9343.T's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9343.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9343.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2307.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2307.T has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2307.T trades at ¥915.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2307.T's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2307.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2307.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2307.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3712.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3712.T has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3712.T trades at ¥843.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3712.T's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3712.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3712.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3712.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5586.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5586.T has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5586.T trades at ¥787.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5586.T's P/E ratio is 84.16. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5586.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5586.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5586.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5621.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5621.T has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5621.T trades at ¥1,335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5621.T's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5621.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5621.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5621.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4013.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4013.T has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4013.T trades at ¥633.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4013.T's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4013.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4013.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4013.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5572.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5572.T has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5572.T trades at ¥2,735.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5572.T's P/E ratio is 82.56. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5572.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5572.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5572.T's competition here
3852.T vs 332A.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 332A.T has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 332A.T trades at ¥1,023.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 332A.T's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 332A.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 332A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 332A.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4299.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4299.T has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4299.T trades at ¥1,143.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4299.T's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4299.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4299.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4299.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2169.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2169.T has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2169.T trades at ¥1,747.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2169.T's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2169.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2169.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2169.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3937.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3937.T has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3937.T trades at ¥923.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3937.T's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3937.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3937.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3937.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4193.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4193.T has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4193.T trades at ¥2,238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4193.T's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4193.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4193.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4193.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4382.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4382.T has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4382.T trades at ¥713.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4382.T's P/E ratio is 32.19. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4382.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4382.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4382.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4448.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4448.T has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4448.T trades at ¥254.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4448.T's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4448.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4448.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4448.T's competition here
3852.T vs 6047.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 6047.T has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 6047.T trades at ¥440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 6047.T's P/E ratio is 45.24. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6047.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 6047.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 6047.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4446.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4446.T has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4446.T trades at ¥670.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4446.T's P/E ratio is -53.98. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4446.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4446.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4446.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3969.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3969.T has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3969.T trades at ¥1,337.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3969.T's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3969.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3969.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3969.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3856.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3856.T has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3856.T trades at ¥520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3856.T's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3856.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3856.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3856.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9698.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9698.T has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9698.T trades at ¥1,213.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9698.T's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9698.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9698.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9698.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4412.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4412.T has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4412.T trades at ¥1,083.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4412.T's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4412.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4412.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4412.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4168.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4168.T has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4168.T trades at ¥705.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4168.T's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4168.T's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4168.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4168.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4495.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4495.T has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4495.T trades at ¥1,799.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4495.T's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4495.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4495.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4495.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4389.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4389.T has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4389.T trades at ¥887.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4389.T's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4389.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4389.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4389.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4192.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4192.T has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4192.T trades at ¥243.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4192.T's P/E ratio is -518.75. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4192.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4192.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4192.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4284.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4284.T has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4284.T trades at ¥416.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4284.T's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4284.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4284.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4284.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3804.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3804.T has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3804.T trades at ¥427.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3804.T's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3804.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3804.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3804.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4011.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4011.T has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4011.T trades at ¥2,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4011.T's P/E ratio is 155.26. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4011.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4011.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4011.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4169.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4169.T has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4169.T trades at ¥165.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4169.T's P/E ratio is 62.09. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4169.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4169.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4169.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5588.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5588.T has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5588.T trades at ¥692.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5588.T's P/E ratio is 42.36. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5588.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5588.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5588.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5248.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5248.T has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5248.T trades at ¥477.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5248.T's P/E ratio is 29.89. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5248.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5248.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5248.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4015.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4015.T has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4015.T trades at ¥492.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4015.T's P/E ratio is 119.32. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4015.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4015.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4015.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2303.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2303.T has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2303.T trades at ¥1,237.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2303.T's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2303.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2303.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2303.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4054.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4054.T has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4054.T trades at ¥523.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4054.T's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4054.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4054.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4054.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2186.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2186.T has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2186.T trades at ¥904.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2186.T's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2186.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2186.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2186.T's competition here
3852.T vs 153A.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 153A.T has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 153A.T trades at ¥1,149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 153A.T's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 153A.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 153A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 153A.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2321.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2321.T has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2321.T trades at ¥131.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2321.T's P/E ratio is -69.79. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2321.T's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2321.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2321.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5244.T Comparison June 2026
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5244.T has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5244.T trades at ¥161.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5244.T's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5244.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5244.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5244.T's competition here