Zoono Group Limited

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, LRLCF has a market cap of 236.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while LRLCF trades at $441.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LRLCF's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to LRLCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to LRLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check LRLCF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, LRLCY has a market cap of 236.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while LRLCY trades at $86.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LRLCY's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to LRLCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to LRLCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check LRLCY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, UNLYF has a market cap of 146.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while UNLYF trades at $61.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas UNLYF's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to UNLYF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to UNLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check UNLYF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, RBGLY has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while RBGLY trades at $15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RBGLY's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to RBGLY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to RBGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check RBGLY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, RBGPF has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while RBGPF trades at $77.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RBGPF's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to RBGPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to RBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check RBGPF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, HENOF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while HENOF trades at $79.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HENOF's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to HENOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and HENOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HENOF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, HENOY has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while HENOY trades at $20.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HENOY's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to HENOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to HENOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check HENOY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, HENKY has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while HENKY trades at $18.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HENKY's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to HENKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and HENKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HENKY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, HELKF has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while HELKF trades at $70.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HELKF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to HELKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and HELKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HELKF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, BDRFY has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while BDRFY trades at $25.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BDRFY's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to BDRFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to BDRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check BDRFY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, BDRFF has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while BDRFF trades at $129.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BDRFF's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to BDRFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and BDRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BDRFF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, KAOOY has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while KAOOY trades at $9.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KAOOY's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to KAOOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to KAOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check KAOOY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, KAOCF has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while KAOCF trades at $47.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KAOCF's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to KAOCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and KAOCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KAOCF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, ETTYF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while ETTYF trades at $24.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ETTYF's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ETTYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and ETTYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ETTYF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, UNICY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while UNICY trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas UNICY's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to UNICY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to UNICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check UNICY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, UNCHF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while UNCHF trades at $6.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas UNCHF's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to UNCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to UNCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check UNCHF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, SSDOF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while SSDOF trades at $18.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SSDOF's P/E ratio is -259.57. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to SSDOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and SSDOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSDOF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, LCCTF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while LCCTF trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LCCTF's P/E ratio is 63.57. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to LCCTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to LCCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check LCCTF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, SSDOY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while SSDOY trades at $16.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SSDOY's P/E ratio is -231.86. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to SSDOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to SSDOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check SSDOY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, KCDMF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while KCDMF trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KCDMF's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to KCDMF's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and KCDMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KCDMF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, KCDMY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while KCDMY trades at $9.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KCDMY's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to KCDMY's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to KCDMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check KCDMY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, BICEY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while BICEY trades at $31.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BICEY's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to BICEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to BICEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check BICEY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, NTCOY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while NTCOY trades at $5.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NTCOY's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to NTCOY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to NTCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check NTCOY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, UNLRY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while UNLRY trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas UNLRY's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to UNLRY's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and UNLRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UNLRY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, VDAHF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while VDAHF trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VDAHF's P/E ratio is 99.00. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to VDAHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and VDAHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VDAHF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, HEGIY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while HEGIY trades at $15.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HEGIY's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to HEGIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to HEGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check HEGIY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, UNLRF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while UNLRF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas UNLRF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to UNLRF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and UNLRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UNLRF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, RPHCF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while RPHCF trades at $14.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RPHCF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to RPHCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and RPHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RPHCF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, VDAHY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while VDAHY trades at $21.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VDAHY's P/E ratio is 108.35. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to VDAHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and VDAHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VDAHY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, KBYPF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while KBYPF trades at $37.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KBYPF's P/E ratio is 42.06. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to KBYPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to KBYPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check KBYPF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, HEGIF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while HEGIF trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HEGIF's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to HEGIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and HEGIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HEGIF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, BICEF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while BICEF trades at $62.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BICEF's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to BICEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and BICEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BICEF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, KOSCF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while KOSCF trades at $45.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KOSCF's P/E ratio is 65.23. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to KOSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and KOSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KOSCF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, LIOPF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while LIOPF trades at $9.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LIOPF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to LIOPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and LIOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LIOPF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, BLUMY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while BLUMY trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BLUMY's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to BLUMY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to BLUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check BLUMY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, FACYF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while FACYF trades at $17.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FACYF's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to FACYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and FACYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FACYF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, LIOPY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while LIOPY trades at $16.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LIOPY's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to LIOPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and LIOPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LIOPY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, PORBF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while PORBF trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PORBF's P/E ratio is 45.23. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to PORBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and PORBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PORBF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, KSRYY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while KSRYY trades at $7.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KSRYY's P/E ratio is 54.93. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to KSRYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to KSRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check KSRYY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, MIOFF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while MIOFF trades at $52.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MIOFF's P/E ratio is 40.46. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to MIOFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and MIOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIOFF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, ONXYY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while ONXYY trades at $4.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ONXYY's P/E ratio is 32.79. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ONXYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to ONXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check ONXYY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, PIGEF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while PIGEF trades at $11.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PIGEF's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to PIGEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and PIGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PIGEF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, PGENY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while PGENY trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PGENY's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to PGENY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to PGENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check PGENY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, SRTSF has a market cap of 846.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while SRTSF trades at $13.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SRTSF's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to SRTSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and SRTSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRTSF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, OLVI has a market cap of 834.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while OLVI trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas OLVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to OLVI's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to OLVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check OLVI's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, DUNIY has a market cap of 691.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while DUNIY trades at $29.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DUNIY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to DUNIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and DUNIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DUNIY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, ONXXF has a market cap of 608.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while ONXXF trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ONXXF's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ONXXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to ONXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check ONXXF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, MDOMF has a market cap of 530.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while MDOMF trades at $11.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MDOMF's P/E ratio is 130.56. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to MDOMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to MDOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check MDOMF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, WPNTF has a market cap of 500.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while WPNTF trades at $6.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas WPNTF's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to WPNTF's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to WPNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check WPNTF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, YAMNF has a market cap of 464.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while YAMNF trades at $8.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas YAMNF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to YAMNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to YAMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check YAMNF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, PZCUY has a market cap of 407.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while PZCUY trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PZCUY's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to PZCUY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to PZCUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check PZCUY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, MCBRF has a market cap of 283.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while MCBRF trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MCBRF's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to MCBRF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and MCBRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCBRF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, KITAF has a market cap of 135.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while KITAF trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KITAF's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to KITAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to KITAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check KITAF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, NBBTF has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while NBBTF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NBBTF's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to NBBTF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to NBBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check NBBTF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, UNHLF has a market cap of 94.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while UNHLF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas UNHLF's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to UNHLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and UNHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UNHLF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, RVIV has a market cap of 79M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while RVIV trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RVIV's P/E ratio is 64.29. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to RVIV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to RVIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check RVIV's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, KPTSF has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while KPTSF trades at $6.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KPTSF's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to KPTSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and KPTSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KPTSF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, PURE has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while PURE trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PURE's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to PURE's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to PURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check PURE's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, FDOGF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while FDOGF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FDOGF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to FDOGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to FDOGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check FDOGF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, MIMNF has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while MIMNF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MIMNF's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to MIMNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and MIMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIMNF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, PRFUF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while PRFUF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PRFUF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to PRFUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to PRFUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check PRFUF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, CAWW has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while CAWW trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CAWW's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to CAWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and CAWW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAWW's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, MAVBF has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while MAVBF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MAVBF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to MAVBF's ROE of -2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and MAVBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAVBF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, DQWS has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while DQWS trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DQWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to DQWS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to DQWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check DQWS's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, REVRQ has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while REVRQ trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas REVRQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to REVRQ's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and REVRQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check REVRQ's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, SPCO has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while SPCO trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SPCO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to SPCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and SPCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPCO's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, NUVI has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while NUVI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NUVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to NUVI's ROE of +9.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and NUVI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NUVI's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, CLGOF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while CLGOF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CLGOF's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to CLGOF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and CLGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLGOF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, SNBH has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while SNBH trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SNBH's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to SNBH's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to SNBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check SNBH's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, SKVI has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while SKVI trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SKVI's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to SKVI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to SKVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check SKVI's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, SLGD has a market cap of 812.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while SLGD trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SLGD's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to SLGD's ROE of +4.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to SLGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check SLGD's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, NASO has a market cap of 748.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while NASO trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NASO's P/E ratio is -87.00. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to NASO's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to NASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check NASO's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, WNBD has a market cap of 700K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while WNBD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas WNBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to WNBD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to WNBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check WNBD's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, PHLI has a market cap of 438.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while PHLI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PHLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to PHLI's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to PHLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check PHLI's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, HRSR has a market cap of 185.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while HRSR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HRSR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to HRSR's ROE of +65.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to HRSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check HRSR's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, TVOG has a market cap of 105.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while TVOG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TVOG's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to TVOG's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and TVOG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TVOG's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, EESO has a market cap of 72.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while EESO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EESO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to EESO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and EESO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EESO's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, BRSHF has a market cap of 67K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while BRSHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BRSHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to BRSHF's ROE of +14.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and BRSHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRSHF's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, EOSS has a market cap of 60.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while EOSS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EOSS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to EOSS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and EOSS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EOSS's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, QNTA has a market cap of 40.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while QNTA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas QNTA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to QNTA's ROE of +2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and QNTA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QNTA's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, SYHO has a market cap of 39.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while SYHO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SYHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to SYHO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and SYHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SYHO's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, GRBG has a market cap of 39K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while GRBG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GRBG's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to GRBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and GRBG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRBG's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, JOEY has a market cap of 28.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while JOEY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas JOEY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to JOEY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and JOEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JOEY's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, PYCT has a market cap of 27.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while PYCT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PYCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to PYCT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and PYCT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PYCT's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, SNST has a market cap of 26.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while SNST trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SNST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to SNST's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and SNST have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNST's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, INBI has a market cap of 18.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while INBI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas INBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to INBI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to INBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check INBI's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, HPTN has a market cap of 17.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while HPTN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HPTN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to HPTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and HPTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HPTN's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, GYSN has a market cap of 14K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while GYSN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GYSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to GYSN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and GYSN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GYSN's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, KPOC has a market cap of 13.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while KPOC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KPOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to KPOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and KPOC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KPOC's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, ZRVT has a market cap of 13K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while ZRVT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ZRVT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ZRVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and ZRVT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZRVT's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, NUUU has a market cap of 11.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while NUUU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NUUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to NUUU's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF is less volatile compared to NUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOONF.Check NUUU's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, EMPO has a market cap of 6.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while EMPO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EMPO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to EMPO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and EMPO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMPO's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, BEUT has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while BEUT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BEUT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to BEUT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and BEUT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BEUT's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, NCDP has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while NCDP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NCDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to NCDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and NCDP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NCDP's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, MDAV has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while MDAV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MDAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to MDAV's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and MDAV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDAV's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, PCGR has a market cap of 785. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while PCGR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PCGR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to PCGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and PCGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCGR's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, RBCL has a market cap of 221. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while RBCL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RBCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to RBCL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and RBCL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RBCL's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, SOYO has a market cap of 62. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while SOYO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SOYO's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to SOYO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and SOYO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOYO's competition here

ZOONF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZOONF stands at 7.3M. In comparison, BMXC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZOONF is priced at $0.02, while BMXC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZOONF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BMXC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ZOONF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to BMXC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOONF and BMXC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BMXC's competition here