China Chunlai Education Group Co., Ltd.
China Chunlai Education Group Co., Ltd. 1969.HK Peers
See (1969.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1969.HK | $4.23 | -0.24% | 5.08B | 6.22 | $0.68 | +4.36% |
| 9901.HK | $37.95 | -0.78% | 62.06B | 21.20 | $1.79 | +0.16% |
| 0667.HK | $5.86 | +1.74% | 12.86B | 23.44 | $0.25 | +3.41% |
| 1797.HK | $11.86 | +1.19% | 12.41B | -593.00 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| 1773.HK | $3.73 | -1.32% | 7.66B | 10.66 | $0.35 | +2.42% |
| 0839.HK | $2.48 | +0.40% | 6.94B | 14.59 | $0.17 | +11.82% |
| 2469.HK | $2.19 | -1.35% | 4.75B | 18.25 | $0.12 | N/A |
| 3978.HK | $5.61 | -1.06% | 4.20B | 20.04 | $0.28 | +0.62% |
| 0032.HK | $8.50 | +1.19% | 3.17B | 7.33 | $1.16 | +4.94% |
| 1890.HK | $1.40 | +1.45% | 2.82B | 3.11 | $0.45 | +5.42% |
Stock Comparison
1969.HK vs 9901.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 9901.HK has a market cap of 62.06B. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 9901.HK trades at $37.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 9901.HK's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 9901.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 9901.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 0667.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 0667.HK has a market cap of 12.86B. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 0667.HK trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 0667.HK's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0667.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 0667.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 1797.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1797.HK has a market cap of 12.41B. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1797.HK trades at $11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1797.HK's P/E ratio is -593.00. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1797.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 1797.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 1773.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1773.HK has a market cap of 7.66B. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1773.HK trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1773.HK's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1773.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 1773.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 0839.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 0839.HK has a market cap of 6.94B. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 0839.HK trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 0839.HK's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0839.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 0839.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 2469.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 2469.HK has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 2469.HK trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 2469.HK's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 2469.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 2469.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 3978.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 3978.HK has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 3978.HK trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 3978.HK's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3978.HK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 3978.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 0032.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 0032.HK has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 0032.HK trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 0032.HK's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0032.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK and 0032.HK have similar daily volatility (1.18).
1969.HK vs 1890.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1890.HK has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1890.HK trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1890.HK's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1890.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 1890.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 9616.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 9616.HK has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 9616.HK trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 9616.HK's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 9616.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 9616.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 1769.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1769.HK has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1769.HK trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1769.HK's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1769.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 1769.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 2001.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 2001.HK has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 2001.HK trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 2001.HK's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 2001.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 2001.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 0382.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 0382.HK has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 0382.HK trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 0382.HK's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0382.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 0382.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 6169.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 6169.HK has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 6169.HK trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 6169.HK's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 6169.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 6169.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 1765.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1765.HK has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1765.HK trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1765.HK's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1765.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 1765.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 1593.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1593.HK has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1593.HK trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1593.HK's P/E ratio is 66.50. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1593.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 1593.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 2175.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 2175.HK has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 2175.HK trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 2175.HK's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 2175.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is more volatile compared to 2175.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 1935.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1935.HK has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1935.HK trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1935.HK's P/E ratio is 3.86. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1935.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 1935.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 1317.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1317.HK has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1317.HK trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1317.HK's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1317.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 1317.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 1082.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1082.HK has a market cap of 948.55M. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1082.HK trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1082.HK's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1082.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 1082.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 2779.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 2779.HK has a market cap of 916.89M. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 2779.HK trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 2779.HK's P/E ratio is 2.59. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 2779.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 2779.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 1525.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1525.HK has a market cap of 911.29M. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1525.HK trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1525.HK's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1525.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 1525.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 1756.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1756.HK has a market cap of 696.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1756.HK trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1756.HK's P/E ratio is 1.41. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1756.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 1756.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 1569.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1569.HK has a market cap of 679.05M. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1569.HK trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1569.HK's P/E ratio is -16.10. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1569.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 1569.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 1565.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1565.HK has a market cap of 657.31M. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1565.HK trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1565.HK's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1565.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 1565.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 1851.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1851.HK has a market cap of 560.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1851.HK trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1851.HK's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1851.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 1851.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 6913.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 6913.HK has a market cap of 393.53M. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 6913.HK trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 6913.HK's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 6913.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 6913.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 6068.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 6068.HK has a market cap of 234.29M. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 6068.HK trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 6068.HK's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 6068.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is more volatile compared to 6068.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 2371.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 2371.HK has a market cap of 189.06M. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 2371.HK trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 2371.HK's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 2371.HK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 2371.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 1449.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1449.HK has a market cap of 164.67M. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1449.HK trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1449.HK's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1449.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is more volatile compared to 1449.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 1758.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1758.HK has a market cap of 144.50M. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1758.HK trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1758.HK's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1758.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 1758.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 1752.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1752.HK has a market cap of 134.26M. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1752.HK trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1752.HK's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1752.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 1752.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 1871.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1871.HK has a market cap of 130.80M. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1871.HK trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1871.HK's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1871.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is more volatile compared to 1871.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 1598.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1598.HK has a market cap of 126.69M. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1598.HK trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1598.HK's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1598.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is more volatile compared to 1598.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 1775.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 1775.HK has a market cap of 86.81M. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 1775.HK trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 1775.HK's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1775.HK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is more volatile compared to 1775.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 8363.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 8363.HK has a market cap of 68.57M. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 8363.HK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 8363.HK's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 8363.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 8363.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 8160.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 8160.HK has a market cap of 41.40M. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 8160.HK trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 8160.HK's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 8160.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 8160.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.
1969.HK vs 8417.HK Comparison
1969.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1969.HK stands at 5.08B. In comparison, 8417.HK has a market cap of 19.25M. Regarding current trading prices, 1969.HK is priced at $4.23, while 8417.HK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1969.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.22, whereas 8417.HK's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, 1969.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 8417.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1969.HK is less volatile compared to 8417.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1969.HK.