Natural Food International Holding Limited
Natural Food International Holding Limited 1837.HK Peers
See (1837.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1837.HK | HK$0.78 | -2.50% | 1.7B | 8.67 | HK$0.09 | +4.69% |
| 0288.HK | HK$7.52 | -0.66% | 96.5B | 7.60 | HK$0.99 | +6.87% |
| 2319.HK | HK$17.54 | -1.46% | 68.1B | 584.67 | HK$0.03 | +3.06% |
| 0322.HK | HK$11.76 | -2.97% | 66.3B | 16.33 | HK$0.72 | +3.36% |
| 0151.HK | HK$5.22 | +1.16% | 61.6B | 13.74 | HK$0.38 | +4.93% |
| 3799.HK | HK$3.73 | +0.81% | 51.1B | 15.54 | HK$0.24 | N/A |
| 6186.HK | HK$5.55 | -2.29% | 50.3B | 12.91 | HK$0.43 | +5.38% |
| 9985.HK | HK$14.88 | -1.46% | 36.2B | 30.37 | HK$0.49 | +1.18% |
| 0142.HK | HK$5.73 | +1.96% | 24.4B | 5.21 | HK$1.10 | +4.28% |
| 2555.HK | HK$9.35 | -0.43% | 13.8B | 25.27 | HK$0.37 | +9.77% |
Stock Comparison
1837.HK vs 0288.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0288.HK has a market cap of 96.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 0288.HK trades at HK$7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 0288.HK's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0288.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 0288.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 2319.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 2319.HK has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 2319.HK trades at HK$17.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 2319.HK's P/E ratio is 584.67. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2319.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 2319.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 0322.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0322.HK has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 0322.HK trades at HK$11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 0322.HK's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0322.HK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 0322.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 0151.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0151.HK has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 0151.HK trades at HK$5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 0151.HK's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0151.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 0151.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 3799.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 3799.HK has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 3799.HK trades at HK$3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 3799.HK's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3799.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 3799.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 6186.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 6186.HK has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 6186.HK trades at HK$5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 6186.HK's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6186.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 6186.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 9985.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 9985.HK has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 9985.HK trades at HK$14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 9985.HK's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9985.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 9985.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 0142.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0142.HK has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 0142.HK trades at HK$5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 0142.HK's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0142.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 0142.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 2555.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 2555.HK has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 2555.HK trades at HK$9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 2555.HK's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2555.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 2555.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 1579.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 1579.HK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 1579.HK trades at HK$13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 1579.HK's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1579.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 1579.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 0345.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0345.HK has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 0345.HK trades at HK$9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 0345.HK's P/E ratio is 85.36. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0345.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 0345.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 2517.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 2517.HK has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 2517.HK trades at HK$3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 2517.HK's P/E ratio is 33.78. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2517.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 2517.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 1112.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 1112.HK has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 1112.HK trades at HK$12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 1112.HK's P/E ratio is -152.75. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1112.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 1112.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 9676.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 9676.HK has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 9676.HK trades at HK$6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 9676.HK's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9676.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 9676.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 1610.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 1610.HK has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 1610.HK trades at HK$1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 1610.HK's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1610.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 1610.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 1475.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 1475.HK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 1475.HK trades at HK$6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 1475.HK's P/E ratio is 36.58. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1475.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 1475.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 1230.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 1230.HK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 1230.HK trades at HK$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 1230.HK's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1230.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 1230.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 1458.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 1458.HK has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 1458.HK trades at HK$2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 1458.HK's P/E ratio is 61.00. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1458.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 1458.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 6868.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 6868.HK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 6868.HK trades at HK$3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 6868.HK's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6868.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 6868.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 1717.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 1717.HK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 1717.HK trades at HK$1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 1717.HK's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1717.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 1717.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 6836.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 6836.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 6836.HK trades at HK$3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 6836.HK's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6836.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 6836.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 9977.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 9977.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 9977.HK trades at HK$1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 9977.HK's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9977.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 9977.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 1497.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 1497.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 1497.HK trades at HK$6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 1497.HK's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1497.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 1497.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 0411.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0411.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 0411.HK trades at HK$10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 0411.HK's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0411.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 0411.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 3838.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 3838.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 3838.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 3838.HK's P/E ratio is 2.20. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3838.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 3838.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 8476.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 8476.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 8476.HK trades at HK$3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 8476.HK's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 8476.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 8476.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 1583.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 1583.HK has a market cap of 951.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 1583.HK trades at HK$1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 1583.HK's P/E ratio is 42.00. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1583.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 1583.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 2317.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 2317.HK has a market cap of 928.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 2317.HK trades at HK$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 2317.HK's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2317.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 2317.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 0829.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0829.HK has a market cap of 888.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 0829.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 0829.HK's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0829.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 0829.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 0809.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0809.HK has a market cap of 736.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 0809.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 0809.HK's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0809.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 0809.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 3999.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 3999.HK has a market cap of 640.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 3999.HK trades at HK$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 3999.HK's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3999.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 3999.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 2530.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 2530.HK has a market cap of 620M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 2530.HK trades at HK$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 2530.HK's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2530.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 2530.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 8609.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 8609.HK has a market cap of 585M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 8609.HK trades at HK$1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 8609.HK's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 8609.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 8609.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 1262.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 1262.HK has a market cap of 550.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 1262.HK trades at HK$2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 1262.HK's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1262.HK's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 1262.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 2226.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 2226.HK has a market cap of 445.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 2226.HK trades at HK$0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 2226.HK's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2226.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 2226.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 1285.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 1285.HK has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 1285.HK trades at HK$0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 1285.HK's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1285.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 1285.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 1767.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 1767.HK has a market cap of 315M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 1767.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 1767.HK's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1767.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 1767.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 0926.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0926.HK has a market cap of 280M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 0926.HK trades at HK$2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 0926.HK's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0926.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 0926.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 1068.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 1068.HK has a market cap of 251.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 1068.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 1068.HK's P/E ratio is -6.90. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1068.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 1068.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 3889.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 3889.HK has a market cap of 198.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 3889.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 3889.HK's P/E ratio is 3.43. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3889.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 3889.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 1695.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 1695.HK has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 1695.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 1695.HK's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1695.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 1695.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 0932.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0932.HK has a market cap of 93.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 0932.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 0932.HK's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0932.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 0932.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 8362.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 8362.HK has a market cap of 88.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 8362.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 8362.HK's P/E ratio is -27.39. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 8362.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 8362.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 1676.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 1676.HK has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 1676.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 1676.HK's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1676.HK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 1676.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 0834.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0834.HK has a market cap of 68.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 0834.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 0834.HK's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0834.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 0834.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 0841.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0841.HK has a market cap of 53.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 0841.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 0841.HK's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0841.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 0841.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 2147.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 2147.HK has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 2147.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 2147.HK's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2147.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 2147.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 8241.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 8241.HK has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 8241.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 8241.HK's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 8241.HK's ROE of -4.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 8241.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 1340.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 1340.HK has a market cap of 36.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 1340.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 1340.HK's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1340.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 1340.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 8179.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 8179.HK has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 8179.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 8179.HK's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 8179.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 8179.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.
1837.HK vs 6183.HK Comparison
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 6183.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$0.78, while 6183.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.67, whereas 6183.HK's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6183.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 6183.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.