Whitbread plc
Whitbread plc WTBCF Peers
See (WTBCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTBCF | $40.51 | N/A | 7.1B | 21.21 | $1.91 | +3.19% |
| ICHGF | $114.93 | +3.07% | 17.8B | 29.77 | $3.86 | +1.44% |
| ACCYY | $10.83 | +1.88% | 13B | 20.43 | $0.53 | N/A |
| ACRFF | $52.65 | N/A | 12.4B | 19.79 | $2.66 | +2.51% |
| WTBDY | $9.89 | +3.34% | 7B | 20.60 | $0.48 | +3.18% |
| MINOF | $0.95 | N/A | 5B | 31.75 | $0.03 | +0.84% |
| MNILY | $18.05 | N/A | 4.1B | 41.98 | $0.43 | +2.48% |
| PNDXF | $16.86 | N/A | 3.3B | 22.48 | $0.75 | +2.59% |
| MAORF | $1.90 | N/A | 2.4B | -31.67 | -$0.06 | +2.63% |
| NHHEF | $5.40 | N/A | 2.4B | 10.19 | $0.53 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WTBCF vs ICHGF Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ICHGF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while ICHGF trades at $114.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ICHGF's P/E ratio is 29.77. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ICHGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is more volatile compared to ICHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs ACCYY Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ACCYY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while ACCYY trades at $10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ACCYY's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACCYY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is more volatile compared to ACCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs ACRFF Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ACRFF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while ACRFF trades at $52.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ACRFF's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACRFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is more volatile compared to ACRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs WTBDY Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, WTBDY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while WTBDY trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas WTBDY's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WTBDY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is more volatile compared to WTBDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs MINOF Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MINOF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while MINOF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MINOF's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MINOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is more volatile compared to MINOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs MNILY Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MNILY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while MNILY trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MNILY's P/E ratio is 41.98. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MNILY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is more volatile compared to MNILY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs PNDXF Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, PNDXF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while PNDXF trades at $16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas PNDXF's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNDXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to PNDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs MAORF Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MAORF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while MAORF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MAORF's P/E ratio is -31.67. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAORF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to MAORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs NHHEF Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, NHHEF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while NHHEF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas NHHEF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NHHEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is more volatile compared to NHHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs MNOIY Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MNOIY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while MNOIY trades at $16.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MNOIY's P/E ratio is -27.29. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MNOIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is more volatile compared to MNOIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs SHALF Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SHALF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while SHALF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SHALF's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHALF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is more volatile compared to SHALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs SHALY Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SHALY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while SHALY trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SHALY's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHALY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is more volatile compared to SHALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs SMIZF Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SMIZF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while SMIZF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SMIZF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMIZF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is more volatile compared to SMIZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs DLTTF Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, DLTTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while DLTTF trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas DLTTF's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DLTTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to DLTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs HKSHF Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HKSHF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while HKSHF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas HKSHF's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HKSHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to HKSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs HKSHY Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HKSHY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while HKSHY trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas HKSHY's P/E ratio is -8.28. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HKSHY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to HKSHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs FATLF Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, FATLF has a market cap of 839.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while FATLF trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas FATLF's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FATLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is more volatile compared to FATLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs CLKFF Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CLKFF has a market cap of 220.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while CLKFF trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CLKFF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLKFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to CLKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs CTYLF Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CTYLF has a market cap of 147.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while CTYLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CTYLF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTYLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to CTYLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs HOCXF Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HOCXF has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while HOCXF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas HOCXF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HOCXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is more volatile compared to HOCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs AGORF Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AGORF has a market cap of 111M. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while AGORF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas AGORF's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGORF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is more volatile compared to AGORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs KCKSF Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, KCKSF has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while KCKSF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas KCKSF's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KCKSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to KCKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs SKTP Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SKTP has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while SKTP trades at $1,587.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SKTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKTP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is more volatile compared to SKTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs SKTPP Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SKTPP has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while SKTPP trades at $178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SKTPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKTPP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is more volatile compared to SKTPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs BUHF Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, BUHF has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while BUHF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas BUHF's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BUHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is more volatile compared to BUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs CAGU Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CAGU has a market cap of 4K. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while CAGU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CAGU's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is less volatile compared to CAGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.
WTBCF vs CNDL Comparison
WTBCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTBCF stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CNDL has a market cap of 903. Regarding current trading prices, WTBCF is priced at $40.51, while CNDL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTBCF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CNDL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WTBCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNDL's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WTBCF is more volatile compared to CNDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTBCF.