Uju Holding Limited (1948.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1948.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1948.HK | HK$4.10 | -0.97% | 2.6B | 15.18 | HK$0.28 | +1.18% |
| 1860.HK | HK$12.04 | -7.74% | 19.6B | 41.23 | HK$0.31 | N/A |
| 2422.HK | HK$1.81 | +1.69% | 2.9B | -29.83 | -HK$0.06 | N/A |
| 0752.HK | HK$2.32 | -0.85% | 2.9B | 6.51 | HK$0.35 | +8.33% |
| 0917.HK | HK$9.60 | +2.56% | 2.6B | 8.88 | HK$1.11 | N/A |
| 1762.HK | HK$1.02 | -1.92% | 2B | 25.50 | HK$0.04 | N/A |
| 8093.HK | HK$2.67 | +3.49% | 2B | -3.42 | -HK$0.78 | N/A |
| 6696.HK | HK$2.94 | +1.73% | 2B | -0.68 | -HK$4.34 | N/A |
| 9881.HK | HK$17.70 | -14.41% | 1.7B | 70.80 | HK$0.25 | N/A |
| 1716.HK | HK$5.10 | -0.78% | 1.4B | 530.00 | HK$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1948.HK vs 1860.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 1860.HK has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 1860.HK trades at HK$12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 1860.HK's P/E ratio is 41.23. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1860.HK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 1860.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 1860.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 2422.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 2422.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 2422.HK trades at HK$1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 2422.HK's P/E ratio is -29.83. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2422.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 2422.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 2422.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 0752.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 0752.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 0752.HK trades at HK$2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 0752.HK's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0752.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 0752.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 0752.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 0917.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 0917.HK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 0917.HK trades at HK$9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 0917.HK's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0917.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 0917.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 0917.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 1762.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 1762.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 1762.HK trades at HK$1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 1762.HK's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1762.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 1762.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 1762.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 8093.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 8093.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 8093.HK trades at HK$2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 8093.HK's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8093.HK's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is more volatile compared to 8093.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 8093.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 6696.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 6696.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 6696.HK trades at HK$2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 6696.HK's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6696.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 6696.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 6696.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 9881.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 9881.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 9881.HK trades at HK$17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 9881.HK's P/E ratio is 70.80. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9881.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 9881.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 9881.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 1716.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 1716.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 1716.HK trades at HK$5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 1716.HK's P/E ratio is 530.00. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1716.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 1716.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 1716.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 0745.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 0745.HK has a market cap of 918.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 0745.HK trades at HK$3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 0745.HK's P/E ratio is 130.67. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0745.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is more volatile compared to 0745.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 0745.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 0623.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 0623.HK has a market cap of 907.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 0623.HK trades at HK$1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 0623.HK's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0623.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is more volatile compared to 0623.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 0623.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 2550.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 2550.HK has a market cap of 849.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 2550.HK trades at HK$1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 2550.HK's P/E ratio is 94.00. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2550.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 2550.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 2550.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 0205.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 0205.HK has a market cap of 838.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 0205.HK trades at HK$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 0205.HK's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0205.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is more volatile compared to 0205.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 0205.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 9919.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 9919.HK has a market cap of 603.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 9919.HK trades at HK$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 9919.HK's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9919.HK's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 9919.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 9919.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 1831.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 1831.HK has a market cap of 537.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 1831.HK trades at HK$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 1831.HK's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1831.HK's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 1831.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 1831.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 2405.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 2405.HK has a market cap of 520M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 2405.HK trades at HK$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 2405.HK's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2405.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 2405.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 2405.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 8403.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 8403.HK has a market cap of 480.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 8403.HK trades at HK$3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 8403.HK's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8403.HK's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 8403.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 8403.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 0550.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 0550.HK has a market cap of 451M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 0550.HK trades at HK$0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 0550.HK's P/E ratio is -99.00. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0550.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 0550.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 0550.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 2540.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 2540.HK has a market cap of 445M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 2540.HK trades at HK$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 2540.HK's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2540.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is more volatile compared to 2540.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 2540.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 2486.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 2486.HK has a market cap of 429.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 2486.HK trades at HK$3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 2486.HK's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2486.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 2486.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 2486.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 1640.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 1640.HK has a market cap of 419.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 1640.HK trades at HK$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 1640.HK's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1640.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 1640.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 1640.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 2131.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 2131.HK has a market cap of 347.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 2131.HK trades at HK$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 2131.HK's P/E ratio is 37.73. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2131.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 2131.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 2131.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 6833.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 6833.HK has a market cap of 341.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 6833.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 6833.HK's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6833.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is more volatile compared to 6833.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 6833.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 1993.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 1993.HK has a market cap of 286.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 1993.HK trades at HK$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 1993.HK's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1993.HK's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 1993.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 1993.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 1917.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 1917.HK has a market cap of 218.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 1917.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 1917.HK's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1917.HK's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 1917.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 1917.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 0343.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 0343.HK has a market cap of 192.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 0343.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 0343.HK's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0343.HK's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 0343.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 0343.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 0164.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 0164.HK has a market cap of 181.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 0164.HK trades at HK$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 0164.HK's P/E ratio is -52.00. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0164.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 0164.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 0164.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 6988.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 6988.HK has a market cap of 170.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 6988.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 6988.HK's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6988.HK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 6988.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 6988.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 1753.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 1753.HK has a market cap of 162.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 1753.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 1753.HK's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1753.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 1753.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 1753.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 1163.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 1163.HK has a market cap of 162.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 1163.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 1163.HK's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1163.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 1163.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 1163.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 1351.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 1351.HK has a market cap of 143.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 1351.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 1351.HK's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1351.HK's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 1351.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 1351.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 0072.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 0072.HK has a market cap of 114M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 0072.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 0072.HK's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0072.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 0072.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 0072.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 8627.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 8627.HK has a market cap of 54.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 8627.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 8627.HK's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8627.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 8627.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 8627.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 1849.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 1849.HK has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 1849.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 1849.HK's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1849.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 1849.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 1849.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 8500.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 8500.HK has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 8500.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 8500.HK's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8500.HK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 8500.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 8500.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 1736.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 1736.HK has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 1736.HK trades at HK$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 1736.HK's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1736.HK's ROE of +1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is more volatile compared to 1736.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 1736.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 8429.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 8429.HK has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 8429.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 8429.HK's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8429.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 8429.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 8429.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 8112.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 8112.HK has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 8112.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 8112.HK's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8112.HK's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is more volatile compared to 8112.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 8112.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 8091.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 8091.HK has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 8091.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 8091.HK's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8091.HK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is more volatile compared to 8091.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 8091.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 8401.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 8401.HK has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 8401.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 8401.HK's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8401.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is less volatile compared to 8401.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 8401.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 8121.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 8121.HK has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 8121.HK trades at HK$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 8121.HK's P/E ratio is 2.13. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8121.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is more volatile compared to 8121.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 8121.HK's competition here
1948.HK vs 8238.HK Comparison June 2026
1948.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.HK stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 8238.HK has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.HK is priced at HK$4.10, while 8238.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas 8238.HK's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, 1948.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8238.HK's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.HK is more volatile compared to 8238.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.HK.Check 8238.HK's competition here