Waseco Resources Inc.
Waseco Resources Inc. (WSRUF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WSRUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WSRUF | $0.02 | +0.00% | 833.6K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AUXIF | $0.01 | +0.00% | 50.3B | 0.10 | $0.06 | N/A |
| FNLPF | $18.65 | -1.84% | 13.7B | 98.16 | $0.19 | +3.89% |
| ANGPY | $7.63 | -3.90% | 12B | 152.60 | $0.05 | +8.16% |
| IMPUF | $10.28 | -6.97% | 9.2B | -9.61 | -$1.07 | N/A |
| IMPUY | $10.12 | -0.39% | 9.2B | -9.44 | -$1.07 | N/A |
| OICT | $10.05 | +0.00% | 5.5B | -34.30 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| NMPNF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 5.83 | $1.89 | N/A |
| JINFF | $8.82 | +0.00% | 3.5B | 20.05 | $0.44 | +0.91% |
| GMINF | $11.77 | -5.08% | 2.7B | 22.63 | $0.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WSRUF vs AUXIF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, AUXIF has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while AUXIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUXIF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUXIF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to AUXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check AUXIF's competition here
WSRUF vs FNLPF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while FNLPF trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 98.16. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check FNLPF's competition here
WSRUF vs ANGPY Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while ANGPY trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 152.60. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check ANGPY's competition here
WSRUF vs IMPUF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while IMPUF trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is -9.61. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check IMPUF's competition here
WSRUF vs IMPUY Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while IMPUY trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is -9.44. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check IMPUY's competition here
WSRUF vs OICT Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while OICT trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -34.30. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check OICT's competition here
WSRUF vs NMPNF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF and NMPNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NMPNF's competition here
WSRUF vs JINFF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while JINFF trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check JINFF's competition here
WSRUF vs GMINF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while GMINF trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GMINF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check GMINF's competition here
WSRUF vs POYYF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF and POYYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check POYYF's competition here
WSRUF vs ZMPLF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while ZMPLF trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF and ZMPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZMPLF's competition here
WSRUF vs AUCOY Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check AUCOY's competition here
WSRUF vs ABBRF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 503.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while ABBRF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check ABBRF's competition here
WSRUF vs GLGDF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 481.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while GLGDF trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 147.40. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check GLGDF's competition here
WSRUF vs TPRFF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check TPRFF's competition here
WSRUF vs SAPLF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 257.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while SAPLF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check SAPLF's competition here
WSRUF vs GOTRF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 254.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while GOTRF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -3.92%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check GOTRF's competition here
WSRUF vs TIHRF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 245M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while TIHRF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check TIHRF's competition here
WSRUF vs BRVMF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 234.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while BRVMF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -71.50. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check BRVMF's competition here
WSRUF vs PLLHF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 189.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while PLLHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF and PLLHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLLHF's competition here
WSRUF vs HEGLF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 174.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while HEGLF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF and HEGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HEGLF's competition here
WSRUF vs SLVTF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while SLVTF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check SLVTF's competition here
WSRUF vs IAUFF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 143.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while IAUFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF and IAUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IAUFF's competition here
WSRUF vs BOCOF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while BOCOF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check BOCOF's competition here
WSRUF vs BKRRF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 121.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while BKRRF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check BKRRF's competition here
WSRUF vs SDRC Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 119.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while SDRC trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -320.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check SDRC's competition here
WSRUF vs PDIV Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, PDIV has a market cap of 111.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while PDIV trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDIV's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PDIV's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to PDIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check PDIV's competition here
WSRUF vs CTNXF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check CTNXF's competition here
WSRUF vs XANAF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 103.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while XANAF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XANAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check XANAF's competition here
WSRUF vs VLMGF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 98.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while VLMGF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -87.99. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check VLMGF's competition here
WSRUF vs ARRKF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 85.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while ARRKF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF and ARRKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARRKF's competition here
WSRUF vs CHPGF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 84M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while CHPGF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -43.67. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check CHPGF's competition here
WSRUF vs PAASF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 83.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while PAASF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check PAASF's competition here
WSRUF vs INMNF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, INMNF has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while INMNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INMNF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INMNF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF and INMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INMNF's competition here
WSRUF vs LUCRF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while LUCRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.70. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check LUCRF's competition here
WSRUF vs EMPYF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 71.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while EMPYF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check EMPYF's competition here
WSRUF vs OCGSF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 71M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while OCGSF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check OCGSF's competition here
WSRUF vs PDLMF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while PDLMF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check PDLMF's competition here
WSRUF vs SMDRF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while SMDRF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -25.54. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF and SMDRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMDRF's competition here
WSRUF vs CAPTF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while CAPTF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -29.39. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check CAPTF's competition here
WSRUF vs ORVMF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 57.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while ORVMF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check ORVMF's competition here
WSRUF vs DNCVF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while DNCVF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check DNCVF's competition here
WSRUF vs SSVFF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 53.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while SSVFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -16.12. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check SSVFF's competition here
WSRUF vs BRGC Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while BRGC trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check BRGC's competition here
WSRUF vs SNNGF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while SNNGF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +11.97%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF and SNNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNNGF's competition here
WSRUF vs ACKRF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while ACKRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check ACKRF's competition here
WSRUF vs ADYRF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while ADYRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check ADYRF's competition here
WSRUF vs TSORF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while TSORF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF and TSORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TSORF's competition here
WSRUF vs DYNR Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while DYNR trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DYNR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check DYNR's competition here
WSRUF vs BBBXF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while BBBXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -7.16. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check BBBXF's competition here
WSRUF vs KDKCF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while KDKCF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -15.31. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check KDKCF's competition here
WSRUF vs TEUTF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while TEUTF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -16.14. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check TEUTF's competition here
WSRUF vs HMRRF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF and HMRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMRRF's competition here
WSRUF vs ELRFF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while ELRFF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check ELRFF's competition here
WSRUF vs SSVRF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while SSVRF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -29.01. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check SSVRF's competition here
WSRUF vs WAMFF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while WAMFF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF and WAMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WAMFF's competition here
WSRUF vs FCSUF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while FCSUF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check FCSUF's competition here
WSRUF vs SCTSF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while SCTSF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check SCTSF's competition here
WSRUF vs OKPRF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check OKPRF's competition here
WSRUF vs TBXXF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while TBXXF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF and TBXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TBXXF's competition here
WSRUF vs VTXXF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while VTXXF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to VTXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check VTXXF's competition here
WSRUF vs SMOFF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while SMOFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -12.77. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of +22.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check SMOFF's competition here
WSRUF vs TLSMF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check TLSMF's competition here
WSRUF vs EQMEF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while EQMEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -7.54. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check EQMEF's competition here
WSRUF vs ACRG Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while ACRG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check ACRG's competition here
WSRUF vs ATEPF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while ATEPF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -27.69. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check ATEPF's competition here
WSRUF vs MMNGF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while MMNGF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check MMNGF's competition here
WSRUF vs HGLD Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while HGLD trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF and HGLD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HGLD's competition here
WSRUF vs GBRRF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, GBRRF has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while GBRRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBRRF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GBRRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to GBRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check GBRRF's competition here
WSRUF vs DNRSF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while DNRSF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check DNRSF's competition here
WSRUF vs NAUFF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while NAUFF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check NAUFF's competition here
WSRUF vs ASLRF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to ASLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check ASLRF's competition here
WSRUF vs GLDRF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check GLDRF's competition here
WSRUF vs SHGDF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while SHGDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check SHGDF's competition here
WSRUF vs EMPPF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while EMPPF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -10.55. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check EMPPF's competition here
WSRUF vs GSMGF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, GSMGF has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while GSMGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSMGF's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GSMGF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to GSMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check GSMGF's competition here
WSRUF vs WEXPF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while WEXPF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check WEXPF's competition here
WSRUF vs VIPRF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while VIPRF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check VIPRF's competition here
WSRUF vs AGMRF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while AGMRF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -12.62. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check AGMRF's competition here
WSRUF vs MRZLF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while MRZLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF and MRZLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRZLF's competition here
WSRUF vs AGLDF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while AGLDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check AGLDF's competition here
WSRUF vs THMG Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while THMG trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -14.25. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THMG's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF and THMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THMG's competition here
WSRUF vs CTMCF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while CTMCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check CTMCF's competition here
WSRUF vs URVNF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check URVNF's competition here
WSRUF vs LGCXF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while LGCXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -7.09. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check LGCXF's competition here
WSRUF vs AUCUF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while AUCUF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check AUCUF's competition here
WSRUF vs MERG Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, MERG has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while MERG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MERG's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MERG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to MERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check MERG's competition here
WSRUF vs KGFMF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while KGFMF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -10.29. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check KGFMF's competition here
WSRUF vs PVGDF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while PVGDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check PVGDF's competition here
WSRUF vs VOYRF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, VOYRF has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while VOYRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOYRF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VOYRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to VOYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check VOYRF's competition here
WSRUF vs PNTRF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while PNTRF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF and PNTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNTRF's competition here
WSRUF vs CJIMF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while CJIMF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check CJIMF's competition here
WSRUF vs AUSVF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, AUSVF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while AUSVF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUSVF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUSVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to AUSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check AUSVF's competition here
WSRUF vs AMNP Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, AMNP has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while AMNP trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMNP's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMNP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to AMNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check AMNP's competition here
WSRUF vs SEKZF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, SEKZF has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while SEKZF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEKZF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SEKZF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to SEKZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check SEKZF's competition here
WSRUF vs BYRG Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, BYRG has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while BYRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYRG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BYRG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to BYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check BYRG's competition here
WSRUF vs CNRIF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, CNRIF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while CNRIF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNRIF's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNRIF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF and CNRIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNRIF's competition here
WSRUF vs PGLDF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while PGLDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check PGLDF's competition here
WSRUF vs SBMCF Comparison July 2025
WSRUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WSRUF stands at 833.6K. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WSRUF is priced at $0.02, while SBMCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WSRUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, WSRUF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of +8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WSRUF is less volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WSRUF.Check SBMCF's competition here