Fattal Holdings (1998) Ltd
Fattal Holdings (1998) Ltd (FATLF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FATLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FATLF | $24.75 | +0.00% | 839.2M | 32.57 | $0.76 | N/A |
| MNOIY | $33.00 | +0.00% | 41.7B | -45.83 | -$0.72 | +101.61% |
| ICHGF | $144.50 | +0.35% | 21.5B | 29.67 | $4.87 | +1.28% |
| ACCYY | $10.49 | +8.26% | 12.2B | 27.42 | $0.38 | +2.76% |
| ACRFF | $46.52 | +0.00% | 10.9B | 24.61 | $1.89 | +3.08% |
| WTBDY | $7.97 | +3.78% | 5.4B | 19.10 | $0.42 | +4.11% |
| WTBCF | $31.09 | +0.00% | 5.2B | 16.11 | $1.93 | +4.15% |
| MINOF | $0.78 | +0.00% | 4.4B | 19.59 | $0.04 | +2.83% |
| MNILY | $17.20 | +0.00% | 3.9B | 17.37 | $0.99 | +2.62% |
| MAORF | $3.00 | +0.00% | 3.8B | -42.86 | -$0.07 | +20.50% |
Stock Comparison
FATLF vs MNOIY Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, MNOIY has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while MNOIY trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas MNOIY's P/E ratio is -45.83. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MNOIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and MNOIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNOIY's competition here
FATLF vs ICHGF Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, ICHGF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while ICHGF trades at $144.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas ICHGF's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ICHGF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and ICHGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ICHGF's competition here
FATLF vs ACCYY Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, ACCYY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while ACCYY trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas ACCYY's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ACCYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to ACCYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check ACCYY's competition here
FATLF vs ACRFF Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, ACRFF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while ACRFF trades at $46.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas ACRFF's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ACRFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to ACRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check ACRFF's competition here
FATLF vs WTBDY Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, WTBDY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while WTBDY trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas WTBDY's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to WTBDY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to WTBDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check WTBDY's competition here
FATLF vs WTBCF Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, WTBCF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while WTBCF trades at $31.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas WTBCF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to WTBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and WTBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WTBCF's competition here
FATLF vs MINOF Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, MINOF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while MINOF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas MINOF's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MINOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and MINOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MINOF's competition here
FATLF vs MNILY Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, MNILY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while MNILY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas MNILY's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MNILY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and MNILY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNILY's competition here
FATLF vs MAORF Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, MAORF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while MAORF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas MAORF's P/E ratio is -42.86. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MAORF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and MAORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAORF's competition here
FATLF vs PNDXF Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, PNDXF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while PNDXF trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas PNDXF's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PNDXF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to PNDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check PNDXF's competition here
FATLF vs NHHEF Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, NHHEF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while NHHEF trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas NHHEF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to NHHEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and NHHEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NHHEF's competition here
FATLF vs SMIZF Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, SMIZF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while SMIZF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas SMIZF's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SMIZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to SMIZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check SMIZF's competition here
FATLF vs SHALF Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, SHALF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while SHALF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas SHALF's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SHALF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and SHALF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHALF's competition here
FATLF vs SHALY Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, SHALY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while SHALY trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas SHALY's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SHALY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to SHALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check SHALY's competition here
FATLF vs DLTTF Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, DLTTF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while DLTTF trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas DLTTF's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to DLTTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to DLTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check DLTTF's competition here
FATLF vs HKSHF Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, HKSHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while HKSHF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas HKSHF's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to HKSHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and HKSHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKSHF's competition here
FATLF vs HKSHY Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, HKSHY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while HKSHY trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas HKSHY's P/E ratio is 31.43. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to HKSHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to HKSHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check HKSHY's competition here
FATLF vs CLKFF Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, CLKFF has a market cap of 250.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while CLKFF trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas CLKFF's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CLKFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and CLKFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLKFF's competition here
FATLF vs CTYLF Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, CTYLF has a market cap of 179.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while CTYLF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas CTYLF's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CTYLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to CTYLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check CTYLF's competition here
FATLF vs HOCXF Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, HOCXF has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while HOCXF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas HOCXF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to HOCXF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and HOCXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HOCXF's competition here
FATLF vs KCKSF Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, KCKSF has a market cap of 102.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while KCKSF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas KCKSF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to KCKSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to KCKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check KCKSF's competition here
FATLF vs AGORF Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, AGORF has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while AGORF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas AGORF's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to AGORF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and AGORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGORF's competition here
FATLF vs SKTPP Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, SKTPP has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while SKTPP trades at $229.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas SKTPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SKTPP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to SKTPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check SKTPP's competition here
FATLF vs SKTP Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, SKTP has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while SKTP trades at $1,625.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas SKTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SKTP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and SKTP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKTP's competition here
FATLF vs BUHF Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, BUHF has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while BUHF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas BUHF's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BUHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and BUHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BUHF's competition here
FATLF vs CAGU Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, CAGU has a market cap of 10.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while CAGU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas CAGU's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CAGU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF is less volatile compared to CAGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATLF.Check CAGU's competition here
FATLF vs SONDQ Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, SONDQ has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while SONDQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas SONDQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SONDQ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and SONDQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SONDQ's competition here
FATLF vs CNDL Comparison May 2026
FATLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATLF stands at 839.2M. In comparison, CNDL has a market cap of 903. Regarding current trading prices, FATLF is priced at $24.75, while CNDL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATLF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas CNDL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FATLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CNDL's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FATLF and CNDL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNDL's competition here