China Xinhua Education Group Limited
China Xinhua Education Group Limited (2779.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2779.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2779.HK | HK$0.59 | +0.00% | 949.1M | 2.68 | HK$0.22 | N/A |
| 9901.HK | HK$34.35 | -1.86% | 56.2B | 18.98 | HK$1.81 | +0.17% |
| 1797.HK | HK$22.85 | +4.10% | 23.9B | -1142.50 | -HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 0667.HK | HK$8.04 | -1.35% | 17.7B | 30.92 | HK$0.26 | +2.70% |
| 1773.HK | HK$4.03 | +2.81% | 8.3B | 11.51 | HK$0.35 | +2.71% |
| 0839.HK | HK$2.76 | -4.17% | 7.8B | 25.18 | HK$0.11 | +4.01% |
| 2469.HK | HK$3.43 | +3.00% | 7.4B | 28.58 | HK$0.12 | N/A |
| 1969.HK | HK$4.36 | -2.24% | 5.2B | 6.14 | HK$0.71 | +4.48% |
| 3978.HK | HK$4.99 | -2.35% | 3.7B | 17.82 | HK$0.28 | +2.41% |
| 0032.HK | HK$8.36 | +4.50% | 3.1B | 7.21 | HK$1.16 | +2.25% |
Stock Comparison
2779.HK vs 9901.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 9901.HK has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 9901.HK trades at HK$34.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 9901.HK's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9901.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 9901.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 9901.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1797.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1797.HK has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1797.HK trades at HK$22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1797.HK's P/E ratio is -1142.50. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1797.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1797.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1797.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 0667.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 0667.HK has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 0667.HK trades at HK$8.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0667.HK's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0667.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 0667.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 0667.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1773.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1773.HK has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1773.HK trades at HK$4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1773.HK's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1773.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1773.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1773.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 0839.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 0839.HK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 0839.HK trades at HK$2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0839.HK's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0839.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 0839.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 0839.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 2469.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 2469.HK has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 2469.HK trades at HK$3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 2469.HK's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2469.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 2469.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 2469.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1969.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1969.HK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1969.HK trades at HK$4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1969.HK's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1969.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1969.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1969.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 3978.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 3978.HK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 3978.HK trades at HK$4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 3978.HK's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3978.HK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 3978.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 3978.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 0032.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 0032.HK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 0032.HK trades at HK$8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0032.HK's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0032.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 0032.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 0032.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1890.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1890.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1890.HK trades at HK$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1890.HK's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1890.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1890.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1890.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 9616.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 9616.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 9616.HK trades at HK$3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 9616.HK's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9616.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 9616.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 9616.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 6169.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 6169.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 6169.HK trades at HK$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 6169.HK's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6169.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 6169.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 6169.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 2001.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 2001.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 2001.HK trades at HK$1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 2001.HK's P/E ratio is 2.41. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2001.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 2001.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 2001.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 0382.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 0382.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 0382.HK trades at HK$1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0382.HK's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0382.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 0382.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 0382.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1769.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1769.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1769.HK trades at HK$2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1769.HK's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1769.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1769.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1769.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1765.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1765.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1765.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1765.HK's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1765.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1765.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1765.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1935.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1935.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1935.HK trades at HK$0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1935.HK's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1935.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK and 1935.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 1935.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1593.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1593.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1593.HK trades at HK$1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1593.HK's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1593.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1593.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1593.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1525.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1525.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1525.HK trades at HK$2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1525.HK's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1525.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1525.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1525.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 2175.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 2175.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 2175.HK trades at HK$2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 2175.HK's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2175.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 2175.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 2175.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1317.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1317.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1317.HK trades at HK$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1317.HK's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1317.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1317.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1317.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1082.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1082.HK has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1082.HK trades at HK$1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1082.HK's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1082.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1082.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1082.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1851.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1851.HK has a market cap of 850M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1851.HK trades at HK$1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1851.HK's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1851.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK and 1851.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 1851.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1756.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1756.HK has a market cap of 708M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1756.HK trades at HK$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1756.HK's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1756.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1756.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1756.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1565.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1565.HK has a market cap of 693.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1565.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1565.HK's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1565.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1565.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1565.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1569.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1569.HK has a market cap of 658M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1569.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1569.HK's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1569.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1569.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1569.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 6913.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 6913.HK has a market cap of 393.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 6913.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 6913.HK's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6913.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 6913.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 6913.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 6068.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 6068.HK has a market cap of 284.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 6068.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 6068.HK's P/E ratio is 2.62. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6068.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 6068.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 6068.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 2371.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 2371.HK has a market cap of 256.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 2371.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 2371.HK's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2371.HK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 2371.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 2371.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1449.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1449.HK has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1449.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1449.HK's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1449.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK and 1449.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 1449.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1871.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1871.HK has a market cap of 134.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1871.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1871.HK's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1871.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1871.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1871.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1598.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1598.HK has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1598.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1598.HK's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1598.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 1598.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 1598.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1752.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1752.HK has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1752.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1752.HK's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1752.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK and 1752.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 1752.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1758.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1758.HK has a market cap of 113.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1758.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1758.HK's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1758.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK and 1758.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 1758.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 1775.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 1775.HK has a market cap of 87.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 1775.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1775.HK's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1775.HK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK and 1775.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 1775.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 8363.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 8363.HK has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 8363.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 8363.HK's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8363.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 8363.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 8363.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 8160.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 8160.HK has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 8160.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 8160.HK's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8160.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 8160.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 8160.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 8417.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 8417.HK has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 8417.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 8417.HK's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8417.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK and 8417.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 8417.HK's competition here
2779.HK vs 8055.HK Comparison August 2025
2779.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2779.HK stands at 949.1M. In comparison, 8055.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2779.HK is priced at HK$0.59, while 8055.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2779.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 8055.HK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 2779.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8055.HK's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 2779.HK is less volatile compared to 8055.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2779.HK.Check 8055.HK's competition here