Sichuan Baicha Baidao Industrial Co., Ltd.
Sichuan Baicha Baidao Industrial Co., Ltd. 2555.HK Peers
See (2555.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2555.HK | HK$9.87 | +0.00% | 14.2B | 25.95 | HK$0.37 | +21.84% |
| 0288.HK | HK$7.60 | +0.00% | 98.7B | 7.77 | HK$0.99 | +6.72% |
| 0322.HK | HK$11.68 | +0.00% | 66.5B | 16.39 | HK$0.72 | +3.35% |
| 0151.HK | HK$5.45 | +0.00% | 64.9B | 13.75 | HK$0.40 | +4.68% |
| 2319.HK | HK$16.36 | +0.00% | 64.1B | 550.00 | HK$0.03 | +24.22% |
| 6186.HK | HK$5.74 | +0.00% | 52.7B | 13.51 | HK$0.43 | +5.62% |
| 3799.HK | HK$3.73 | +0.81% | 51.1B | 15.54 | HK$0.24 | N/A |
| 9985.HK | HK$14.30 | +0.00% | 34.4B | 28.32 | HK$0.50 | +2.52% |
| 0142.HK | HK$5.66 | +0.00% | 24.5B | 5.19 | HK$1.11 | +18.70% |
| 1579.HK | HK$13.96 | +0.00% | 13.5B | 16.75 | HK$0.83 | +5.30% |
Stock Comparison
2555.HK vs 0288.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 0288.HK has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 0288.HK trades at HK$7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 0288.HK's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0288.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 0288.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 0322.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 0322.HK has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 0322.HK trades at HK$11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 0322.HK's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0322.HK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 0322.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 0151.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 0151.HK has a market cap of 64.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 0151.HK trades at HK$5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 0151.HK's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0151.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 0151.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 2319.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 2319.HK has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 2319.HK trades at HK$16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 2319.HK's P/E ratio is 550.00. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 2319.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 2319.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 6186.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 6186.HK has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 6186.HK trades at HK$5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 6186.HK's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 6186.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 6186.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 3799.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 3799.HK has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 3799.HK trades at HK$3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 3799.HK's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3799.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 3799.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 9985.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 9985.HK has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 9985.HK trades at HK$14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 9985.HK's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 9985.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 9985.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 0142.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 0142.HK has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 0142.HK trades at HK$5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 0142.HK's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0142.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 0142.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 1579.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1579.HK has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 1579.HK trades at HK$13.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 1579.HK's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1579.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 1579.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 9676.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 9676.HK has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 9676.HK trades at HK$6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 9676.HK's P/E ratio is 36.19. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 9676.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 9676.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 0345.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 0345.HK has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 0345.HK trades at HK$9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 0345.HK's P/E ratio is 84.36. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0345.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 0345.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 2517.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 2517.HK has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 2517.HK trades at HK$3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 2517.HK's P/E ratio is 37.11. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 2517.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is less volatile compared to 2517.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 1112.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1112.HK has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 1112.HK trades at HK$11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 1112.HK's P/E ratio is -136.22. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1112.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is less volatile compared to 1112.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 1610.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1610.HK has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 1610.HK trades at HK$1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 1610.HK's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1610.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 1610.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 1475.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1475.HK has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 1475.HK trades at HK$6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 1475.HK's P/E ratio is 36.05. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1475.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 1475.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 1230.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1230.HK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 1230.HK trades at HK$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 1230.HK's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1230.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 1230.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 1458.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1458.HK has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 1458.HK trades at HK$2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 1458.HK's P/E ratio is 61.00. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1458.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 1458.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 1717.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1717.HK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 1717.HK trades at HK$2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 1717.HK's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1717.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 1717.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 6868.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 6868.HK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 6868.HK trades at HK$3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 6868.HK's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 6868.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 6868.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 6836.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 6836.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 6836.HK trades at HK$3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 6836.HK's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 6836.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 6836.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 9977.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 9977.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 9977.HK trades at HK$1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 9977.HK's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 9977.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 9977.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 1497.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1497.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 1497.HK trades at HK$6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 1497.HK's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1497.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 1497.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 0411.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 0411.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 0411.HK trades at HK$10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 0411.HK's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0411.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 0411.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 1837.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1837.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 1837.HK trades at HK$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 1837.HK's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1837.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 1837.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 3838.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 3838.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 3838.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 3838.HK's P/E ratio is 2.17. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3838.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 3838.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 8476.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 8476.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 8476.HK trades at HK$3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 8476.HK's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8476.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 8476.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 2317.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 2317.HK has a market cap of 944.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 2317.HK trades at HK$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 2317.HK's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 2317.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 2317.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 0829.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 0829.HK has a market cap of 920.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 0829.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 0829.HK's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0829.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 0829.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 1583.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1583.HK has a market cap of 906.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 1583.HK trades at HK$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 1583.HK's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1583.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is less volatile compared to 1583.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 0809.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 0809.HK has a market cap of 798.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 0809.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 0809.HK's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0809.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is less volatile compared to 0809.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 2530.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 2530.HK has a market cap of 670M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 2530.HK trades at HK$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 2530.HK's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 2530.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is less volatile compared to 2530.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 3999.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 3999.HK has a market cap of 630M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 3999.HK trades at HK$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 3999.HK's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3999.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 3999.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 8609.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 8609.HK has a market cap of 585M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 8609.HK trades at HK$1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 8609.HK's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8609.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 8609.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 1262.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1262.HK has a market cap of 471.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 1262.HK trades at HK$1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 1262.HK's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1262.HK's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is less volatile compared to 1262.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 1285.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1285.HK has a market cap of 415M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 1285.HK trades at HK$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 1285.HK's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1285.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 1285.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 2226.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 2226.HK has a market cap of 387.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 2226.HK trades at HK$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 2226.HK's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 2226.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 2226.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 1767.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1767.HK has a market cap of 345M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 1767.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 1767.HK's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1767.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 1767.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 0926.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 0926.HK has a market cap of 302M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 0926.HK trades at HK$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 0926.HK's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0926.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 0926.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 1068.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1068.HK has a market cap of 258.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 1068.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 1068.HK's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1068.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK and 1068.HK have similar daily volatility (5.52).
2555.HK vs 3889.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 3889.HK has a market cap of 206.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 3889.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 3889.HK's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3889.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is less volatile compared to 3889.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 0932.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 0932.HK has a market cap of 102.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 0932.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 0932.HK's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0932.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 0932.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 1695.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1695.HK has a market cap of 95M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 1695.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 1695.HK's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1695.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is less volatile compared to 1695.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 8362.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 8362.HK has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 8362.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 8362.HK's P/E ratio is -25.22. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8362.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 8362.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 1676.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1676.HK has a market cap of 76.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 1676.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 1676.HK's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1676.HK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 1676.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 0834.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 0834.HK has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 0834.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 0834.HK's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0834.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 0834.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 0841.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 0841.HK has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 0841.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 0841.HK's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0841.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 0841.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 2147.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 2147.HK has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 2147.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 2147.HK's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 2147.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 2147.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 8241.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 8241.HK has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 8241.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 8241.HK's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8241.HK's ROE of -4.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 8241.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 1340.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 1340.HK has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 1340.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 1340.HK's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1340.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 1340.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 8179.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 8179.HK has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 8179.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 8179.HK's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8179.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is less volatile compared to 8179.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.
2555.HK vs 6183.HK Comparison
2555.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2555.HK stands at 14.2B. In comparison, 6183.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2555.HK is priced at HK$9.87, while 6183.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2555.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 25.95, whereas 6183.HK's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, 2555.HK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 6183.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2555.HK is more volatile compared to 6183.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2555.HK.