iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF XGD.TO Peers
See (XGD.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XGD.TO | CA$32.02 | -0.59% | 1.8B | 21.37 | CA$1.50 | +0.75% |
| IGAF.TO | CA$15.72 | +0.70% | 3.4B | N/A | N/A | +0.84% |
| TEC.TO | CA$47.99 | +0.61% | 3.1B | 37.66 | CA$1.27 | +0.11% |
| TGED.TO | CA$28.09 | +0.63% | 1.2B | 31.60 | CA$0.89 | +3.51% |
| DXG.TO | CA$72.92 | +0.59% | 752.2M | 32.61 | CA$2.24 | +11.24% |
| CIF.TO | CA$53.37 | -0.15% | 700.2M | 14.27 | CA$3.74 | +2.91% |
| FSF.TO | CA$33.69 | +1.41% | 606.5M | N/A | N/A | +1.23% |
| XDG.TO | CA$28.23 | -0.49% | 488.4M | 17.72 | CA$1.59 | +3.06% |
| XHC.TO | CA$63.53 | -0.20% | 481.8M | 24.37 | CA$2.61 | +4.53% |
| CINF.TO | CA$29.25 | -0.07% | 455.3M | N/A | N/A | +2.92% |
Stock Comparison
XGD.TO vs IGAF.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IGAF.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while IGAF.TO trades at CA$15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas IGAF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGAF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to IGAF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs TEC.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TEC.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while TEC.TO trades at CA$47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas TEC.TO's P/E ratio is 37.66. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to TEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs TGED.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TGED.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while TGED.TO trades at CA$28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas TGED.TO's P/E ratio is 31.60. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGED.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to TGED.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs DXG.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DXG.TO has a market cap of 752.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while DXG.TO trades at CA$72.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas DXG.TO's P/E ratio is 32.61. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXG.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to DXG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs CIF.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CIF.TO has a market cap of 700.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while CIF.TO trades at CA$53.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas CIF.TO's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to CIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs FSF.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FSF.TO has a market cap of 606.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while FSF.TO trades at CA$33.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas FSF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to FSF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs XDG.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XDG.TO has a market cap of 488.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while XDG.TO trades at CA$28.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas XDG.TO's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to XDG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs XHC.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XHC.TO has a market cap of 481.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while XHC.TO trades at CA$63.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas XHC.TO's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XHC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to XHC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs CINF.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CINF.TO has a market cap of 455.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while CINF.TO trades at CA$29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas CINF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CINF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to CINF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs TQGD.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TQGD.TO has a market cap of 416.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while TQGD.TO trades at CA$21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas TQGD.TO's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TQGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to TQGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs 0P0001ED1S.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0P0001ED1S.TO has a market cap of 323.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while 0P0001ED1S.TO trades at CA$13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas 0P0001ED1S.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001ED1S.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to 0P0001ED1S.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs CWW.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CWW.TO has a market cap of 302.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while CWW.TO trades at CA$62.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas CWW.TO's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWW.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to CWW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs ZWG.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ZWG.TO has a market cap of 275.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while ZWG.TO trades at CA$31.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ZWG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to ZWG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs COW.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, COW.TO has a market cap of 254.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while COW.TO trades at CA$68.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas COW.TO's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to COW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs VMO.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VMO.TO has a market cap of 235.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while VMO.TO trades at CA$70.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas VMO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to VMO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs 0P0001ODDT.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0P0001ODDT.TO has a market cap of 229.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while 0P0001ODDT.TO trades at CA$23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas 0P0001ODDT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001ODDT.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to 0P0001ODDT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs CGR.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CGR.TO has a market cap of 227.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while CGR.TO trades at CA$30.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas CGR.TO's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to CGR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs GDV.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GDV.TO has a market cap of 181.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while GDV.TO trades at CA$11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas GDV.TO's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDV.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to GDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs LIFE.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LIFE.TO has a market cap of 179.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while LIFE.TO trades at CA$18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas LIFE.TO's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LIFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to LIFE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs CYH.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CYH.TO has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while CYH.TO trades at CA$23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas CYH.TO's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to CYH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs XGI.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XGI.TO has a market cap of 124.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while XGI.TO trades at CA$61.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas XGI.TO's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to XGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs ZGD.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ZGD.TO has a market cap of 123M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while ZGD.TO trades at CA$159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ZGD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZGD.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to ZGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs CGLO.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CGLO.TO has a market cap of 121.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while CGLO.TO trades at CA$30.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas CGLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGLO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to CGLO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs XDGH.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XDGH.TO has a market cap of 99.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while XDGH.TO trades at CA$27.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas XDGH.TO's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDGH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to XDGH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs PMNT.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PMNT.TO has a market cap of 98.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while PMNT.TO trades at CA$19.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas PMNT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMNT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to PMNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs XMY.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XMY.TO has a market cap of 95.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while XMY.TO trades at CA$32.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas XMY.TO's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to XMY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs TGRE.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TGRE.TO has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while TGRE.TO trades at CA$15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas TGRE.TO's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGRE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to TGRE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs XCD.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XCD.TO has a market cap of 68.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while XCD.TO trades at CA$60.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas XCD.TO's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to XCD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs LONG.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LONG.TO has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while LONG.TO trades at CA$37.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas LONG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LONG.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to LONG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs ONEQ.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ONEQ.TO has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while ONEQ.TO trades at CA$46.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ONEQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONEQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to ONEQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs 0P0001NDFE.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0P0001NDFE.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while 0P0001NDFE.TO trades at CA$13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas 0P0001NDFE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001NDFE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to 0P0001NDFE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs GIQG.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GIQG.TO has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while GIQG.TO trades at CA$31.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas GIQG.TO's P/E ratio is 35.98. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIQG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to GIQG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs ESGG.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ESGG.TO has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while ESGG.TO trades at CA$52.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ESGG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to ESGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs TGGR.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TGGR.TO has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while TGGR.TO trades at CA$28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas TGGR.TO's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGGR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to TGGR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs VVO.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VVO.TO has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while VVO.TO trades at CA$39.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas VVO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VVO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to VVO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs DXN.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DXN.TO has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while DXN.TO trades at CA$23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas DXN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to DXN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs ZMT.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ZMT.TO has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while ZMT.TO trades at CA$79.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ZMT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to ZMT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs HGGG.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HGGG.TO has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while HGGG.TO trades at CA$51.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas HGGG.TO's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to HGGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs 0P0001N8LS.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0P0001N8LS.TO has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while 0P0001N8LS.TO trades at CA$39.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas 0P0001N8LS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001N8LS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to 0P0001N8LS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs VAH.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VAH.TO has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while VAH.TO trades at CA$28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas VAH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to VAH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs PINV.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PINV.TO has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while PINV.TO trades at CA$24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas PINV.TO's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PINV.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to PINV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs MIVG.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MIVG.TO has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while MIVG.TO trades at CA$37.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas MIVG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIVG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to MIVG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs CGAA.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CGAA.TO has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while CGAA.TO trades at CA$28.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas CGAA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGAA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to CGAA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs RWU.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RWU.TO has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while RWU.TO trades at CA$20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas RWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to RWU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs VLQ.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VLQ.TO has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while VLQ.TO trades at CA$32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas VLQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to VLQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs SOL.CN Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SOL.CN has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while SOL.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SOL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOL.CN's ROE of +8.78%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to SOL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs FLGD.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FLGD.TO has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while FLGD.TO trades at CA$29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas FLGD.TO's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to FLGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs RIG.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RIG.TO has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while RIG.TO trades at CA$18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas RIG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIG.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to RIG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs HRA.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HRA.TO has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while HRA.TO trades at CA$10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas HRA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HRA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to HRA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs RLD.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RLD.TO has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while RLD.TO trades at CA$24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas RLD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to RLD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs EATS.CN Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EATS.CN has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while EATS.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas EATS.CN's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EATS.CN's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is less volatile compared to EATS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs SHZ.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SHZ.TO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while SHZ.TO trades at CA$7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SHZ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHZ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to SHZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs DFD.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DFD.TO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while DFD.TO trades at CA$21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas DFD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to DFD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs HLTH.CN Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HLTH.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while HLTH.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas HLTH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLTH.CN's ROE of -140.65%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to HLTH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs DFE.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DFE.TO has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while DFE.TO trades at CA$17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas DFE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to DFE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs RLE.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RLE.TO has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while RLE.TO trades at CA$28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas RLE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to RLE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs HGM.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HGM.TO has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while HGM.TO trades at CA$11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas HGM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGM.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to HGM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs PSY.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PSY.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while PSY.TO trades at CA$30.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas PSY.TO's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to PSY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO vs PXG.TO Comparison
XGD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XGD.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PXG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XGD.TO is priced at CA$32.02, while PXG.TO trades at CA$28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XGD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas PXG.TO's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, XGD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PXG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XGD.TO is more volatile compared to PXG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XGD.TO.