Zimplats Holdings Limited
Zimplats Holdings Limited ZIM.AX Peers
See (ZIM.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIM.AX | A$15.40 | -0.65% | 1.7B | 49.68 | A$0.31 | N/A |
| BRE.AX | A$2.24 | -0.44% | 556.3M | -11.20 | -A$0.20 | N/A |
| AZY.AX | A$0.67 | -5.67% | 385.4M | -66.50 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| SMI.AX | A$0.53 | -2.75% | 383M | -53.00 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| 29M.AX | A$0.25 | +2.04% | 342.8M | -1.04 | -A$0.24 | N/A |
| STK.AX | A$0.14 | -6.67% | 316.7M | 14.00 | A$0.01 | N/A |
| MTM.AX | A$0.64 | N/A | 293.3M | -31.75 | -A$0.02 | N/A |
| MI6.AX | A$0.12 | N/A | 247.3M | -5.75 | -A$0.02 | N/A |
| LRV.AX | A$0.57 | -1.72% | 235M | -11.40 | -A$0.05 | N/A |
| VAL.AX | A$0.05 | +4.17% | 228.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ZIM.AX vs BRE.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BRE.AX has a market cap of 556.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while BRE.AX trades at A$2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas BRE.AX's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRE.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to BRE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs AZY.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AZY.AX has a market cap of 385.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while AZY.AX trades at A$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas AZY.AX's P/E ratio is -66.50. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AZY.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to AZY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs SMI.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SMI.AX has a market cap of 383M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while SMI.AX trades at A$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas SMI.AX's P/E ratio is -53.00. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMI.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to SMI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs 29M.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 29M.AX has a market cap of 342.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while 29M.AX trades at A$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas 29M.AX's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 29M.AX's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to 29M.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs STK.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, STK.AX has a market cap of 316.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while STK.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas STK.AX's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STK.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to STK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs MTM.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MTM.AX has a market cap of 293.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while MTM.AX trades at A$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas MTM.AX's P/E ratio is -31.75. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to MTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs MI6.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MI6.AX has a market cap of 247.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while MI6.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas MI6.AX's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MI6.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to MI6.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs LRV.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LRV.AX has a market cap of 235M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while LRV.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas LRV.AX's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LRV.AX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to LRV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs VAL.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VAL.AX has a market cap of 228.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while VAL.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas VAL.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VAL.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to VAL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs TOK.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TOK.AX has a market cap of 181.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while TOK.AX trades at A$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas TOK.AX's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TOK.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to TOK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs XAM.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XAM.AX has a market cap of 181M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while XAM.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas XAM.AX's P/E ratio is -7.90. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XAM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to XAM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs A1M.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, A1M.AX has a market cap of 172.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while A1M.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas A1M.AX's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to A1M.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to A1M.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs CEL.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CEL.AX has a market cap of 169.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while CEL.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas CEL.AX's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CEL.AX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to CEL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs BOC.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BOC.AX has a market cap of 152.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while BOC.AX trades at A$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas BOC.AX's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BOC.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to BOC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs MM8.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MM8.AX has a market cap of 129.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while MM8.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas MM8.AX's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MM8.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to MM8.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs PTR.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PTR.AX has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while PTR.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas PTR.AX's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PTR.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to PTR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs NWF.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NWF.AX has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while NWF.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas NWF.AX's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NWF.AX's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to NWF.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs CNB.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CNB.AX has a market cap of 82.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while CNB.AX trades at A$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas CNB.AX's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CNB.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to CNB.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs OSM.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OSM.AX has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while OSM.AX trades at A$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas OSM.AX's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OSM.AX's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to OSM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs PUA.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PUA.AX has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while PUA.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas PUA.AX's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PUA.AX's ROE of +76.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to PUA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs FEG.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FEG.AX has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while FEG.AX trades at A$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas FEG.AX's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FEG.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to FEG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs IDA.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IDA.AX has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while IDA.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas IDA.AX's P/E ratio is 1.05. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IDA.AX's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to IDA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs SPD.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SPD.AX has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while SPD.AX trades at A$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas SPD.AX's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPD.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to SPD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs RIM.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RIM.AX has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while RIM.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas RIM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RIM.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to RIM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs MMA.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MMA.AX has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while MMA.AX trades at A$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas MMA.AX's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MMA.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to MMA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs AGD.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AGD.AX has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while AGD.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas AGD.AX's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AGD.AX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to AGD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs MM1.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MM1.AX has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while MM1.AX trades at A$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas MM1.AX's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MM1.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to MM1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs BDM.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BDM.AX has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while BDM.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas BDM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BDM.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to BDM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs E2M.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, E2M.AX has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while E2M.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas E2M.AX's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to E2M.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to E2M.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs MXR.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MXR.AX has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while MXR.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas MXR.AX's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MXR.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to MXR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs MKR.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MKR.AX has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while MKR.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas MKR.AX's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MKR.AX's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to MKR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs FTL.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FTL.AX has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while FTL.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas FTL.AX's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FTL.AX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to FTL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs BMR.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BMR.AX has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while BMR.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas BMR.AX's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BMR.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to BMR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs TLM.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TLM.AX has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while TLM.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas TLM.AX's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TLM.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to TLM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs LDR.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LDR.AX has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while LDR.AX trades at A$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas LDR.AX's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LDR.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to LDR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs PNX.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PNX.AX has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while PNX.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas PNX.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PNX.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to PNX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs HMX.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HMX.AX has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while HMX.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas HMX.AX's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HMX.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to HMX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs FRS.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FRS.AX has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while FRS.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas FRS.AX's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FRS.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to FRS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs GSN.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GSN.AX has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while GSN.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas GSN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GSN.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to GSN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs QML.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, QML.AX has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while QML.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas QML.AX's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QML.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to QML.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs G50.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, G50.AX has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while G50.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas G50.AX's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to G50.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to G50.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs RDN.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RDN.AX has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while RDN.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas RDN.AX's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RDN.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to RDN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs CAE.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CAE.AX has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while CAE.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas CAE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CAE.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to CAE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs HAR.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HAR.AX has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while HAR.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas HAR.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HAR.AX's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to HAR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs FME.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FME.AX has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while FME.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas FME.AX's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FME.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to FME.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs PGM.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PGM.AX has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while PGM.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas PGM.AX's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PGM.AX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to PGM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs LKY.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LKY.AX has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while LKY.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas LKY.AX's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LKY.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to LKY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs SCN.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SCN.AX has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while SCN.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas SCN.AX's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCN.AX's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to SCN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs COY.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, COY.AX has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while COY.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas COY.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COY.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to COY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs ODE.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ODE.AX has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while ODE.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas ODE.AX's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ODE.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to ODE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs BRX.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BRX.AX has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while BRX.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas BRX.AX's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRX.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to BRX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs MPG.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MPG.AX has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while MPG.AX trades at A$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas MPG.AX's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MPG.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to MPG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs OMX.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OMX.AX has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while OMX.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas OMX.AX's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OMX.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to OMX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs LYN.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LYN.AX has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while LYN.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas LYN.AX's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LYN.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to LYN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs ERL.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ERL.AX has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while ERL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas ERL.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ERL.AX's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to ERL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs LCL.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LCL.AX has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while LCL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas LCL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LCL.AX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to LCL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs LOM.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LOM.AX has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while LOM.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas LOM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LOM.AX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to LOM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs PRS.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PRS.AX has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while PRS.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas PRS.AX's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRS.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to PRS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs NFL.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NFL.AX has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while NFL.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas NFL.AX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NFL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to NFL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs GIB.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GIB.AX has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while GIB.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas GIB.AX's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GIB.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to GIB.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs CBY.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CBY.AX has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while CBY.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas CBY.AX's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CBY.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to CBY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs KOB.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KOB.AX has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while KOB.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas KOB.AX's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KOB.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to KOB.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs RON.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RON.AX has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while RON.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas RON.AX's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RON.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to RON.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs C1X.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, C1X.AX has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while C1X.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas C1X.AX's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to C1X.AX's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to C1X.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs RB6.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RB6.AX has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while RB6.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas RB6.AX's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RB6.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to RB6.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs T88.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, T88.AX has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while T88.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas T88.AX's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to T88.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to T88.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs TAR.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TAR.AX has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while TAR.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas TAR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TAR.AX's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to TAR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs BIM.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BIM.AX has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while BIM.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas BIM.AX's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BIM.AX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to BIM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs GRL.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GRL.AX has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while GRL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas GRL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRL.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to GRL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs MHC.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MHC.AX has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while MHC.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas MHC.AX's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MHC.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to MHC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs ALV.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ALV.AX has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while ALV.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas ALV.AX's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALV.AX's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to ALV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs HWK.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HWK.AX has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while HWK.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas HWK.AX's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HWK.AX's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to HWK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs PNT.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PNT.AX has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while PNT.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas PNT.AX's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PNT.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to PNT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs TG1.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TG1.AX has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while TG1.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas TG1.AX's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TG1.AX's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to TG1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs RCR.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RCR.AX has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while RCR.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas RCR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RCR.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to RCR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs CBH.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CBH.AX has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while CBH.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas CBH.AX's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CBH.AX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to CBH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs MOH.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MOH.AX has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while MOH.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas MOH.AX's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MOH.AX's ROE of -2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to MOH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs PKO.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PKO.AX has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while PKO.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas PKO.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PKO.AX's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to PKO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs CUS.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CUS.AX has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while CUS.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas CUS.AX's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CUS.AX's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to CUS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs KFM.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KFM.AX has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while KFM.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas KFM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KFM.AX's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to KFM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs BPM.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BPM.AX has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while BPM.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas BPM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BPM.AX's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to BPM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs GCR.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GCR.AX has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while GCR.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas GCR.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GCR.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to GCR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs OCT.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OCT.AX has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while OCT.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas OCT.AX's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OCT.AX's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to OCT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs M3M.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, M3M.AX has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while M3M.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas M3M.AX's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to M3M.AX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX and M3M.AX have similar daily volatility (3.92).
ZIM.AX vs AS2.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AS2.AX has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while AS2.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas AS2.AX's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AS2.AX's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to AS2.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs AVW.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AVW.AX has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while AVW.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas AVW.AX's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVW.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is less volatile compared to AVW.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs BMO.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BMO.AX has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while BMO.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas BMO.AX's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BMO.AX's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to BMO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs DUN.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DUN.AX has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while DUN.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas DUN.AX's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DUN.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to DUN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs EMS.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EMS.AX has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while EMS.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas EMS.AX's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EMS.AX's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to EMS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs BIG.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BIG.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while BIG.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas BIG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BIG.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to BIG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.
ZIM.AX vs DRM.AX Comparison
ZIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM.AX stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DRM.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM.AX is priced at A$15.40, while DRM.AX trades at A$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 49.68, whereas DRM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZIM.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DRM.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM.AX is more volatile compared to DRM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.AX.