Whitbread plc
Whitbread plc (WTBCF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WTBCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTBCF | $44.95 | +0.01% | 7.8B | 23.91 | $1.88 | +2.87% |
| ICHGF | $112.65 | +0.00% | 17.3B | 29.26 | $3.85 | +1.47% |
| ACCYY | $9.83 | -3.53% | 11.8B | 18.20 | $0.54 | +2.21% |
| ACRFF | $48.10 | -10.23% | 11.8B | 17.55 | $2.74 | +2.74% |
| WTBDY | $10.06 | -3.45% | 7.3B | 21.40 | $0.47 | +3.12% |
| MINOF | $0.95 | +0.00% | 5B | 31.75 | $0.03 | +27.38% |
| MNILY | $18.05 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 41.98 | $0.43 | +0.08% |
| PNDXF | $16.62 | +0.00% | 3.2B | 22.76 | $0.73 | +2.59% |
| NHHEF | $5.40 | +0.00% | 2.4B | 10.19 | $0.53 | N/A |
| MAORF | $1.75 | -20.45% | 2.2B | -25.00 | -$0.07 | +2.86% |
Stock Comparison
WTBCF vs ICHGF Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ICHGF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while ICHGF trades at $112.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas ICHGF's P/E ratio is 29.26. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ICHGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to ICHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.Check ICHGF's competition here
WTBCF vs ACCYY Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ACCYY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while ACCYY trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas ACCYY's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACCYY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to ACCYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.Check ACCYY's competition here
WTBCF vs ACRFF Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ACRFF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while ACRFF trades at $48.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas ACRFF's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACRFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF and ACRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACRFF's competition here
WTBCF vs WTBDY Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, WTBDY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while WTBDY trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas WTBDY's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WTBDY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to WTBDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.Check WTBDY's competition here
WTBCF vs MINOF Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MINOF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while MINOF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas MINOF's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MINOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF and MINOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MINOF's competition here
WTBCF vs MNILY Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MNILY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while MNILY trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas MNILY's P/E ratio is 41.98. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MNILY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF and MNILY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNILY's competition here
WTBCF vs PNDXF Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PNDXF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while PNDXF trades at $16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas PNDXF's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNDXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to PNDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.Check PNDXF's competition here
WTBCF vs NHHEF Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NHHEF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while NHHEF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas NHHEF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NHHEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to NHHEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.Check NHHEF's competition here
WTBCF vs MAORF Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MAORF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while MAORF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas MAORF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAORF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF and MAORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAORF's competition here
WTBCF vs MNOIY Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MNOIY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while MNOIY trades at $16.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas MNOIY's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MNOIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to MNOIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.Check MNOIY's competition here
WTBCF vs SHALF Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SHALF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while SHALF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas SHALF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHALF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to SHALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.Check SHALF's competition here
WTBCF vs SMIZF Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SMIZF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while SMIZF trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas SMIZF's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMIZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to SMIZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.Check SMIZF's competition here
WTBCF vs SHALY Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SHALY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while SHALY trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas SHALY's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHALY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to SHALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.Check SHALY's competition here
WTBCF vs HKSHF Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, HKSHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while HKSHF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas HKSHF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HKSHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to HKSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.Check HKSHF's competition here
WTBCF vs DLTTF Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DLTTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while DLTTF trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas DLTTF's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DLTTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to DLTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.Check DLTTF's competition here
WTBCF vs HKSHY Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, HKSHY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while HKSHY trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas HKSHY's P/E ratio is -8.28. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HKSHY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to HKSHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.Check HKSHY's competition here
WTBCF vs FATLF Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, FATLF has a market cap of 839.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while FATLF trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas FATLF's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FATLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF and FATLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FATLF's competition here
WTBCF vs CLKFF Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CLKFF has a market cap of 262.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while CLKFF trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas CLKFF's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLKFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to CLKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.Check CLKFF's competition here
WTBCF vs CTYLF Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CTYLF has a market cap of 147.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while CTYLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas CTYLF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTYLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to CTYLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.Check CTYLF's competition here
WTBCF vs HOCXF Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, HOCXF has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while HOCXF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas HOCXF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HOCXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF and HOCXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HOCXF's competition here
WTBCF vs AGORF Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AGORF has a market cap of 106.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while AGORF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas AGORF's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGORF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF and AGORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGORF's competition here
WTBCF vs KCKSF Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, KCKSF has a market cap of 102.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while KCKSF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas KCKSF's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KCKSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to KCKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.Check KCKSF's competition here
WTBCF vs SKTPP Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SKTPP has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while SKTPP trades at $178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas SKTPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKTPP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF and SKTPP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKTPP's competition here
WTBCF vs SKTP Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SKTP has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while SKTP trades at $1,619.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas SKTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKTP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF and SKTP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKTP's competition here
WTBCF vs BUHF Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BUHF has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while BUHF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas BUHF's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BUHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF and BUHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BUHF's competition here
WTBCF vs CAGU Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CAGU has a market cap of 4K. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while CAGU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas CAGU's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to CAGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.Check CAGU's competition here
WTBCF vs CNDL Comparison August 2025
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CNDL has a market cap of 903. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $44.95, while CNDL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas CNDL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNDL's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF and CNDL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNDL's competition here