BMO Equal Weight Global Base Metals Hedged to CAD Index ETF
BMO Equal Weight Global Base Metals Hedged to CAD Index ETF ZMT.TO Peers
See (ZMT.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZMT.TO | $67.83 | -1.04% | 22.02M | N/A | N/A | +0.32% |
| IGAF.TO | $15.28 | +0.26% | 3.33B | N/A | N/A | +0.87% |
| TEC.TO | $44.87 | +1.29% | 3.24B | 35.21 | $1.27 | +0.12% |
| XGD.TO | $27.65 | -2.12% | 1.57B | 18.45 | $1.50 | +0.71% |
| TGED.TO | $26.32 | +0.25% | 784.13M | 29.75 | $0.88 | +3.45% |
| DXG.TO | $65.40 | +0.08% | 674.60M | 29.24 | $2.24 | +12.54% |
| CIF.TO | $50.74 | -0.04% | 608.68M | 13.57 | $3.74 | +2.83% |
| FSF.TO | $32.84 | +0.67% | 575.44M | N/A | N/A | +1.16% |
| XHC.TO | $60.93 | -2.10% | 505.83M | 23.31 | $2.61 | +4.69% |
| XDG.TO | $27.52 | -0.43% | 456.65M | 17.22 | $1.60 | +2.94% |
Stock Comparison
ZMT.TO vs IGAF.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, IGAF.TO has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while IGAF.TO trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGAF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGAF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and IGAF.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs TEC.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, TEC.TO has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while TEC.TO trades at $44.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEC.TO's P/E ratio is 35.21. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to TEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs XGD.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, XGD.TO has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while XGD.TO trades at $27.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGD.TO's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGD.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to XGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs TGED.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, TGED.TO has a market cap of 784.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while TGED.TO trades at $26.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGED.TO's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGED.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to TGED.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs DXG.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, DXG.TO has a market cap of 674.60M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while DXG.TO trades at $65.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXG.TO's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to DXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs CIF.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, CIF.TO has a market cap of 608.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while CIF.TO trades at $50.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIF.TO's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to CIF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs FSF.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, FSF.TO has a market cap of 575.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while FSF.TO trades at $32.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and FSF.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs XHC.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, XHC.TO has a market cap of 505.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while XHC.TO trades at $60.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHC.TO's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XHC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to XHC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs XDG.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, XDG.TO has a market cap of 456.65M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while XDG.TO trades at $27.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDG.TO's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to XDG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs TQGD.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, TQGD.TO has a market cap of 370.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while TQGD.TO trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TQGD.TO's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TQGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to TQGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs CINF.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, CINF.TO has a market cap of 367.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while CINF.TO trades at $28.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CINF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CINF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to CINF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs 0P0001ED1S.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, 0P0001ED1S.TO has a market cap of 308.52M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while 0P0001ED1S.TO trades at $12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001ED1S.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001ED1S.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and 0P0001ED1S.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs CWW.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, CWW.TO has a market cap of 299.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while CWW.TO trades at $60.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWW.TO's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to CWW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs ZWG.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, ZWG.TO has a market cap of 256.85M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while ZWG.TO trades at $31.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to ZWG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs COW.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, COW.TO has a market cap of 245.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while COW.TO trades at $67.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COW.TO's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to COW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs 0P0001ODDT.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, 0P0001ODDT.TO has a market cap of 230.77M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while 0P0001ODDT.TO trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001ODDT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001ODDT.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and 0P0001ODDT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs CGR.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, CGR.TO has a market cap of 207.54M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while CGR.TO trades at $30.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGR.TO's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to CGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs VMO.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, VMO.TO has a market cap of 205.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while VMO.TO trades at $65.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to VMO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs GDV.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, GDV.TO has a market cap of 175.98M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while GDV.TO trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDV.TO's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDV.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to GDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs LIFE.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, LIFE.TO has a market cap of 171.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while LIFE.TO trades at $17.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIFE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LIFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to LIFE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs ZGD.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, ZGD.TO has a market cap of 145.51M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while ZGD.TO trades at $135.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZGD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to ZGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs CYH.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, CYH.TO has a market cap of 144.45M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while CYH.TO trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYH.TO's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to CYH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs XGI.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, XGI.TO has a market cap of 118.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while XGI.TO trades at $57.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGI.TO's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGI.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and XGI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs CGLO.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, CGLO.TO has a market cap of 106.03M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while CGLO.TO trades at $29.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGLO.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to CGLO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs PMNT.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, PMNT.TO has a market cap of 98.54M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while PMNT.TO trades at $18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMNT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMNT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and PMNT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs XMY.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, XMY.TO has a market cap of 97.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while XMY.TO trades at $32.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMY.TO's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to XMY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs XDGH.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, XDGH.TO has a market cap of 93.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while XDGH.TO trades at $26.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDGH.TO's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDGH.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to XDGH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs TGRE.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, TGRE.TO has a market cap of 80.01M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while TGRE.TO trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGRE.TO's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGRE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to TGRE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs XCD.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, XCD.TO has a market cap of 65.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while XCD.TO trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCD.TO's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and XCD.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs LONG.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, LONG.TO has a market cap of 63.54M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while LONG.TO trades at $35.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LONG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LONG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and LONG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs VVO.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, VVO.TO has a market cap of 50.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while VVO.TO trades at $37.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VVO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to VVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs ONEQ.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, ONEQ.TO has a market cap of 49.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while ONEQ.TO trades at $43.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONEQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONEQ.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and ONEQ.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs GIQG.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, GIQG.TO has a market cap of 46.12M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while GIQG.TO trades at $29.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIQG.TO's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIQG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and GIQG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs 0P0001NDFE.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, 0P0001NDFE.TO has a market cap of 45.80M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while 0P0001NDFE.TO trades at $12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001NDFE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001NDFE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and 0P0001NDFE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs ESGG.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, ESGG.TO has a market cap of 42.51M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while ESGG.TO trades at $49.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to ESGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs TGGR.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, TGGR.TO has a market cap of 37.98M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while TGGR.TO trades at $27.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGGR.TO's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGGR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to TGGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs DXN.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, DXN.TO has a market cap of 26.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while DXN.TO trades at $22.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to DXN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs VAH.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, VAH.TO has a market cap of 22.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while VAH.TO trades at $28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to VAH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs CGAA.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, CGAA.TO has a market cap of 21.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while CGAA.TO trades at $27.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGAA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGAA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and CGAA.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs 0P0001N8LS.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, 0P0001N8LS.TO has a market cap of 21.31M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while 0P0001N8LS.TO trades at $36.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001N8LS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001N8LS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and 0P0001N8LS.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs PINV.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, PINV.TO has a market cap of 20.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while PINV.TO trades at $22.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PINV.TO's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PINV.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and PINV.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs MIVG.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, MIVG.TO has a market cap of 19.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while MIVG.TO trades at $37.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIVG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIVG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and MIVG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs HGGG.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, HGGG.TO has a market cap of 19.75M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while HGGG.TO trades at $45.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGGG.TO's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and HGGG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs RWU.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, RWU.TO has a market cap of 12.24M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while RWU.TO trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and RWU.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs VLQ.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, VLQ.TO has a market cap of 11.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while VLQ.TO trades at $32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and VLQ.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs FLGD.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, FLGD.TO has a market cap of 10.85M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while FLGD.TO trades at $29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLGD.TO's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and FLGD.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs RIG.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, RIG.TO has a market cap of 10.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while RIG.TO trades at $18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and RIG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs HRA.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, HRA.TO has a market cap of 10.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while HRA.TO trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HRA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to HRA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs RLD.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, RLD.TO has a market cap of 9.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while RLD.TO trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and RLD.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs EATS.CN Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, EATS.CN has a market cap of 7.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while EATS.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EATS.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EATS.CN's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to EATS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs DFD.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, DFD.TO has a market cap of 5.32M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while DFD.TO trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and DFD.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs SOL.CN Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, SOL.CN has a market cap of 5.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while SOL.CN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOL.CN's ROE of +8.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to SOL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs HLTH.CN Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, HLTH.CN has a market cap of 3.24M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while HLTH.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLTH.CN's ROE of -140.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and HLTH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs DFE.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, DFE.TO has a market cap of 2.66M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while DFE.TO trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and DFE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZMT.TO vs RLE.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, RLE.TO has a market cap of 2.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while RLE.TO trades at $28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO is less volatile compared to RLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMT.TO.
ZMT.TO vs HGM.TO Comparison
ZMT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMT.TO stands at 22.02M. In comparison, HGM.TO has a market cap of 1.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMT.TO is priced at $67.83, while HGM.TO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMT.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGM.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMT.TO and HGM.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).