Xigem Technologies Corporation
Xigem Technologies Corporation XIGM.CN Peers
See (XIGM.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XIGM.CN | CA$0.01 | +0.00% | 650.8K | -1.00 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| CRM.NE | CA$20.58 | -0.05% | 336.8B | 40.35 | CA$0.51 | +0.62% |
| SHOP.TO | CA$175.79 | +0.82% | 228.1B | 104.64 | CA$1.68 | N/A |
| CSU.TO | CA$4,916.44 | -1.37% | 104.2B | 103.33 | CA$47.58 | +0.11% |
| CDAY.TO | CA$93.38 | +0.38% | 14.6B | 2334.50 | CA$0.04 | N/A |
| DSG.TO | CA$142.56 | -1.12% | 12.2B | 63.07 | CA$2.26 | N/A |
| OTEX.TO | CA$39.46 | +1.00% | 10.2B | 11.89 | CA$3.32 | +3.69% |
| KXS.TO | CA$201.27 | +0.01% | 5.7B | 437.76 | CA$0.46 | N/A |
| LSPD.TO | CA$17.71 | +2.79% | 2.4B | -2.95 | -CA$6.00 | N/A |
| MAGT.TO | CA$44.24 | +0.00% | 1.8B | 368.67 | CA$0.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
XIGM.CN vs CRM.NE Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, CRM.NE has a market cap of 336.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CRM.NE trades at CA$20.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CRM.NE's P/E ratio is 40.35. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CRM.NE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to CRM.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs SHOP.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, SHOP.TO has a market cap of 228.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while SHOP.TO trades at CA$175.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SHOP.TO's P/E ratio is 104.64. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SHOP.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to SHOP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs CSU.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, CSU.TO has a market cap of 104.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CSU.TO trades at CA$4,916.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CSU.TO's P/E ratio is 103.33. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CSU.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to CSU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs CDAY.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, CDAY.TO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CDAY.TO trades at CA$93.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CDAY.TO's P/E ratio is 2334.50. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CDAY.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to CDAY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs DSG.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, DSG.TO has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while DSG.TO trades at CA$142.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DSG.TO's P/E ratio is 63.07. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DSG.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to DSG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs OTEX.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, OTEX.TO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while OTEX.TO trades at CA$39.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas OTEX.TO's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to OTEX.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to OTEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs KXS.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, KXS.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while KXS.TO trades at CA$201.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KXS.TO's P/E ratio is 437.76. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to KXS.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to KXS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs LSPD.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, LSPD.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while LSPD.TO trades at CA$17.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LSPD.TO's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to LSPD.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to LSPD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs MAGT.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, MAGT.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while MAGT.TO trades at CA$44.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MAGT.TO's P/E ratio is 368.67. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to MAGT.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to MAGT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs ENGH.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, ENGH.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ENGH.TO trades at CA$23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ENGH.TO's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ENGH.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to ENGH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs DCBO.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, DCBO.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while DCBO.TO trades at CA$41.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DCBO.TO's P/E ratio is 41.46. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DCBO.TO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to DCBO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs ABST.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, ABST.TO has a market cap of 808M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ABST.TO trades at CA$15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ABST.TO's P/E ratio is -23.03. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ABST.TO's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to ABST.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs CMG.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, CMG.TO has a market cap of 621.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CMG.TO trades at CA$7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CMG.TO's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CMG.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to CMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs TCS.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, TCS.TO has a market cap of 548.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while TCS.TO trades at CA$36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TCS.TO's P/E ratio is 123.17. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to TCS.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to TCS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs BLN.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, BLN.TO has a market cap of 548.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while BLN.TO trades at CA$6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BLN.TO's P/E ratio is -72.22. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to BLN.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to BLN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs ABXX.NE Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, ABXX.NE has a market cap of 415.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ABXX.NE trades at CA$12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ABXX.NE's P/E ratio is -8.09. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ABXX.NE's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to ABXX.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs REAL.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, REAL.TO has a market cap of 394.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while REAL.TO trades at CA$5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas REAL.TO's P/E ratio is 177.33. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to REAL.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to REAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs QFOR.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, QFOR.TO has a market cap of 242.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while QFOR.TO trades at CA$6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas QFOR.TO's P/E ratio is -7.73. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to QFOR.TO's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to QFOR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs WNDR.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, WNDR.TO has a market cap of 232.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while WNDR.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas WNDR.TO's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to WNDR.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to WNDR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs SYZ.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, SYZ.TO has a market cap of 228M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while SYZ.TO trades at CA$9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SYZ.TO's P/E ratio is -195.00. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SYZ.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to SYZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs IMP.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, IMP.TO has a market cap of 177.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while IMP.TO trades at CA$3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IMP.TO's P/E ratio is 42.86. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to IMP.TO's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to IMP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs EINC.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, EINC.TO has a market cap of 163.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while EINC.TO trades at CA$3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EINC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to EINC.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to EINC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs THNC.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, THNC.TO has a market cap of 146.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while THNC.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas THNC.TO's P/E ratio is 72.00. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to THNC.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to THNC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs URL.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, URL.CN has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while URL.CN trades at CA$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas URL.CN's P/E ratio is 129.00. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to URL.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to URL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs XTRA.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, XTRA.TO has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while XTRA.TO trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas XTRA.TO's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to XTRA.TO's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to XTRA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs MVP.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, MVP.TO has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while MVP.TO trades at CA$1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MVP.TO's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to MVP.TO's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to MVP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs TONY.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, TONY.CN has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while TONY.CN trades at CA$3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TONY.CN's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to TONY.CN's ROE of -3.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to TONY.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs AXCP.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, AXCP.CN has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while AXCP.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AXCP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to AXCP.CN's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to AXCP.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs LGIQ.NE Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, LGIQ.NE has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while LGIQ.NE trades at CA$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LGIQ.NE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to LGIQ.NE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to LGIQ.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs LUXX.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, LUXX.CN has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while LUXX.CN trades at CA$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LUXX.CN's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to LUXX.CN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and LUXX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs TWOH.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, TWOH.CN has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while TWOH.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TWOH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to TWOH.CN's ROE of +2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and TWOH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs BLOX.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, BLOX.CN has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while BLOX.CN trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BLOX.CN's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to BLOX.CN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and BLOX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs LSPK.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, LSPK.TO has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while LSPK.TO trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LSPK.TO's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to LSPK.TO's ROE of -7.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to LSPK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs ADCO.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, ADCO.TO has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ADCO.TO trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ADCO.TO's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ADCO.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to ADCO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs SKUR.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, SKUR.CN has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while SKUR.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SKUR.CN's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SKUR.CN's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and SKUR.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs BNSL.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, BNSL.CN has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while BNSL.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BNSL.CN's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to BNSL.CN's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. XIGM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and BNSL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
XIGM.CN vs HP.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, HP.CN has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while HP.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HP.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to HP.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and HP.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs FDGE.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, FDGE.TO has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while FDGE.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FDGE.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to FDGE.TO's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and FDGE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs IGN.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, IGN.CN has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while IGN.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IGN.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to IGN.CN's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and IGN.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs VQS.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, VQS.TO has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while VQS.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VQS.TO's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to VQS.TO's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to VQS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs SPO.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, SPO.CN has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while SPO.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SPO.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SPO.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and SPO.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs ISFT.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, ISFT.CN has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ISFT.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ISFT.CN's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ISFT.CN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to ISFT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs CNI.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, CNI.CN has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CNI.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CNI.CN's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CNI.CN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to CNI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs EGTI.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, EGTI.CN has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while EGTI.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EGTI.CN's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to EGTI.CN's ROE of +13.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and EGTI.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs IAI.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, IAI.CN has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while IAI.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IAI.CN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to IAI.CN's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to IAI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs BYFM.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, BYFM.CN has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while BYFM.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BYFM.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to BYFM.CN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and BYFM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs VSBY.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, VSBY.CN has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while VSBY.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VSBY.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to VSBY.CN's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to VSBY.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs MWRK.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, MWRK.CN has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while MWRK.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MWRK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to MWRK.CN's ROE of -3.26%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to MWRK.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs LIQD.NE Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, LIQD.NE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while LIQD.NE trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LIQD.NE's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to LIQD.NE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and LIQD.NE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs LQID.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, LQID.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while LQID.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LQID.CN's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to LQID.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and LQID.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs GBMC.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, GBMC.CN has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while GBMC.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GBMC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to GBMC.CN's ROE of +3.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and GBMC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs WFLD.V Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, WFLD.V has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while WFLD.V trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas WFLD.V's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to WFLD.V's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to WFLD.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs KASH.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, KASH.CN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while KASH.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KASH.CN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to KASH.CN's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to KASH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs CK.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, CK.CN has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CK.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CK.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CK.CN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and CK.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs XRA.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, XRA.CN has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while XRA.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas XRA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to XRA.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to XRA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs GBLC.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, GBLC.CN has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while GBLC.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GBLC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to GBLC.CN's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to GBLC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs WHIP.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, WHIP.CN has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while WHIP.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas WHIP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to WHIP.CN's ROE of +73.91%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to WHIP.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs ARWY.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, ARWY.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ARWY.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ARWY.CN's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ARWY.CN's ROE of +5.35%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and ARWY.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs EMPH.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, EMPH.CN has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while EMPH.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EMPH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to EMPH.CN's ROE of +3.26%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and EMPH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs PLNK.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, PLNK.CN has a market cap of 887K. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while PLNK.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PLNK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PLNK.CN's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and PLNK.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs PPK.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, PPK.CN has a market cap of 828K. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while PPK.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PPK.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PPK.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and PPK.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs FDM.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, FDM.CN has a market cap of 821.1K. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while FDM.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FDM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to FDM.CN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and FDM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs PUSH.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, PUSH.CN has a market cap of 808.4K. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while PUSH.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PUSH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PUSH.CN's ROE of -10.43%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. XIGM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and PUSH.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
XIGM.CN vs TTT.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, TTT.CN has a market cap of 763.5K. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while TTT.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TTT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to TTT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and TTT.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs SOLV.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, SOLV.CN has a market cap of 762.7K. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while SOLV.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SOLV.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SOLV.CN's ROE of -47.47%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to SOLV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs GEMS.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, GEMS.CN has a market cap of 669K. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while GEMS.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GEMS.CN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to GEMS.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and GEMS.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs DVN.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, DVN.CN has a market cap of 604.1K. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while DVN.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DVN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DVN.CN's ROE of +3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and DVN.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs ZEU.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, ZEU.CN has a market cap of 410.4K. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ZEU.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ZEU.CN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ZEU.CN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and ZEU.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs COYX.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, COYX.CN has a market cap of 388.4K. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while COYX.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas COYX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to COYX.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and COYX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs RAD.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, RAD.CN has a market cap of 278.4K. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while RAD.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RAD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to RAD.CN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and RAD.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
XIGM.CN vs TSF.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, TSF.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while TSF.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TSF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to TSF.CN's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. XIGM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
XIGM.CN vs VOYG.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, VOYG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while VOYG.TO trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VOYG.TO's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to VOYG.TO's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to VOYG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs LNK.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, LNK.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while LNK.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LNK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to LNK.CN's ROE of +3.39%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. XIGM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and LNK.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
XIGM.CN vs LWRK.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, LWRK.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while LWRK.TO trades at CA$32.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LWRK.TO's P/E ratio is 87.22. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to LWRK.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to LWRK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs XCT.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, XCT.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while XCT.TO trades at CA$3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas XCT.TO's P/E ratio is -55.36. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to XCT.TO's ROE of +20.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to XCT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs SWIS.CN Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, SWIS.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while SWIS.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SWIS.CN's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SWIS.CN's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. XIGM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and SWIS.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
XIGM.CN vs PAT.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, PAT.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while PAT.TO trades at CA$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PAT.TO's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PAT.TO's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN is less volatile compared to PAT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIGM.CN.
XIGM.CN vs NXJ.TO Comparison
XIGM.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIGM.CN stands at 650.8K. In comparison, NXJ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XIGM.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while NXJ.TO trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIGM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NXJ.TO's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, XIGM.CN's ROE is -0.79%, compared to NXJ.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XIGM.CN and NXJ.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).