Yuhe International, Inc.
Yuhe International, Inc. YUII Peers
See (YUII) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YUII | $0.00 | N/A | 2K | N/A | -$1.75 | N/A |
| CBLUY | $10.68 | -4.56% | 53.5B | 5.90 | $1.81 | +13.38% |
| YARIY | $17.98 | -2.76% | 18.3B | 32.11 | $0.56 | +1.27% |
| PHOJY | $22.09 | N/A | 17.5B | 3.99 | $5.53 | N/A |
| YRAIF | $33.00 | N/A | 8.4B | 29.20 | $1.13 | N/A |
| BLONF | $0.01 | +150.00% | 7B | -0.50 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| KPLUF | $18.62 | +38.03% | 3.3B | 1862.00 | $0.01 | +1.02% |
| TSDOF | $35.50 | +20.34% | 2.1B | 44.38 | $0.80 | +2.60% |
| CBLUF | $0.28 | N/A | 1.3B | 9.35 | $0.03 | +10.36% |
| SNFRF | $0.16 | +50.22% | 1.1B | 7.80 | $0.02 | +4.03% |
Stock Comparison
YUII vs CBLUY Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, CBLUY has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while CBLUY trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBLUY's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CBLUY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to CBLUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs YARIY Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, YARIY has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while YARIY trades at $17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YARIY's P/E ratio is 32.11. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to YARIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to YARIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs PHOJY Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, PHOJY has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while PHOJY trades at $22.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHOJY's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PHOJY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and PHOJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs YRAIF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, YRAIF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while YRAIF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YRAIF's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to YRAIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and YRAIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs BLONF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, BLONF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while BLONF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLONF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BLONF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and BLONF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs KPLUF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, KPLUF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while KPLUF trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KPLUF's P/E ratio is 1862.00. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to KPLUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and KPLUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs TSDOF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, TSDOF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while TSDOF trades at $35.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSDOF's P/E ratio is 44.38. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TSDOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to TSDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs CBLUF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, CBLUF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while CBLUF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBLUF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CBLUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and CBLUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs SNFRF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, SNFRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while SNFRF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNFRF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SNFRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to SNFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs SNFRY Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, SNFRY has a market cap of 799.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while SNFRY trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNFRY's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SNFRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and SNFRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs NUFMF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, NUFMF has a market cap of 593.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while NUFMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUFMF's P/E ratio is -38.75. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NUFMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and NUFMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs BWEL Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, BWEL has a market cap of 551.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while BWEL trades at $550.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BWEL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to BWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs MBCF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, MBCF has a market cap of 313.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while MBCF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBCF's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MBCF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to MBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs ALGWF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, ALGWF has a market cap of 120.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while ALGWF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGWF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ALGWF's ROE of -3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to ALGWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs DNKLY Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, DNKLY has a market cap of 102.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while DNKLY trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNKLY's P/E ratio is -24.29. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to DNKLY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to DNKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs EMSNF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, EMSNF has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while EMSNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMSNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to EMSNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and EMSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs PLHCF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, PLHCF has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while PLHCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLHCF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PLHCF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and PLHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs MGROF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, MGROF has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while MGROF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGROF's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MGROF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to MGROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs KNGW Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, KNGW has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while KNGW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNGW's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to KNGW's ROE of -8.27%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and KNGW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs EDNSF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, EDNSF has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while EDNSF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDNSF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to EDNSF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and EDNSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs VNPKF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, VNPKF has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while VNPKF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNPKF's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to VNPKF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and VNPKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs HMIFF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, HMIFF has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while HMIFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMIFF's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HMIFF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and HMIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs ARLSF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, ARLSF has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while ARLSF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARLSF's P/E ratio is -11.34. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ARLSF's ROE of -4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to ARLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs VVIVF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, VVIVF has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while VVIVF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVIVF's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to VVIVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and VVIVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs LBTD Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, LBTD has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while LBTD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTD's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to LBTD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to LBTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs FTZZF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, FTZZF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while FTZZF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTZZF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to FTZZF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to FTZZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs KRLTF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, KRLTF has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while KRLTF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRLTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to KRLTF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and KRLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs APEOF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, APEOF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while APEOF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APEOF's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to APEOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and APEOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs BEVVF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, BEVVF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while BEVVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEVVF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BEVVF's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to BEVVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs MAAFF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, MAAFF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while MAAFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MAAFF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to MAAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs HFGVF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, HFGVF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while HFGVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HFGVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HFGVF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to HFGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs EACTF Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, EACTF has a market cap of 578.4K. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while EACTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EACTF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to EACTF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and EACTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs PTAM Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, PTAM has a market cap of 267.5K. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while PTAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTAM's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PTAM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to PTAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs IGNE Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, IGNE has a market cap of 156.5K. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while IGNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to IGNE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to IGNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs GREN Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, GREN has a market cap of 115.3K. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while GREN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GREN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GREN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to GREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs KWBT Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, KWBT has a market cap of 56.5K. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while KWBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWBT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to KWBT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and KWBT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs BIONQ Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, BIONQ has a market cap of 44.8K. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while BIONQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIONQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BIONQ's ROE of +1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to BIONQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs AGYP Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, AGYP has a market cap of 21K. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while AGYP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGYP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AGYP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and AGYP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs KGET Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, KGET has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while KGET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGET's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to KGET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and KGET have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs SLCO Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, SLCO has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while SLCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SLCO's ROE of -5.46%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and SLCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs HUMT Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, HUMT has a market cap of 3.7K. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while HUMT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HUMT's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and HUMT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs ITRO Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, ITRO has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while ITRO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITRO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ITRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and ITRO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs NOEC Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, NOEC has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while NOEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOEC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NOEC's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII is less volatile compared to NOEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUII.
YUII vs PHOS Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, PHOS has a market cap of 841. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while PHOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PHOS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and PHOS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs USBC Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 41. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while USBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to USBC's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and USBC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YUII vs QCCP Comparison
YUII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUII stands at 2K. In comparison, QCCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, YUII is priced at $0.00, while QCCP trades at $1,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUII currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUII's ROE is -0.42%, compared to QCCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUII and QCCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).