China Oriented International Holdings Limited
China Oriented International Holdings Limited 1871.HK Peers
See (1871.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1871.HK | HK$0.19 | +0.52% | 115.2M | -9.60 | -HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 9901.HK | HK$42.15 | +0.48% | 68.9B | 23.29 | HK$1.81 | +0.14% |
| 0667.HK | HK$6.68 | -0.15% | 14.7B | 25.69 | HK$0.26 | +3.29% |
| 1797.HK | HK$11.86 | +0.17% | 12.4B | -593.00 | -HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 1773.HK | HK$4.54 | -4.62% | 9.3B | 12.97 | HK$0.35 | +1.98% |
| 0839.HK | HK$2.72 | +0.00% | 7.6B | 24.73 | HK$0.11 | +4.09% |
| 2469.HK | HK$2.45 | +8.89% | 5.3B | 20.42 | HK$0.12 | N/A |
| 1969.HK | HK$4.14 | -0.24% | 5B | 5.83 | HK$0.71 | +4.83% |
| 3978.HK | HK$5.26 | +2.94% | 3.8B | 18.79 | HK$0.28 | +2.34% |
| 0032.HK | HK$8.10 | -0.49% | 3B | 6.98 | HK$1.16 | +2.22% |
Stock Comparison
1871.HK vs 9901.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 9901.HK has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 9901.HK trades at HK$42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 9901.HK's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 9901.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 9901.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 0667.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 0667.HK has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 0667.HK trades at HK$6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 0667.HK's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0667.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 0667.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 1797.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1797.HK has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1797.HK trades at HK$11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1797.HK's P/E ratio is -593.00. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1797.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 1797.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 1773.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1773.HK has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1773.HK trades at HK$4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1773.HK's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1773.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 1773.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 0839.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 0839.HK has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 0839.HK trades at HK$2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 0839.HK's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0839.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 0839.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 2469.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 2469.HK has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 2469.HK trades at HK$2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 2469.HK's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 2469.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 2469.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 1969.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1969.HK has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1969.HK trades at HK$4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1969.HK's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1969.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 1969.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 3978.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 3978.HK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 3978.HK trades at HK$5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 3978.HK's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 3978.HK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 3978.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 0032.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 0032.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 0032.HK trades at HK$8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 0032.HK's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0032.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK and 0032.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
1871.HK vs 1890.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1890.HK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1890.HK trades at HK$1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1890.HK's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1890.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 1890.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 9616.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 9616.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 9616.HK trades at HK$3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 9616.HK's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 9616.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 9616.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 1769.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1769.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1769.HK trades at HK$3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1769.HK's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1769.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 1769.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 6169.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 6169.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 6169.HK trades at HK$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 6169.HK's P/E ratio is 2.44. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 6169.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 6169.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 0382.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 0382.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 0382.HK trades at HK$1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 0382.HK's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0382.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 0382.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 2001.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 2001.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 2001.HK trades at HK$0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 2001.HK's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 2001.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 2001.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 1765.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1765.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1765.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1765.HK's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1765.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 1765.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 2175.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 2175.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 2175.HK trades at HK$2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 2175.HK's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 2175.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 2175.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 1935.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1935.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1935.HK trades at HK$0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1935.HK's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1935.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 1935.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 1593.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1593.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1593.HK trades at HK$1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1593.HK's P/E ratio is 0.61. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1593.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 1593.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 1525.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1525.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1525.HK trades at HK$2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1525.HK's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1525.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 1525.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 1082.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1082.HK has a market cap of 954.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1082.HK trades at HK$1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1082.HK's P/E ratio is -39.25. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1082.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 1082.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 1317.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1317.HK has a market cap of 951.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1317.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1317.HK's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1317.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 1317.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 2779.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 2779.HK has a market cap of 949.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 2779.HK trades at HK$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 2779.HK's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 2779.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 2779.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 1565.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1565.HK has a market cap of 712.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1565.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1565.HK's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1565.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 1565.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 1756.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1756.HK has a market cap of 708M. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1756.HK trades at HK$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1756.HK's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1756.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 1756.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 1851.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1851.HK has a market cap of 695M. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1851.HK trades at HK$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1851.HK's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1851.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 1851.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 1569.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1569.HK has a market cap of 603.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1569.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1569.HK's P/E ratio is -14.30. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1569.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 1569.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 6913.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 6913.HK has a market cap of 373.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 6913.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 6913.HK's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 6913.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 6913.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 2371.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 2371.HK has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 2371.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 2371.HK's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 2371.HK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 2371.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 6068.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 6068.HK has a market cap of 236.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 6068.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 6068.HK's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 6068.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 6068.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 1449.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1449.HK has a market cap of 166.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1449.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1449.HK's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1449.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 1449.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 1752.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1752.HK has a market cap of 139.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1752.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1752.HK's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1752.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 1752.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 1758.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1758.HK has a market cap of 128.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1758.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1758.HK's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1758.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK and 1758.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
1871.HK vs 1598.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1598.HK has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1598.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1598.HK's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1598.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 1598.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 1775.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 1775.HK has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1775.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 1775.HK's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1775.HK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK and 1775.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
1871.HK vs 8363.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 8363.HK has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 8363.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 8363.HK's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 8363.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 8363.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 8160.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 8160.HK has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 8160.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 8160.HK's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 8160.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 8160.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.
1871.HK vs 8417.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 8417.HK has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 8417.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 8417.HK's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 8417.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK and 8417.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
1871.HK vs 8055.HK Comparison
1871.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1871.HK stands at 115.2M. In comparison, 8055.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1871.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 8055.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1871.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.60, whereas 8055.HK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 1871.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 8055.HK's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 1871.HK is less volatile compared to 8055.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1871.HK.