West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.
West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd. (WRLGF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WRLGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRLGF | $0.91 | +6.35% | 353.7M | -3.19 | -$0.28 | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $5.70 | +2.15% | 147.9B | 23.17 | $0.24 | +1.26% |
| GFIOF | $55.71 | +9.24% | 45.6B | 24.40 | $2.09 | +1.53% |
| NESRF | $20.76 | +1.99% | 28.9B | 24.35 | $0.83 | +1.76% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | +0.00% | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +233.26% |
| CAHPF | $10.61 | +1.09% | 20.3B | 21.28 | $0.47 | +1.29% |
| LUGDF | $83.64 | +5.26% | 19.1B | 27.92 | $2.83 | +3.52% |
| ZHAOF | $4.40 | +3.53% | 15.4B | 46.11 | $0.09 | +0.17% |
| EDVMF | $66.45 | +6.06% | 15.3B | 32.13 | $1.98 | +1.87% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +0.00% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WRLGF vs ZIJMF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 147.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while ZIJMF trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check ZIJMF's competition here
WRLGF vs GFIOF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while GFIOF trades at $55.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check GFIOF's competition here
WRLGF vs NESRF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while NESRF trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check NESRF's competition here
WRLGF vs OPYGY Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to OPYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check OPYGY's competition here
WRLGF vs CAHPF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while CAHPF trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check CAHPF's competition here
WRLGF vs LUGDF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while LUGDF trades at $83.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check LUGDF's competition here
WRLGF vs ZHAOF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while ZHAOF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 46.11. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check ZHAOF's competition here
WRLGF vs EDVMF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while EDVMF trades at $66.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is 32.13. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check EDVMF's competition here
WRLGF vs NSTYY Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to NSTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check NSTYY's competition here
WRLGF vs NCMGY Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check NCMGY's competition here
WRLGF vs NCMGF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check NCMGF's competition here
WRLGF vs HGMCF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while HGMCF trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to HGMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check HGMCF's competition here
WRLGF vs SBYSF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while SBYSF trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -47.69. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check SBYSF's competition here
WRLGF vs OCANF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while OCANF trades at $41.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check OCANF's competition here
WRLGF vs AULGF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to AULGF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to AULGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check AULGF's competition here
WRLGF vs ZIJMY Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while ZIJMY trades at $115.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check ZIJMY's competition here
WRLGF vs DPMLF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while DPMLF trades at $40.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check DPMLF's competition here
WRLGF vs ARGTF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while ARGTF trades at $29.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is 45.31. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check ARGTF's competition here
WRLGF vs RMLRF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while RMLRF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check RMLRF's competition here
WRLGF vs GSISF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while GSISF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to GSISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check GSISF's competition here
WRLGF vs PMNXF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while PMNXF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check PMNXF's competition here
WRLGF vs KNTNF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while KNTNF trades at $22.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check KNTNF's competition here
WRLGF vs HCHDF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while HCHDF trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 34.45. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check HCHDF's competition here
WRLGF vs TORXF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while TORXF trades at $49.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check TORXF's competition here
WRLGF vs PAFRF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while PAFRF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check PAFRF's competition here
WRLGF vs CRNLF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while CRNLF trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 38.19. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check CRNLF's competition here
WRLGF vs RGRNF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while RGRNF trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check RGRNF's competition here
WRLGF vs MAUTF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while MAUTF trades at $11.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -56.13. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check MAUTF's competition here
WRLGF vs REDLF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while REDLF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check REDLF's competition here
WRLGF vs DGMLF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check DGMLF's competition here
WRLGF vs WFRSF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while WFRSF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check WFRSF's competition here
WRLGF vs DRDGF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while DRDGF trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check DRDGF's competition here
WRLGF vs EOGSF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while EOGSF trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 50.72. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check EOGSF's competition here
WRLGF vs GRLGF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while GRLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check GRLGF's competition here
WRLGF vs WDOFF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while WDOFF trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check WDOFF's competition here
WRLGF vs ELKMF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while ELKMF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check ELKMF's competition here
WRLGF vs CELTF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to CELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check CELTF's competition here
WRLGF vs RMGGY Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, RMGGY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while RMGGY trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas RMGGY's P/E ratio is 171.67. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to RMGGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to RMGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check RMGGY's competition here
WRLGF vs RMGGF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while RMGGF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is 102.00. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check RMGGF's competition here
WRLGF vs SNWGF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while SNWGF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -55.05. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check SNWGF's competition here
WRLGF vs ORAAF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while ORAAF trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -18.74. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check ORAAF's competition here
WRLGF vs KOZAY Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while KOZAY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check KOZAY's competition here
WRLGF vs BELGF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while BELGF trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is -64.50. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to BELGF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check BELGF's competition here
WRLGF vs CXBMF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while CXBMF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check CXBMF's competition here
WRLGF vs PDIYF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while PDIYF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -67.91. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check PDIYF's competition here
WRLGF vs ESGFF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, ESGFF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while ESGFF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas ESGFF's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ESGFF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to ESGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check ESGFF's competition here
WRLGF vs ALKEF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while ALKEF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check ALKEF's competition here
WRLGF vs MNSAF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while MNSAF trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check MNSAF's competition here
WRLGF vs RSRBF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while RSRBF trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is -21.35. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check RSRBF's competition here
WRLGF vs OBNNF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check OBNNF's competition here
WRLGF vs RUPRF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while RUPRF trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -267.50. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check RUPRF's competition here
WRLGF vs GUYGF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while GUYGF trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -114.75. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check GUYGF's competition here
WRLGF vs KSKGF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while KSKGF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 52.63. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check KSKGF's competition here
WRLGF vs ORZCF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while ORZCF trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check ORZCF's competition here
WRLGF vs RIOFF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while RIOFF trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 121.00. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check RIOFF's competition here
WRLGF vs MWSNF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while MWSNF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -81.90. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check MWSNF's competition here
WRLGF vs HCHDY Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 930.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to HCHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check HCHDY's competition here
WRLGF vs SVLKF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to SVLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check SVLKF's competition here
WRLGF vs OMGGF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 909.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while OMGGF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -143.00. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check OMGGF's competition here
WRLGF vs SGSVF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check SGSVF's competition here
WRLGF vs KRRGF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check KRRGF's competition here
WRLGF vs THXPF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 759.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while THXPF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check THXPF's competition here
WRLGF vs ASGOF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 717.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while ASGOF trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of +117.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check ASGOF's competition here
WRLGF vs WTGRF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check WTGRF's competition here
WRLGF vs RGDFF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check RGDFF's competition here
WRLGF vs MAKOF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 629.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while MAKOF trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check MAKOF's competition here
WRLGF vs FFMGF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, FFMGF has a market cap of 626.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while FFMGF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas FFMGF's P/E ratio is -46.50. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to FFMGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to FFMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check FFMGF's competition here
WRLGF vs STBMF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 604.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while STBMF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check STBMF's competition here
WRLGF vs THSGF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 594.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while THSGF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is -113.75. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check THSGF's competition here
WRLGF vs HSTXF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 546.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while HSTXF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check HSTXF's competition here
WRLGF vs JAGGF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 544.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while JAGGF trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -31.95. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check JAGGF's competition here
WRLGF vs PROBF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 539.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while PROBF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -29.39. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check PROBF's competition here
WRLGF vs ECRTF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 531.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while ECRTF trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check ECRTF's competition here
WRLGF vs GSHRF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, GSHRF has a market cap of 528.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while GSHRF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas GSHRF's P/E ratio is -107.00. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to GSHRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to GSHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check GSHRF's competition here
WRLGF vs NVMLF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check NVMLF's competition here
WRLGF vs LGDTF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, LGDTF has a market cap of 493.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while LGDTF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas LGDTF's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to LGDTF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to LGDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check LGDTF's competition here
WRLGF vs RMLFF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 493.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while RMLFF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check RMLFF's competition here
WRLGF vs OSKA Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, OSKA has a market cap of 483.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while OSKA trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas OSKA's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to OSKA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to OSKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check OSKA's competition here
WRLGF vs ELEMF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 475.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while ELEMF trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 96.10. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check ELEMF's competition here
WRLGF vs ARNGF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check ARNGF's competition here
WRLGF vs GDRZF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 461.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while GDRZF trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -15.04. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check GDRZF's competition here
WRLGF vs AGXKF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 456.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while AGXKF trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check AGXKF's competition here
WRLGF vs AMXEF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, AMXEF has a market cap of 452.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while AMXEF trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas AMXEF's P/E ratio is -106.67. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to AMXEF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to AMXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check AMXEF's competition here
WRLGF vs BSXGF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, BSXGF has a market cap of 392.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while BSXGF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas BSXGF's P/E ratio is -83.28. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to BSXGF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to BSXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check BSXGF's competition here
WRLGF vs STPGF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 386.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while STPGF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check STPGF's competition here
WRLGF vs LMGDF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 384.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while LMGDF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check LMGDF's competition here
WRLGF vs BYAGF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, BYAGF has a market cap of 377.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while BYAGF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas BYAGF's P/E ratio is -91.60. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to BYAGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to BYAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check BYAGF's competition here
WRLGF vs MNDJF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 371.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while MNDJF trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check MNDJF's competition here
WRLGF vs TPRXF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check TPRXF's competition here
WRLGF vs GGAZF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 341.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while GGAZF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +25.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check GGAZF's competition here
WRLGF vs NSUPF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, NSUPF has a market cap of 329.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while NSUPF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas NSUPF's P/E ratio is -27.14. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to NSUPF's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to NSUPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check NSUPF's competition here
WRLGF vs FDMIF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 326.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while FDMIF trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -31.47. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check FDMIF's competition here
WRLGF vs SRBIF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 325.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while SRBIF trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check SRBIF's competition here
WRLGF vs MMTMF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, MMTMF has a market cap of 324.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while MMTMF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas MMTMF's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to MMTMF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to MMTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check MMTMF's competition here
WRLGF vs KFFLF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, KFFLF has a market cap of 322.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while KFFLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas KFFLF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to KFFLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to KFFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check KFFLF's competition here
WRLGF vs CRTTF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, CRTTF has a market cap of 297.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while CRTTF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas CRTTF's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to CRTTF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to CRTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check CRTTF's competition here
WRLGF vs OGNRF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 289.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while OGNRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 143.30. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is more volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check OGNRF's competition here
WRLGF vs SITKF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, SITKF has a market cap of 289.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while SITKF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas SITKF's P/E ratio is 1.01. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to SITKF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to SITKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check SITKF's competition here
WRLGF vs WHGOF Comparison February 2026
WRLGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRLGF stands at 353.7M. In comparison, WHGOF has a market cap of 287.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRLGF is priced at $0.91, while WHGOF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRLGF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.19, whereas WHGOF's P/E ratio is -130.00. In terms of profitability, WRLGF's ROE is -0.74%, compared to WHGOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRLGF is less volatile compared to WHGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRLGF.Check WHGOF's competition here