Zomedica Corp.
Zomedica Corp. ZOM Peers
See (ZOM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZOM | $0.10 | -0.21% | 95.35M | -1.62 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| ZTS | $160.41 | -0.94% | 71.41B | 28.80 | $5.57 | +1.15% |
| HLN | $10.45 | -2.43% | 47.13B | 24.88 | $0.42 | +1.60% |
| TAK | $13.73 | -3.28% | 43.26B | 30.50 | $0.45 | +4.29% |
| TEVA | $17.49 | -2.62% | 20.04B | -15.21 | -$1.15 | N/A |
| ITCI | $131.87 | N/A | 14.05B | -180.64 | -$0.73 | N/A |
| RDY | $14.09 | +1.11% | 11.73B | 18.53 | $0.76 | +0.68% |
| NBIX | $116.87 | -2.96% | 11.57B | 39.48 | $2.96 | N/A |
| CTLT | $63.48 | N/A | 11.52B | -27.84 | -$2.28 | N/A |
| VTRS | $8.79 | -1.90% | 10.32B | -16.58 | -$0.53 | +5.43% |
Stock Comparison
ZOM vs ZTS Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, ZTS has a market cap of 71.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while ZTS trades at $160.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ZTS's P/E ratio is 28.80. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ZTS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to ZTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs HLN Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, HLN has a market cap of 47.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while HLN trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas HLN's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HLN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to HLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs TAK Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, TAK has a market cap of 43.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while TAK trades at $13.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas TAK's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TAK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to TAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs TEVA Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, TEVA has a market cap of 20.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while TEVA trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas TEVA's P/E ratio is -15.21. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TEVA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to TEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs ITCI Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, ITCI has a market cap of 14.05B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while ITCI trades at $131.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ITCI's P/E ratio is -180.64. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ITCI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to ITCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs RDY Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, RDY has a market cap of 11.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while RDY trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas RDY's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RDY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to RDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs NBIX Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, NBIX has a market cap of 11.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while NBIX trades at $116.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas NBIX's P/E ratio is 39.48. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NBIX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to NBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs CTLT Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, CTLT has a market cap of 11.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while CTLT trades at $63.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CTLT's P/E ratio is -27.84. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CTLT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to CTLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs VTRS Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, VTRS has a market cap of 10.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while VTRS trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas VTRS's P/E ratio is -16.58. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to VTRS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to VTRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs ELAN Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, ELAN has a market cap of 6.47B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while ELAN trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ELAN's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ELAN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to ELAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs LNTH Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, LNTH has a market cap of 5.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while LNTH trades at $78.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas LNTH's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LNTH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to LNTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs RGC Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, RGC has a market cap of 4.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while RGC trades at $324.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas RGC's P/E ratio is -1012.52. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RGC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to RGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs PRGO Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, PRGO has a market cap of 3.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while PRGO trades at $26.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas PRGO's P/E ratio is -21.85. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PRGO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to PRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs AMRX Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, AMRX has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while AMRX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas AMRX's P/E ratio is -187.50. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AMRX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to AMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs ALVO Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, ALVO has a market cap of 3.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while ALVO trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ALVO's P/E ratio is -12.14. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ALVO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to ALVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs EVO Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, EVO has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while EVO trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas EVO's P/E ratio is -6.36. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to EVO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to EVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs ALVOW Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, ALVOW has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while ALVOW trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ALVOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ALVOW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to ALVOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs HCM Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, HCM has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while HCM trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas HCM's P/E ratio is 65.70. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to HCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs DCPH Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, DCPH has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while DCPH trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas DCPH's P/E ratio is -11.58. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DCPH's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to DCPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs EMBCV Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, EMBCV has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while EMBCV trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas EMBCV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to EMBCV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to EMBCV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs SUPN Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, SUPN has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while SUPN trades at $32.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas SUPN's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SUPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to SUPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs BHC Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, BHC has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while BHC trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BHC's P/E ratio is -38.96. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to BHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs BGM Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, BGM has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while BGM trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BGM's P/E ratio is -57.95. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BGM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to BGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs TARO Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, TARO has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while TARO trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas TARO's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TARO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to TARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs INDV Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, INDV has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while INDV trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas INDV's P/E ratio is -223.80. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to INDV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to INDV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs ANIP Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, ANIP has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while ANIP trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ANIP's P/E ratio is -59.62. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ANIP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to ANIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs DVAX Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, DVAX has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while DVAX trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas DVAX's P/E ratio is -19.24. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DVAX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to DVAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs AMPH Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, AMPH has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while AMPH trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas AMPH's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AMPH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to AMPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs PCRX Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, PCRX has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while PCRX trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas PCRX's P/E ratio is -10.88. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PCRX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to PCRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs PAHC Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, PAHC has a market cap of 996.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while PAHC trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas PAHC's P/E ratio is 51.25. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PAHC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to PAHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs HROW Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, HROW has a market cap of 964.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while HROW trades at $26.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas HROW's P/E ratio is -53.61. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HROW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to HROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs COLL Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, COLL has a market cap of 957.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while COLL trades at $29.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas COLL's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to COLL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to COLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs PETQ Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, PETQ has a market cap of 919.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while PETQ trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas PETQ's P/E ratio is 83.73. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PETQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to PETQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs AVDL Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, AVDL has a market cap of 872.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while AVDL trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas AVDL's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AVDL's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to AVDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs CRON Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, CRON has a market cap of 786.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while CRON trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CRON's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CRON's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to CRON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs EMBC Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, EMBC has a market cap of 730.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while EMBC trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas EMBC's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to EMBC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to EMBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs EOLS Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, EOLS has a market cap of 653.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while EOLS trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas EOLS's P/E ratio is -12.51. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to EOLS's ROE of -9.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to EOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs BDSI Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, BDSI has a market cap of 577.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while BDSI trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BDSI's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BDSI's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to BDSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs TLRY Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, TLRY has a market cap of 454.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while TLRY trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas TLRY's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TLRY's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to TLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs ORGO Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, ORGO has a market cap of 399.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while ORGO trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ORGO's P/E ratio is -315.00. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ORGO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to ORGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs KMDA Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, KMDA has a market cap of 396.21M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while KMDA trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas KMDA's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to KMDA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to KMDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs SIGA Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, SIGA has a market cap of 390.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while SIGA trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas SIGA's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SIGA's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to SIGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs TKNO Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, TKNO has a market cap of 360.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while TKNO trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas TKNO's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TKNO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to TKNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs ZYBT Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, ZYBT has a market cap of 351.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while ZYBT trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ZYBT's P/E ratio is 123.50. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ZYBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to ZYBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs SNDL Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, SNDL has a market cap of 339.64M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while SNDL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas SNDL's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SNDL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to SNDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs EBS Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, EBS has a market cap of 319.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while EBS trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas EBS's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to EBS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to EBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs ALIM Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, ALIM has a market cap of 301.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while ALIM trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ALIM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ALIM's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to ALIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs ACB Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, ACB has a market cap of 283.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while ACB trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ACB's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ACB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to ACB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs LNDC Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, LNDC has a market cap of 263.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while LNDC trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas LNDC's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LNDC's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to LNDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs CGC Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, CGC has a market cap of 262.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while CGC trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CGC's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CGC's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to CGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs LFCR Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, LFCR has a market cap of 257.33M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while LFCR trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas LFCR's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LFCR's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to LFCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs TYHT Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, TYHT has a market cap of 229.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while TYHT trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas TYHT's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TYHT's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to TYHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs AQST Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, AQST has a market cap of 227.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while AQST trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas AQST's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AQST's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to AQST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs REPH Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, REPH has a market cap of 177.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while REPH trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas REPH's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to REPH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to REPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs OGI Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, OGI has a market cap of 156.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while OGI trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas OGI's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to OGI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to OGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs ESPR Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, ESPR has a market cap of 154.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while ESPR trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ESPR's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ESPR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to ESPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs DERM Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, DERM has a market cap of 146.12M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while DERM trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas DERM's P/E ratio is -8.78. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DERM's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to DERM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs BIOA Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, BIOA has a market cap of 143.04M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while BIOA trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BIOA's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BIOA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to BIOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs THTX Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, THTX has a market cap of 120.47M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while THTX trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas THTX's P/E ratio is -37.43. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to THTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to THTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs SCTL Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, SCTL has a market cap of 116.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while SCTL trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas SCTL's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SCTL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to SCTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs PROC Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, PROC has a market cap of 113.95M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while PROC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas PROC's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PROC's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to PROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs IRWD Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, IRWD has a market cap of 110.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while IRWD trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas IRWD's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to IRWD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to IRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs OPTN Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, OPTN has a market cap of 95.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while OPTN trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas OPTN's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to OPTN's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to OPTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs CRDL Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, CRDL has a market cap of 94.61M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while CRDL trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CRDL's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CRDL's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to CRDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs GRVI Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, GRVI has a market cap of 88.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while GRVI trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas GRVI's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GRVI's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to GRVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs CPIX Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, CPIX has a market cap of 77.66M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while CPIX trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CPIX's P/E ratio is -12.09. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CPIX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to CPIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs INCR Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, INCR has a market cap of 72.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while INCR trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas INCR's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to INCR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to INCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs ZYNE Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, ZYNE has a market cap of 70.12M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while ZYNE trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ZYNE's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ZYNE's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to ZYNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs SSIC Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, SSIC has a market cap of 66.72M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while SSIC trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas SSIC's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SSIC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to SSIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs VLNS Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, VLNS has a market cap of 61.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while VLNS trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas VLNS's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to VLNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to VLNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs ASRT Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, ASRT has a market cap of 58.30M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while ASRT trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ASRT's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ASRT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to ASRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs JUPW Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, JUPW has a market cap of 49.33M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while JUPW trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas JUPW's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to JUPW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to JUPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs QLI Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, QLI has a market cap of 38.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while QLI trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas QLI's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to QLI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to QLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs SCYX Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, SCYX has a market cap of 37.66M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while SCYX trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas SCYX's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SCYX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to SCYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs RMTI Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, RMTI has a market cap of 36.57M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while RMTI trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas RMTI's P/E ratio is -35.67. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RMTI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to RMTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs HEXO Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, HEXO has a market cap of 31.24M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while HEXO trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas HEXO's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HEXO's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to HEXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs SXTC Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, SXTC has a market cap of 27.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while SXTC trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas SXTC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SXTC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to SXTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs CYTH Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, CYTH has a market cap of 23.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while CYTH trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CYTH's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CYTH's ROE of +7.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to CYTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs EGRX Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, EGRX has a market cap of 22.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while EGRX trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas EGRX's P/E ratio is 2.06. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to EGRX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to EGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs KALA Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, KALA has a market cap of 22.45M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while KALA trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas KALA's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to KALA's ROE of -3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to KALA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs DRRX Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, DRRX has a market cap of 20.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while DRRX trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas DRRX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DRRX's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to DRRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs QNTM Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, QNTM has a market cap of 19.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while QNTM trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas QNTM's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to QNTM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to QNTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs TXMD Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, TXMD has a market cap of 17.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while TXMD trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas TXMD's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TXMD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to TXMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs FLGC Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, FLGC has a market cap of 16.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while FLGC trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas FLGC's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FLGC's ROE of -3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to FLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs ACRX Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, ACRX has a market cap of 14.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while ACRX trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ACRX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ACRX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to ACRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs SISI Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, SISI has a market cap of 14.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while SISI trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas SISI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SISI's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to SISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs PRPH Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, PRPH has a market cap of 14.24M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while PRPH trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas PRPH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PRPH's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to PRPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs GELS Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, GELS has a market cap of 13.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while GELS trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas GELS's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GELS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to GELS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs COSM Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, COSM has a market cap of 13.34M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while COSM trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas COSM's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to COSM's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to COSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs BFRIW Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, BFRIW has a market cap of 13.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while BFRIW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BFRIW's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BFRIW's ROE of -4.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to BFRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs TLPH Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, TLPH has a market cap of 10.66M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while TLPH trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas TLPH's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TLPH's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to TLPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs AGRX Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, AGRX has a market cap of 10.43M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while AGRX trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas AGRX's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AGRX's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to AGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs NLTX Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, NLTX has a market cap of 8.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while NLTX trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas NLTX's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NLTX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to NLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs AYTU Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, AYTU has a market cap of 8.08M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while AYTU trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas AYTU's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AYTU's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to AYTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs LCI Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, LCI has a market cap of 7.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while LCI trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas LCI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LCI's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to LCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs BGXX Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, BGXX has a market cap of 7.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while BGXX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BGXX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BGXX's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to BGXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs ADMP Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, ADMP has a market cap of 7.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while ADMP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ADMP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ADMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is more volatile compared to ADMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs CPHI Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, CPHI has a market cap of 6.85M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while CPHI trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CPHI's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CPHI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to CPHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.
ZOM vs BFRI Comparison
ZOM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOM stands at 95.35M. In comparison, BFRI has a market cap of 6.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOM is priced at $0.10, while BFRI trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BFRI's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, ZOM's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BFRI's ROE of -4.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOM is less volatile compared to BFRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOM.