Zalando SE

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, AMZ.DE has a market cap of 1.81T. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while AMZ.DE trades at $170.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas AMZ.DE's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMZ.DE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is more volatile compared to AMZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, 2RR.F has a market cap of 268.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while 2RR.F trades at $14.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas 2RR.F's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2RR.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is more volatile compared to 2RR.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, AHLA.F has a market cap of 267.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while AHLA.F trades at $111.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas AHLA.F's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHLA.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is more volatile compared to AHLA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, IXD1.DE has a market cap of 144.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while IXD1.DE trades at $46.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas IXD1.DE's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IXD1.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is more volatile compared to IXD1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, MLB1.DE has a market cap of 110.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while MLB1.DE trades at $2,174.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas MLB1.DE's P/E ratio is 65.52. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLB1.DE's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is more volatile compared to MLB1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, 013A.F has a market cap of 39.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while 013A.F trades at $29.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas 013A.F's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 013A.F's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is more volatile compared to 013A.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, AHLA.DE has a market cap of 33.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while AHLA.DE trades at $111.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas AHLA.DE's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHLA.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is more volatile compared to AHLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, EBA.DE has a market cap of 28.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while EBA.DE trades at $61.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas EBA.DE's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EBA.DE's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is more volatile compared to EBA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, DHER.DE has a market cap of 7.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while DHER.DE trades at $25.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas DHER.DE's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DHER.DE's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is less volatile compared to DHER.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, 3E2.BE has a market cap of 4.56B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while 3E2.BE trades at $42.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas 3E2.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3E2.BE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is more volatile compared to 3E2.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, 3E2.DE has a market cap of 4.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while 3E2.DE trades at $40.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas 3E2.DE's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3E2.DE's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is less volatile compared to 3E2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, 3E2.F has a market cap of 4.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while 3E2.F trades at $39.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas 3E2.F's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3E2.F's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is less volatile compared to 3E2.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, ZO1.DE has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while ZO1.DE trades at $468.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas ZO1.DE's P/E ratio is -211.10. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZO1.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is more volatile compared to ZO1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, CEC.DE has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while CEC.DE trades at $3.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas CEC.DE's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEC.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is less volatile compared to CEC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, YOU.DE has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while YOU.DE trades at $6.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas YOU.DE's P/E ratio is -15.79. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YOU.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is more volatile compared to YOU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, YOU.F has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while YOU.F trades at $6.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas YOU.F's P/E ratio is -15.77. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YOU.F's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is more volatile compared to YOU.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, 8WZ.F has a market cap of 767.65M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while 8WZ.F trades at $2.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas 8WZ.F's P/E ratio is -21.09. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8WZ.F's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is less volatile compared to 8WZ.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, SNH.DE has a market cap of 670.67M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while SNH.DE trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas SNH.DE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNH.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is less volatile compared to SNH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, G5NA.DE has a market cap of 360.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while G5NA.DE trades at $11.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas G5NA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to G5NA.DE's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is more volatile compared to G5NA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, H24.DE has a market cap of 252.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while H24.DE trades at $7.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas H24.DE's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to H24.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is less volatile compared to H24.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, BIKE.DE has a market cap of 106.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while BIKE.DE trades at $2.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas BIKE.DE's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIKE.DE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is less volatile compared to BIKE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, BIKE.F has a market cap of 103.79M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while BIKE.F trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas BIKE.F's P/E ratio is -7.58. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIKE.F's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is less volatile compared to BIKE.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, FSNT.DE has a market cap of 89.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while FSNT.DE trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas FSNT.DE's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FSNT.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is less volatile compared to FSNT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, PLDADEL00013.SG has a market cap of 83.08M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while PLDADEL00013.SG trades at $6.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas PLDADEL00013.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is more volatile compared to PLDADEL00013.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, ART.DE has a market cap of 53.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while ART.DE trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas ART.DE's P/E ratio is -66.43. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ART.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is more volatile compared to ART.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, MRX.DE has a market cap of 50.24M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while MRX.DE trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas MRX.DE's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRX.DE's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is less volatile compared to MRX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, MRX.F has a market cap of 49.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while MRX.F trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas MRX.F's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRX.F's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is less volatile compared to MRX.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, ECF.DE has a market cap of 19.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while ECF.DE trades at $2.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas ECF.DE's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ECF.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is more volatile compared to ECF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, BBY.DE has a market cap of 16.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while BBY.DE trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas BBY.DE's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBY.DE's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is less volatile compared to BBY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, BTBB.DE has a market cap of 2.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while BTBB.DE trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas BTBB.DE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BTBB.DE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is less volatile compared to BTBB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, U1DA.F has a market cap of 125073.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while U1DA.F trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas U1DA.F's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to U1DA.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is less volatile compared to U1DA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.

ZAL.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAL.DE stands at 8.20B. In comparison, CEC1.DE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ZAL.DE is priced at $31.63, while CEC1.DE trades at $3.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.71, whereas CEC1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, ZAL.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEC1.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAL.DE is less volatile compared to CEC1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAL.DE.