DaChan Food (Asia) Limited
DaChan Food (Asia) Limited 3999.HK Peers
See (3999.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3999.HK | $0.65 | +1.56% | 660.52M | 10.83 | $0.06 | N/A |
| 0288.HK | $6.68 | -0.30% | 85.71B | 6.82 | $0.98 | +7.74% |
| 0322.HK | $13.26 | +0.61% | 74.74B | 18.42 | $0.72 | +2.42% |
| 2319.HK | $18.40 | +0.33% | 71.53B | 613.33 | $0.03 | +2.92% |
| 0151.HK | $5.31 | +0.57% | 62.67B | 13.97 | $0.38 | +4.85% |
| 6186.HK | $5.82 | -1.02% | 52.77B | 13.86 | $0.42 | +4.94% |
| 3799.HK | $3.73 | +0.81% | 51.08B | 15.54 | $0.24 | N/A |
| 9985.HK | $14.88 | -0.93% | 34.99B | 29.76 | $0.50 | +1.67% |
| 0142.HK | $5.52 | +1.10% | 23.49B | 5.02 | $1.10 | +4.44% |
| 2555.HK | $9.46 | -0.53% | 13.98B | 26.28 | $0.36 | +7.35% |
Stock Comparison
3999.HK vs 0288.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 0288.HK has a market cap of 85.71B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 0288.HK trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 0288.HK's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0288.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 0288.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 0322.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 0322.HK has a market cap of 74.74B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 0322.HK trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 0322.HK's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0322.HK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 0322.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 2319.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 2319.HK has a market cap of 71.53B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 2319.HK trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 2319.HK's P/E ratio is 613.33. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2319.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 2319.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 0151.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 0151.HK has a market cap of 62.67B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 0151.HK trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 0151.HK's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0151.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 0151.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 6186.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 6186.HK has a market cap of 52.77B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 6186.HK trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 6186.HK's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 6186.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 6186.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 3799.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 3799.HK has a market cap of 51.08B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 3799.HK trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 3799.HK's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3799.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is more volatile compared to 3799.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 9985.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 9985.HK has a market cap of 34.99B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 9985.HK trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 9985.HK's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 9985.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 9985.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 0142.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 0142.HK has a market cap of 23.49B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 0142.HK trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 0142.HK's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0142.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 0142.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 2555.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 2555.HK has a market cap of 13.98B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 2555.HK trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 2555.HK's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2555.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 2555.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 1579.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 1579.HK has a market cap of 13.19B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 1579.HK trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 1579.HK's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1579.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 1579.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 0345.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 0345.HK has a market cap of 10.02B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 0345.HK trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 0345.HK's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0345.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 0345.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 2517.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 2517.HK has a market cap of 9.15B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 2517.HK trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 2517.HK's P/E ratio is 36.11. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2517.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 2517.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 9676.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 9676.HK has a market cap of 7.80B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 9676.HK trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 9676.HK's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 9676.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 9676.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 1112.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 1112.HK has a market cap of 7.64B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 1112.HK trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 1112.HK's P/E ratio is -131.56. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1112.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 1112.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 1475.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 1475.HK has a market cap of 6.99B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 1475.HK trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 1475.HK's P/E ratio is 35.26. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1475.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is more volatile compared to 1475.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 1610.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 1610.HK has a market cap of 6.74B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 1610.HK trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 1610.HK's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1610.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 1610.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 1230.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 1230.HK has a market cap of 5.69B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 1230.HK trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 1230.HK's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1230.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is more volatile compared to 1230.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 1458.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 1458.HK has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 1458.HK trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 1458.HK's P/E ratio is 66.25. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1458.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 1458.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 6868.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 6868.HK has a market cap of 3.53B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 6868.HK trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 6868.HK's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 6868.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is more volatile compared to 6868.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 1717.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 1717.HK has a market cap of 3.45B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 1717.HK trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 1717.HK's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1717.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is more volatile compared to 1717.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 6836.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 6836.HK has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 6836.HK trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 6836.HK's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 6836.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is more volatile compared to 6836.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 9977.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 9977.HK has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 9977.HK trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 9977.HK's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 9977.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is more volatile compared to 9977.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 1497.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 1497.HK has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 1497.HK trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 1497.HK's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1497.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is more volatile compared to 1497.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 0411.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 0411.HK has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 0411.HK trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 0411.HK's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0411.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 0411.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 1837.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 1837.HK has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 1837.HK trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 1837.HK's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1837.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 1837.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 3838.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 3838.HK has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 3838.HK trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 3838.HK's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3838.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is more volatile compared to 3838.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 0829.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 0829.HK has a market cap of 985.30M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 0829.HK trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 0829.HK's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0829.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 0829.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 2317.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 2317.HK has a market cap of 974.55M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 2317.HK trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 2317.HK's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2317.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is more volatile compared to 2317.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 1583.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 1583.HK has a market cap of 921.22M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 1583.HK trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 1583.HK's P/E ratio is 40.67. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1583.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is more volatile compared to 1583.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 8476.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 8476.HK has a market cap of 876.40M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 8476.HK trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 8476.HK's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8476.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is more volatile compared to 8476.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 2530.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 2530.HK has a market cap of 640.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 2530.HK trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 2530.HK's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2530.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 2530.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 0809.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 0809.HK has a market cap of 630.18M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 0809.HK trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 0809.HK's P/E ratio is 2.37. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0809.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 0809.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 8609.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 8609.HK has a market cap of 585.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 8609.HK trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 8609.HK's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8609.HK's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is more volatile compared to 8609.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 1285.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 1285.HK has a market cap of 419.15M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 1285.HK trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 1285.HK's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1285.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 1285.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 2226.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 2226.HK has a market cap of 370.40M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 2226.HK trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 2226.HK's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2226.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is more volatile compared to 2226.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 1767.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 1767.HK has a market cap of 320.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 1767.HK trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 1767.HK's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1767.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 1767.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 1262.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 1262.HK has a market cap of 305.78M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 1262.HK trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 1262.HK's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1262.HK's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 1262.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 0926.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 0926.HK has a market cap of 271.43M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 0926.HK trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 0926.HK's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0926.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 0926.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 1068.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 1068.HK has a market cap of 262.48M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 1068.HK trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 1068.HK's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1068.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 1068.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 3889.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 3889.HK has a market cap of 177.69M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 3889.HK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 3889.HK's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3889.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 3889.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 8362.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 8362.HK has a market cap of 86.80M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 8362.HK trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 8362.HK's P/E ratio is -26.96. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8362.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 8362.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 1695.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 1695.HK has a market cap of 81.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 1695.HK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 1695.HK's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1695.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 1695.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 0932.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 0932.HK has a market cap of 80.81M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 0932.HK trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 0932.HK's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0932.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 0932.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 1676.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 1676.HK has a market cap of 78.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 1676.HK trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 1676.HK's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1676.HK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is more volatile compared to 1676.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 0834.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 0834.HK has a market cap of 67.94M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 0834.HK trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 0834.HK's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0834.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 0834.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 0841.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 0841.HK has a market cap of 45.61M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 0841.HK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 0841.HK's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0841.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is more volatile compared to 0841.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 2147.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 2147.HK has a market cap of 40.32M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 2147.HK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 2147.HK's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2147.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 2147.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 8241.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 8241.HK has a market cap of 36.89M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 8241.HK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 8241.HK's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8241.HK's ROE of -4.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is more volatile compared to 8241.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 8179.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 8179.HK has a market cap of 36.25M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 8179.HK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 8179.HK's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8179.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 8179.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.
3999.HK vs 1340.HK Comparison
3999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3999.HK stands at 660.52M. In comparison, 1340.HK has a market cap of 35.07M. Regarding current trading prices, 3999.HK is priced at $0.65, while 1340.HK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.83, whereas 1340.HK's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, 3999.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1340.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3999.HK is less volatile compared to 1340.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3999.HK.