iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF
iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF XDG.TO Peers
See (XDG.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
XDG.TO vs IGAF.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, IGAF.TO has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while IGAF.TO trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas IGAF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGAF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to IGAF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs TEC.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, TEC.TO has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while TEC.TO trades at $41.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas TEC.TO's P/E ratio is 31.82. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to TEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs XGD.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, XGD.TO has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while XGD.TO trades at $30.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas XGD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGD.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to XGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs TGED.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, TGED.TO has a market cap of 766.70M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while TGED.TO trades at $25.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas TGED.TO's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGED.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to TGED.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs DXG.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, DXG.TO has a market cap of 659.95M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while DXG.TO trades at $63.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas DXG.TO's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to DXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs FSF.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, FSF.TO has a market cap of 601.14M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while FSF.TO trades at $31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas FSF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to FSF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs CIF.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, CIF.TO has a market cap of 599.20M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while CIF.TO trades at $49.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas CIF.TO's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to CIF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs XHC.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, XHC.TO has a market cap of 554.30M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while XHC.TO trades at $62.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas XHC.TO's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XHC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to XHC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs TQGD.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, TQGD.TO has a market cap of 385.51M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while TQGD.TO trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas TQGD.TO's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TQGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to TQGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs CINF.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, CINF.TO has a market cap of 368.03M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while CINF.TO trades at $28.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas CINF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CINF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to CINF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs 0P0001ED1S.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, 0P0001ED1S.TO has a market cap of 314.19M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while 0P0001ED1S.TO trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas 0P0001ED1S.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001ED1S.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to 0P0001ED1S.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs CWW.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, CWW.TO has a market cap of 307.87M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while CWW.TO trades at $60.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas CWW.TO's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to CWW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs ZWG.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, ZWG.TO has a market cap of 275.72M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while ZWG.TO trades at $30.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas ZWG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to ZWG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs COW.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, COW.TO has a market cap of 273.50M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while COW.TO trades at $66.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas COW.TO's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to COW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs 0P0001ODDT.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, 0P0001ODDT.TO has a market cap of 259.06M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while 0P0001ODDT.TO trades at $23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas 0P0001ODDT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001ODDT.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to 0P0001ODDT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs CGR.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, CGR.TO has a market cap of 214.91M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while CGR.TO trades at $30.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas CGR.TO's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to CGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs VMO.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, VMO.TO has a market cap of 199.51M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while VMO.TO trades at $64.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas VMO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to VMO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs GDV.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, GDV.TO has a market cap of 174.07M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while GDV.TO trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas GDV.TO's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDV.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to GDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs LIFE.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, LIFE.TO has a market cap of 172.63M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while LIFE.TO trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas LIFE.TO's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LIFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to LIFE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs CYH.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, CYH.TO has a market cap of 148.08M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while CYH.TO trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas CYH.TO's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to CYH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs ZGD.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, ZGD.TO has a market cap of 137.51M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while ZGD.TO trades at $150.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas ZGD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to ZGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs XGI.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, XGI.TO has a market cap of 132.78M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while XGI.TO trades at $55.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas XGI.TO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGI.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to XGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs CGLO.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, CGLO.TO has a market cap of 110.39M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while CGLO.TO trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas CGLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGLO.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to CGLO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs PMNT.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, PMNT.TO has a market cap of 98.48M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while PMNT.TO trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas PMNT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMNT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to PMNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs XDGH.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, XDGH.TO has a market cap of 87.51M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while XDGH.TO trades at $26.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas XDGH.TO's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDGH.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to XDGH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs TGRE.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, TGRE.TO has a market cap of 84.45M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while TGRE.TO trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas TGRE.TO's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGRE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to TGRE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs XCD.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, XCD.TO has a market cap of 70.18M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while XCD.TO trades at $57.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas XCD.TO's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to XCD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs LONG.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, LONG.TO has a market cap of 65.99M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while LONG.TO trades at $34.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas LONG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LONG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to LONG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs ONEQ.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, ONEQ.TO has a market cap of 52.88M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while ONEQ.TO trades at $41.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas ONEQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONEQ.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to ONEQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs 0P0001NDFE.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, 0P0001NDFE.TO has a market cap of 49.05M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while 0P0001NDFE.TO trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas 0P0001NDFE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001NDFE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to 0P0001NDFE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs ESGG.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, ESGG.TO has a market cap of 44.15M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while ESGG.TO trades at $48.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas ESGG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to ESGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs GIQG.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, GIQG.TO has a market cap of 43.11M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while GIQG.TO trades at $28.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas GIQG.TO's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIQG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to GIQG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs TGGR.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, TGGR.TO has a market cap of 38.23M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while TGGR.TO trades at $26.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas TGGR.TO's P/E ratio is 24.51. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGGR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to TGGR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs VVO.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, VVO.TO has a market cap of 32.46M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while VVO.TO trades at $38.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas VVO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VVO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to VVO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs XMY.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, XMY.TO has a market cap of 25.98M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while XMY.TO trades at $32.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas XMY.TO's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to XMY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs DXN.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, DXN.TO has a market cap of 24.68M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while DXN.TO trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas DXN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to DXN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs ZMT.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, ZMT.TO has a market cap of 23.08M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while ZMT.TO trades at $65.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas ZMT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to ZMT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs 0P0001N8LS.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, 0P0001N8LS.TO has a market cap of 22.93M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while 0P0001N8LS.TO trades at $35.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas 0P0001N8LS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001N8LS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to 0P0001N8LS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs CGAA.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, CGAA.TO has a market cap of 22.38M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while CGAA.TO trades at $27.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas CGAA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGAA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to CGAA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs VAH.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, VAH.TO has a market cap of 22.28M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while VAH.TO trades at $28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas VAH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to VAH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs PINV.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, PINV.TO has a market cap of 19.47M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while PINV.TO trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas PINV.TO's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PINV.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to PINV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs MIVG.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, MIVG.TO has a market cap of 18.81M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while MIVG.TO trades at $36.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas MIVG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIVG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to MIVG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs HGGG.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, HGGG.TO has a market cap of 18.12M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while HGGG.TO trades at $49.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas HGGG.TO's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to HGGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs RWU.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, RWU.TO has a market cap of 12.24M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while RWU.TO trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas RWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to RWU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs VLQ.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, VLQ.TO has a market cap of 11.58M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while VLQ.TO trades at $32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas VLQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to VLQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs FLGD.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, FLGD.TO has a market cap of 10.85M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while FLGD.TO trades at $29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas FLGD.TO's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to FLGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs RIG.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, RIG.TO has a market cap of 10.46M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while RIG.TO trades at $18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas RIG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to RIG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs HRA.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, HRA.TO has a market cap of 10.39M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while HRA.TO trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas HRA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HRA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to HRA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs RLD.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, RLD.TO has a market cap of 9.17M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while RLD.TO trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas RLD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to RLD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs EATS.CN Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, EATS.CN has a market cap of 6.85M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while EATS.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas EATS.CN's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EATS.CN's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to EATS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs SOL.CN Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, SOL.CN has a market cap of 5.75M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while SOL.CN trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas SOL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOL.CN's ROE of +8.78%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to SOL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs DFD.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, DFD.TO has a market cap of 5.32M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while DFD.TO trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas DFD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to DFD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs HLTH.CN Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, HLTH.CN has a market cap of 3.24M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while HLTH.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas HLTH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLTH.CN's ROE of -140.65%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to HLTH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs DFE.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, DFE.TO has a market cap of 2.66M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while DFE.TO trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas DFE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to DFE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs RLE.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, RLE.TO has a market cap of 2.58M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while RLE.TO trades at $28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas RLE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is less volatile compared to RLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs HGM.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, HGM.TO has a market cap of 1.02M. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while HGM.TO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas HGM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGM.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to HGM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs SHZ.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, SHZ.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while SHZ.TO trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas SHZ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHZ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. XDG.TO has daily volatility of 0.33 and SHZ.TO has daily volatility of N/A.
XDG.TO vs PXG.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, PXG.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while PXG.TO trades at $28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas PXG.TO's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PXG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to PXG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
XDG.TO vs PSY.TO Comparison
XDG.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XDG.TO stands at 447.32M. In comparison, PSY.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, XDG.TO is priced at $27.47, while PSY.TO trades at $30.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XDG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.00, whereas PSY.TO's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, XDG.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XDG.TO is more volatile compared to PSY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XDG.TO.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGAF.TO | $14.80 | +0.89% | 3.40B | N/A | N/A | +0.89% |
| TEC.TO | $41.67 | +0.24% | 3.01B | 31.82 | $1.31 | +0.13% |
| XGD.TO | $30.67 | +3.06% | 1.74B | 22.50 | $1.36 | +0.64% |
| TGED.TO | $25.73 | +0.39% | 766.70M | 29.09 | $0.88 | +3.53% |
| DXG.TO | $63.98 | -0.20% | 659.95M | 28.61 | $2.24 | N/A |
| FSF.TO | $31.85 | +1.50% | 601.14M | N/A | N/A | +1.19% |
| CIF.TO | $49.29 | -0.06% | 599.20M | 12.97 | $3.80 | +2.91% |
| XHC.TO | $62.41 | -1.33% | 554.30M | 26.26 | $2.38 | +4.57% |
| XDG.TO | $27.47 | -0.07% | 447.32M | 17.00 | $1.62 | +2.94% |
| TQGD.TO | $19.90 | +0.45% | 385.51M | 13.76 | $1.45 | +3.40% |