China Xinhua Education Group Limited
China Xinhua Education Group Limited 2779.HK Peers
See (2779.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2779.HK | HK$0.59 | N/A | 949.1M | 2.57 | HK$0.23 | +10.71% |
| 9901.HK | HK$36.60 | -1.88% | 59.9B | 20.11 | HK$1.82 | +0.16% |
| 0667.HK | HK$6.49 | -2.26% | 14.3B | 24.96 | HK$0.26 | +3.10% |
| 1797.HK | HK$12.82 | N/A | 13.4B | -641.00 | -HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 1773.HK | HK$4.11 | -2.14% | 8.4B | 11.74 | HK$0.35 | +2.19% |
| 0839.HK | HK$2.68 | -1.47% | 7.5B | 24.36 | HK$0.11 | +3.79% |
| 1969.HK | HK$4.11 | -1.20% | 4.9B | 5.79 | HK$0.71 | +2.66% |
| 2469.HK | HK$2.27 | -1.30% | 4.9B | 18.92 | HK$0.12 | N/A |
| 3978.HK | HK$5.03 | -2.71% | 3.8B | 17.96 | HK$0.28 | +2.44% |
| 0032.HK | HK$8.20 | N/A | 3.1B | 7.07 | HK$1.16 | +5.12% |
Stock Comparison
2779.HK vs 9901.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 9901.HK has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 9901.HK trades at HK$36.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 9901.HK's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9901.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 9901.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 0667.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 0667.HK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 0667.HK trades at HK$6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 0667.HK's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0667.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 0667.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1797.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1797.HK has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1797.HK trades at HK$12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1797.HK's P/E ratio is -641.00. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1797.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1797.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1773.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1773.HK has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1773.HK trades at HK$4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1773.HK's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1773.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1773.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 0839.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 0839.HK has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 0839.HK trades at HK$2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 0839.HK's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0839.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 0839.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1969.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1969.HK has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1969.HK trades at HK$4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1969.HK's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1969.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1969.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 2469.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 2469.HK has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 2469.HK trades at HK$2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 2469.HK's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2469.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 2469.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 3978.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 3978.HK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 3978.HK trades at HK$5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 3978.HK's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3978.HK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 3978.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 0032.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 0032.HK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 0032.HK trades at HK$8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 0032.HK's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0032.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 0032.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1890.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1890.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1890.HK trades at HK$1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1890.HK's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1890.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1890.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 9616.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 9616.HK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 9616.HK trades at HK$3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 9616.HK's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9616.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 9616.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1769.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1769.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1769.HK trades at HK$3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1769.HK's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1769.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1769.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 2001.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 2001.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 2001.HK trades at HK$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 2001.HK's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2001.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 2001.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 0382.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 0382.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 0382.HK trades at HK$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 0382.HK's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0382.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 0382.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 6169.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 6169.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 6169.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 6169.HK's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6169.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 6169.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1765.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1765.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1765.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1765.HK's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1765.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1765.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 2175.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 2175.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 2175.HK trades at HK$2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 2175.HK's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2175.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 2175.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1935.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1935.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1935.HK trades at HK$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1935.HK's P/E ratio is 3.86. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1935.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1935.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1593.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1593.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1593.HK trades at HK$1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1593.HK's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1593.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1593.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1525.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1525.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1525.HK trades at HK$2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1525.HK's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1525.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1525.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1317.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1317.HK has a market cap of 966.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1317.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1317.HK's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1317.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1317.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1082.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1082.HK has a market cap of 924.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1082.HK trades at HK$1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1082.HK's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1082.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1082.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1851.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1851.HK has a market cap of 735M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1851.HK trades at HK$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1851.HK's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1851.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1851.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1756.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1756.HK has a market cap of 696M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1756.HK trades at HK$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1756.HK's P/E ratio is 1.38. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1756.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1756.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1565.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1565.HK has a market cap of 687.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1565.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1565.HK's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1565.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1565.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1569.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1569.HK has a market cap of 653.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1569.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1569.HK's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1569.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1569.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 6913.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 6913.HK has a market cap of 380.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 6913.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 6913.HK's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6913.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 6913.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 6068.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 6068.HK has a market cap of 232.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 6068.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 6068.HK's P/E ratio is 2.14. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6068.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 6068.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 2371.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 2371.HK has a market cap of 189.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 2371.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 2371.HK's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2371.HK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 2371.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1449.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1449.HK has a market cap of 166.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1449.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1449.HK's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1449.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1449.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1758.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1758.HK has a market cap of 149M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1758.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1758.HK's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1758.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1758.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1752.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1752.HK has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1752.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1752.HK's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1752.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1752.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1598.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1598.HK has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1598.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1598.HK's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1598.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1598.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1871.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1871.HK has a market cap of 119.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1871.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1871.HK's P/E ratio is -9.95. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1871.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1871.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 1775.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1775.HK has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1775.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 1775.HK's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1775.HK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 1775.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 8363.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 8363.HK has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 8363.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 8363.HK's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8363.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 8363.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 8160.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 8160.HK has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 8160.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 8160.HK's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8160.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 8160.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 8417.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 8417.HK has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 8417.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 8417.HK's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8417.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is more volatile compared to 8417.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.
2779.HK vs 8055.HK Comparison
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 8055.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 8055.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas 8055.HK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8055.HK's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 8055.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.