Pan American Silver Corp
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for PAASF
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for PAASF
Pan American Silver Corp (PAASF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PAASF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAASF | $0.66 | +1.54% | 255.6M | 0.26 | $2.56 | +0.92% |
| FNLPF | $51.50 | +9.25% | 37.1B | 26.78 | $1.88 | +1.76% |
| ANGPY | $15.89 | +7.22% | 25B | 26.93 | $0.59 | +6.49% |
| IMPUY | $16.59 | +8.15% | 14.9B | 29.62 | $0.56 | +1.67% |
| IMPUF | $15.68 | -2.00% | 14.1B | 28.00 | $0.56 | +1.83% |
| MMSMY | $47.30 | +0.35% | 13.5B | 45.92 | $1.03 | +2.03% |
| JINFF | $24.97 | +1.30% | 9.9B | 21.16 | $1.18 | +0.32% |
| GMINF | $41.20 | +1.93% | 9.8B | 32.98 | $1.25 | N/A |
| XZJCF | $130.42 | +0.00% | 7.5B | 25.37 | $5.14 | +1.24% |
| OICT | $11.25 | +0.00% | 6.2B | -38.40 | -$0.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PAASF vs FNLPF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while FNLPF trades at $51.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check FNLPF's competition here
PAASF vs ANGPY Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while ANGPY trades at $15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 26.93. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check ANGPY's competition here
PAASF vs IMPUY Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while IMPUY trades at $16.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check IMPUY's competition here
PAASF vs IMPUF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while IMPUF trades at $15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check IMPUF's competition here
PAASF vs MMSMY Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while MMSMY trades at $47.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 45.92. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check MMSMY's competition here
PAASF vs JINFF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while JINFF trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check JINFF's competition here
PAASF vs GMINF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while GMINF trades at $41.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 32.98. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GMINF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check GMINF's competition here
PAASF vs XZJCF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while XZJCF trades at $130.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check XZJCF's competition here
PAASF vs OICT Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while OICT trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -38.40. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check OICT's competition here
PAASF vs NMPNF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to NMPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check NMPNF's competition here
PAASF vs ABBRF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while ABBRF trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -109.09. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check ABBRF's competition here
PAASF vs POYYF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to POYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check POYYF's competition here
PAASF vs ZMPLF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while ZMPLF trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check ZMPLF's competition here
PAASF vs AUCOY Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check AUCOY's competition here
PAASF vs GLGDF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 808.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while GLGDF trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check GLGDF's competition here
PAASF vs TIHRF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 520.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while TIHRF trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check TIHRF's competition here
PAASF vs FCSUF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while FCSUF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check FCSUF's competition here
PAASF vs SAPLF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 380.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while SAPLF trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check SAPLF's competition here
PAASF vs BKRRF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 370.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while BKRRF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check BKRRF's competition here
PAASF vs SLVTF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 370M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while SLVTF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -66.30. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check SLVTF's competition here
PAASF vs TPRFF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check TPRFF's competition here
PAASF vs IAUFF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 319M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while IAUFF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check IAUFF's competition here
PAASF vs BRVMF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 304.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while BRVMF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -92.00. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check BRVMF's competition here
PAASF vs HGLD Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 280.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while HGLD trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check HGLD's competition here
PAASF vs VTXXF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 241.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while VTXXF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to VTXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check VTXXF's competition here
PAASF vs CHPGF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 219.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while CHPGF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -71.49. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check CHPGF's competition here
PAASF vs GOTRF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 212.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while GOTRF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check GOTRF's competition here
PAASF vs SMDRF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 206.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while SMDRF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -129.00. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check SMDRF's competition here
PAASF vs NAUFF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 200.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while NAUFF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -37.75. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check NAUFF's competition here
PAASF vs ORVMF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 200.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while ORVMF trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is -9.77. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check ORVMF's competition here
PAASF vs SSVFF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 182.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while SSVFF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -22.42. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check SSVFF's competition here
PAASF vs CAPTF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 176.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while CAPTF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -80.50. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check CAPTF's competition here
PAASF vs TBXXF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 151.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while TBXXF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -18.26. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check TBXXF's competition here
PAASF vs XANAF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while XANAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XANAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check XANAF's competition here
PAASF vs SNNGF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while SNNGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check SNNGF's competition here
PAASF vs LGCXF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 113.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while LGCXF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -32.40. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check LGCXF's competition here
PAASF vs AGLDF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 110.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while AGLDF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check AGLDF's competition here
PAASF vs CTNXF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check CTNXF's competition here
PAASF vs OCGSF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while OCGSF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -6.68. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check OCGSF's competition here
PAASF vs TSORF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 99.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while TSORF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -105.00. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check TSORF's competition here
PAASF vs EMPYF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 98.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while EMPYF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check EMPYF's competition here
PAASF vs SCTSF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 96.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while SCTSF trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check SCTSF's competition here
PAASF vs PLLHF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 94.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while PLLHF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check PLLHF's competition here
PAASF vs ACRG Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while ACRG trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -46.43. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check ACRG's competition here
PAASF vs AMNP Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, AMNP has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while AMNP trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas AMNP's P/E ratio is -10.35. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMNP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to AMNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check AMNP's competition here
PAASF vs LUCRF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 87.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while LUCRF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check LUCRF's competition here
PAASF vs PGLDF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 87.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while PGLDF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is -14.12. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of -4.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check PGLDF's competition here
PAASF vs TEUTF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while TEUTF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -26.20. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check TEUTF's competition here
PAASF vs THMG Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 74.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while THMG trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to THMG's ROE of -10.76%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check THMG's competition here
PAASF vs DNCVF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while DNCVF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check DNCVF's competition here
PAASF vs SDRC Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while SDRC trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -190.00. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check SDRC's competition here
PAASF vs AGMRF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while AGMRF trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check AGMRF's competition here
PAASF vs ATEPF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while ATEPF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -15.14. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check ATEPF's competition here
PAASF vs ARRKF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while ARRKF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check ARRKF's competition here
PAASF vs KDKCF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while KDKCF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -71.77. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check KDKCF's competition here
PAASF vs LBCMF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, LBCMF has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while LBCMF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas LBCMF's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LBCMF's ROE of -5.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to LBCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check LBCMF's competition here
PAASF vs ELRFF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while ELRFF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check ELRFF's competition here
PAASF vs KGFMF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 65.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while KGFMF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -73.89. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check KGFMF's competition here
PAASF vs CTMCF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while CTMCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -14.69. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check CTMCF's competition here
PAASF vs PDLMF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 55.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while PDLMF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check PDLMF's competition here
PAASF vs ACKRF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while ACKRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check ACKRF's competition here
PAASF vs EQMEF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while EQMEF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -25.84. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check EQMEF's competition here
PAASF vs DNRSF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while DNRSF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check DNRSF's competition here
PAASF vs EMPPF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while EMPPF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check EMPPF's competition here
PAASF vs VIPRF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while VIPRF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check VIPRF's competition here
PAASF vs RKHNF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while RKHNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to RKHNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check RKHNF's competition here
PAASF vs BBBXF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while BBBXF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check BBBXF's competition here
PAASF vs CPPMF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while CPPMF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -6.66. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to CPPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check CPPMF's competition here
PAASF vs SMOFF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while SMOFF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -8.86. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check SMOFF's competition here
PAASF vs BRGC Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while BRGC trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check BRGC's competition here
PAASF vs MMNGF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while MMNGF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -21.41. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check MMNGF's competition here
PAASF vs ADYRF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while ADYRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check ADYRF's competition here
PAASF vs VLMGF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while VLMGF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -38.55. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check VLMGF's competition here
PAASF vs CJIMF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while CJIMF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check CJIMF's competition here
PAASF vs SSVRF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while SSVRF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check SSVRF's competition here
PAASF vs DYNR Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while DYNR trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DYNR's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check DYNR's competition here
PAASF vs HMRRF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to HMRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check HMRRF's competition here
PAASF vs PNTRF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while PNTRF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -52.00. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check PNTRF's competition here
PAASF vs ESGLF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while ESGLF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check ESGLF's competition here
PAASF vs CGDXF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, CGDXF has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while CGDXF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas CGDXF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CGDXF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to CGDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check CGDXF's competition here
PAASF vs MRZLF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 32.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while MRZLF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -7.39. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check MRZLF's competition here
PAASF vs OKPRF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check OKPRF's competition here
PAASF vs STRFF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, STRFF has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while STRFF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas STRFF's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STRFF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to STRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check STRFF's competition here
PAASF vs TLSMF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check TLSMF's competition here
PAASF vs PVGDF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while PVGDF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -17.15. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check PVGDF's competition here
PAASF vs ZLME Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, ZLME has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while ZLME trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas ZLME's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZLME's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to ZLME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check ZLME's competition here
PAASF vs FREDF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, FREDF has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while FREDF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas FREDF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FREDF's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to FREDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check FREDF's competition here
PAASF vs WEXPF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while WEXPF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check WEXPF's competition here
PAASF vs WAMFF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while WAMFF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -4.52. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check WAMFF's competition here
PAASF vs SUNPF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, SUNPF has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while SUNPF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas SUNPF's P/E ratio is -29.57. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUNPF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to SUNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check SUNPF's competition here
PAASF vs GLDRF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check GLDRF's competition here
PAASF vs MINR Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, MINR has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while MINR trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas MINR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MINR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to MINR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check MINR's competition here
PAASF vs SBMCF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while SBMCF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of -22.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check SBMCF's competition here
PAASF vs HBEIF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, HBEIF has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while HBEIF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas HBEIF's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HBEIF's ROE of -4.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to HBEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check HBEIF's competition here
PAASF vs ALGRF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, ALGRF has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while ALGRF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas ALGRF's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALGRF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to ALGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check ALGRF's competition here
PAASF vs GBRRF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, GBRRF has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while GBRRF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas GBRRF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GBRRF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is more volatile compared to GBRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check GBRRF's competition here
PAASF vs URVNF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check URVNF's competition here
PAASF vs RLYGF Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, RLYGF has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while RLYGF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas RLYGF's P/E ratio is -7.81. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RLYGF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to RLYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check RLYGF's competition here
PAASF vs RITE Comparison April 2026
PAASF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAASF stands at 255.6M. In comparison, RITE has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAASF is priced at $0.66, while RITE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAASF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas RITE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAASF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RITE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAASF is less volatile compared to RITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAASF.Check RITE's competition here