Hope Education Group Co., Ltd.
Hope Education Group Co., Ltd. (1765.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1765.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1765.HK | HK$0.20 | -2.45% | 1.6B | 3.32 | HK$0.06 | N/A |
| 9901.HK | HK$35.00 | -4.11% | 57.2B | 19.34 | HK$1.81 | +0.17% |
| 1797.HK | HK$21.95 | +1.15% | 23B | -1097.50 | -HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 0667.HK | HK$8.15 | +2.13% | 17.9B | 31.35 | HK$0.26 | +2.70% |
| 1773.HK | HK$3.92 | -4.34% | 8.1B | 10.89 | HK$0.36 | +2.71% |
| 0839.HK | HK$2.77 | -3.82% | 7.8B | 25.18 | HK$0.11 | +4.01% |
| 2469.HK | HK$3.33 | +5.38% | 7.2B | 27.75 | HK$0.12 | N/A |
| 1969.HK | HK$4.46 | -3.04% | 5.4B | 6.28 | HK$0.71 | +4.48% |
| 3978.HK | HK$5.11 | -1.92% | 4B | 18.25 | HK$0.28 | +2.41% |
| 1890.HK | HK$1.54 | -4.94% | 3.1B | 3.50 | HK$0.44 | +4.55% |
Stock Comparison
1765.HK vs 9901.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 9901.HK has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 9901.HK trades at HK$35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 9901.HK's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9901.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 9901.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 9901.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1797.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1797.HK has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1797.HK trades at HK$21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1797.HK's P/E ratio is -1097.50. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1797.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 1797.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1797.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 0667.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0667.HK has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 0667.HK trades at HK$8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 0667.HK's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0667.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 0667.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 0667.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1773.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1773.HK has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1773.HK trades at HK$3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1773.HK's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1773.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 1773.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1773.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 0839.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0839.HK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 0839.HK trades at HK$2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 0839.HK's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0839.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 0839.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 0839.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 2469.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 2469.HK has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 2469.HK trades at HK$3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 2469.HK's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2469.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is less volatile compared to 2469.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 2469.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1969.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1969.HK has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1969.HK trades at HK$4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1969.HK's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1969.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 1969.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1969.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 3978.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 3978.HK has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 3978.HK trades at HK$5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 3978.HK's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3978.HK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 3978.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 3978.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1890.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1890.HK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1890.HK trades at HK$1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1890.HK's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1890.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 1890.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1890.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 0032.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0032.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 0032.HK trades at HK$8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 0032.HK's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0032.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 0032.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 0032.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 9616.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 9616.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 9616.HK trades at HK$3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 9616.HK's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9616.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 9616.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 9616.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 6169.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 6169.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 6169.HK trades at HK$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 6169.HK's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6169.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 6169.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 6169.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 2001.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 2001.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 2001.HK trades at HK$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 2001.HK's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2001.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 2001.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 2001.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 0382.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0382.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 0382.HK trades at HK$1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 0382.HK's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0382.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 0382.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 0382.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1769.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1769.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1769.HK trades at HK$3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1769.HK's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1769.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 1769.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1769.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1935.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1935.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1935.HK trades at HK$0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1935.HK's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1935.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 1935.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1935.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1593.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1593.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1593.HK trades at HK$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1593.HK's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1593.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 1593.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1593.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1525.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1525.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1525.HK trades at HK$2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1525.HK's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1525.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 1525.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1525.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 2175.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 2175.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 2175.HK trades at HK$2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 2175.HK's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2175.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is less volatile compared to 2175.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 2175.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1317.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1317.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1317.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1317.HK's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1317.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 1317.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1317.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 2779.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 2779.HK has a market cap of 949.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 2779.HK trades at HK$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 2779.HK's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2779.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 2779.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 2779.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1082.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1082.HK has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1082.HK trades at HK$1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1082.HK's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1082.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 1082.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1082.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1851.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1851.HK has a market cap of 850M. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1851.HK trades at HK$1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1851.HK's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1851.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 1851.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1851.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1756.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1756.HK has a market cap of 708M. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1756.HK trades at HK$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1756.HK's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1756.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 1756.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1756.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1565.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1565.HK has a market cap of 699.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1565.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1565.HK's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1565.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 1565.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1565.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1569.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1569.HK has a market cap of 628.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1569.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1569.HK's P/E ratio is -14.90. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1569.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 1569.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1569.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 6913.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 6913.HK has a market cap of 393.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 6913.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 6913.HK's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6913.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 6913.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 6913.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 2371.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 2371.HK has a market cap of 263.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 2371.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 2371.HK's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2371.HK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is less volatile compared to 2371.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 2371.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 6068.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 6068.HK has a market cap of 243M. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 6068.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 6068.HK's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6068.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 6068.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 6068.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1449.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1449.HK has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1449.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1449.HK's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1449.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 1449.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1449.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1871.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1871.HK has a market cap of 147.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1871.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1871.HK's P/E ratio is -12.30. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1871.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is less volatile compared to 1871.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1871.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1598.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1598.HK has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1598.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1598.HK's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1598.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 1598.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1598.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1752.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1752.HK has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1752.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1752.HK's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1752.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 1752.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1752.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1758.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1758.HK has a market cap of 113.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1758.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1758.HK's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1758.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 1758.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1758.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 1775.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1775.HK has a market cap of 87.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 1775.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 1775.HK's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1775.HK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 1775.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 1775.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 8363.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 8363.HK has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 8363.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 8363.HK's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8363.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 8363.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 8363.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 8160.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 8160.HK has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 8160.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 8160.HK's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8160.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 8160.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 8160.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 8417.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 8417.HK has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 8417.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 8417.HK's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8417.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is more volatile compared to 8417.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 8417.HK's competition here
1765.HK vs 8055.HK Comparison August 2025
1765.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1765.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 8055.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1765.HK is priced at HK$0.20, while 8055.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1765.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.32, whereas 8055.HK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 1765.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8055.HK's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 1765.HK is less volatile compared to 8055.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1765.HK.Check 8055.HK's competition here