Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 1000.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 1000.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1000.HK | HK$0.52 | +0.00% | 102.7M | -7.20 | -HK$0.07 | N/A |
| 1860.HK | HK$10.68 | +5.22% | 16.4B | 12.83 | HK$0.78 | N/A |
| 2422.HK | HK$2.08 | +21.64% | 3.2B | -32.58 | -HK$0.06 | N/A |
| 0752.HK | HK$2.22 | -0.89% | 2.9B | 6.57 | HK$0.34 | +8.50% |
| 0917.HK | HK$9.44 | +19.49% | 2.5B | 8.42 | HK$1.12 | N/A |
| 1948.HK | HK$4.04 | +0.00% | 2.4B | 15.25 | HK$0.27 | +1.24% |
| 1762.HK | HK$1.05 | -10.26% | 2B | 25.91 | HK$0.04 | N/A |
| 6696.HK | HK$2.94 | +1.73% | 2B | -0.94 | -HK$3.13 | N/A |
| 9881.HK | HK$17.70 | -14.41% | 1.7B | 70.80 | HK$0.25 | N/A |
| 8093.HK | HK$1.88 | +0.53% | 1.4B | 77.98 | HK$0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Mobvista Inc. (HKSE: 1860.HK)
1000.HK vs 1860.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 1860.HK has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 1860.HK trades at HK$10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 1860.HK's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 1860.HK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 1860.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 1860.HK's competition here
Rego Interactive Co., Ltd (HKSE: 2422.HK)
1000.HK vs 2422.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 2422.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 2422.HK trades at HK$2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 2422.HK's P/E ratio is -32.58. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 2422.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 2422.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 2422.HK's competition here
Pico Far East Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0752.HK)
1000.HK vs 0752.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 0752.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 0752.HK trades at HK$2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 0752.HK's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 0752.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 0752.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 0752.HK's competition here
Qunabox Group (HKSE: 0917.HK)
1000.HK vs 0917.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 0917.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 0917.HK trades at HK$9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 0917.HK's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 0917.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 0917.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 0917.HK's competition here
Uju Holding Limited (HKSE: 1948.HK)
1000.HK vs 1948.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 1948.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 1948.HK trades at HK$4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 1948.HK's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 1948.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is similarly volatile compared to 1948.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 1948.HK's competition here
Wanka Online Inc. (HKSE: 1762.HK)
1000.HK vs 1762.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 1762.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 1762.HK trades at HK$1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 1762.HK's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 1762.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 1762.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 1762.HK's competition here
Many Idea Cloud Holdings Limited (HKSE: 6696.HK)
1000.HK vs 6696.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 6696.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 6696.HK trades at HK$2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 6696.HK's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 6696.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 6696.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 6696.HK's competition here
Rongta Technology (Xiamen) Group Co. (HKSE: 9881.HK)
1000.HK vs 9881.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 9881.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 9881.HK trades at HK$17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 9881.HK's P/E ratio is 70.80. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 9881.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 9881.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 9881.HK's competition here
Web3 Meta Limited (HKSE: 8093.HK)
1000.HK vs 8093.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 8093.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 8093.HK trades at HK$1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 8093.HK's P/E ratio is 77.98. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 8093.HK's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is similarly volatile compared to 8093.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 8093.HK's competition here
China National Culture Group Limited (HKSE: 0745.HK)
1000.HK vs 0745.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 0745.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 0745.HK trades at HK$5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 0745.HK's P/E ratio is -10.65. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 0745.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is similarly volatile compared to 0745.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 0745.HK's competition here
Most Kwai Chung Limited (HKSE: 1716.HK)
1000.HK vs 1716.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 1716.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 1716.HK trades at HK$4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 1716.HK's P/E ratio is -377.00. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 1716.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 1716.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 1716.HK's competition here
Golden Bridge Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0623.HK)
1000.HK vs 0623.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 0623.HK has a market cap of 969M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 0623.HK trades at HK$2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 0623.HK's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 0623.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 0623.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 0623.HK's competition here
Easou Technology Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2550.HK)
1000.HK vs 2550.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 2550.HK has a market cap of 901.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 2550.HK trades at HK$1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 2550.HK's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 2550.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 2550.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 2550.HK's competition here
ShiFang Holding Limited (HKSE: 1831.HK)
1000.HK vs 1831.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 1831.HK has a market cap of 812M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 1831.HK trades at HK$0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 1831.HK's P/E ratio is -26.33. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 1831.HK's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 1831.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 1831.HK's competition here
BFB Health Limited (HKSE: 0205.HK)
1000.HK vs 0205.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 0205.HK has a market cap of 681.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 0205.HK trades at HK$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 0205.HK's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 0205.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 0205.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 0205.HK's competition here
Activation Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 9919.HK)
1000.HK vs 9919.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 9919.HK has a market cap of 573.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 9919.HK trades at HK$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 9919.HK's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 9919.HK's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 9919.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 9919.HK's competition here
Plus Group Holdings Inc. (HKSE: 2486.HK)
1000.HK vs 2486.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 2486.HK has a market cap of 497.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 2486.HK trades at HK$4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 2486.HK's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 2486.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 2486.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 2486.HK's competition here
China Frontier Technology Group (HKSE: 1661.HK)
1000.HK vs 1661.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 1661.HK has a market cap of 459.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 1661.HK trades at HK$2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 1661.HK's P/E ratio is -6.63. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 1661.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 1661.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 1661.HK's competition here
Allegro Culture Ltd. (HKSE: 0550.HK)
1000.HK vs 0550.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 0550.HK has a market cap of 455.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 0550.HK trades at HK$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 0550.HK's P/E ratio is -28.46. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 0550.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 0550.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 0550.HK's competition here
Lesi Group (HKSE: 2540.HK)
1000.HK vs 2540.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 2540.HK has a market cap of 405M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 2540.HK trades at HK$0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 2540.HK's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 2540.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 2540.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 2540.HK's competition here
Netjoy Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2131.HK)
1000.HK vs 2131.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 2131.HK has a market cap of 362M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 2131.HK trades at HK$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 2131.HK's P/E ratio is -327.34. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 2131.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 2131.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 2131.HK's competition here
AI X Tech Inc. (HKSE: 1490.HK)
1000.HK vs 1490.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 1490.HK has a market cap of 308.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 1490.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 1490.HK's P/E ratio is 95.79. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 1490.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is similarly volatile compared to 1490.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 1490.HK's competition here
B.Duck Semk Holdings International Limited (HKSE: 2250.HK)
1000.HK vs 2250.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 2250.HK has a market cap of 307.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 2250.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 2250.HK's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 2250.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 2250.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 2250.HK's competition here
Powerwin Tech Group Limited (HKSE: 2405.HK)
1000.HK vs 2405.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 2405.HK has a market cap of 284M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 2405.HK trades at HK$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 2405.HK's P/E ratio is -8.87. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 2405.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is similarly volatile compared to 2405.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 2405.HK's competition here
New Media Lab Limited (HKSE: 1284.HK)
1000.HK vs 1284.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 1284.HK has a market cap of 279M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 1284.HK trades at HK$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 1284.HK's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 1284.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is similarly volatile compared to 1284.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 1284.HK's competition here
Qian Xun Technology Limited (HKSE: 1640.HK)
1000.HK vs 1640.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 1640.HK has a market cap of 266.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 1640.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 1640.HK's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 1640.HK's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 1640.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 1640.HK's competition here
Jiading International Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8153.HK)
1000.HK vs 8153.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 8153.HK has a market cap of 263.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 8153.HK trades at HK$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 8153.HK's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 8153.HK's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is similarly volatile compared to 8153.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 8153.HK's competition here
Asiaray Media Group Limited (HKSE: 1993.HK)
1000.HK vs 1993.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 1993.HK has a market cap of 215.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 1993.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 1993.HK's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 1993.HK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 1993.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 1993.HK's competition here
Huashi Group Holdings Ltd. (HKSE: 1111.HK)
1000.HK vs 1111.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 1111.HK has a market cap of 192.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 1111.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 1111.HK's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 1111.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 1111.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 1111.HK's competition here
Culturecom Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0343.HK)
1000.HK vs 0343.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 0343.HK has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 0343.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 0343.HK's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 0343.HK's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 0343.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 0343.HK's competition here
Adtiger Corporations Limited (HKSE: 1163.HK)
1000.HK vs 1163.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 1163.HK has a market cap of 145.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 1163.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 1163.HK's P/E ratio is -26.59. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 1163.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 1163.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 1163.HK's competition here
China Baoli Technologies Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0164.HK)
1000.HK vs 0164.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 0164.HK has a market cap of 144.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 0164.HK trades at HK$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 0164.HK's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 0164.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is similarly volatile compared to 0164.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 0164.HK's competition here
Elife Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0223.HK)
1000.HK vs 0223.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 0223.HK has a market cap of 121.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 0223.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 0223.HK's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 0223.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 0223.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 0223.HK's competition here
Bright Future Technology Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1351.HK)
1000.HK vs 1351.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 1351.HK has a market cap of 110.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 1351.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 1351.HK's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 1351.HK's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 1351.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 1351.HK's competition here
Meta Media Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0072.HK)
1000.HK vs 0072.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 0072.HK has a market cap of 103.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 0072.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 0072.HK's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 0072.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 0072.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 0072.HK's competition here
Orange Tour Cultural Holding Limited (HKSE: 8627.HK)
1000.HK vs 8627.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 8627.HK has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 8627.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 8627.HK's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 8627.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 8627.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 8627.HK's competition here
AM Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1849.HK)
1000.HK vs 1849.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 1849.HK has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 1849.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 1849.HK's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 1849.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 1849.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 1849.HK's competition here
Icon Culture Global Company Limited (HKSE: 8500.HK)
1000.HK vs 8500.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 8500.HK has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 8500.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 8500.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 8500.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 8500.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 8500.HK's competition here
China Parenting Network Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1736.HK)
1000.HK vs 1736.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 1736.HK has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 1736.HK trades at HK$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 1736.HK's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 1736.HK's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is similarly volatile compared to 1736.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 1736.HK's competition here
Cornerstone Financial Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8112.HK)
1000.HK vs 8112.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 8112.HK has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 8112.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 8112.HK's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 8112.HK's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is similarly volatile compared to 8112.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 8112.HK's competition here
OOH Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8091.HK)
1000.HK vs 8091.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 8091.HK has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 8091.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 8091.HK's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 8091.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 8091.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 8091.HK's competition here
Hua Xia Water Group Limited (HKSE: 8401.HK)
1000.HK vs 8401.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 8401.HK has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 8401.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 8401.HK's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 8401.HK's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 8401.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 8401.HK's competition here
SV Vision Limited (HKSE: 8429.HK)
1000.HK vs 8429.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 8429.HK has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 8429.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 8429.HK's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 8429.HK's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is less volatile compared to 8429.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 8429.HK's competition here
Great World Company Holdings Ltd (HKSE: 8003.HK)
1000.HK vs 8003.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 8003.HK has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 8003.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 8003.HK's P/E ratio is 0.82. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 8003.HK's ROE of +15.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is similarly volatile compared to 8003.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 8003.HK's competition here
Guoen Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8121.HK)
1000.HK vs 8121.HK Comparison August 2026
Beijing Media Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1000.HK) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1000.HK stands at 102.7M. In comparison, 8121.HK has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1000.HK is priced at HK$0.52 on the HKSE, while 8121.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1000.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.20, whereas 8121.HK's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, 1000.HK's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 8121.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1000.HK is similarly volatile compared to 8121.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1000.HK.Check 8121.HK's competition here