Natural Food International Holding Limited
Natural Food International Holding Limited (1837.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1837.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1837.HK | HK$1.65 | +1.85% | 3.6B | 11.79 | HK$0.14 | +2.42% |
| 0288.HK | HK$10.63 | +1.63% | 136.4B | 11.19 | HK$0.95 | +8.47% |
| 0322.HK | HK$13.36 | +1.52% | 75.3B | 14.84 | HK$0.90 | +5.42% |
| 2319.HK | HK$17.55 | +0.57% | 68B | 39.00 | HK$0.45 | +3.17% |
| 0151.HK | HK$4.77 | +1.27% | 56.3B | 11.93 | HK$0.40 | +3.34% |
| 3799.HK | HK$3.73 | +0.81% | 51.1B | 15.54 | HK$0.24 | N/A |
| 6186.HK | HK$3.50 | +0.00% | 31.7B | 10.61 | HK$0.33 | +8.12% |
| 0142.HK | HK$5.40 | -2.35% | 23B | 4.09 | HK$1.32 | +5.12% |
| 9985.HK | HK$9.33 | -2.00% | 22.7B | 16.37 | HK$0.57 | +5.52% |
| 1579.HK | HK$16.77 | -1.00% | 16.3B | 16.77 | HK$1.00 | +4.41% |
Stock Comparison
1837.HK vs 0288.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0288.HK has a market cap of 136.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 0288.HK trades at HK$10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 0288.HK's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0288.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 0288.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 0288.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 0322.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0322.HK has a market cap of 75.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 0322.HK trades at HK$13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 0322.HK's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0322.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 0322.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 0322.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 2319.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 2319.HK has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 2319.HK trades at HK$17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 2319.HK's P/E ratio is 39.00. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2319.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 2319.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 2319.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 0151.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0151.HK has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 0151.HK trades at HK$4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 0151.HK's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0151.HK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 0151.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 0151.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 3799.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 3799.HK has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 3799.HK trades at HK$3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 3799.HK's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3799.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 3799.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 3799.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 6186.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 6186.HK has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 6186.HK trades at HK$3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 6186.HK's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6186.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 6186.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 6186.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 0142.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0142.HK has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 0142.HK trades at HK$5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 0142.HK's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0142.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 0142.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 0142.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 9985.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 9985.HK has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 9985.HK trades at HK$9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 9985.HK's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9985.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 9985.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 9985.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 1579.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1579.HK has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 1579.HK trades at HK$16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1579.HK's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1579.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 1579.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 1579.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 2517.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 2517.HK has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 2517.HK trades at HK$4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 2517.HK's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2517.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 2517.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 2517.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 9676.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 9676.HK has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 9676.HK trades at HK$6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 9676.HK's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9676.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 9676.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 9676.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 2555.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 2555.HK has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 2555.HK trades at HK$5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 2555.HK's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2555.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 2555.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 2555.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 1112.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1112.HK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 1112.HK trades at HK$12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1112.HK's P/E ratio is 34.63. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1112.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 1112.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 1112.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 1475.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1475.HK has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 1475.HK trades at HK$7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1475.HK's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1475.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 1475.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 1475.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 0345.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0345.HK has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 0345.HK trades at HK$6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 0345.HK's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0345.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 0345.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 0345.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 1610.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1610.HK has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 1610.HK trades at HK$1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1610.HK's P/E ratio is -7.11. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1610.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 1610.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 1610.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 1230.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1230.HK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 1230.HK trades at HK$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1230.HK's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1230.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 1230.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 1230.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 1717.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1717.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 1717.HK trades at HK$1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1717.HK's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1717.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 1717.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 1717.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 6836.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 6836.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 6836.HK trades at HK$3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 6836.HK's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6836.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 6836.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 6836.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 9977.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 9977.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 9977.HK trades at HK$1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 9977.HK's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9977.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 9977.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 9977.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 6868.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 6868.HK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 6868.HK trades at HK$2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 6868.HK's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6868.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 6868.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 6868.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 1458.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1458.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 1458.HK trades at HK$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1458.HK's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1458.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 1458.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 1458.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 0411.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0411.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 0411.HK trades at HK$12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 0411.HK's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0411.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 0411.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 0411.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 1497.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1497.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 1497.HK trades at HK$5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1497.HK's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1497.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 1497.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 1497.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 8476.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 8476.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 8476.HK trades at HK$4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 8476.HK's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8476.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 8476.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 8476.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 2317.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 2317.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 2317.HK trades at HK$0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 2317.HK's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2317.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 2317.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 2317.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 3838.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 3838.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 3838.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 3838.HK's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3838.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 3838.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 3838.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 1583.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1583.HK has a market cap of 829.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 1583.HK trades at HK$1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1583.HK's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1583.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 1583.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 1583.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 1262.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1262.HK has a market cap of 795M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 1262.HK trades at HK$3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1262.HK's P/E ratio is -16.55. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1262.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 1262.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 1262.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 9876.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 9876.HK has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 9876.HK trades at HK$2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 9876.HK's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9876.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 9876.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 9876.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 3999.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 3999.HK has a market cap of 660.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 3999.HK trades at HK$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 3999.HK's P/E ratio is -65.00. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3999.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 3999.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 3999.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 0829.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0829.HK has a market cap of 597.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 0829.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 0829.HK's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0829.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 0829.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 0829.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 2530.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 2530.HK has a market cap of 590M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 2530.HK trades at HK$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 2530.HK's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2530.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 2530.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 2530.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 8609.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 8609.HK has a market cap of 585M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 8609.HK trades at HK$1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 8609.HK's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8609.HK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 8609.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 8609.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 0809.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0809.HK has a market cap of 505.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 0809.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 0809.HK's P/E ratio is 1.90. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0809.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 0809.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 0809.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 1285.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1285.HK has a market cap of 473.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 1285.HK trades at HK$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1285.HK's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1285.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 1285.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 1285.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 1767.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1767.HK has a market cap of 350M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 1767.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1767.HK's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1767.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 1767.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 1767.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 0926.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0926.HK has a market cap of 297.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 0926.HK trades at HK$2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 0926.HK's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0926.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 0926.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 0926.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 2226.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 2226.HK has a market cap of 231.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 2226.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 2226.HK's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2226.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 2226.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 2226.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 1068.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1068.HK has a market cap of 207.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 1068.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1068.HK's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1068.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 1068.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 1068.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 3889.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 3889.HK has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 3889.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 3889.HK's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3889.HK's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 3889.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 3889.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 0834.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0834.HK has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 0834.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 0834.HK's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0834.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 0834.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 0834.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 1695.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1695.HK has a market cap of 106.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 1695.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1695.HK's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1695.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 1695.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 1695.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 0841.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0841.HK has a market cap of 101.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 0841.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 0841.HK's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0841.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 0841.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 0841.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 0932.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0932.HK has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 0932.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 0932.HK's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0932.HK's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 0932.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 0932.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 8362.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 8362.HK has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 8362.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 8362.HK's P/E ratio is -22.61. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8362.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 8362.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 8362.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 1340.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1340.HK has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 1340.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1340.HK's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1340.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 1340.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 1340.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 1676.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1676.HK has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 1676.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1676.HK's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1676.HK's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 1676.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 1676.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 8241.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 8241.HK has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 8241.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 8241.HK's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8241.HK's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is more volatile compared to 8241.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 8241.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 2147.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 2147.HK has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 2147.HK trades at HK$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 2147.HK's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2147.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 2147.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 2147.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 8179.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 8179.HK has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 8179.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 8179.HK's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8179.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 8179.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 8179.HK's competition here
1837.HK vs 6183.HK Comparison April 2026
1837.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1837.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 6183.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1837.HK is priced at HK$1.65, while 6183.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1837.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 6183.HK's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, 1837.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6183.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1837.HK is less volatile compared to 6183.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1837.HK.Check 6183.HK's competition here