Etsy, Inc.
Etsy, Inc. 3E2.BE Peers
See (3E2.BE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3E2.BE | $41.85 | -1.43% | 4.48B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AMZ.DE | $188.70 | -1.12% | 2.00T | 34.50 | $5.47 | N/A |
| 2RR.F | $15.09 | +1.06% | 288.97B | 19.85 | $0.76 | +0.84% |
| AHLA.F | $119.20 | +1.19% | 285.41B | 19.13 | $6.23 | +1.29% |
| IXD1.DE | $47.70 | -1.32% | 148.49B | 25.37 | $1.88 | +2.30% |
| MLB1.DE | $2,272.50 | -0.33% | 115.21B | 62.74 | $36.22 | N/A |
| 013A.F | $32.10 | -4.32% | 42.07B | 9.79 | $3.28 | +2.66% |
| AHLA.DE | $119.60 | +0.67% | 35.80B | 19.17 | $6.24 | +0.10% |
| EBA.DE | $61.86 | -0.82% | 28.52B | 16.72 | $3.70 | +1.67% |
| ZAL.DE | $31.52 | -2.11% | 8.18B | 30.60 | $1.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
3E2.BE vs AMZ.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, AMZ.DE has a market cap of 2.00T. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while AMZ.DE trades at $188.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMZ.DE's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AMZ.DE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to AMZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs 2RR.F Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, 2RR.F has a market cap of 288.97B. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while 2RR.F trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2RR.F's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 2RR.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to 2RR.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs AHLA.F Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, AHLA.F has a market cap of 285.41B. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while AHLA.F trades at $119.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHLA.F's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AHLA.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to AHLA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs IXD1.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, IXD1.DE has a market cap of 148.49B. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while IXD1.DE trades at $47.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IXD1.DE's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IXD1.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to IXD1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs MLB1.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, MLB1.DE has a market cap of 115.21B. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while MLB1.DE trades at $2,272.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLB1.DE's P/E ratio is 62.74. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MLB1.DE's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to MLB1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs 013A.F Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, 013A.F has a market cap of 42.07B. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while 013A.F trades at $32.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 013A.F's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 013A.F's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to 013A.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs AHLA.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, AHLA.DE has a market cap of 35.80B. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while AHLA.DE trades at $119.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHLA.DE's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AHLA.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to AHLA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs EBA.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, EBA.DE has a market cap of 28.52B. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while EBA.DE trades at $61.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBA.DE's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EBA.DE's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to EBA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs ZAL.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, ZAL.DE has a market cap of 8.18B. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while ZAL.DE trades at $31.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZAL.DE's P/E ratio is 30.60. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ZAL.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to ZAL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs DHER.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, DHER.DE has a market cap of 7.88B. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while DHER.DE trades at $26.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHER.DE's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DHER.DE's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to DHER.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs 3E2.F Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, 3E2.F has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while 3E2.F trades at $41.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3E2.F's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 3E2.F's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to 3E2.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs 3E2.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, 3E2.DE has a market cap of 4.22B. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while 3E2.DE trades at $40.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3E2.DE's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 3E2.DE's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to 3E2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs ZO1.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, ZO1.DE has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while ZO1.DE trades at $468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZO1.DE's P/E ratio is -211.10. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ZO1.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to ZO1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs CEC.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, CEC.DE has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while CEC.DE trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEC.DE's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CEC.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to CEC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs YOU.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, YOU.DE has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while YOU.DE trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YOU.DE's P/E ratio is -15.72. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to YOU.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to YOU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs YOU.F Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, YOU.F has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while YOU.F trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YOU.F's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to YOU.F's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to YOU.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs 8WZ.F Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, 8WZ.F has a market cap of 804.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while 8WZ.F trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 8WZ.F's P/E ratio is -20.33. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 8WZ.F's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to 8WZ.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs SNH.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, SNH.DE has a market cap of 670.67M. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while SNH.DE trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNH.DE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SNH.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to SNH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs G5NA.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, G5NA.DE has a market cap of 360.26M. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while G5NA.DE trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas G5NA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to G5NA.DE's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE and G5NA.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
3E2.BE vs H24.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, H24.DE has a market cap of 252.84M. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while H24.DE trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H24.DE's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to H24.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to H24.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs BIKE.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, BIKE.DE has a market cap of 104.23M. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while BIKE.DE trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIKE.DE's P/E ratio is -7.61. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BIKE.DE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to BIKE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs BIKE.F Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, BIKE.F has a market cap of 103.35M. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while BIKE.F trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIKE.F's P/E ratio is -7.55. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BIKE.F's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to BIKE.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs FSNT.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, FSNT.DE has a market cap of 89.82M. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while FSNT.DE trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSNT.DE's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FSNT.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to FSNT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs PLDADEL00013.SG Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, PLDADEL00013.SG has a market cap of 78.21M. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while PLDADEL00013.SG trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLDADEL00013.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to PLDADEL00013.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs ART.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, ART.DE has a market cap of 54.49M. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while ART.DE trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ART.DE's P/E ratio is -68.21. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ART.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE and ART.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
3E2.BE vs MRX.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, MRX.DE has a market cap of 48.70M. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while MRX.DE trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRX.DE's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MRX.DE's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to MRX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs MRX.F Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, MRX.F has a market cap of 48.02M. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while MRX.F trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRX.F's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MRX.F's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE and MRX.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
3E2.BE vs ECF.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, ECF.DE has a market cap of 19.28M. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while ECF.DE trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECF.DE's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ECF.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to ECF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs BBY.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, BBY.DE has a market cap of 16.93M. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while BBY.DE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBY.DE's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BBY.DE's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to BBY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs BTBB.DE Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, BTBB.DE has a market cap of 2.69M. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while BTBB.DE trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTBB.DE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BTBB.DE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to BTBB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.
3E2.BE vs U1DA.F Comparison
3E2.BE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3E2.BE stands at 4.48B. In comparison, U1DA.F has a market cap of 121274.00. Regarding current trading prices, 3E2.BE is priced at $41.85, while U1DA.F trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3E2.BE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U1DA.F's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, 3E2.BE's ROE is -0.26%, compared to U1DA.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3E2.BE is less volatile compared to U1DA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3E2.BE.