iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) XFH.TO Peers
See (XFH.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XFH.TO | CA$34.27 | +1.03% | 1.6B | 16.56 | CA$2.07 | +2.40% |
| BLK.NE | CA$27.40 | +1.63% | 218.4B | 24.91 | CA$1.10 | N/A |
| BN.TO | CA$84.41 | +1.27% | 139.1B | 205.88 | CA$0.41 | +0.57% |
| BAM.TO | CA$75.65 | +0.15% | 122B | 40.45 | CA$1.87 | +3.02% |
| VFV.TO | CA$150.30 | +0.93% | 21.2B | 26.33 | CA$5.71 | +1.02% |
| ZSP.TO | CA$92.45 | +0.77% | 18.1B | N/A | N/A | +0.92% |
| PHYS.TO | CA$34.27 | -1.30% | 15.9B | 3.63 | CA$9.43 | N/A |
| XIU.TO | CA$40.18 | -0.12% | 14.2B | 21.78 | CA$1.85 | +3.07% |
| XEF.TO | CA$42.62 | +1.45% | 11.4B | 16.74 | CA$2.55 | +2.63% |
| VUN.TO | CA$112.90 | +0.97% | 10.9B | 25.52 | CA$4.42 | +0.95% |
Stock Comparison
XFH.TO vs BLK.NE Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 218.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while BLK.NE trades at CA$27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to BLK.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs BN.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BN.TO has a market cap of 139.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while BN.TO trades at CA$84.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas BN.TO's P/E ratio is 205.88. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BN.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to BN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs BAM.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BAM.TO has a market cap of 122B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while BAM.TO trades at CA$75.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas BAM.TO's P/E ratio is 40.45. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAM.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to BAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs VFV.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VFV.TO has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while VFV.TO trades at CA$150.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas VFV.TO's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to VFV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ZSP.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZSP.TO has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ZSP.TO trades at CA$92.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ZSP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZSP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to ZSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs PHYS.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PHYS.TO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while PHYS.TO trades at CA$34.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas PHYS.TO's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHYS.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to PHYS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XIU.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XIU.TO has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XIU.TO trades at CA$40.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XIU.TO's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XIU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XEF.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XEF.TO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XEF.TO trades at CA$42.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XEF.TO's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs VUN.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VUN.TO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while VUN.TO trades at CA$112.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas VUN.TO's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to VUN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs IGM.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IGM.TO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while IGM.TO trades at CA$43.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas IGM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGM.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to IGM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ZCN.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZCN.TO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ZCN.TO trades at CA$35.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ZCN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to ZCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ZEA.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZEA.TO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ZEA.TO trades at CA$25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ZEA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to ZEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs PSLV.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PSLV.TO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while PSLV.TO trades at CA$16.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas PSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSLV.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to PSLV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XIC.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XIC.TO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XIC.TO trades at CA$42.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XIC.TO's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XIC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XSP.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XSP.TO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XSP.TO trades at CA$63.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XSP.TO's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs VCN.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VCN.TO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while VCN.TO trades at CA$54.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas VCN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to VCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XUS.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XUS.TO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XUS.TO trades at CA$52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XUS.TO's P/E ratio is 26.55. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XUS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs CEF.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CEF.TO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while CEF.TO trades at CA$40.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas CEF.TO's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEF.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to CEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ONEX.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ONEX.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ONEX.TO trades at CA$111.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ONEX.TO's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONEX.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to ONEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XEQT.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XEQT.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XEQT.TO trades at CA$35.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XEQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs VEQT.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VEQT.TO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while VEQT.TO trades at CA$47.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas VEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to VEQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs VGRO.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VGRO.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while VGRO.TO trades at CA$39.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas VGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to VGRO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs CASH.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CASH.TO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while CASH.TO trades at CA$50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas CASH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CASH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to CASH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs CSAV.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CSAV.TO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while CSAV.TO trades at CA$50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas CSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to CSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs VIU.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VIU.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while VIU.TO trades at CA$38.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas VIU.TO's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to VIU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ZEB.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZEB.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ZEB.TO trades at CA$45.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ZEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to ZEB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ZMMK.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZMMK.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ZMMK.TO trades at CA$49.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ZMMK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMMK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to ZMMK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs PSA.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PSA.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while PSA.TO trades at CA$50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas PSA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to PSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ZLB.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZLB.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ZLB.TO trades at CA$52.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ZLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to ZLB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs CIX.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CIX.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while CIX.TO trades at CA$31.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas CIX.TO's P/E ratio is -17.09. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIX.TO's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to CIX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs VSP.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VSP.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while VSP.TO trades at CA$99.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas VSP.TO's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to VSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ZCS.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZCS.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ZCS.TO trades at CA$14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ZCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to ZCS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs HXS.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HXS.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while HXS.TO trades at CA$87.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas HXS.TO's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to HXS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs QUU.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, QUU.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while QUU.TO trades at CA$243.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas QUU.TO's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to QUU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs HXT.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HXT.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while HXT.TO trades at CA$70.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas HXT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to HXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XUU.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XUU.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XUU.TO trades at CA$62.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XUU.TO's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XUU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs VDY.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VDY.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while VDY.TO trades at CA$51.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas VDY.TO's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to VDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs TPU.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TPU.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while TPU.TO trades at CA$48.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas TPU.TO's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to TPU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs VBAL.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VBAL.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while VBAL.TO trades at CA$34.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas VBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to VBAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ZUE.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZUE.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ZUE.TO trades at CA$84.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ZUE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZUE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to ZUE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XSEM.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XSEM.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XSEM.TO trades at CA$23.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XSEM.TO's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XSEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XQQ.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XQQ.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XQQ.TO trades at CA$56.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XQQ.TO's P/E ratio is 34.24. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XQQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ZWB.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZWB.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ZWB.TO trades at CA$20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ZWB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to ZWB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XGRO.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XGRO.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XGRO.TO trades at CA$31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XGRO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs TTP.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TTP.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while TTP.TO trades at CA$30.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas TTP.TO's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to TTP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs BBUC.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BBUC.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while BBUC.TO trades at CA$42.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas BBUC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBUC.TO's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to BBUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XAW.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XAW.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XAW.TO trades at CA$46.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XAW.TO's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XAW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs TPE.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TPE.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while TPE.TO trades at CA$25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas TPE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to TPE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XBB.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XBB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XBB.TO trades at CA$28.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XBB.TO's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs SII.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SII.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while SII.TO trades at CA$91.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas SII.TO's P/E ratio is 34.71. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SII.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to SII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs VEE.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VEE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while VEE.TO trades at CA$40.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas VEE.TO's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to VEE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs VXC.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VXC.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while VXC.TO trades at CA$67.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas VXC.TO's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VXC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to VXC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs NSCE.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NSCE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while NSCE.TO trades at CA$48.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas NSCE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.53. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSCE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to NSCE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XEC.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XEC.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XEC.TO trades at CA$31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XEC.TO's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs PFMN.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PFMN.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while PFMN.TO trades at CA$15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas PFMN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFMN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to PFMN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs VCE.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VCE.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while VCE.TO trades at CA$58.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas VCE.TO's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to VCE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XDIV.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XDIV.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XDIV.TO trades at CA$32.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XDIV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDIV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XDIV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XCB.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XCB.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XCB.TO trades at CA$20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XCB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ZQQ.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZQQ.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ZQQ.TO trades at CA$155.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ZQQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZQQ.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to ZQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ZLU.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZLU.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ZLU.TO trades at CA$54.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ZLU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to ZLU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs CMR.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CMR.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while CMR.TO trades at CA$50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas CMR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to CMR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs VGG.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VGG.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while VGG.TO trades at CA$95.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas VGG.TO's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to VGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XBAL.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XBAL.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XBAL.TO trades at CA$31.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to XBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs HSAV.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HSAV.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while HSAV.TO trades at CA$115.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas HSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to HSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs MNY.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MNY.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while MNY.TO trades at CA$100.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas MNY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to MNY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs QCN.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, QCN.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while QCN.TO trades at CA$162.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas QCN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to QCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs FIH-U.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FIH-U.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while FIH-U.TO trades at CA$18.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas FIH-U.TO's P/E ratio is 61.93. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIH-U.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to FIH-U.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XIN.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XIN.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XIN.TO trades at CA$38.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XIN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XIN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XFN.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XFN.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XFN.TO trades at CA$64.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XFN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XFN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XFN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XEI.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XEI.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XEI.TO trades at CA$28.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XEI.TO's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ZWU.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZWU.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ZWU.TO trades at CA$10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ZWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to ZWU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs QQC.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, QQC.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while QQC.TO trades at CA$36.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas QQC.TO's P/E ratio is 34.15. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QQC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to QQC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XDV.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XDV.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XDV.TO trades at CA$34.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XDV.TO's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs CYB.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CYB.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while CYB.TO trades at CA$80.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas CYB.TO's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYB.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to CYB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs CACB.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CACB.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while CACB.TO trades at CA$20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas CACB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to CACB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs CBIL.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CBIL.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while CBIL.TO trades at CA$50.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas CBIL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBIL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to CBIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ISIF.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ISIF.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ISIF.TO trades at CA$12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ISIF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to ISIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ZWC.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZWC.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ZWC.TO trades at CA$18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ZWC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to ZWC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XGB.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XGB.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XGB.TO trades at CA$19.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XGB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XSH.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XSH.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XSH.TO trades at CA$19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XSH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to XSH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs UNC.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UNC.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while UNC.TO trades at CA$135.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas UNC.TO's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UNC.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to UNC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs EQL.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EQL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while EQL.TO trades at CA$37.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas EQL.TO's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQL.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to EQL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ZPR.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZPR.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ZPR.TO trades at CA$11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ZPR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to ZPR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ZGB.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZGB.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ZGB.TO trades at CA$45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ZGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to ZGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ZEM.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZEM.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ZEM.TO trades at CA$23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ZEM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to ZEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs HMAX.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HMAX.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while HMAX.TO trades at CA$14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas HMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to HMAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs HXCN.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HXCN.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while HXCN.TO trades at CA$44.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas HXCN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to HXCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs VSB.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VSB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while VSB.TO trades at CA$23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas VSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to VSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs RIIN.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RIIN.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while RIIN.TO trades at CA$21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas RIIN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to RIIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XEG.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XEG.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XEG.TO trades at CA$17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XEG.TO's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XEG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ZUQ.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ZUQ.TO trades at CA$87.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ZUQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to ZUQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs HHL.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HHL.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while HHL.TO trades at CA$7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas HHL.TO's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HHL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to HHL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs CVG.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CVG.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while CVG.TO trades at CA$78.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas CVG.TO's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVG.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to CVG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs MUB.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MUB.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while MUB.TO trades at CA$18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas MUB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to MUB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XWD.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XWD.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XWD.TO trades at CA$98.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XWD.TO's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XWD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XWD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs FCUV.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FCUV.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while FCUV.TO trades at CA$19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas FCUV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCUV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to FCUV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs XRE.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XRE.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while XRE.TO trades at CA$15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas XRE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XRE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to XRE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs BND.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BND.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while BND.TO trades at CA$17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas BND.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BND.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is more volatile compared to BND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.
XFH.TO vs ZDV.TO Comparison
XFH.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XFH.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZDV.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XFH.TO is priced at CA$34.27, while ZDV.TO trades at CA$23.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XFH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.56, whereas ZDV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XFH.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XFH.TO is less volatile compared to ZDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XFH.TO.