Busy Ming Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1768.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 1768.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Food Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 1768.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1768.HK | HK$341.60 | -3.83% | 74.8B | 27.52 | HK$12.58 | N/A |
| 6689.HK | HK$1.74 | -24.35% | 2.8B | 1.61 | HK$1.08 | N/A |
| 1854.HK | HK$1.27 | +2.42% | 2.6B | -39.02 | -HK$0.03 | N/A |
| 1497.HK | HK$5.50 | +0.00% | 2.5B | 12.13 | HK$0.45 | +5.53% |
| 0374.HK | HK$2.71 | +0.00% | 1B | 30.91 | HK$0.09 | +3.51% |
| 3838.HK | HK$0.17 | +2.38% | 977.2M | 3.12 | HK$0.05 | +5.83% |
| 9876.HK | HK$2.31 | -7.60% | 677.6M | 16.28 | HK$0.15 | +1.74% |
| 0677.HK | HK$0.35 | -1.41% | 602.6M | -20.51 | -HK$0.02 | +6.48% |
| 0829.HK | HK$0.15 | +0.00% | 494.3M | 17.37 | HK$0.01 | N/A |
| 1587.HK | HK$0.50 | +1.01% | 340M | 7.29 | HK$0.07 | +3.00% |
Stock Comparison
Chongqing Hongjiu Fruit Co., Limited (HKSE: 6689.HK)
1768.HK vs 6689.HK Comparison July 2026
Busy Ming Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1768.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1768.HK stands at 74.8B. In comparison, 6689.HK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1768.HK is priced at HK$341.60 on the HKSE, while 6689.HK trades at HK$1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1768.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.52, whereas 6689.HK's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, 1768.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 6689.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1768.HK is less volatile compared to 6689.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1768.HK.Check 6689.HK's competition here
China Wantian Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1854.HK)
1768.HK vs 1854.HK Comparison July 2026
Busy Ming Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1768.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1768.HK stands at 74.8B. In comparison, 1854.HK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1768.HK is priced at HK$341.60 on the HKSE, while 1854.HK trades at HK$1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1768.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.52, whereas 1854.HK's P/E ratio is -39.02. In terms of profitability, 1768.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1854.HK's ROE of -2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1768.HK is less volatile compared to 1854.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1768.HK.Check 1854.HK's competition here
Xiamen Yan Palace Bird's Nest Industry Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1497.HK)
1768.HK vs 1497.HK Comparison July 2026
Busy Ming Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1768.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1768.HK stands at 74.8B. In comparison, 1497.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1768.HK is priced at HK$341.60 on the HKSE, while 1497.HK trades at HK$5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1768.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.52, whereas 1497.HK's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, 1768.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1497.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1768.HK is more volatile compared to 1497.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1768.HK.Check 1497.HK's competition here
Four Seas Mercantile Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0374.HK)
1768.HK vs 0374.HK Comparison July 2026
Busy Ming Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1768.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1768.HK stands at 74.8B. In comparison, 0374.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1768.HK is priced at HK$341.60 on the HKSE, while 0374.HK trades at HK$2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1768.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.52, whereas 0374.HK's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, 1768.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0374.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1768.HK is more volatile compared to 0374.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1768.HK.Check 0374.HK's competition here
China Starch Holdings Limited (HKSE: 3838.HK)
1768.HK vs 3838.HK Comparison July 2026
Busy Ming Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1768.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1768.HK stands at 74.8B. In comparison, 3838.HK has a market cap of 977.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1768.HK is priced at HK$341.60 on the HKSE, while 3838.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1768.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.52, whereas 3838.HK's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, 1768.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 3838.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1768.HK is more volatile compared to 3838.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1768.HK.Check 3838.HK's competition here
Ocean One Holding Ltd. (HKSE: 9876.HK)
1768.HK vs 9876.HK Comparison July 2026
Busy Ming Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1768.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1768.HK stands at 74.8B. In comparison, 9876.HK has a market cap of 677.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1768.HK is priced at HK$341.60 on the HKSE, while 9876.HK trades at HK$2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1768.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.52, whereas 9876.HK's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, 1768.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 9876.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1768.HK is more volatile compared to 9876.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1768.HK.Check 9876.HK's competition here
Golden Resources Development International Limited (HKSE: 0677.HK)
1768.HK vs 0677.HK Comparison July 2026
Busy Ming Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1768.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1768.HK stands at 74.8B. In comparison, 0677.HK has a market cap of 602.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1768.HK is priced at HK$341.60 on the HKSE, while 0677.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1768.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.52, whereas 0677.HK's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, 1768.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0677.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1768.HK is more volatile compared to 0677.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1768.HK.Check 0677.HK's competition here
Shenguan Holdings (Group) Limited (HKSE: 0829.HK)
1768.HK vs 0829.HK Comparison July 2026
Busy Ming Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1768.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1768.HK stands at 74.8B. In comparison, 0829.HK has a market cap of 494.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1768.HK is priced at HK$341.60 on the HKSE, while 0829.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1768.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.52, whereas 0829.HK's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, 1768.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0829.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1768.HK is more volatile compared to 0829.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1768.HK.Check 0829.HK's competition here
Shineroad International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1587.HK)
1768.HK vs 1587.HK Comparison July 2026
Busy Ming Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1768.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1768.HK stands at 74.8B. In comparison, 1587.HK has a market cap of 340M. Regarding current trading prices, 1768.HK is priced at HK$341.60 on the HKSE, while 1587.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1768.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.52, whereas 1587.HK's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, 1768.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1587.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1768.HK is more volatile compared to 1587.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1768.HK.Check 1587.HK's competition here
B & S International Holdings Ltd. (HKSE: 1705.HK)
1768.HK vs 1705.HK Comparison July 2026
Busy Ming Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1768.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1768.HK stands at 74.8B. In comparison, 1705.HK has a market cap of 320M. Regarding current trading prices, 1768.HK is priced at HK$341.60 on the HKSE, while 1705.HK trades at HK$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1768.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.52, whereas 1705.HK's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, 1768.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1705.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1768.HK is less volatile compared to 1705.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1768.HK.Check 1705.HK's competition here
Momentum Financial Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1152.HK)
1768.HK vs 1152.HK Comparison July 2026
Busy Ming Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1768.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1768.HK stands at 74.8B. In comparison, 1152.HK has a market cap of 262.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1768.HK is priced at HK$341.60 on the HKSE, while 1152.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1768.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.52, whereas 1152.HK's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, 1768.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1152.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1768.HK is more volatile compared to 1152.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1768.HK.Check 1152.HK's competition here
Hong Kong Food Investment Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0060.HK)
1768.HK vs 0060.HK Comparison July 2026
Busy Ming Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1768.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1768.HK stands at 74.8B. In comparison, 0060.HK has a market cap of 109.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1768.HK is priced at HK$341.60 on the HKSE, while 0060.HK trades at HK$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1768.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.52, whereas 0060.HK's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, 1768.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0060.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1768.HK is more volatile compared to 0060.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1768.HK.Check 0060.HK's competition here
Cool Link (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 8491.HK)
1768.HK vs 8491.HK Comparison July 2026
Busy Ming Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1768.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1768.HK stands at 74.8B. In comparison, 8491.HK has a market cap of 107.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1768.HK is priced at HK$341.60 on the HKSE, while 8491.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1768.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.52, whereas 8491.HK's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, 1768.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 8491.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1768.HK is less volatile compared to 8491.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1768.HK.Check 8491.HK's competition here
Winning Tower Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8362.HK)
1768.HK vs 8362.HK Comparison July 2026
Busy Ming Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1768.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1768.HK stands at 74.8B. In comparison, 8362.HK has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, 1768.HK is priced at HK$341.60 on the HKSE, while 8362.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1768.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.52, whereas 8362.HK's P/E ratio is 1100.00. In terms of profitability, 1768.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 8362.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1768.HK is less volatile compared to 8362.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1768.HK.Check 8362.HK's competition here
Pu'er Lancang Ancient Tea Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6911.HK)
1768.HK vs 6911.HK Comparison July 2026
Busy Ming Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1768.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1768.HK stands at 74.8B. In comparison, 6911.HK has a market cap of 72.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1768.HK is priced at HK$341.60 on the HKSE, while 6911.HK trades at HK$2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1768.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.52, whereas 6911.HK's P/E ratio is 4.03. In terms of profitability, 1768.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 6911.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1768.HK is more volatile compared to 6911.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1768.HK.Check 6911.HK's competition here
Heng Tai Consumables Group Limited (HKSE: 0197.HK)
1768.HK vs 0197.HK Comparison July 2026
Busy Ming Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1768.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1768.HK stands at 74.8B. In comparison, 0197.HK has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1768.HK is priced at HK$341.60 on the HKSE, while 0197.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1768.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.52, whereas 0197.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 1768.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0197.HK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 1768.HK is more volatile compared to 0197.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1768.HK.Check 0197.HK's competition here
Asia Grocery Distribution Limited (HKSE: 8413.HK)
1768.HK vs 8413.HK Comparison July 2026
Busy Ming Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1768.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1768.HK stands at 74.8B. In comparison, 8413.HK has a market cap of 52.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1768.HK is priced at HK$341.60 on the HKSE, while 8413.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1768.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.52, whereas 8413.HK's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, 1768.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 8413.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1768.HK is more volatile compared to 8413.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1768.HK.Check 8413.HK's competition here
Fresh Express Delivery Holdings Group Co., Limited (HKSE: 1175.HK)
1768.HK vs 1175.HK Comparison July 2026
Busy Ming Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1768.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1768.HK stands at 74.8B. In comparison, 1175.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1768.HK is priced at HK$341.60 on the HKSE, while 1175.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1768.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.52, whereas 1175.HK's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, 1768.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1175.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1768.HK is more volatile compared to 1175.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1768.HK.Check 1175.HK's competition here